Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread - Gorl Tawk's very own DMZ (De-Moidified Zone)

threadbanned for 3 months
Clearly it doesn't even matter that people don't want it, don't vote for it, all of europe is getting them no matter what. "The women voted for it" is used as a scapegoat,
Yeah nah that's just delusional. Women absolutely do vote for and support this. It's no wonder that the whole policy of importing 'workers' from the third world en masse, instead of simply breeding more, became commonplace in most western countries almost simultaneously right after women have had 2-4 decades post women's suffrage to establish themselves as a political force (separate and adversarial to men that is) in those same western countries, as opposed to this happening at any point in one-and-a-half thousand years prior to that. Sure, the politicians waving through the migrants are men, but who do you think voted for them?
And to preempt the predictable and pedantic
>but what about this one specific instance with a few hundred people in that one mining town in fifteen-eleventy-twelve France?
It has never happened at this scale, stop trying to rationalize it away.

If you really believe that women are actually based and anything to the contrary is scapegoating, talk to a woman you know irl. A colleague, an acquaintance, a relative, doesn't matter. Someone that you have never spoken to about politics before, and then tell her you think your country should close its borders and deport non-White migrants. I guarantee you, you will not be met with agreement, you will be met with outrage. You'll be pelted with some bullshit about 'muh human decency' and 'why can't you be empathetic?'
 

Attachments

  • CuhVsdGVMAAwyJQ.jpg
    CuhVsdGVMAAwyJQ.jpg
    140.9 KB · Views: 33
Yeah nah that's just delusional. Women absolutely do vote for and support this. It's no wonder that the whole policy of importing 'workers' from the third world en masse, instead of simply breeding more, became commonplace in most western countries almost simultaneously right after women have had 2-4 decades post women's suffrage to establish themselves as a political force (separate and adversarial to men that is) in those same western countries, as opposed to this happening at any point in one-and-a-half thousand years prior to that. Sure, the politicians waving through the migrants are men, but who do you think voted for them?
And to preempt the predictable and pedantic
>but what about this one specific instance with a few hundred people in that one mining town in fifteen-eleventy-twelve France?
It has never happened at this scale, stop trying to rationalize it away.

If you really believe that women are actually based and anything to the contrary is scapegoating, talk to a woman you know irl. A colleague, an acquaintance, a relative, doesn't matter. Someone that you have never spoken to about politics before, and then tell her you think your country should close its borders and deport non-White migrants. I guarantee you, you will not be met with agreement, you will be met with outrage. You'll be pelted with some bullshit about 'muh human decency' and 'why can't you be empathetic?'
Exhibit A of Moid blaming women long before wealthy CEOs who want the cheapest workers possible.
 
Exhibit A of Moid blaming women long before wealthy CEOs who want the cheapest workers possible.
Corporations have existed since the 1600s, but the whole inviting-third-world-invasion thing didn't start until the late 1940s.
If CEOs and corporations were the cause, why did it not happen in the hundreds of years preceding women's suffrage?
 
Corporations have existed since the 1600s, but the whole inviting-third-world-invasion thing didn't start until the late 1940s.
If CEOs and corporations were the cause, why did it not happen in the hundreds of years preceding women's suffrage?
How do you think blacks got out of Africa?
 
Corporations have existed since the 1600s, but the whole inviting-third-world-invasion thing didn't start until the late 1940s.
If CEOs and corporations were the cause, why did it not happen in the hundreds of years preceding women's suffrage?
17th century corporations ran on slavery, colonialism, and feudal labor. When that became illegal, capital found the next best thing.
 
Corporations have existed since the 1600s, but the whole inviting-third-world-invasion thing didn't start until the late 1940s.
If CEOs and corporations were the cause, why did it not happen in the hundreds of years preceding women's suffrage?
CEOs were mass importing slave labor from Africa, India and several other countries into North America long before the 40s. They were the ones who argued that slave labor was needed to pick cotton instead of hiring locals, because they didn’t want to pay any wages whatsoever.

There’s a lot of literature out there about French and British aristocrats mass importing Indian slave labor into other countries to suppress the populous from being able to overthrow the colonial leaders.

Slavery was a net negative on the European economy for that reason. Even back then, your average European was well aware of how slave labor was suppressing wages (despite the illiteracy that was common).

