Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
>Women complain, provoke, shame and insult
>Proceeds to the exact same thing

Men and projection, name a better duo.
1713721487286.png
 
View attachment 5926505
View attachment 5926507

This has to be a troll but idk men really are this dumb.
consider the following: it is in fact a skill issue because any kind of sexual act between two people necessitates good communication; if you don't sit down with your partner to talk about what you like, what they like, what's negotiable versus what's completely off the table, personal limitations ("i can't do this position because [x]"), and how you feel in that moment, no shit it's not going to be fun.

for example, if a woman is being eaten out but she feels like her partner's doing the same thing over and over and she's worried they'll get huffy if she even implies she's not satisfied, then obviously cunnilingus won't be on the menu. it's also up to the partner who's performing the act to not just larp what they saw in porn and actually think "hmm i wonder what'll happen if i try this". basically, sex should be a mutual experience between adults who want to make each other happy and feel gratified in doing so, instead of the ooga booga me stick pp in hole drudgery these uncreative slime molds leave us with (and then blame on everything except themselves when reception is less than stellar).
 
Yeah many women express being dissatisfied, baffling because the bare minimum isnt much work but hey if your only experience with sex is a 10 minute (generous) grunt fest with little noise beyond an out of shape moid and the occassional cough and whatever else is the result of bodies slapping, im not surprised people think they dont enjoy sex at all or very little.
 
they would never dare say about a black woman.
Are you kidding? Black women are shit on incessantly. "They're all masculine (in looks and style), they're loud, they're angry, they're irresponsible, they have a bad attitude, they're lazy, etc."

Any woman who speaks up or disagrees with anything, regardless of how even, rational, logical, or sanguine, is "hysterical," "angry," "masculine," and/or "emasculating." The online "voice of men" is unable to conceive of women as anything individual; we are all conceived of in relation to, and secondary to, men. Everything is women's fault, including but not limited to a man's guilt/shame, or his violence. #notallblahblah, but that is the "voice," and too many of these black/ red/ doompillers unironically buy it - to the point of making it their entire personality - which I hope for their and society's sake is mostly just online bullshit, but [X]. So stupid, and they will lose what they apparently pine for - the company of a great match, love, family - but comfort themselves with the idea that those nasty post-wall bitches will also be alone. Funnily, forever alone women seem far less angry and bitter than their male counterparts, so who really wins that one-sided war?

View attachment 5926505
View attachment 5926507

This has to be a troll but idk men really are this dumb.
Maybe if he (in that pic) got his face out of her ass and to the places that she actually wants to feel him he'd have more success.

And lol, women don't like sex. That's a "sex with you" issue, Patriarchal sir. What an embarrassment as a self-appointed spokesman.

to not just larp what they saw in porn and actually think "hmm i wonder what'll happen if i try this"
What, actually think, learn her body, appreciate her and enjoy the intense intimacy from that, rather than lamely perform a "service"? Don't be silly.
 
Are you kidding? Black women are shit on incessantly. "They're all masculine (in looks and style), they're loud, they're angry, they're irresponsible, they have a bad attitude, they're lazy, etc."
Way to take my post way out of context, I was specifically talking about the super politically correct crowd that will insult only white women because they are afraid to be called racist if they insult black women and misogynist if they insult all women, but they have decided misogyny is actually okay if you just add "white" in front of woman because whuite women are super evil colonizers and oppressors actually. I thought that was pretty obvious from my post but there's probably a reason you left out half the sentence to get mad about.
 
I was specifically talking about the super politically correct crowd

You're right - I did not grab that from your comment. I read it as a broader statement, and if I didn't read closely enough, apologies.

But I think you did some cherry-picking, too. My larger comment agreed with you.

And in all, I was not trying to set up the race Olympics. Again, I thought you were speaking about white women being especially and unfairly shit on in general. All groups of women, separately and together, are shit on and insulted online. I took issue with the idea I thought you were advancing that some women - black women specifically - are spared by the full range of the anti-woman brigade for whatever reason, or that being a Karen* is described commonly as "the worst."

Again, if you're saying that that reference was about a specific type of hyper-politically correct group that does make white anything out to be the worst of the worst in any situation, I follow you now.

* "Karen" was originally a specific type of unpleasant busybody trying to control everything within view, not any woman who voiced a concern. I, as exactly the demographic targeted (middle-aged white woman) in the Karen stereotype, have not felt bothered by it bc "Karen" was a particular strain of wheedling jerk, puffed-up on petty power and officiously demanding manager attention because anyone else was basically subhuman. I've not ever perceived it as = all white women or even particularly about race matters. But no doubt some folks have taken it there.

