Moids that want to ban no fault divorce, fail to understand that no fault divorce also protects men who are stuck in abusive marriages, if we were to completely abolish no fault divorce, then not only abused women wouldn't be able to get out of unstable marriages but abused men too.
But then again, moids can't make up their mind if men are stronger than women and are able to beat them up, or if they're are poor little meow meows that are unable to defend themselves, can also face abuse from women and how women abusing men is same if not worse than when men do it.
it was common for european nobility to get married 2-3 times in their life. they'd ask the pope to grant them an annulment aka divorce.
Men online that insist that divorce is something evil women created to oppress men, forget that the whole branch of Catholicism went through an intense reform all because Henry VIII was a manchild that got angry at the Pope for not allowing him to get a divorce so can be a massive man-whore by having sex with other women in hopes of getting a male heir.
That's why the "Erm.. Men were always for marriage and family" lie manosphere/trad spheres try to push online is a load of shit. If that was the case we wouldn't have men through entire history trying to break systems and laws that they placed first, in the hopes of punishing women for infidelity and separating, only for them to realize that their systems and laws regarding this are kinda shit, when they had to deal with same consequences for their actions. If they truly wanted marriage and family like they claim, we wouldn't have the concept of shotgun marriages that 99% of the time happened to make sure the man that impregnated the woman takes responsibility.
Before the #DropKiwifarms fallout, this site was full of "not all trannies!!!" and "femboys are based" faggots. Obviously the culture changed and now they are ashamed to say that, but in situatuons like the Dankula one they're bitting their hands to not go "akchually, fucking trannies is not bad, fuck foids" because nothing works better to keep men in line than being called a fag and rated "autistc" by other guys.
It still is, just most of these posters along with
the "totally based" trannies and fags are now in the woman-hate thread. It's why they keep insisting this thread is full of bitter trannies, because it's another case of them projecting. Male posters in those thread give them a pass, especially to the trannies under the cope of "AT LEAST THEY UNDERSTAND AND CARE ABOUT MEN'S ISSUES UNLIKE PSYCHOTIC W*MEN!!"
Also, men that say things like how femboys are soooooo based because they are "basically women but without emotional baggage and manipulation", one prove that they are willing to stick their dick into as long as something is vaguely feminine and two, never been around a femboy. Because every femboy that I've seen online is somehow even worse and do things men accuse women of doing of. They're incredibly smarmy, promiscuous, sociopathic, self-centered and emotionally manipulative.
Men that fell for this meme and dated them briefly will tell you how femboys constantly played with their feelings and used them to uplift themselves until they couldn't get anymore dopamine from that man and moved onto the next person.
The resident old fag tranny recanted his trannyism after he got pressed few times. Like every other man he didn't not once mentioned he went to see therapist for why he almost cut his dick off. So now the man hate whiteknigts for him because he said fuck women few times.
>He couldn't even commit to this delusions
How disgraceful is that a random valley girl from California that smokes weed is more committed to her delusions that she's an Oracle of Delphi or some prophetess when she gets high on shrooms, than a man who has multiple industries bent on their backs to appease mentally ill people like him and their delusions?
Not even Japanese ritualistic suicide would absolve him of this embarrassment.
