Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dude, your lack of understanding of the founding fathers while also gobbling their balls is astounding.

Do you own land?

ETA: Also, the first few amendments to the constitution were made by the founding fathers, you absolute nonce.
I do own land. it's nice being a home owner. As for the need voter Identity. I can tell you as a former poll worker. Yes we need people to be able to have proof of there identity.It helps streamline the whole process as well as helps ensure everyone is were they should be. The other thing it helps with is making sure your vote is your vote and not someone else's.
 
The thing is that impersonating someone to commit voter fraud is just so inefficient that it's laughable. The amount of effort and luck that's required to cast just 1 fraudulent vote by it is not worth the effort. Way more efficient to just disenfranchise voters like the Republicans try to do. Hell, getting a fake ID in that person's name is far easier than the rest of the steps that'd be required to do it
Most of the time it's people who aren't eligible to vote that do so. Someone in Nevada or Arizona compared voter reg lists to non-citizens issued driver's licenses and found quite a few of them did vote.

Some of that has to with policies that offer or automatically register voters as part of getting a DMV license in states that allow illegals to get obtain a license.
 
Last edited:
Most of the time it's people who aren't eligible to vote that do so. Someone in Nevada or Arizona compared voter reg lists to non-citizens issued driver's licenses and found quite a few of them did vote.

Some of that has to to with policies that offer or automatically register voters as part of getting a DMV license in states that allow illegals to get obtain a license.
Why the heck are states letting illegals get driver's licenses? They should just be kicked out, not enabled.
 
Why the heck are states letting illegals get driver's licenses? They should just be kicked out, not enabled.
The theory is the state can and should enable people to make a living and track bad drivers regardless of their legal status; automatically offering an illegal barely literate in their native language let alone English is disingenuous.
Because that’s the number 1 pet project Democrats have: amnesty. If they do that, the thinking is they’ll never lose another election.
This is probably the real reason. As if illegals don't hop back over the border the moment they rack up fines and/or jail time for drunk driving and sending people to the hospital (or even to the grave).
 
The theory is the state can and should enable people to make a living and track bad drivers regardless of their legal status; automatically offering an illegal barely literate in their native language let alone English is disingenuous.

This is probably the real reason. As if illegals don't hop back over the border the moment they rack up fines and/or jail time for drunk driving and sending people to the hospital (or even to the grave).
Some of the states with illegals - well, I'm thinking of California - don't really prosecute anything less than the worst crimes - particularly against certain classes. They either won't get fined or picked up in the first place, or they'll just ignore their court dates with no consequences.
 
post this in bailout thread :story::story:
1608263524496.png

1608263552057.png

1608264078153.png

1608264134562.png



&

Holy Trinity :story: Roaring 2020
1608263455272.png


&
Bonus Points Reason for $600 dollars is missuse aka Tree water him Kyle Reetinghouse :gunt: :gunt:

A second stimulus check could be sent to Americans, if Congress’ latest negotiations are successful.
The reported sum of $600 per individual may not sound like much, but can have lasting effects if used wisely, advisors say.
Start by whittling down high interest debts and bulking up your emergency and retirement savings.

A new stimulus check is in the works for millions of Americans.

If you’re eligible for a payment, it may feel either like a life raft or a sudden windfall, depending on how Covid-19 has affected you and your family.

The payments are said to be around $600 per individual, down from the $1,200 sums that were authorized by Congress in the spring, according to the latest reports out of Congress. Lawmakers are continuing to negotiate on new coronavirus relief aid.

That’s as 20.6 million Americans were receiving unemployment benefits as of Nov. 28. First-time claims rose by 885,000 for the week ending Dec. 12, the biggest one-week increase since Sept. 5.


Lawmakers near relief deal with stimulus checks under discussion
“If you’re jobless, you should obviously pay for one of three things, either shelter, food or medication,” Winnie Sun, co-founder and managing director of Sun Group Wealth Partners in Irvine, California, said of the stimulus checks.

If you’re lucky enough to not be in that situation, then you can put the money to work to help you in the future.

“You could do a lot more so that it’s not just $600,” Sun said. “It has the potential to be larger later on.”