Tl; dr: yes, I missed if you were talking about a group that tends to be reflexively anti-white rather than general anti-woman commentary.
 
women are the problem and inviting them on to ridicule them DO HAVE a female equivalent of women who fetishize being very toxic, very fickle, and using sex to get what they want
All those women have only fans and online businesses related to them getting attention. One openly admitted on a podcast making something like half a mil . Their job is to hook these degens into paying 10 bucks so they can call her a whore . She won't even read the message but some pr guy who runs the account and answer to their dumbass.
 
It's not. The trick is that they have view woman as people deserving of respect, whose thoughts and feelings matter and are just as important as men's. That's the actual hangup for every man bitching about how he can't get woman. That's what he doesn't want to change.
Bonus: Here's a standard faggot test for a beta male in my experience: If he meets a woman who shares the same interest, perhaps the same game, book, series or ttrpg or whatever else, with a depth similar or perhaps even higher to his, he can react either of two ways. He can either be normal about seeing a "rare specimen" in his hobby be as invested as he is and will treat her as an equal, or he'll throw a nuclear level chimp out because a lower form of being just spread her period blood all over his ego. Troons think they can remedy this issue, but they really can't.

The first will either react with excitement or the usual degree of eagerness when meeting a new friend. The other? This day is literally THE rope for him. It is a literal death sentence for some foid to be in his boy's club, and she could possibly, *gasp* be better, more knowledgeable than him, or perhaps own a collector's item he covets? It's beyond over. And that's even if he acknowledges her ability and know-how. Women need to weaponize their autism more.

A step more condescending are the male-feminist guys. Him and the dude that hate women are the same shit, except I'm expected to award the other for being well intentioned. Worthless. In the end the result is the same. Just treat us as an equal.
 
Honestly if we wanted we could fill this thread entirely with stories about men raping and killing women in horrible ways because that happens in this world EVER DAY. We could post about men who rape corpses and animals and literal babies and be busy all fucking day sharing articles about that. I don't usually post that shit here because it is depressing as fuck and just blackpilling, but we could do that. The men who are upset about us making fun of redpill men on Twitter really don't even know how generous we are being to them.
I've been seeing that Twitter account pop up all the time. It's supposed to make fun of coalburners - white women dating black men - and it steadfastly devolved into an account that gleefully promotes the horrific violence against women. Many years ago there was a blog named Unamusement Park that detailed interracial dating and what kind of things a white woman can expect by dating a black man. It used no misogynistic slurs or other such language, it just laid out the facts. It brought up the murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom, as well as other lesser known cases. This account has a weird sexual fetish with it. Instead of a somber warning a la Colin Flaherty, they get off to it.

I've been seeing this with the Title IX thing as well. I see drastically different responses, even from other men, in threads related to trannies: fathers who do not want their daughters exposed to this shit and are always on the alert. But with A&N there is a crude joy in women 'getting what they deserve'. In the Sideshows thread, or even the SRS thread, there is always a sombre attitude for these people: yes, they did it to themselves, but awareness is needed to stop it from happening to others. The other attitude almost smacks of the language abusers use: "I am doing this because you made me do it." Women deserve it because they voted for it, so on and so forth.

Upper class women don't deal with this. Working class women do. I get the sentiment that some people need tough love to 'peak' and realize how fucking insane this all is, but expressing such delight that women and girls are being beaten, raped, and losing medals not only loses women from the Right but also increases resentment. Yes, women had to lose medals to males in order for it to be taken seriously - but for every Riley Gaines, there were no men ever making Lia Thomas unsafe. No fathers to protect their daughters. I understand that women must take a stand themselves, especially towards the libshit feminists who throw away their rights - but I also understand that they will lose everything if they do something. We really do underestimate how Riley Gaines changed the conversation.

I should also like to mention that the person who made that comment to me also supports men downloading CP, as in actively downloading it, vs it being 'planted' on their computer, so go fucking figure.

Just like with immigration, it's funny until something happens to you. Until it's your pastor, or your father, or your uncle or your sons or whoever is important to you. I truly do wonder if those people have any daughters; that they can look them in the eye and say, 'See, bitch? This is what you get for taking away male spaces. You're gonna get your skull caved in. Maybe raped. That'll teach you for daring to want things. You will never be a functional adult. I will never help you because your sex asked for this.'

Another article pointed out how nasty Gen Alpha boys were. Figured I'd add this Twitter thread.
youth today.PNG
I wonder what the demographics of these schools are.
youth today 2.PNG
Evil.
youth today 3.PNG
The rational sex.
 
