Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

Traits ( that ought) to exclude moids and scrotes from contributing to the genepool:
  • Bald
  • Weak jaw
  • Obese
  • Has a stinky butt (many such cases. SAD.)
  • Asks for anal/ butt stuff (giving or recieving)
  • Groypers
  • Purchases sex
  • Has EVER looked at porn
  • Not being Luigi BrowsMcDreamy
  • Has ANY career other than Lumberjack or Farmer
  • Bullies Women and Girls for fun
  • Can't find the clit
  • Thinks DV/rape is funny
  • Has "standards" for who they would rape (ie "you're too ugly to rape")
  • Mentions "divorce rape" (regardless of relationship/marital status)
Did I miss anything?
Hygiene, consooming, autism. If you have a dusty shitass room with trash and baubles everywhere, you shouldn't be allowed to have children.
 
Legion of Men is run by a 40 year old self help Romanian guru who encourages passport bro culture.
Screenshot_20250103-031328_(1).png
Least our robo husbandos can last longer than three thrusts 😉
 
Being a beard is OK because you were protecting men, yo. Context for this was an Arcane video, but I'm just focusing on the first point:
View attachment 6836773
"Being a beard isn't misogynistic. It's a vital role women serve because men can't be bothered to stop murdering each other if one likes sucking cock or taking things up the ass."
>A woman being a mule for a man, both emotionally and physically without any compensation for it is bad
Okay we can agree on that!
>A woman being a mule for a gay man, both emotionally and physically without any compensation is okay
because women would protect gay men from other men! You're doing a hecking gooderino thing!

....:lossmanjack:

Or maybe Neanderthal men who are homosexual in every way except physically should stop murdering rectum raiders because they envy these rectum raiders' ability to be homosexual in every way unlike them and also somehow feel "threatened" by them. But nah, why hold men accountable when you can just force a woman to be a labor mule?
 
Last edited:
Here's some cultural enrichment and wisdom from Indian men about women with tattoos for y'all.

These 'men' are batshit insane, I really cannot even say more at this point without going into a shizo-rant myself.

If any of these pictures are too NSFW (you don't really see anything, just underwear/legs in some pictures), please tell me and I'll throw them under a spoiler.

The post:
1736432451947.png

Some highlights from the comments:
1736432480839.png
1736432569050.png
1736432489308.png
1736432607513.png
1736432640894.png
1736432820228.png
1736432712997.png
1736432500866.png
1736432506642.png
1736432673953.png
 
Traits ( that ought) to exclude moids and scrotes from contributing to the genepool:
  • Bald
  • Weak jaw
  • Obese
  • Has a stinky butt (many such cases. SAD.)
  • Asks for anal/ butt stuff (giving or recieving)
  • Groypers
  • Purchases sex
  • Has EVER looked at porn
  • Not being Luigi BrowsMcDreamy
  • Has ANY career other than Lumberjack or Farmer
  • Bullies Women and Girls for fun
  • Can't find the clit
  • Thinks DV/rape is funny
  • Has "standards" for who they would rape (ie "you're too ugly to rape")
  • Mentions "divorce rape" (regardless of relationship/marital status)
Did I miss anything?
Owns pitbulls

Edit: I have thought of more while on break.
  • Doesn't wash his hands
  • Leaves the toilet seat up
  • Dribbles piss all over the bathroom
  • Only eats fast food
  • Doesn't know how to cook
  • Jew nose
  • Beer gut and bitch tits
  • "Male feminist"
  • Only drinks soda
  • Nintendo obsession
  • Employs weaponized incompetence
  • Pothead
  • Overly gay with male friends (butt buddies)
  • Becomes destructive when upset (breaks shit when he dies in vidya)
  • Has never scheduled his own doctor, dentist, or eye appointments
  • Unable to pick up the correct items at the grocery store
  • Cannot be in a store for more than 5 minutes without bitching and complaining
  • Draws, watches, or in anyway consumes anime
  • "Entrepreneur"
  • Refuses to ever buy new clothes or shoes unless mommy buys them for him
  • Redditor
  • Doesn't brush teeth
  • Choking, slapping, or hair-pulling during sex without consent first
  • Uncircumcised
There's definitely more I'm missing.
 
