Something I have noticed about moids is a complete inability to analyze cause-and-effect. I had this realization when I stumbled across yet another dipshit "repeal the 19th amendment" guy on Twitter.
The Republicans talk about striking down Roe v. Wade, and then it happens in a Republican-majority supreme court. Women, who have a vested interest in the right to abort (in cases of rape, incest, babies that could kill them, babies that come out horribly deformed, etc), are suddenly more concerned about abortion than they've been before because states are now free to just decide whatever the fuck draconian abortion laws they want.
Moids notice this and decide that, instead of being like "oh shit, we fucked up by supporting this and hurting the rights of women", decide that their angle should be that women also completely lose their right to vote.
It's so fucking stupid. I just can't.
It's mind-blowing and it's a constant. It's beyond them.
There are two kinds of women: pro-abortion and anti-abortion. Women who are anti-abortion believe that life and human value begins at conception and that when you get an abortion, you are killing a child. Women who are pro-abortion don't. I have never (and doubt I will) meet a woman who 1) lacks a strong stance on abortion and 2) doesn't fall into one of these two camps.
Women can get pregnant, men can not. Therefore, it stands to reason that women who are pro-abortion are MORE SO than pro-abortion men. Duh, they are the only ones who would ever be in a position to need an abortion.
Women care about children more than men do. Therefore, it stands to reason that women who are anti-abortion are MORE SO than anti-abortion men. The belief that you are fighting for the life of an actual child will always be more compelling and more passionate than the belief that you are fighting for the right to wrangle the behavior of hoes. You have some pick-mes who say that women shouldn't have consequence-free sex, but I assure you that these are clout-chasing outliers and do not represent what the American Christian base genuinely thinks.
Go to an evangelical church and ask the women what their main voting "hot buttons" are. Abortion will be in the top three. Interview evangelical men and abortion is lower on the list.
I have not met a single man who can grasp this concept.
Ambitious women are dangerous.
We need to figure out what's going on.
View attachment 6491873
This floored me. Just read how stupid it is.
View attachment 6491875
But you blame women for their flaws no problem.
Which brings me to this: hates women, shoes away from Jews:
View attachment 6491877
"Men don't need ambitious women"
View attachment 6491878
How many rich men take care of loser women? C'mon,how many? You think they're taking home trailer park fatties, or women like Melania Trump?
This is absolutely crazy. You have:
- What "we've" done to women, as if women as a group are completely incapable of changing or evolving or fluctuating apart from the control of men.
- A complete lack of understanding on what "ambition" means; they think it means they want a career, when in reality building a family is ambitious. Even trying to lose weight is an ambition. They can't measure up to women with any goals, at all.
- They aren't looking for an "equal." So they're looking for someone they can control and be in complete power over.
- "I feel bad for women" is a lie I see often from alt-right/dissident right men. It's an attempt at manipulation. They're saying that they feel bad for women for having standards and not being saddled to a mediocre man. Really, they see women as a resource (pussy) that is being wasted by not being hitched to a man.
- "Us men are trying" and yet you can't hold a candle to a woman with any sort of goals. Thanks for telling on yourself.
- "A successful man will take care of a loser woman." So a successful man would marry a fat woman who dropped out of high school and can't cook and doesn't work and is infertile due to her obesity yet refuses to lose weight? That kind of loser? Or are we again only thinking of ambition/success/loser in corporate definitions?
It’s pure evil and a lie told by men for men and boys.
Men are more likely to be raped by another man than falsely accused of rape. Men lie about rape more than any woman. Men constantly make false DV allegations and women have had their lives ruined because of it, and women have been murdered with false DV allegations used as a defence.
For every man who had a woman spread rumors that he abused her and had his friends and family ice him out, there are 50 women who were actually sexually assaulted by a man and were not able to obtain justice or get anyone to believe them.
For every man who was nonconsensually groped by a woman or otherwise sexually coerced, there are 500 women who where sexually assaulted by a man.
Men will say that they experience more DV than women (a flat-out lie), but unless a man is a paraplegic his life is not in danger from his wife throwing a plate or lamp at him. The moment a man gets mad enough to raise his hand at a woman, her life is in peril.
Men act like we're saying men can't be assaulted by women. It's within the realm of possibility, but it's so rare it's a nonissue. Who is groping, raping, and abusing men?
Other men.
All of us in this thread know a woman who was raped or beaten or treated as subhuman by virtue of our gender. Do any of us know a man who had his life ruined due to a rape allegation? Fired due to an inappropriate joke? Suffered abuse at the hands of a woman? And no, nagging is not abuse. I know of two male SA victims and both of them were victimized by men.
as an insult to the 
gesture.