I'm sure mom and dad will take full personal accountability for letting their child have 13 hours of screen time every day and objectively fucking up their development. And we're not talking about a little screentime or a teensy bit of minecraft, we're talking about excessive amounts of screentime every day of the month. Of course, every child being exposed to infinite amounts of pornography and easy to access grooming chatrooms will have excellent consequences for both the male and female sex and the worsening gender wars. Look at the zoomers.

I'm still curious if gen alpha will finally put a pin in the troony social contagion though. Maybe, maybe not. Depends on how many of them get groomed.
 
Upper class women don't deal with this. Working class women do. I get the sentiment that some people need tough love to 'peak' and realize how fucking insane this all is, but expressing such delight that women and girls are being beaten, raped, and losing medals not only loses women from the Right but also increases resentment. Yes, women had to lose medals to males in order for it to be taken seriously - but for every Riley Gaines, there were no men ever making Lia Thomas unsafe. No fathers to protect their daughters. I understand that women must take a stand themselves, especially towards the libshit feminists who throw away their rights - but I also understand that they will lose everything if they do something. We really do underestimate how Riley Gaines changed the conversation.

I should also like to mention that the person who made that comment to me also supports men downloading CP, as in actively downloading it, vs it being 'planted' on their computer, so go fucking figure.

Just like with immigration, it's funny until something happens to you. Until it's your pastor, or your father, or your uncle or your sons or whoever is important to you. I truly do wonder if those people have any daughters; that they can look them in the eye and say, 'See, bitch? This is what you get for taking away male spaces. You're gonna get your skull caved in. Maybe raped. That'll teach you for daring to want things. You will never be a functional adult. I will never help you because your sex asked for this.'
No, you see little 7-year old Sally getting assaulted by a feral nignog or tranny in a space where she can be the most vulnerable is a win, because those pesky feminazis didn't let me play my video games as a big tittied scantily clad woman and those meanie website that are basically glorified tabloid websites wrote white man bad.

I want the terminally online shrimp dicks who's only exposure to politics is through online discourse and can only shout "LOL YOU VOTED FOR THIS/YOU ENABLED THIS!" to ask themselves:

  • And who told women that if they don't look out for those more vulnerable, less fortunate and more likely to face injustice and oppressions, that they would be undesirable because they reject their nurturing traits and "purpose" as caretaker of family and their community?

  • Who told women if they aren't kind to those in suffering and plight, the world would view them as cruel witches?

  • Who hammered down the point to women through generations and generations of their propaganda, if they even for once think of themselves and put themselves above those less fortunate when it comes to priorities and needs, they're going to be condemned forever for being selfish and cruel?

I do not need to spell out the answer. Another reason why libshit feminism managed to gain traction is because it was presented as a more "positive", kinder and egalitarian option, it's really no different how men pitted easily impressionable women against suffragettes during the early 20th century by telling them "You don't want to be a man-hating prudish harpy that hates fun and wants to abolish families, now do you?", but replace it with "You don't want to associate yourself with those man-hating harpies that blame everything on patriachy, now do you?".

But anyways, men who call themselves protectors, pillars of morality and other fancy terms, only to take massive glee in little girls and their mothers being assaulted, are protectors, just as how MtF troons are women. And the concept of tough love only works when the person who's been warning or being tough on the other person, is willing to work together with the other person despite their fuckups, which is something clearly these men don't want to do.

1713816187669.png
 
Last edited:
alright, ladies, so i've got a moid who can't stop trying to get my attention and i've been stealth-ignoring him for like two days with no slowing down from the moid. i know it's only been two days, but like, dude i'm ghosting you for a reason, stop trying to get my attention.

why can't they take the hint that their existence isn't wanted and their desperate need for female attention and validation is obnoxious and pathetic?
 
alright, ladies, so i've got a moid who can't stop trying to get my attention and i've been stealth-ignoring him for like two days with no slowing down from the moid. i know it's only been two days, but like, dude i'm ghosting you for a reason, stop trying to get my attention.

why can't they take the hint that their existence isn't wanted and their desperate need for female attention and validation is obnoxious and pathetic?
Irl?
 
nah, online. i'd prefer not to have to put the dude on ignore because doing so bothers me on principle, but it feels like the dude is kinda ramping his bullshit up and i don't have the patience for that so i'll probably have to, integrity be damned.

the world would be such a nicer place if people men understood the concept of leaving other people women the fuck alone
 
Back