- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
That's because Glenn Greenwald is one of the only journos who ever wrote anything positive about Kiwifarms and supports the site.
Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread
- Thread starter Lidl Drip
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2022
First of all, you'll only lose Salon privileges if you deliberately shit up the thread and go "WOW YOU HOLES ARE SO FUCKING STUPID US MEN BUILT THE WORLD!!".
Secondly, most of women (when they're not complete faghags) find beef with gays how they exaggerate their mannerisms and through that double down
on the stereotypes women are still fighting against to this day. It also doesn't help that that gays tend to be the one that dominate the beauty industry, hence why most beauty products have sexual names and don't fit on a woman's face, because it's made for gay people that inject botox and do drag queen shit.
More specific beef that women have is that left-leaning gays who are extra flamboyant, despite being gay, also want a mommy figure but not in a typical straight dude fashion of "I want her to take care of me and jack me off while telling I'm a good boy", but in a more supportive/faghag role hence why there's the whole "mother" phenomenon in the alphabet community, so often at times left-leaning gays tend to project this idea onto other women such as celebrities (for some reason especially on black female celebrities who tend to be very homophobic) only to get mad when surprise, surprise the woman they projected this idea onto is nothing like that, rather she's her own human being with her own views, and if she has any views that are oppose to theirs, they'll do anything to "cancel" her and try get her blacklisted. Example of this mentality can be best seen with Azealia Banks, where almost every other month there's some attempt at gays trying to cancel her for being anti-gay/homophobic, only for her to not give a fuck and double down.
As for right-leaning gays, they are a mixed bag, because there are those that genuinely want to be left alone and don't want to have any involvement in whole alphabet and gender theatrics and then there's what I like to call the "conservative pick-mes". The latter are hypocrites who will shit on women for "rejecting" the trad call to have a husband and children, while they are also rejecting that call by being gay, they shit on evil jezebels who have casual sex while their whole culture basically being a hotspot of casual sex. But anyone not retarded can see that they're only holding these values so there's more white surrogate mothers for them to exploit and white children to adopt, because they are losing grace with places such as Brazil and Southeast Asia because of how many child molesters in their community used those places to find surrogate mothers or families who are desperate enough to give their own children to them for some money.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
Patriarchy can't seem to get it's fucking story straight. Men are supposed to be the civilized, rational, analytical ones who don't let their emotions cloud their judgment; but patriarchy also celebrates men who commit acts of domestic violence and murder their wives in a "crime of passion". Which one is it, guys? Are you the cool-headed pragmatists, or the hot-headed warriors? Because if you believe in gender essentialism (which most misogynists do) then it cannot be both. From the view of a gender-essentialist, being male would either promote being an impulsive, violent brute, in which case the civilized, contemplative pragmatist men are just bad at being men, or vice versa.
Yes, these sexist men view independent women like untamed horses. They want to "break" women to their will. Patriarchy is in many ways a systematic application of the ideas of animal husbandry, as applied to human women.
Fuck this guy. Any church worth its salt doesn't preach that women are objects to be owned and controlled by men. The Way of Love is not about subjugating and extracting labor and kids from other people. What OOP is describing is a kind of slavery.
"Life on easy mode" is selling your body to dirty coomers for pence on the pound to obtain a safe-ish place to sleep. Right. bloody capitalist nightmare is more like it...
Also, AK is a pretty bad place to not have a home. I'd advise her to check w shelters and hopefully there's some warming centers in her location where she can safely not freeze to death. Igloos and snow shanties aren't moid safe.
When they're criticizing your body for not being sexually appealing enough to them. Because they're gay, they will never really be satisfied with the way women look, and they project that by being absolutely scathing to women at times. I also think gay men have co-opted a lot of sexist words like 'cunt', 'whore', and 'bitch' the same way they've reappropriated the words 'queer' and 'faggot', but all these words run on the n-word rule. They can also revel in their maleness and male privilege a bit much, for example the 'gold-star' gays who pride themselves on never having fucked a woman.
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
Meanwhile as being sexually harassed or worse by adult moids is a universal experience for minor girls
So do a lot of straight men. Hell, conservative straight men in Florida straight up banned teaching kids about periods before 6th grade because they think it's yucky (even though many girls hit menarche in mid-late elementary school).
Not a popular opinion here, but the worst shit gay men do you also see in straight men hundreds of times over.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
I love how whenever the topic of feminism comes up in any discussion, men immediately rush in to be the perfect exactly of why feminism is needed.
Male: actually we don't even need feminism anymore, women have all the rights they need and are safe and equal in our society
Other male: feminism means I can BEAT WOMEN! We need to get rid of women's rights actually because those dumb foids aren't having sex with me! They should be cattle for me to own and abuse! Lower the age of consent to 0!
