Absolutely delusional, women are the creators, as close to god as you can be as a mortal. Men could never. This seethe is born from womb envy. Men create things because they can't create people.
At least three of the things he defined as the act of MANLILY creating something can easily be re-defined as transforming/consuming something using his own sole criterion (his ass).
>Chopping wood
The tree was already there, so all the woodchopper does is transform it into smaller pieces.
>Drilling for oil
Is oil created through oil drilling? No, it's already there, but it has it be brought to the surface through drilling. Thereafter it's transformed into things like gasoline.
>Farming for food
Scrotes didn't create cows or their milk, or chickens and their eggs. All they do is take something that has been created by the animals and transform it and/or consume it. Even the meat of the animals isn't something created by scrotes but through cell formation. Wheat seeds don't exist because men created them. Etc
If we go by the independent creature definition of alive then ova aren't alive, but neither are sperm.
If we go by the cell definition of alive (in the sense that it can do things like self-replicating, even if it has no mind of its own) then ova are very much alive. If an egg matures and is fertilized then this will lead to the creation of a zygote, but if it fails to be fertilized then it will die AKA disintegrate into small components and be absorbed by the body.
Also, since this man insists on bringing up the soil and seed comparison: planting seeds in fertile soil isn't going to yield the same results as planting seeds in dirt. Similarly, @kalironside having sex with a woman (something which will never happen) could potentially lead to the creation of a human zygote, but if he were to ejaculate into a petri dish containing disintegrated egg cells then absolutely nothing would happen. That's because there is in fact a difference between living and dead eggs.
There's no way you can logically define sperm as being alive while at the same time defining eggs as being unalive/dead, but as has already been shown ∞:s of times, it wouldn't be possible for men to use actual logic to "prove" that they are superior because they'd just end up proving themselves wrong.
When the wall hits, it hits a male like a truck