Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

[Grimoire Canthari]

View attachment 5964064

He's talking more about Chad's muscles instead of the woman in a bikini. FAGGOT

 

[Totallyunknown]

View attachment 5964064

A guy messaged me on this app with an eye roll emoji and something from my profile. So I responded with an eye roll emoji and something from his profile. He then told me he just thought I was interesting, no need to take it personal. I responded that if that was his intention then that was mine as well. He then said I had a really toxic attitude. I responded that he was the one used one of his likes to send me an eye rolling emoji about my profile. He then said he didn't know how to use emojis. I pointed out that yet he still managed to feel offended when I used the exact same emoji in response. At which point he apologized for wasting my time and wished me a good evening.

I think I saw a meme somewhere talking about how men are really upset about how women have evolved and I think that sums up everything. Women on average as a whole have evolved over the past 100 years because we could finally access what men had for a millennium. Men, with the same access, are still mostly garbage. They might have caused their own devolution thanks to porn.

The man bear thing reminds me of the men who ask me to immediately within maybe one brief conversation on a dating app to meet for a date. I have 80% of the time responded that I am open to a date but I'd prefer to chat a bit more online to feel comfortable about who I'm meeting. I'd say maybe 5% of men will say they understand and continue a conversation. A large portion of them become offended and I'll try to joke that you know, this IS the internet, we could be anyone with any kind of intentions, like maybe murder Hahaha. They will always say that they can see where I'm coming from but "you gotta take the risk eventually", "I'm much better in person though/texting is lame", "I'm not like other guys", "I have sisters." - - not once do they ever consider the fact that they are an absolute stranger to me and that their expectation is for a woman to see their photo, immediately want to meet in person with no conversation about common interests or hobbies or anything about who they are and then just have them sit there with the potential of being sexually harassed or assaulted for the next hour. To which they would then be blamed for making the (wrong and stupid) decision to meet that man without knowing anything about him.

Therefore, it is societies expectation as well that you would never meet a strange man possibly anywhere at this point. Men have yet to evolve to understand the extremely basic premise of how a stranger becomes an acquaintance to... literally anyone. They feel entitled to others comfort by simply existing, much like any predator at the top of the food chain. But the bear knows that both it and we are a stranger and the events following will be in accordance to what we know strangers do. Men do not believe they are strangers and therefore create more volatile circumstances.

 

[SpookyObserver]

((( Harlan Ellison))) was the author of that execrable tome. He lived his entire life at the intersection of seething and chimping out. Two of his grossest moments were groping a woman at an award show and being the head defender of Ed Kramer ( Dragon*Con founder , convicted pedophile). He went after a woman for years ( Nancy Collins) who tried to tell everyone about Kramers shit.

Gotta say, AM's little rant about how much hate he has is a personal favorite of mine.

 

[Fat and Balding]

"stupid foids picking the bear don't understand per capita hurr durr"

 

[I'm Really Feeling It]

So apparently our client would rather let their computer environment stay offline and on fire than accept troubleshooting from a woman. Nice to know.

 

[Doctor Love]

I’m stunned by how dense the posters in the bear question thread are.

That's actually the exact reason I would prefer another man to a bear. Those posters are unaware of their own strength, because they've never had to use it. As such, they generally minimise other people's problems and can't conceptualise real fear.

That means they tend to mistake kindness for weakness - which, by the way, is a concept you women should familiarise yourself with. They don't "think you like them", they see your kindness as weakness and then try to use it to get what they want. Men who actually like you have a completely different attitude towards you, and generally "don't want to spoil a good friendship" which is reflected in their words.

Spoiler: Bear or man

A lot of men are like that, so in-case you are ever stuck in the woods with a bear and/or strange men, remember that the most valuable asset is fabric. Strings can be formed from nettles, which, although stingy, are very useful for fabric. Elasticity is a valuable tool, and with the nettle fibers and some sticks, you can form a crossbow.