Male: actually we don't even need feminism anymore, women have all the rights they need and are safe and equal in our society
Other male: feminism means I can BEAT WOMEN! We need to get rid of women's rights actually because those dumb foids aren't having sex with me! They should be cattle for me to own and abuse! Lower the age of consent to 0!
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
LMAO Anti-moid shield in action, suck it @Luke-Warm Tampon Tea
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2019
Just owned those stupid femoids by posting in the DMZ. They'll never recover from my amazing arguments...
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2022
Honestly, it really makes me roll my eyes when western moids along with their fellow Korean moids go
"LOL THIS IS WHAT RADICAL FEMINISM HAS BROUGHT TO YOU!! CHECKMATE" when the discussion of Korea's fertility dropping rapidly appears.
Korea wouldn't be in such an issue in the first place, hadn't their rigorous culture treated women so dogshit and heavily favored male
children to the point female babies were abandoned or left to die if they weren't boys. Radical feminism wouldn't become a heavily
favored ideology by Korean women, if Korean society actually decided to address its issue on how they treat women and what they expect from them,
rather than hand waving it.
But it's also interesting how everybody pearl clutching and reeeeeeing about how those evil feminazi Korean women
putting their foot down against their dogshit caste system are the ones also that are commending and saying how Korean and white men
are based for refusing to be in the army.
Moids: Lol of course, white/Korean men don't want to enlist or be drafted in the army anymore, they were constantly guilt-tripped
and demonized non-stop. It's only a natural response to feel no obligation for their country.
Also moids: Reeeeee those bitchy Korean women should stop blaming the society for the issue
and turn the other cheek! It's absurd to hold to these negative feelings! REEEEEEEEEE ! IT'S YOUR
OBLIGATION TO HAVE CHILDREN!!!!!
we wouldn't be dealing with gross scrotes trying to both strip and cover women with AI and there wouldn't be scrotes still butthurt about the idea
of women being able to work, vote and live a life without orbiting for retarded guys.
"LOL THIS IS WHAT RADICAL FEMINISM HAS BROUGHT TO YOU!! CHECKMATE" when the discussion of Korea's fertility dropping rapidly appears.
Korea wouldn't be in such an issue in the first place, hadn't their rigorous culture treated women so dogshit and heavily favored male
children to the point female babies were abandoned or left to die if they weren't boys. Radical feminism wouldn't become a heavily
favored ideology by Korean women, if Korean society actually decided to address its issue on how they treat women and what they expect from them,
rather than hand waving it.
But it's also interesting how everybody pearl clutching and reeeeeeing about how those evil feminazi Korean women
putting their foot down against their dogshit caste system are the ones also that are commending and saying how Korean and white men
are based for refusing to be in the army.
Moids: Lol of course, white/Korean men don't want to enlist or be drafted in the army anymore, they were constantly guilt-tripped
and demonized non-stop. It's only a natural response to feel no obligation for their country.
Also moids: Reeeeee those bitchy Korean women should stop blaming the society for the issue
and turn the other cheek! It's absurd to hold to these negative feelings! REEEEEEEEEE ! IT'S YOUR
OBLIGATION TO HAVE CHILDREN!!!!!
If that was the case we wouldn't be still having issues with sexual harassment of women in male dominated work spaces,
we wouldn't be dealing with gross scrotes trying to both strip and cover women with AI and there wouldn't be scrotes still butthurt about the idea
of women being able to work, vote and live a life without orbiting for retarded guys.
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This will all end in tears, I just know it.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
I love our Feminazi Farms. 
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
Don't Korean moms encourage their daughters to not marry or date men, since they don't want them getting beaten and possibly murdered? Like domestic violence is that big of a problem.
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2014
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2015
Moids absolutely fucking hate the concept of child support so I’m legitimately baffled why they get their knickers in a twist about women not having babies.
Isnt that what they want? No babies to pay for or look after?
Isnt that what they want? No babies to pay for or look after?
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2016
Men always go on about how women are more malleable, easy to manipulate and more likely to fall for cults compared to them yet will blindly take advice from Andrew Tate and others like him.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
They are under the illusion that women spend all the money on themselves, because they have no idea how much it costs to raise a child, because they usually aren't involved much in that process. Men who bitch and moan about child support and evil divorce courts tend to be men like Ethan Ralph.
FarmVille
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2021
Late but I needed to highlight the retardation of this comment.
He’s not a man? He raped someone smaller and weaker than him. That’s exactly the kind of shit men do. That’s the one and only entirely consistent thing all men from all cultures have done throughout all of human history.