How the first stimulus checks were used

The three best ways to spend your coronavirus stimulus check
The first stimulus checks included payments of up to $1,200 per person, or $2,400 per married couple filing jointly, plus $500 per dependent under age 17. Full payments were sent to those whose adjusted gross income fell under certain thresholds: $75,000 for individuals, $112,500 for heads of household or $150,000 for married couples.

Those payments were gradually phased out for incomes above those levels.

Research shows the stimulus money was used in a variety of ways.

A June survey from the Bureau of Labor Statistics found that 59% of stimulus check recipients planned to use the money to pay for expenses, followed by paying off debt, at 13%, and adding to savings (12%). The rest did not expect to receive a check (14%) or did not respond (1%).

Other research from Envestnet Yodlee indicates that some stimulus check recipients had more recreational uses for the money. Depending on income, that included travel, electronics and even securities trades, in addition to more practical uses.

What to think about before spending the next check

Because the second stimulus check stands to be just half the size of the first, it may not seem like a lot of money.

But that doesn’t mean it can’t make a meaningful difference to your financial health, provided it is used the right way.

If you have credit card debt, start by using the stimulus check to pay that down, said Roger Ma, financial planner at Lifelaidout in New York and author of Work Your Money, Not Your Life.

Those accounts can often come with interest rates of 20% or more, so knocking down card balances will give you an immediate return.

“It becomes a slippery slope when that’s accruing every month and the balance just keeps getting bigger,” Ma said. “The sooner you can extinguish that, the stronger your financial position will be.”


Five stimulus benefits set to expire at the end of 2020
If you already have your credit cards under control, next think about beefing up your emergency savings, Ma advises. The rule of thumb tends to be having three to six months in cash in an online savings account that you can quickly access.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, however, you likely want to strive to have even more set aside — up to 12 months’ worth of living expenses — in case your income suddenly runs dry.

You probably won’t go from two months to 12 months in savings immediately, so you might also want to think about cutting some expenses to help get there, Ma said.

Consider diversifying your goals
Not all of the stimulus check has to go to one purpose, according to Sun, who said she likes the idea of putting some of it towards emergency savings and some toward retirement savings.

Ideally, that retirement money could go into a Roth individual retirement account, she said, which can also serve as a backup emergency savings. Of note, Roth IRAs come with some rules. You have to meet certain income thresholds in order to invest in one of these accounts. Certain qualified penalty-free withdrawals can only be made after five years.

Of course, you may be tempted to do something more extravagant with the money — say, buy a new pair of skis or invest in a favorite company’s stock.


Why $1,200 stimulus checks were dropped from December’s Covid relief package
For retail items on your wish list, you may want to put aside a portion of the stimulus check and then wait for a good deal, Sun said.

Rather than buying individual stocks, it would be preferable to instead focus on your retirement savings or your children’s college savings, she said.

“I do think it would be a mistake to buy individual stocks with it, because the amount’s not that large,” Sun said.

Another great way to invest the money that will reap returns: Invest in yourself, whether it be an online course, book or even a new tool like a webcam, Sun suggests.

“That’s definitely a smart way to use this money,” Sun said.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: revmoo
Sounds like Trump is about to finally concede now that SCOTUS has screwed him and that his EO amounted to nothing. He must know that people are going to come after those who worked for him as a way to get to him.
lol. Are you seriously suggesting that Trump is going to concede out of concern for his patsies?

That's the funniest shit yet.
 
Sounds like Trump is about to finally concede now that SCOTUS has screwed him and that his EO amounted to nothing. He must know that people are going to come after those who worked for him as a way to get to him.
Why when they are going to end up in the camps anyways though? I mean if every random person on the internet who supports Trump is definitely going to end up in the camps what would make them think leaving the White House a month early would make any difference? If he really wanted to protect them he'd get them to start their HRT now so they could start managing their test levels early, maybe get an early release.
 
Why else would Trump tell his WH staff to clear house and leave the DC area?
Um, he obviously didn't do that. Ann Vandersteel is a QAnon lunatic. Unless this is some weird interpretation of him firing a bunch of campaign (not White House) staff to save money a month after he lost
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back