- Joined
- May 2, 2020
What I find even more interesting is that in 2016, there were recounts attempted in 4 states and successfully completed in 2. There was also a recount in Florida during the 2000 election. Also, there have been numerous recounts in other races for house, senate and governorship throughout recent years. Recounts have become normal in the 21st century. The recounts in 2000 and 2016 did not change the outcome of the election.Real question:
Two nights ago when I first saw a challenge being mentioned, some lady on Twitter said "This benefits EVERYBODY." just for me to see more ook ooking from leftists.
So lemme ask democrats: Gee whiz, wouldn't you WANT TO FIND OUT if your guy is in fact cheating?????? This is like police detectives coming in having to sit a man down and rattle him while asking "Wouldn't YOU WANT to find out if your wife just put a hit out on you and paid for it with the new stereo you bought last week at Sears?"
Goddamn... you'd think ANYBODY would WANT TO KNOW whether their prospective presidential candidate is in fact ILLIGITAMATE. My God, leftists. If the DNC is willing to engage in sloppy cheating just to get in...
Do you REALLY think they have your interests in mind?
Why are people so adamant about there being no recounts? It's totally justified to request them when states are being determined by thousands of ballots. The past shows that the winner is unlikely to change anyway, unless some serious inconsistencies are found.