Last edited:
Is it really consent if it's prostitution? The top minds of reddit immediately wash their hands of any guilt by mutually agreeing to the fantasy that all prostitutes are in healthy and stable employment and have the freedom to decline clients at will and end the encounter whenever they start to feel unsafe. Add in manosphere types whining that blue collar MANLY MAN work is harder than sex work, "sex work is work" lefty sex offenders, and Marxist antiwork types acting like having to sell your body to a rapist is literally no different than picking up a shift at a Bath and Body Works cash register.
 
and Marxist antiwork types acting like having to sell your body to a rapist is literally no different than picking up a shift at a Bath and Body Works cash register.
Love me some "you're literally selling your body, what's the difference?" type arguments. Those are so retarded that I don't know whether I'm being trolled or predditors actually believe this crap.
 
Here's some cultural enrichment and wisdom from Indian men about women with tattoos for y'all.

These 'men' are batshit insane, I really cannot even say more at this point without going into a shizo-rant myself.

If any of these pictures are too NSFW (you don't really see anything, just underwear/legs in some pictures), please tell me and I'll throw them under a spoiler.

The post:
View attachment 6837935

Some highlights from the comments:
View attachment 6837937
View attachment 6837942
View attachment 6837938
View attachment 6837943
View attachment 6837944
View attachment 6837950
View attachment 6837949
View attachment 6837939
View attachment 6837940
View attachment 6837946
TL;DFR holy shit Anuspoo Rapeshra. I premaritally sexed over 9000 tattoo artists in the time it took me to get through this autism. Think of how many times youve deleted an effort post bc it felt too dramatic and then think of how many times this fag did not.

I am unfamiliar with this particular scrote but the fact that men who look like that can just exist online without being half as publicly shamed as the most average looking woman... it just pisses me the fuck off. I know women have been conditioned for eons to accept male fuglies but a new age is dawning and my feminist agenda is to let men know we don't like looking at uggos either, as a matter of fact. This bitch looks like he could eat an apple through a screen door. -2/10
 
Here's some cultural enrichment and wisdom from Indian men about women with tattoos for y'all.

These 'men' are batshit insane, I really cannot even say more at this point without going into a shizo-rant myself.

If any of these pictures are too NSFW (you don't really see anything, just underwear/legs in some pictures), please tell me and I'll throw them under a spoiler.

The post:
View attachment 6837935

Some highlights from the comments:
View attachment 6837937
View attachment 6837942
View attachment 6837938
View attachment 6837943
View attachment 6837944
View attachment 6837950
View attachment 6837949
View attachment 6837939
View attachment 6837940
View attachment 6837946
I've noticed that this stigma only exists around women with tattoos. If a woman gets a tattoo anywhere she's untrustworthy, mentally unstable, and a whore.
Meanwhile a lot of male athletes are tatted up like the yakuza and nobody shits on them for it.
 
Last edited:
Traits ( that ought) to exclude moids and scrotes from contributing to the genepool:
  • Bald
  • Weak jaw
  • Obese
  • Has a stinky butt (many such cases. SAD.)
  • Asks for anal/ butt stuff (giving or recieving)
  • Groypers
  • Purchases sex
  • Has EVER looked at porn
  • Not being Luigi BrowsMcDreamy
  • Has ANY career other than Lumberjack or Farmer
  • Bullies Women and Girls for fun
  • Can't find the clit
  • Thinks DV/rape is funny
  • Has "standards" for who they would rape (ie "you're too ugly to rape")
  • Mentions "divorce rape" (regardless of relationship/marital status)
Did I miss anything?
Yes. Wide hips.

It's a sign of obesity and poor muscle tone, Middle Eastern ethnicity, hormonal imbalances, medical conditions such as Klinefelter's, dreadful genetics, and just being generally poor prospects for reproduction.

None of these are acceptable qualities in a man.

If a man has wide hips, leave him.
(But only after making fun of his weird body.)
 
