- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
That's why Trump's literally the worst dictator in history. What kind of retarded dictator loses an election jfcA dictator would not have even let you get elections and another thing DICTATORS DONT LOSE ELECTIONS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's why Trump's literally the worst dictator in history. What kind of retarded dictator loses an election jfcA dictator would not have even let you get elections and another thing DICTATORS DONT LOSE ELECTIONS
can only imagine how pissed some countries that have actually had to deal with dictators are rn as they watch people scream about Dick Tater DrumpfThat's why Trump's literally the worst dictator in history. What kind of retarded dictator loses an election jfc
They are creating the narrative that he is turbo orange chavez if he manage to pull it off, i find that offensive, if Trump was Chavez, Biden would have been charged with something like "Treason to the motherland" and barred for running any election or arrest all the other opposition leaders and nab their parties filling it with the most horribles candidates to make people not wanting to go to voteThat's why Trump's literally the worst dictator in history. What kind of retarded dictator loses an election jfc
The media is just the fucking worst though, they continue to disappoint me more and more every year somehow. For all they've railed against Trump's lack of class and grace, they have become some of the most uncivil, fearmongering, immoral, alarmist, and egotistical arseholes around.
Why the fuck would someone admit they were being dishonest there? That's like the "absolutely zero effort" question to ask. Then again, since when has the media been in any place to ask others if they're lying?Strangest interview I saw recently was Fox with some guy overseeing a polling place and they asked “are you being dishonest?” to which the guy just goes no and the reporter then considered the matter settled.
Why the fuck would someone admit they were being dishonest there? That's like the "absolutely zero effort" question to ask. Then again, since when has the media been in any place to ask others if they're lying?
I'm gonna be honest with some people if they where going to fraud the election this bad they would have done it with Hillary and not Biden.
Tbh, I think they did fraud it with Clinton, just on a smaller scale that would have crushed other candidates. I don't have any proof (or even evidence) of that, it's merely a suspicion.I'm gonna be honest with some people if they where going to fraud the election this bad they would have done it with Hillary and not Biden.
AOC is pushing environmentalist policies, and yet, she didn't even know what a garbage disposal was.
![]()
Ocasio-Cortez blown away by first experience with a garbage disposal
New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is learning a lot of new things in Washington — including what a garbage disposal is. The 29-year-old freshman congresswoman posted photos and videos on Insta…nypost.com
You want me to believe that no one ever had a shred of doubt that Cucker Tarlson might be a controlled opposition?
Edit:
His behavior around Hunter's Biden laptop was already suspicious as heck.
They didn't think they were going to need to then, so they never had anything set up to do it.
That’s the thing- any reputable investigative reporter would take that statement, and then start digging around it and collecting primary/secondary information to compare against their word. Essentially information forensics to reconstruct the events and to see if the statement’s true or not.Why the fuck would someone admit they were being dishonest there? That's like the "absolutely zero effort" question to ask. Then again, since when has the media been in any place to ask others if they're lying?
Argument Scott Adams keeps making on his livestreams is that the media hyped Trump up as Hitler for the past four years, which would mean many Democrats would view it as the good and decent thing to do anything it takes to keep Hitler out of office.Tbh, I think they did fraud it with Clinton, just on a smaller scale that would have crushed other candidates. I don't have any proof (or even evidence) of that, it's merely a suspicion.
According to his TV report the opened document envelope was found by a FedEx(?) employee and reported, It never came to him directly. Is that true? Dunno. It's at least plausible.He hyped something big then failed to deliver. That's not even a good false flag. I suspect he got the documents then found there was something damaging to Trump or other Republicans in there so he just pushed it under the rug.
People have been complaining about Smartmatic's system since at least 2006.You think a multiple state vote stealing apparatus was set up in 4 years but no one can find evidence of it?
At this point, I think it's clear that no amount of debunking would be adequate.The reporter treated the matter settled and didn't ask anything regarding any allegations so that the guy could try clearing up any confusion. Even if you think all the allegations are false it's stupid to not even mention what they are so they could get debunked.
She got reelected because she can suck a golf ball through a garden hose and don't deny it when she's got those psycho Theranos eyes. Also not enough people pay attention to elections of any kind other than presidency. Been that way for years.She just got reelected, so clearly her constituents didn't care about this meme the right was trying to push (hint: NYC doesn't have garbage disposals). Bad strategy.
Between this and the fractional voting vid (not even counting everything else) anyone still posting "muh conspiracy theory"/"it can never happen" likely has their teeth stained from Tide pods.According to his TV report the opened document envelope was found by a FedEx(?) employee and reported, It never came to him directly. Is that true? Dunno. It's at least plausible.
People have been complaining about Smartmatic's system since at least 2006.
Texas has refused to certify Dominion 3 different times since 2013:
View attachment 1743099
Elizabeth Warren and others publicly expressed concern last year about Dominion (among others): https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/H.I.G. McCarthy, & Staple Street letters.pdf
View attachment 1743104
In 2018 the NYT put out a video talking about how easily it is to hack elections, especially when the ballots are 100% paperless. Props to Alyssa for pointing it out. (This tweet has been making the rounds today lol)
View attachment 1743118
There were concerns the 2016 election was hacked in favor of Trump.
View attachment 1743135
MSNBC reported in 2019 that the Dominion machines actively in use were dated back to the 90s, which means they are supremely vulnerable to hacking attempts.
The VP at Dominion, Eric Coomer, states in a 2016 meeting that they intentionally do not update their systems in order to avoid the re-certification process..
Finally, that same VP allegedly is a hardcore Antifa member...
View attachment 1743192
...that sits in on group calls in a Colorado Antifa ring and was bragging about fixing the election.
I'm not saying every allegation is true. I'm not even saying the 2020 election was hacked.
What I'm saying is, the infrastructure to make a shady election happen has been in place for a long time. All it needs is a motivating political shitstorm.
You seem to be a believer that 'realism' is doomering. You must want to take my money.Did something happen that caused the doomering in here to skyrocket, or is everybody just very anxious about next week's fireworks?
I think you can think that elections are honest and true and still think that some voter fraud and human error in counting takes place. The two statements aren't antithetical to each other. Reason being that the low-scale vote stealing in ones and twos happen from partisans on both sides so tend to balance out. Genuine human error gets found out in recounts that happen when it's close enough to matter. Has there been individual races won by so few votes that fraud could have made a difference? Sure if the election is very close than it's possible the wrong person might be elected but if it's that close then every single ballot is checked, double checked, audited, verified and recounted with court cases to make rulings on individual votes. That's my definition of a free and fair election, one where the people running the election have done everything they can to ensure the winner is the candidate with the most votes.Half of the arguments in this thread are nonsensical. "There was no fraud" vs "There was fraud". Every election has fraud the difference is was the fraud enough to turn the tables and change the outcome, this type of situation usually occurs in very close races. If you think any election in any country is honest and true you are delusional.
How is asking for proof being controlled opposition? The dude literally said he believed fraud was happening and when he asked Powell for the proof she basically screeched angrily at him.You want me to believe that no one ever had a shred of doubt that Cucker Tarlson might be a controlled opposition?