Let’s not even get into the same 100 corporations that regularly lobby around policies in the first world countries.
 
Ladies, ladies, let's all be rational here. Have you considered that the 5 dudes who run the world are forced to keep importing cheap labor because it's what your liberal female coworker wants? They don't want to cut costs, they're just forced to because it's what women voted for. Their hands are tied here. Stop criticizing the people who are actually in power and take it up with Sharon from HR with the coexist bumper sticker, she's the real villain here. And if Sharon does vote right wing, and the right come into power and proceed to do fuck all and print more H1B visas, well, that's still Sharon's fault. Fucking Sharon and her fucking bumper sticker. I can't believe she didn't answer my texts last Friday. Where was I? Ah yes, women.
 
regards to the sickle-cell anemia bit—don't predominantly Africans deal with this?
Yes. That trait prevents them from getting malaria or hookworm, the latter responsible for the "dumb hick" stereotype when it was literally a parasite in their brain. It got in through sores on their feet because they worked barefoot in the fields.
Yeah nah that's just delusional. Women absolutely do vote for and support this. It's no wonder that the whole policy of importing 'workers' from the third world en masse, instead of simply breeding more, became commonplace in most western countries almost simultaneously right after women have had 2-4 decades post women's suffrage to establish themselves as a political force
Here are the voting trends by race. Hart-Celler Act, which opened the borders to non whites in America, was done by a white man and a Jew. The opening of European, Australian and Canadian borders was either done by Jews or men.

Legion of Men, childless Romanian influencer, discusses how abortion killed more people than all the wars in human history.
Screenshot_2026-05-03-23-40-16-387.jpg
Select comments:
Screenshot_2026-05-03-23-42-54-999.jpg
Screenshot_2026-05-03-23-43-10-648.jpg
Any more dramatic and you'll sound like Frollo.
Screenshot_2026-05-03-23-43-30-317.jpg
When you ban abortion you get higher maternal mortality rates. Actions have consequences.

Crying about future nignogs that might be the next Einstein:
Screenshot_2026-05-03-23-43-43-778.jpg
Screenshot_2026-05-03-23-43-56-328.jpg
And here's the chaser, from a few days ago, on that same channel:
Screenshot_2026-05-03-23-41-49-724.jpg
Posting about black fatigue while crying about fetuses. Typical.
 
You say it's not true that young women are being alienated by the right, and then go on to describe some pretty effective political strategies the left uses to capture young female voters, but the right can't do the same because (?????)

When young men don't vote because they feel disenfranchised, it's a social problem we must collectively solve, but when young women vote left because the right doesn't attempt to represent their values and interests, it's their fault for being too emotional. Brilliant rhetorical strategy, let's see how it pays off.

All I'm saying is if the right keeps losing elections where you live, and your response is "boooo women suck, stop voting how I don't like" then don't get mad when you keep losing.
Obviously the answer is to repeal the Nineteenth Amendment because these stupid women keep voting wrong.
 
should we sterilize the poor? would you cosign my effort to deploy a virus that affects people with sickle-cell anemia and causes infertility?
FWIW I don’t agree with the notion that having children in poverty shouldn’t be done, or that it’s something only for the wealthy. I know a lot of the thread thinks otherwise but I’ve gone over my thoughts in this thread before so for posterity, mentioning that this thread isn’t monolithic in that view.
 
Yeah, I really dislike that part of site culture that's like "we call each other faggots and then we make up." Like that's how male bonding works, sure, but I don't think female relationships are enhanced by insulting each other. We should be able to handle our disagreements better.
You're a faggot
 
>gets banned from MHT for being a thread shitting scrote
>hate sponsors the thread
Gender of Accountability strikes again :thinking:
Was it my faggot post? I keep getting random stickers on it. That's really funny if so.

Edit: I have returned from the sponsored post page to bring you news. My gracious sponsor is not one of our recent street shitters, but a long-time fan and avid reader of our humble thread. Mankirk, I thought you liked me. You've never negrated my posts before, even the really mean ones. Et tu, Brute?
You're a faggot
Thanks kween.
 
Last edited:
i personally don't think there should be any regulation regarding reproduction (and i mean reproduction between consenting adults, not rape) because it invariably leads to men outlawing women's bodily functions.
 
Back
Top Bottom