Today's Zawn Villines mailshot -
I’m in a baby loss support group. Every couple of weeks, the same thing will happen: a woman will share that, a day or two after her baby died, her husband screamed at and verbally abused her, never apologized, and continued a pattern of verbal abuse at the most awful time of her life. Other posters will chime in with similar stories.

And then they’ll all come to the same conclusion.

Is it that they need to leave their husbands? That their husbands are abusive?

No.

“Men grieve differently.”

Can you imagine a world in which men accepted, justified, and defended this behavior from women? Of course not. If women sleep an extra 2 minutes or forget to vacuum, they’re bad mothers. The notion of verbally abusing your spouse after a death is unfathomable. And defending that behavior? Truly ghastly.

We see this phenomenon any time women need anything from men—because, of course, a core belief of misogyny is that women are not allowed to want things, and that all women’s needs are really just wants.

When she’s just had a baby, it’s normal for him to ignore her needs—but if she asks him to make her a sandwich or expects him to do the majority of household labor when he’s ill or recovering from surgery, she’s a monster.

If he works full-time, he’s the breadwinner and that means she has to do everything else. If she also works full-time—or even if she’s the only one who works full-time—well, you can’t go expecting men to care for children, now can you?

If he’s neurodivergent, she’s expected to accommodate whatever he wants, no matter what he does, forever. If she’s neurodivergent, society weaponizes that against her and still expects her to do it all.

We’ve built an entire motherhood culture around defending men. We thank them for not hitting us, or for remembering (as we do, usually without thanks) that children need food. When they act badly, we claim that they have a different love language. Or we assume we just need to better understand them and their needs.

Even supposedly “feminist” authors don’t recognize exploitation of women’s time and labor as abuse—because even in leftist circles, we can’t fully grasp women’s humanity. We’re not willing to accept that men who steal their partners’ labor are stealing their partners’ lives.

Men are buying their free time with their partners’ exhaustion.

Abuse of pregnant and postpartum women isn’t just common; it’s normal.

The whole world wants to convince women that their feelings don’t matter, but that no matter what their husband does or says or neglects, his feelings are central.

Over and over, on post after post, I see the same tired bullshit.

“Sure, he does this objectively abusive thing, but I know he really loves me.”

The result is that marriage is terrible for women’s emotional, physical, and financial health.

Love has to actually mean something, or it is worthless. If love is just the label we put on abusive behavior to justify it, then love doesn’t matter.
And of course, if she ever threatens to leave, he’ll weaponize his “love.” He’ll cry, threaten her, threaten suicide, or maybe do all three at once. Or he’ll tell everyone she left for “no reason,” because living a life that makes her happy is, to him, not a valid reason.

If your husband can’t be bothered to pull his weight around the house, to care about your emotions, to listen to your needs and adapt, to treat you like a person who matters, to apologize when he was wrong, then the problem is not communication.

It’s not that you need to work harder to understand his needs.

It’s not that you need to communicate more, or better, or differently.

It’s not your hormones. No, you’re not too emotional or expecting too much.

It’s that he doesn’t love you.

We have to stop pretending that men who mistreat their partners and children. We have to stop believing their hollow insistence of love. We have to demand a world where love actually means something.

And we have to stop demanding perfect love from women when their partners can’t manage any love at all.

Love prioritizes the needs of the other person. And it’s something too few men are doing.

For too many men, a wife is not a person but a role—part servant, part sex doll, part emotional crutch.

You deserve more than to be someone’s servant.

If you’ve been trying to make things better for years, if he blows up every time you try to make a change, you are in an abusive relationship—even if there’s no hitting.

Abusers don’t love you.

Make a plan to get out.

You do not have to spend your one precious life on a man who doesn’t love you, when others will.

You do not have to suffer enough to earn the right to leave.

Treat your needs with the same respect you would treat his.

Women are human beings, too.

Women’s needs matter, too.

Maybe your husband doesn’t love you.

Considering the possibility may be the first step toward freedom.
 