He’s not man* he’s a man. GTGO with this no true men shit
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2022
Jokes on you. I have a femdom fetish, so this men-hating thread actually turns me on.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
This is a pretty obvious example of biased observers inferring causation from correlation. A bunch of other factors may have a role in Korea's declining fertility, such as:
> Industrialization
> That whole war n' armistice thing
> Rising costs of raising children
> Grey wave - women are choosing to have fewer children in order to care for their own parents
> aggressive tiger parenting increases the psychological burden of having kids (because you are micromanaging them)
> Women who work are penalized for having kids by getting 'mommy-tracked' and denied advancement.
Any of the above factors could also have played a role, but moids just jump to the conclusion they want to be true without any rational analysis. Fuckin' hypocrites.
None of which is to say Korea isn't a sexist country. It is extremely sexist and extremely conformist, kind of like Japan. The government and culture treat women like shit and expect them to just eat it, like their moms and grandmothers did. And then when the new generation of Korean women throw down their aprons and tell the men to make their own damn pickles, the Korean moids are shocked, shocked, that sexist feudal practices didn't survive the Internet age.
They want the Paul Elam special; to have children, disavow them in early childhood as "not mine", fuck off and make someone else do the hard work of raising them, waiting for the children to contact you as adults looking to reunite. Surprise, they look just like you and they even like the same foods and music. You accept them as your child, after all. Then one day you get all violent with your grandkids and your daughter decides she doesn't want to see you if it means beating on her kids, and you once again decry her as "not my daughter".
Best of both worlds! You can freeload on women's reproductive capability and caregiving 100% and it gives you enough time to sell bizarre online counseling sessions where you teach other men how to ruin their relationships with their wives.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2024
Absolutely, and relevant to a few things being brought up in some of the tranny threads recently, as well as gay men being brought up again here: I find it so laughably absurd that retards claim women are to blame for social acceptance of troons and the sexual horrors their coomerism represents. Because women vote and wouldn’t you know, we all vote for silly woman things like being able to legally remove life-threatening parasites from our bodies, and all those aborted fetuses rolling down the slippery slope obviously means a vote for abortion = a vote for troonrape.
OG troons were 1 overwhelmingly male 2 actively disliked by lesbians in particular (for being obvious rapists eg “cotton ceiling”) and GBs who rightfully saw them as sex pest parasites trying to piggyback off a larger, legitimate movement 3 still ultimately managed to append themselves to the LGB via sympathetic gay men.
There were absolutely gay and bisexual men in the LGB movement horrified that pedos and troons wanted to partner with them, just are there are gay and bisexual men horrified by it now. But David Thorstad founded NAMBLA in the late 70s, after already being a major player in the gay liberation scene for years prior. He decried “lesbian feminists” for putting supposedly undue emphasis on child abuse and the evils of pornography; those feminists absolutely were not cooing with glee at the prospect of credible assault by crack den drug addicts who slept on park benches (Marsha P Johnson and Sylvia Rivera; they were gay, but what a couple of excellent role models for the youth of today!) and other crossdressing ilk who espoused such wholesome ideas as the “cotton ceiling”, modeled quite respectfully ofc after the “glass ceiling”. There simply is not an equivalent group of females, of any sexuality, raping and molesting children like males do, nor are pooners on Grindr anywhere close to the threat degenerate moids present to beings living and dead, sentient or otherwise. The male sex drive is very strong; access to children is important to pedos, and they will do whatever they can to obtain it.
I don’t necessarily think this was all a conscious, meticulously plotted long con, as perfectly as it’s worked out for creeps—but the interests aligned, and one hand washes the other. The liberal handmaidens and cissie soyboys are useful idiots with their own perversions (the Vaush highlight
not surprising but still horrible), and conservatives have their own endemic pedo problems to deal with. They’re all facets of the same dark place in the male psyche, just given different outward justifications.
I don’t necessarily think this was all a conscious, meticulously plotted long con, as perfectly as it’s worked out for creeps—but the interests aligned, and one hand washes the other. The liberal handmaidens and cissie soyboys are useful idiots with their own perversions (the Vaush highlight
not surprising but still horrible), and conservatives have their own endemic pedo problems to deal with. They’re all facets of the same dark place in the male psyche, just given different outward justifications.Men, regardless of whether they want to hurt girls, boys, or both, are the ones who troon out for sex pest reasons the most, as well as the ones who have accepted and immunized troons and pedofags for common interests of degeneracy. But I have good news for males wanting to blame this on women anyway: dykes took care of dying fags during the AIDS crisis, and some of the not-dead fags proceeded to support troons’ induction into LGB liberation—QED, lesbian feminists are responsible for troonism after all!
(Edited to move spoiler endtag placement down)
Last edited: