DMZ ♀ Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

This thread is a DMZ (De-Moidified Zone) and is strictly for women. Men and trannies (men) shitting up the thread will be removed from the entire Lolcow Salon for a month.
I have no strong opinion on permanently putting DMZ’s pet moids out to pasture. Like on principle I get it, but if people are civil and at least try to be thoughtful w/e. I do think it is probably some testament to female nature that a lot of us both deeply despise many behaviors and actions of males as a sex while also having men in our lives that matter to us, not as pets or appliances but people. I do not think misogynists are capable of the same—at best, they love an adjacent woman like a mother, sister, or wife as a dog. I love my animal companions and still mourn/remember them years later, but loving and losing an actual human person is so far beyond losing a pet.

wrt the greater principle of being against males in a “DMZ” one might say, see, this is why women will never destroy patriarchy, they are too kind, too permissive. One might respond, perhaps, but how sad it is that to be capable of true love and social connection is to be “inferior” to the sex that revels in violence, theft, and destruction. What is, isn’t necessarily what ought to be. The males posting here may or may not add anything but at worst I can ignore them bc they’re just saying something I already know.

Anyway, if you’ve got the female support system to pull it off, I think true misandry/separatism sounds swell. Most won’t go that road, but it should be far more possible and common than it is. Even mild “misandry” like being annoyed at males pissing on toilets seats etc makes scrotes shit themselves, so when one Valerie Solanas a century shows up and tries to knife a pedo hack, godspeed to her in every iteration. I unironically want male reproductive rights forcibly revoked and for at least half of all males on earth to die so that maybe everything else here won’t, at least not quite so quickly, but we couldn’t be so lucky.
 
wrt the greater principle of being against males in a “DMZ” one might say, see, this is why women will never destroy patriarchy, they are too kind, too permissive.
Maybe we could have talked about this normally and I could have been convinced that it's a good idea to kick them all out of the thread permanently and we could have petitioned this together, but instead FarmVille passive aggressively blamed me for Dyn being in this thread and then came to my profile to call me a taintlicker and some other not so nice things. I feel like I have already put up with enough abuse by moids over the last 8 months for making this thread. Acting that way isn't going to start a good faith discussion. I think this thread has been pretty functional and without much drama for quite a while and I would appreciate if it stayed that way. If any moids act up or get annoying they usually get removed quickly.
 
I do think it is probably some testament to female nature that a lot of us both deeply despise many behaviors and actions of males as a sex while also having men in our lives that matter to us, not as pets or appliances but people. I do not think misogynists are capable of the same—at best, they love an adjacent woman like a mother, sister, or wife as a dog. I love my animal companions and still mourn/remember them years later, but loving and losing an actual human person is so far beyond losing a pet.
Couldn't agree more. I don't think i'll ever have the lack of empathy for men that some men have for women. I truly do not understand how they will not see women as people capable of rational thought. Also I think a lot of us are ok with "pet moids" (men in the NO MOID thread) because we want to be understood and we wish that men not only understood us but that they had the same desire to understand us the same way we do men (i don't mean this in a romantic sense)
if you’ve got the female support system to pull it off, I think true misandry/separatism sounds swell. Most won’t go that road, but it should be far more possible and common than it is. Even mild “misandry” like being annoyed at males pissing on toilets seats etc makes scrotes shit themselves
It really does speak volumes that separatism is widely seen as the worst offense and its literally just ignoring men. Whereas male on female violence and rape is commonplace.
I unironically want male reproductive rights forcibly revoked
If only the 4b movement of korea got picked up in other parts of the world...
 
I have no strong opinion on permanently putting DMZ’s pet moids out to pasture. Like on principle I get it, but if people are civil and at least try to be thoughtful w/e. I do think it is probably some testament to female nature that a lot of us both deeply despise many behaviors and actions of males as a sex while also having men in our lives that matter to us, not as pets or appliances but people. I do not think misogynists are capable of the same—at best, they love an adjacent woman like a mother, sister, or wife as a dog. I love my animal companions and still mourn/remember them years later, but loving and losing an actual human person is so far beyond losing a pet.

wrt the greater principle of being against males in a “DMZ” one might say, see, this is why women will never destroy patriarchy, they are too kind, too permissive. One might respond, perhaps, but how sad it is that to be capable of true love and social connection is to be “inferior” to the sex that revels in violence, theft, and destruction. What is, isn’t necessarily what ought to be. The males posting here may or may not add anything but at worst I can ignore them bc they’re just saying something I already know.

Anyway, if you’ve got the female support system to pull it off, I think true misandry/separatism sounds swell. Most won’t go that road, but it should be far more possible and common than it is. Even mild “misandry” like being annoyed at males pissing on toilets seats etc makes scrotes shit themselves, so when one Valerie Solanas a century shows up and tries to knife a pedo hack, godspeed to her in every iteration. I unironically want male reproductive rights forcibly revoked and for at least half of all males on earth to die so that maybe everything else here won’t, at least not quite so quickly, but we couldn’t be so lucky.

The reality is that heterosexual woman are always going to be mentally impaired by their desire to form romantic relationships with moids.

They are always searching for the man who is going to be the exception and cannot bring themselves to accept he’s not out there. They are wired to look for the good in men which is dumb cause moids always gonna moid.

There’s not even the creativity to imagine a thread without moids. It’s like if there isn’t a man to respond to their behavior they might as well not even exist.,
 
loving and losing an actual human person is so far beyond losing a pet.
image_2024-03-08_192019520.png
 
I’m frankly just hurt no one’s called me out for spreading falsehoods on IWD by saying Solanas knifed Warhol when she really tried to shoot him. I forgot and was too lazy to check. *sigh*

If you are not just being farcical I legitimately need you to explain this line of thinking to me, please!
 
The reality is that heterosexual woman are always going to be mentally impaired by their desire to form romantic relationships with moids.

They are always searching for the man who is going to be the exception and cannot bring themselves to accept he’s not out there. They are wired to look for the good in men which is dumb cause moids always gonna moid.

There’s not even the creativity to imagine a thread without moids. It’s like if there isn’t a man to respond to their behavior they might as well not even exist.,
This is the man hate thread not the shitting on straight women like a common misogynist moid cretin thread. I fully understand why you'd prefer no men - there are approximately zero man free spaces on the internet. That is not the fault of women. Not even straight women. And for the record since that is your thesis - I am a straight woman with a perfectly charming nigel who left ovarit because they allow men. I have different expectations on the farms because it is not claiming to be a feminist space. I mostly ignore the dudes - just like in real life. I appreciate your contributions to the thread, so I hope you'll consider doing the same and just chill with the other ladies here. But attacking your kiwi sisters cause they disagree ain't it.
 
I’m frankly just hurt no one’s called me out for spreading falsehoods on IWD by saying Solanas knifed Warhol when she really tried to shoot him. I forgot and was too lazy to check. *sigh*


If you are not just being farcical I legitimately need you to explain this line of thinking to me, please!
np! -- if I have a tier-list of harmlessness weighted against blamelessness, I put trees as S-tier; if I am killed by a tree, it is the will of forces beyond the tree or even the willful planting of it. Feel free to add other taxonomic actors here.
  1. next would be all non-human domesticated animals, to whom we as a species owe a blood debt for domesticating their ancestors; this is a recognition of many landmark events in human history.
  2. then non-human wild animals, who, were it not for humans simply being OP intellectually, would be on an equal footing for responsibility in harm.
  3. then humans, in all their variety for good and evil.
I used to look across my street and see three centenarian oaks that are no longer there. I mourn their destruction in the same way I do my favorite aunt. She, like the oaks, was not a blood relation, but a favorite. Other losses are too personal, but suffice it to say that my feelings are strong.
 
Anyway, if you’ve got the female support system to pull it off, I think true misandry/separatism sounds swell. Most won’t go that road, but it should be far more possible and common than it is.
I agree that that should be a lot more possible.
I unironically want male reproductive rights forcibly revoked and for at least half of all males on earth to die so that maybe everything else here won’t, at least not quite so quickly, but we couldn’t be so lucky.
could you explain your reasoning behind this other than the fact that obviously the climate isn’t going to degrade as quickly if human population growth is curtailed?
Although I disagree with the premise, I always find it interesting when something like this is proposed, they never go into the details of what the supposed benefits of such an action would be or how it would be implemented. I don’t agree with the idea that men will get better if we just kill a lot of them off (see war’s throughout history) or strictly regulate their ability to reproduce. It doesn’t seem very ethical to me, nor do I suspect that it would really work. I would really like to hear the reasoning though, I am open minded about it.
I am a straight woman with a perfectly charming nigel who left ovarit because they allow men. I have different expectations on the farms because it is not claiming to be a feminist space.
Have a question for you. I can see why you would think that a feminist space like ovarit shouldn’t allow men. Should there be a separate female centered space where men can have respectful, good faith discussions and learn and ask questions? I lurk ovarit from time to time, and to be honest I didn’t know very much about feminism before I did. I only knew about the most ridiculous things done by libfems. I really think that a space like I asked about could be really useful, do you agree?
Edit to avoid double posting:
I don't think i'll ever have the lack of empathy for men that some men have for women. I truly do not understand how they will not see women as people capable of rational thought.
I think what it comes down to is that shitty moids rarely consider the inner state of others unless they want something from them. They are that self centered. It isn’t that they actively see themselves as superior to women, or see women as mindless things in the moment when they are actively committing sexist acts, or worse. Rather they simply want to hurt the woman in question to punish her for not behaving how he wants. the how is irrelevant. They likely think similarly about other men that don’t behave how they want, but they don’t act it out because they know they wouldn’t get away with it. All the sophistry that misogynists come up with is post hoc justification for why they are right to behave the way they do. It’s that simple. They have people who they treat well, and enemies who don’t give them what they want and must therefore be destroyed. (TLDR: assuming that misogynists put actual thought into their misogyny is likely assuming too much)
 
Last edited:
I don’t agree with the idea that men will get better if we just kill a lot of them off
I think often of the chimp (?) tribe where the violent, aggressive, first-to-eat males all were poisoned by some food they found and the resulting peace drastically changed the tribe.

It was baboons: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC387823/

Anyway, yes, huge waves of men should die. Overnight it would be to the betterment of all.
 
Men's obsession with getting cucked is a real mental illness. Most of the MRA types argue for mandatory paternity tests upon birth because they literally don't trust their wife at all. I think it's projection because they are probably cheating on her for real or they think "well if I was a woman I would definitely cheat because it would be so easy!" I think it's also porn sickness to some degree.
Its combination of porn and insecurities. Btw they mandate from the government so they avoid telling women they think that women a lying whores. I was looking into research into it which is far more researched than dunno pelvic fractures during child birth or how much your brain shrinks due to hormones. Believe it or not the average is around 3 % the highest was 20-30% and lowest was 0.8 %. I am putting my money on 0.8 % because there are some Chinese rich cities demand paternity test to register the kid to the mans hukou.
Sniggers is a 50+ body count manslut, I don't want to be too mean and discourage any personal improvement and growth but don't give too much benefit of a doubt that he's not just being a male pick-me saying whatever he thinks we want to hear.
Um yet to see a manwhore to have personal growth and improvement the only time they " are ready to settle for kinky woman" are when they bust through the wall and hit the second wall. The amount of men ready to settle after riding the pussy carousel in their 40s is too damn high for me.

Throw him in the bin and discard anything that comes from his whore mouth.
 
Back