Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
I always knew the claim that women are solely hypersensitive, and overly emotional, incaple of logical thinking on the level of a male, and things like that were bullshit, but wasn't until this thread that I got a glimpse of how emotionally unstable and volitile men can be on a hair trigger

And over basically nothing, over women speaking candidly about them.

Women are more emotionally resilient than men. We have to be.

But men don't have to be emotionally resilient. They can just be babies because they expect a woman will be able to prop them up emotionally and take care of them that way, completely.

And we know that it's not a 2 way street. Cause we've seen in this thread that even nice guys can't even conceptualize surprising their lady with flowers without being told to. (But shout out to the guy that stepped up, you're awesome)

It doesn't occur to them to be thoughtful in a way that is meaningful to females. They expect females to prop up their ego and never hurt them.

And they can't fucking stand it when women just...don't cater to their feelings and egos. And for the first time in my life. I don't feel bad about laughing at them.

Thanks for making this thread @Lidl Drip and thanks to Null for protecting it.
 
The problem with incel "subculture" is that it's designed to keep you miserable, not to help you stop being an incel.

I'd be sympathetic towards incels if they, y'know, were being nice to women or at least smiled at them instead of baring fangs. No dude will tolerate a spouse who treats him like a walking wallet, just as women will not tolerate guys who bitch constantly and give up on life.
I think incels are just modern day natural selection tbh. For some reason people think that incels are a recent phenomenon, but there have always been men who are just too dysgenic and socially retarded to attract a mate. It used to be they just joined the church and became monks or whatever, did something else fulfilling with their life and accepted their fate. It's just now that they have started killing innocent people and children because they can't smash box. Men should just accept that women get to pick and chose whose genes are worth continuing and whose are not. It's the same in nature and they should be happy that women aren't as picky as some birds who require you to build a beautiful nest as well as do an impressive dance for us. If you don't make the cut then accept it or just kill yourself without taking innocent people with you. The entitlement is unreal and we need to teach men that you are not owed sex or a relationship with women.
 
Has anyone here discussed topics like “emotional labor” and “weaponized incompetence?” I came across the ideas recently and they really struck a chord with me. I often see among mothers that they often have a job that offers similar hours, labor, and pay to their husbands’, but they take on planning, cleaning, keeping care of the kids, and generally organizing and memorizing dates and information, while the father gets to sit on his ass and do nothing. I see this among my family and many others’. Has anyone tried to have this conversation with their boyfriends or fathers about this? How did it go?
I enjoy embarrassing the shit out of this kind of guy. Half of them will just brush you off, but I've seen more than one man turn bright red when I ask what their kid's birthday or teacher's name is, and they have no idea. They don't like it when I hit them with a hard stare and a monotone "oh, so your wife is the one that cares for the kids. I see."
 
Combination of incelism and manosphere is a poison for man's soul and mind.
It's the dude version of dangerhair feminism. Horseshoe theory in practice.
But men don't have to be emotionally resilient. They can just be babies because they expect a woman will be able to prop them up emotionally and take care of them that way, completely.
I guess it's a result of different upbringing. Girls either develop a thick skin to catty remarks of their "friends" or develop an eating disorder. Catty guys get violence. When a dude hears mean remarks from the fair sex they don't know how to take it.

That, or single-mother households.
I think incels are just modern day natural selection tbh. For some reason people think that incels are a recent phenomenon, but there have always been men who are just too dysgenic and socially retarded to attract a mate. It used to be they just joined the church and became monks or whatever, did something else fulfilling with their life and accepted their fate. It's just now that they have started killing innocent people and children because they can't smash box. Men should just accept that women get to pick and chose whose genes are worth continuing and whose are not. It's the same in nature and they should be happy that women aren't as picky as some birds who require you to build a beautiful nest as well as do an impressive dance for us. If you don't make the cut then accept it or just kill yourself without taking innocent people with you. The entitlement is unreal and we need to teach men that you are not owed sex or a relationship with women.
In the past lots of men were miserable drunkards and some women preferred to be either widows or spinsters than marry them. Monasteries were full of criminals 'cause becoming a monk gave you protection from the law. There was even a saying "I'm going to kill you, then join the clergy."

Less and less kids have a dad to show them how to not be a retard around girls.
 