Should you need more, find the dens of small animals like rabbits. Collect the top layer of soil, and dry it out. Grind it finely, remove as much debris as you can and concentrate on the white salt crystals which form. These are called nitrates, and particularly, potassium nitrate. When mixed with a fuel, this flammable salt becomes a low-explosive, or even a high-explosive if compressed enough. The nitrate ion is interesting, in that when it decomposes, it releases oxygen, starting a chain reaction.

They are very soluble in water, so you can dissolve it and pass it through a fine-mesh fabric to remove unwanted clays. Once dried, mix this salt with sawdust or charcoal dust at a ratio of 3:1 - this provides the fuel. Pressed tightly, you can produce a rather damaging explosive charge. Dry saltpeter burns without the need for oxygen, and if you soaked fibers in it, you could build a fuse. Sulfur is usually added, but this isn't chemically necessary - it's practical, because it makes it more reliable. Pressed tightly in a clay container, lined with small stones, you would produce a fragmentation effect that would reliably kill a bear.

Once you have constructed your woodland IED, you can then lure the man or bear to a decoy campground. Both man and bear would be attracted to the smell of food, and once they approach, you can either light the fuse from a concealed position or rely on a tripwire system. The tripwire, and snap of sticks, may startle a bear, so if you choose this option, try to make it as quiet as possible. Although the lethality of the explosive is high, this decreases significantly with distance - and a bear can run away, just as quickly as it can run towards you.

The takeaway is that fighting against man or bear, in the wild, is a bad idea. You have to play smart, and focus on your own well-being, first, and tactically eliminating any threats before they can become a direct threat, to you, is the best strategy. There is a reason why most of Europe wiped out wolves.

 

[Lidl Drip]

Too little too late, Elon.

Also one more bear question meme.

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

There is no point talking to males about trannies. They're more likely to hate trannies in the first place, but show them a tranny that's "passing" and attractive enough and they will change their minds. And they'll never stop saying that it's women's fault that trannies exist in the first place. At the end of the day it's all male degeneracy whether they're claiming to be women or not. Some of them pretend to be offended by trannies and faggots but not because they respect women, they're just angry that some men are debasing themselves by acting like their idea of a woman.

I assumed the conservative-oriented people on this site hated trannies because they didn’t want these freaks occupying the changing rooms with their wives and daughters and actually gave a fuck about kids, only to learn that it’s mostly because they hate women to a visceral level so they see trans women as “failed men”. Human psychology is fucking weird.

 

[Inside your walls]

Same guys who were just making ai to cover up women.

View attachment 5964188

In 2000s and 2010s we had conservative men seething and talking mad shit about gay people for being deviants, only for them to be caught participating in the most deviant gay orgies.

Now we have conservative men seething and talking mad shit about women that are liberal and progressive, only for them to be caught either trying to slide into some they/them blue haired woman's DMs and creating AI porn of those said liberal women supporting their moidslop ideology, which is just the moid equivalent of zoomers drawing video game or anime characters with pride flags and pins, if you think about it.

The Free Bird theory/phenomenon is real.

I think I saw a meme somewhere talking about how men are really upset about how women have evolved and I think that sums up everything. Women on average as a whole have evolved over the past 100 years because we could finally access what men had for a millennium. Men, with the same access, are still mostly garbage. They might have caused their own devolution thanks to porn.

One point that has been brought up to me when it comes to this topic and I can't stop thinking about it, is how the reason why men refuse to work now, even simple jobs such as retail or fast food job for a temporarily period until they find a better one is because most of them have this weird mentality of being "too good" for this job, despite being all of them being NEETs that play video games and watch porn whole day, also because these jobs do not give them access to women and the ability to control those women through finances and children like men in the past had the ability to.

View attachment 5965628
Too little too late, Elon.