Because they don't believe you're a person. You're a pet, a slave, a farm animal, an appliance and when you get down into the worst of the worst men you're a toilet and toilet paper.
This is why I encourage people to treat men like dogs. if they act like a whore, treat them like one. I've called so many men whores and useless, and they shut down completely. You can literally pick them up and put them down like a purse. As far as you should be concerned, they don't need to be in your house or near your friends. They're a hobby, not a career.
 
“Sure, he does this objectively abusive thing, but I know he really loves me.”

Love has to actually mean something, or it is worthless. If love is just the label we put on abusive behavior to justify it, then love doesn’t matter.

We have to stop pretending that men who mistreat their partners and children. We have to stop believing their hollow insistence of love. We have to demand a world where love actually means something.

Love prioritizes the needs of the other person. And it’s something too few men are doing.

I honestly feel like this general subject isn't spoken about enough--or, if it is, it's either in the most extreme situations imaginable (e.g. someone literally gets murdered), or it's brought up in a wishy-washy "Stand up for yourselves, ladies! Girl power!" way while nothing materially changes.

I have always been confused as to what the agreed-upon definition for "love" is supposed to be. This author is correct in saying that it changes definition depending on whether the "love" is coming from the man, or directed at the man. When it comes to "loving a man" (i.e. as a husband or father), I'm accustomed to it meaning "be a stuffed animal for him". Show any signs of being sentient and you no longer "love" him. They're like fussy children--if you don't do everything exactly as they like it, they throw a complete fit.

Meanwhile, for the man himself, "love" becomes such a nebulous concept. The only thing I can think of to compare it to is dark matter: we don't exactly have proof of it, but we just assume it's there. Men are given the benefit of the doubt that they "love" the people in their lives even if they never show it, because, well, of course he loves his wife and kids (whom he neglects/abuses)! Are you questioning his legitimacy as the almighty Man of the House? I think men's total failure to understand what love actually is is what also leads to their emotionally bankrupt "male friendships". Like ... yeah, those are my bros for life, bro! But he still runs to his wife for every ounce of emotional support he will ever need.

And as much as I hate to say it, women play their part in upholding this too. Take for example a family unit where the man treats both the wife and the kids like shit. I say from personal experience that, once the children have gotten old enough to see through their father's bullshit, there are wives who will take the side of their husband against the children because "can't you see he really loves you?" There needs to be a point at which the "love" defense no longer applies, because it means absolutely nothing to the person who is hurt. And we need to draw that line before the point at which someone is physically harmed--as if we still don't understand in this day and age that abuse comes in other forms.
 
Yes. Wide hips.

It's a sign of obesity and poor muscle tone, Middle Eastern ethnicity, hormonal imbalances, medical conditions such as Klinefelter's, dreadful genetics, and just being generally poor prospects for reproduction.

None of these are acceptable qualities in a man.

If a man has wide hips, leave him.
(But only after making fun of his weird body.)
Particularly the combo of wide hips x narrow shoulders. When I see a man who has that "pear" shaped body, it doesn't matter how handsome his face is, somehow my brain won't even register them as male, let alone a potential partner. Just a sexless being.
 
Yes. Wide hips.

It's a sign of obesity and poor muscle tone, Middle Eastern ethnicity, hormonal imbalances, medical conditions such as Klinefelter's, dreadful genetics, and just being generally poor prospects for reproduction.

None of these are acceptable qualities in a man.

If a man has wide hips, leave him.
(But only after making fun of his weird body.)
Reminder that Pakistan, Afghanistan and all those Middle Eastern countries will forever be shitholes because they cannot stop fucking their cousins.

Meanwhile even Israel fixed its inbreeding problem via therapeutic abortion, embryo selection and genetic testing. They had a massive Tay Sachs problem because the Ashkenazi Jewish population is descended from 350 individuals and they were big on cousin marriage. They drastically reduced its numbers and now are big proponents of positive eugenics. In most cases, even before you get married, you're encouraged to undergo genetic testing to see what genetic diseases you may carry - male or female. Haredis are a different problem but most Israeli citizens abide by these rules, even the semi religious ones. The Catholic Church forbade first and second cousin marriage among the citizens but of course nobles got away with it (and were punished a la Hapsburgs breeding themselves into retardation and sterility).
 
Back