Last edited:
Has anyone here discussed topics like “emotional labor” and “weaponized incompetence?” I came across the ideas recently and they really struck a chord with me. I often see among mothers that they often have a job that offers similar hours, labor, and pay to their husbands’, but they take on planning, cleaning, keeping care of the kids, and generally organizing and memorizing dates and information, while the father gets to sit on his ass and do nothing. I see this among my family and many others’. Has anyone tried to have this conversation with their boyfriends or fathers about this? How did it go?
Most men inflict varying levels of emotional labor and weaponized incompetence on the women around them, esp. wives and mothers. Some men aren't too bad with it and some men are horrible needy manchildren, but every man I have known does this. Wants to vent to the woman but not hear about her problems, purposefully does a shit job at chores or tasks that are "womanly" such as grocery shopping or cleaning or what have you. It's deeply ingrained, unconscious behavior and I'm not sure if it's a result of how boys are raised or if it's just the male psyche. YMMV with addressing it, depending on the man. A lot just get offended but some do try to make a better effort.

It's the dude version of dangerhair feminism. Horseshoe theory in practice.

I guess it's a result of different upbringing. Girls either develop a thick skin to catty remarks of their "friends" or develop an eating disorder. Catty guys get violence. When a dude hears mean remarks from the fair sex they don't know how to take it.

That, or single-mother households.

In the past lots of men were miserable drunkards and some women preferred to be either widows or spinsters than marry them. Monasteries were full of criminals 'cause becoming a monk gave you protection from the law. There was even a saying "I'm going to kill you, then join the clergy."

Less and less kids have a dad to show them how to not be a retard around girls.
Chimpouts in response to insults or teasing are far more acceptable for young boys. Girls are taught from the time they can walk and talk to be more passive, to take stuff on the chin or just say something snarky in response. While boys are taught that some rough and tumble to "defend your honor" or whatever is acceptable, they are also taught that you shouldn't hit at/yell at women. Unsurprising that we see many males who have made it to adulthood and find themselves unsure how to respond to criticism or shittalking from women.
 
lidl drip garden 2.png
 
Jacko takes big issues with my hopes and dreams of finding a porn-virgin no-internet using uncontacted mountain man bf. Men hate it when you remind them that they are unpure and ruined by years of pornography consumption. Imagine looking in a man's eyes knowing those eyes have seen millions of women naked and abused. Vile.
 
Today I found out there's online invite only groups per city called stuff like ''Are we dating the same guy?' dedicated to snuffing out cheaters, second families, scammers and DV/abuse warnings because women need to do this shit now. Sadly, the rules are biblical length screeds about not attacking the guys appearance, no group facing discussions, a word limit on how much can even be said, no list of crimes unless convicted, use of words like 'allegedly' peppered in a lot of posts. It's literally, quite exclusively, a warning system, because of how many unchecked gross vile men are out there. But they can't even call them scrotes or they'll be deleted. Fuck this gay Earth (:_(
 
That said if the women into BMT were men they would probably be torrenting Daisy's Destruction or becoming another Peter Scully.

I wish you hadn’t reminded me that this man exists. He genuinely makes me think that Evil might really exist as a sentient force on earth.

Jacko takes big issues with my hopes and dreams of finding a porn-virgin no-internet using uncontacted mountain man bf. Men hate it when you remind them that they are unpure and ruined by years of pornography consumption. Imagine looking in a man's eyes knowing those eyes have seen millions of women naked and abused. Vile.

I love it when guys laugh at the idea of other guys not using porn, like the idea of existing without it is totally inconceivable - in spite of hundreds of thousands of years of human existence suggesting otherwise. It really shows just how easily they can be manipulated and controlled.
 
Today I found out there's online invite only groups per city called stuff like ''Are we dating the same guy?' dedicated to snuffing out cheaters, second families, scammers and DV/abuse warnings because women need to do this shit now. Sadly, the rules are biblical length screeds about not attacking the guys appearance, no group facing discussions, a word limit on how much can even be said, no list of crimes unless convicted, use of words like 'allegedly' peppered in a lot of posts. It's literally, quite exclusively, a warning system, because of how many unchecked gross vile men are out there. But they can't even call them scrotes or they'll be deleted. Fuck this gay Earth (:_(
Can't imagine a Facebook page being the best place to store info for the long term either. Who is gonna scroll 2000 times down to find Paul Dogfucker? Fuck reddit and fagbook for killing off traditional forums, the objectively best way to communicate online.
 
Untitled.png

Got clickbaited into clicking on this youtube short in which the pregnant wife accidentally spoils the gender reveal because she pulls the topper stick out of the cake and it has pink cake on it and the husband SCOWLS at her yelling "YOU GAVE IT AWAY!". In the comments some people are pointing out that he should have just ignored that and not gotten angry at his pregnant wife, especially because she didn't even notice until he yelled at her. Ofc immediately butthurt moids bring up "MUH SUICIDE STATISTICS!" and "I GUESS MEN AREN'T ALLOWED TO HAVE FEELINGS?!?!" to justify this manbaby not being able to pull his shit together when his wife is pregnant and they are trying to do a cute video and their child is right there. Probably also angry that it's another girl and not "muh heir to my throne who will carry on muh legacy".

Asking men not to chimp out at inappropriate times means that men are not allowed to have feelings and that's why they are all depressed and suicidal and we should feel sorry for them instead. Men are so coddled it's unreal.
 
Last edited:
Do you guys know that Steven Tyler, the lead singer of Aerosmith, fucked a 14 year old , then forced her to have an abortion because he was worried the drugs he plied her with(and a house fire he probably caused) would fuck up the fetus? He later regretted it BECAUSE and ONLY BECAUSE he learned the fetus was male.

In 1973, Tyler obtained guardianship of 16-year-old Julia Holcomb so that she could live with him in Boston.[97] They dated and took drugs together for three years.[98] Holcomb was referred to by the pseudonym "Diana Hall" by the editor of the Aerosmith autobiography Walk This Way in an attempt to conceal her identity,[citation needed] but other sources have confirmed her identity.[99][100][101] Pressures leading to their split included their age difference (Tyler was 25 when they first met), a withdrawn marriage proposal, a house fire, and a planned pregnancy that resulted in an abortion when Tyler was worried that the smoke from the fire, as well as drugs, might lead to birth defects.[98][102] Look Away, a documentary about sexual abuse in the rock music industry, features Holcomb's story.[103]

Band member Ray Tabano wrote in Walk This Way that the abortion "really messed Steven up," because the fetus was male.[104] Tyler wrote, "It was a big crisis. It's a major thing when you're growing something with a woman, but they convinced us that it would never work out and would ruin our lives. You go to the doctor and they put the needle in her belly and they squeeze the stuff in and you watch. And it comes out dead. I was pretty devastated. In my mind, I'm going, Jesus, what have I done?"[104]
His story was later used by an anti-choice activist who mentions this girl suffered trauma, but only because she was forced to have an abortion, not because she was repeatedly raped as a child.

Bonus:
"I've been misquoted as saying that I'm more female than male. Let me set the record straight -- it's more half and half, and I love the fact that my feelings are akin to puella eternis (Latin for "the eternal girl").
 
Last edited:
View attachment 5354444

Got clickbaited into clicking on this youtube short in which the pregnant wife accidentally spoils the gender reveal because she pulls the topper stick out of the cake and it has pink cake on it and the husband SCOWLS at her yelling "YOU GAVE IT AWAY!". In the comments some people are pointing out that he should have just ignored that and not gotten angry at his pregnant wife, especially because she didn't even notice until he yelled at her. Ofc immediately butthurt moids bring up "MUH SUICIDE STATISTICS!" and "I GUESS MEN AREN'T ALLOWED TO HAVE FEELINGS?!?!" to justify this manbaby not being able to pull his shit together when his wife is pregnant and they are trying to do a cute video and their child is right there. Probably also angry that it's another girl and not "muh heir to my throne who will carry on muh legacy".

Asking men not to chimp out at inappropriate times means that men are not allowed to have feelings and that's why they are all depressed and suicidal and we should feel sorry for them instead. Men are so coddled it's unreal.
Back when men "weren't allowed to have feelings" the male suicide rate was vastly lower. Almost like modern men are just mentally and physically ill. Problem is you can't tell a baby to stop being a baby cuz they'll just cry more.

I've never understood the assertion that "my grandpa wanted to bitch as much as I do, he was just socially pressured not to." Have you considered that your grandpa just wasn't as much of a bitch?
 
Back