Also one more bear question meme.
View attachment 5965631

I will never understand moids crying about JK Rowling about her being a "man-hating feminist" that doesn't give a shit about "male issues" and it's like, yeah no shit she wouldn't want to give a shit about these issues given the fact she had to deal with an abusive husband and condescending male publishers that didn't have faith in her books becoming best-sellers. Even if she did talk about these "male issues" they would still be pissing and shitting themselves because every time a feminist or a woman with slightly feminist views does talk about male issues they get mad because they aren't saying the things they want to hear and that's:

"Oh we feminazis fucked up so bad we made man feel bad! So ladies we need to uplift wholesome moids and make them feel better by bending
over for them and throwing everything we worked for their sake!"

The male entitlement to make feminism and women related issue about them and their issues is insane, but if a woman dares to enter their oh-so alleged male spaces or insert women's issues into men's issues, she gets a fatwa instantly placed upon her.

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

Even though I’ve bitched about the LGB(T) extensively on this platform despite being an alphabetfag, I fucking despise most right-wing men and you don’t hear me talking against them often is because I loathe their politics and don’t want to touch them with a ten-foot pole. At least LGB(T) people are more willing to accept non-conformists (to a detriment of course, but hearing conservatives say shit like “we need to bring back bullying” and bitching about gay men being chomo’s whilst giving a pass to people like Matt Walsh and Andrew Tate is still disgusting hypocrisy).

 

[سلیمان عثمان]

I will never understand moids crying about JK Rowling about her being a "man-hating feminist" that doesn't give a shit about "male issues" and it's like, yeah no shit she wouldn't want to give a shit about these issues given the fact she had to deal with an abusive husband and condescending male publishers that didn't have faith in her books becoming best-sellers.

I too am not capable of comprehending this mind set. In what distorted reality is JK Rowling of all people a 'man-hating feminist'?

Her best known series is written from the point of view of a convincing and sympathetic male protagonist, she is more than capable of and often writes villains and tremendously fucked up people who are women, even A Casual Vacancy largely deals with mutually abusive relationships between men and women, her murder mystery series is named for the male half of the investigation agency and is rife with characters who are shitty mothers, girlfriends, wives, friends, etc. There are numerous examples of garbage men in her works as well but if she really was just anti-man like certain potato brains claim, then one would think that her villains would be exclusively male and her heroes would be exclusively female.

If you look at the cast of characters in her novels and film scripts, I would say that she generally goes to far more extremes to try to humanize and explain her male villains than her female villains (Poor little snakeman gets multiple chapters about how hard done by he was but Umbridge apparently just popped out of the ground fully formed like some kind of child torturing eggplant). If any thing she gives me far more 'guilt-ridden mother' vibes than 'man-hater' vibes.

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

I too am not capable of comprehending this mind set. In what distorted reality is JK Rowling of all people a 'man-hating feminist'?

Her best known series is written from the point of view of a convincing and sympathetic male protagonist, she is more than capable of and often writes villains and tremendously fucked up people who are women, even A Casual Vacancy largely deals with mutually abusive relationships between men and women, her murder mystery series is named for the male half of the investigation agency and is rife with characters who are shitty mothers, girlfriends, wives, friends, etc. There are numerous examples of garbage men in her works as well but if she really was just anti-man like certain potato brains claim, then one would think that her villains would be exclusively male and her heroes would be exclusively female.

If you look at the cast of characters in her novels and film scripts, I would say that she generally goes to far more extremes to try to humanize and explain her male villains than her female villains (Poor little snakeman gets multiple chapters about how hard done by he was but Umbridge apparently just popped out of the ground fully formed like some kind of child torturing eggplant). If any thing she gives me far more 'guilt-ridden mother' vibes than 'man-hater' vibes.

They’re just mad she was doing wokeshit in the 2010’s, when looking back was pretty innocuous compared to crap that creators will pull now. After all the fire she’s come under by deranged troons I would not be surprised if she changed her stance.

Rowling is perhaps the only billionaire I respect because she is actually a self-made billionaire. She wasn’t born into wealth. She didn’t have well-off parents that helped her “pull herself by her bootstraps”. She did it all by herself. She’s very humble and extremely charitable.

It’s just one of the hundreds of excuses these moids will come up with to hate women.

 

[Tablet County]

"stupid foids picking the bear don't understand per capita hurr durr"
View attachment 5964162

Depends on the bear really. If I were to choose between a fellow man and a black bear I'd take the bear because black bears are as scared of you as you are of them. If it was grizzly, I'd rather take my chances with Buffalo Bill. At least he's got good music taste.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

but "you gotta take the risk eventually"

No respect for boundaries; reject/ block/ delete immediately. Seriously: men who dismiss and discard your reasonable comment and preferences (as too uptight, whatever) are men looking (consciously or unconsciously) for someone they don't have to treat with the basic respect they'd give to another man. Can't tell you how many men I've encountered who pressure and cajole and diminish and neg from the jump. It's a test (again, consciously or unconsciously) to see how well you take to control and manipulation - or at minimum, an indicator that they can't abide things proceeding on any terms but their own.

I too am not capable of comprehending this mind set. In what distorted reality is JK Rowling of all people a 'man-hating feminist'?

Her best known series is written from the point of view of a convincing and sympathetic male protagonist, she is more than capable of and often writes villains and tremendously fucked up people who are women, even A Casual Vacancy largely deals with mutually abusive relationships between men and women, her murder mystery series is named for the male half of the investigation agency and is rife with characters who are shitty mothers, girlfriends, wives, friends, etc. There are numerous examples of garbage men in her works as well but if she really was just anti-man like certain potato brains claim, then one would think that her villains would be exclusively male and her heroes would be exclusively female.

If you look at the cast of characters in her novels and film scripts, I would say that she generally goes to far more extremes to try to humanize and explain her male villains than her female villains (Poor little snakeman gets multiple chapters about how hard done by he was but Umbridge apparently just popped out of the ground fully formed like some kind of child torturing eggplant). If any thing she gives me far more 'guilt-ridden mother' vibes than 'man-hater' vibes.

Shocking news, I guess, but a woman can be a feminist and a) not hate men and b) not live in fear of men, and c) see men/males as human. The "feminist" (= reality-based and reasonable) aspect of Harry Potter is that there is a girl who is smart and is on par with or better than the boys...a contender, skilled, and valuable - as a person in general and in the various events. She's a competent person. That's it. And that's, at core, what feminism is about.

 

[Lidl Drip]

Article

 

[Glossy Paper]

They’re just mad she was doing wokeshit in the 2010’s

I can only remember two hated "woke" things. Confirming Dumbledore is gay, and defending the decision to cast a black actress as Hermione in a theatre production. Loads more famous authors are woke-er than her, especially since it's trendy to throw in "support trans kids! trans rights!" every so often on twitter nowadays.

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

The man-bear discourse activates my autism because it's missing so many specifics. How big is the forest, like are there places to escape or hide? More importantly what species is the bear. If it's a black bear those fuckers are basically just big dogs, you can scare them off easily by just running at them. Grizzlies are fucking terrifying though, they're like leftover pleistocene monsters. If it makes sense to one to attack you they usually will keep coming at you even if you hurt them. It just enrages them more most of the time. And if they can subdue you enough to eat they take their time, gnawing at you slowly and boredly with no care if you're still alive. I know the question is bait and everyone's using it as an excuse to trauma dump or troll but seriously.

You could use such questions to apply to men, too. What kind of man? How big? What’s he carrying? White, black, or pajeet shitskin? Is he wearing a stained loli t-shirt?

 

[Lidl Drip]

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

View attachment 5967092

Damn and men be accusing us of being furfags

 

[Lidl Drip]

Damn and men be accusing us of being furfags

They are all making it a sexual thing now because they got terminal coombrain and are jerking off to the thought of women cucking them with bears and then also to the bear actually prefering them over the woman.

Men are honestly so deranged, you just never get used to it.