DMZ ♀ Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

This thread is a DMZ (De-Moidified Zone) and is strictly for women. Men and trannies (men) shitting up the thread will be removed from the entire Lolcow Salon for a month.
Matt Walsh's latent faggotry is flaring up again:

He's far from the only "trad" "conservative" scrote who insists on "facts" which show women should not be trusted with childcare.

He rexitted this retard who gave per capita statistics on interracial homicides (note: this is nonsense, "per capita interracial homicide" transforms East Asians into murder machines).
"Women are more prone to violence against children" contains a related error: it does not factor in encounters, while "per capita interracial homicide" factors in encounters twice.

Men failing at math is a day ending in y, what's remarkable here is the dead npc brain that confidently asserts "facts" but is too npc to notice the immediate conclusions being the opposite of reality.

I notice typos and spelling mistakes IRL. Sometimes people (the visually impaired, and retards with good eyesight) wonder, "How did you spot this? Did you read this sign / price tag / whatever?" Of course I did, I glanced around and saw this bit of writing, and as soon as I saw it, I read it. I don't take a conscious decision to read a short inscription after I spot it.

But consider a small child who's just learning to read (or a foreign language learner parsing sentences). He sees letters and needs to slowly add them together to form words. This is conscious work.
What I'm saying is these scrotes are so bad at thinking that thoughts are work they'd rather not do.
I just don't understand his appeal to men. He's a complete fucking dork. It's like trying to sell Michael Berryman as a sex symbol. That dog don't hunt.
 
The amount of vitriol society shows towards young girls getting preyed upon by grown ass Moids is disgusting. I think back to the early 2000s and the teen pregnancy scare, and how no one bothered to address the elephant in the room.

That elephant in the room being that the majority of teen mothers were being sexually abused and impregnated by pedophiles; who half the time were family members being protected by other Moids in the family. Grooming was barely on the radar for these discussions in the media, because saying things to hurt pedophile’s feelings was going too far.

The media often made it sound like 12 year olds were walking around dressed like strippers and “tempting” older Moids. In reality, pedophiles don't care about how their victims are dressed.

Its also worth pointing out that the majority of women who talk about getting cat called had to deal with that shit when they were in their early teens the most; and the majority of catcallers being no younger than 30.

Fucking gross how much pedophiles are enabled.
 
I just saw an extremely based random_text.txt:

basedrandomquotes.png
 

Attachments

  • basedrandomquotes.png
    basedrandomquotes.png
    23.9 KB · Views: 15
Your reminder that 99.7% of men who claim abuse by women are actually abusive men, don't be confused by their bullshit!
If you were a man who had genuinely been terribly treated by a female partner – and we probably all know a guy that’s happened to – you would feel an instinctive sympathy with female victims, because you’d really get what they’ve been through.

And I have talked to some genuinely mistreated men, and that was, indeed, how they reacted; they come up to me and say things like, “I really get what you’re talking about, because I actually had a pretty similar experience.”

So I get immediately suspicious of a man who stands up angrily, and starts growling, “Why aren’t you talking about this happening to men?? This happened to me!!” This style of guy doesn’t express any caring about what is happening to women. Nor does he express any gratitude towards the women and men who are working to assist abused women and to stop abusers. There’s no sign that he feels any sense of common ground with abused women. So I don’t buy his story. I think what he’s really mad about is that we won’t shut up about what so many men are doing to women.
 
Your reminder that 99.7% of men who claim abuse by women are actually abusive men, don't be confused by their bullshit!
Like the type of guy who will gaslight and abuse a woman until she has a mental breakdown and then films it to post it on social media to show that she is "crazy" and he is the victim when she's laying on the floor wailing and pulling out her hair. Several such videos have gone viral already. You'll notice none of these women are attacking the man but injuring themselves and trying to get away from him while he goes "Look what I have to deal with!".

According to men women just snap and go craaayyyzeeee for no reason, she's just hysterical and needs a lobotomy! Women are just naturally irrational and emotional! Oh but a man who is a family anihilator was justified because the woman must have done something to drive him to doing that and must have somehow deserved it. 🙄
 
If the internet has given language and support to victims its also done the same for abusive men.
And as those of you who have read Why Does He Do That? have already heard me express, many of my most cruel and brutal clients were fond of saying that they were abused men. It’s become almost the norm among abusers to claim that they’re the victims.



Now I’ll turn to one of the hottest points of debate: Are there a lot of men out there being abused by women? Is it true that it happens to men almost as much as it happens to women?

No.

There are a lot of men out there being abused by their male partners, and for that matter a lot of women being abused by their female partners; abuse in same-sex relationships is a very real thing, apparently present in a similar percentage of relationships to what we find in straight relationships. And there are plenty of women who are rotten to their male partners, but it’s not the same as the other examples. Here are some key distinctions:



* The risk that a man will be killed by a woman is very low, and that risk vanishes almost completely once the relationship splits up. In other words, men aren’t trapped in heterosexual relationships out of the danger that they’ll get killed if they leave – a danger that is very real for abused women.

* Very few men are forced by their female partners to have sexual contact that they find disgusting or violent, or that they simply do no want. (Actually, none that I’ve ever encountered.) This is hugely significant, because sexual mistreatment is reported by many abused women to be the single most psychologically harmful, leaving the longest-lasting negative effects, of any aspect of how they were treated in the relationship.

* We don’t often hear of men losing jobs because of constant harassment at work by their partners, an experience that happens to abused women a lot; or men whose finances are manipuated so that all the money and property ends up in the woman’s hands; or men who aren’t allowed to see or talk to anyone.

And on and on.
Every time you see a space online where women are discussing these things you're gonna see these guys and their comments. Read them with the knowing that they are abusive men. See it for what it is, when most other female commenters are fawning over him and he isn't offering them any empathy or support, but when one questions or disagrees with him and he lashes out and calls her names and rages. Understand what you're seeing there, it's all too fucking obvious.
 
Like the type of guy who will gaslight and abuse a woman until she has a mental breakdown and then films it to post it on social media to show that she is "crazy" and he is the victim when she's laying on the floor wailing and pulling out her hair. Several such videos have gone viral already. You'll notice none of these women are attacking the man but injuring themselves and trying to get away from him while he goes "Look what I have to deal with!".

According to men women just snap and go craaayyyzeeee for no reason, she's just hysterical and needs a lobotomy! Women are just naturally irrational and emotional! Oh but a man who is a family anihilator was justified because the woman must have done something to drive him to doing that and must have somehow deserved it. 🙄
I watched the Gabby Petito Netflix documentary the other night and it drove me crazy seeing that bodycam footage of her so upset over the abuse that she's shaking and losing her mind, while he is relaxed and sheepish, "women amirite?" Yet he got treated with kid gloves and the hotel room for domestic violence victims, and she was looked at like a crazy bitch and had to spend the night alone on the road.

And his sister still had the audacity to post a memorial photo of him claiming he was the victim of DV and poor mental health.
 
News from Belgium.

GnqO1_sbkAA6APk.jpg

Yes, this man is studying to become a gynecologist. He is a RAPIST. And they don't want to ruin his future career of being in a position of power with naked vulnerable women examining their privates.

But tell me again how false accusations ruin men's lives when even real accusations that the man CONFESSES to don't even ruin his life.
 
Never forget that men and their "muh mentalzzz" are already massively coddled by society already.

Also never forget:
"An Epidemic of Disbelief
What new research reveals about sexual predators, and why police fail to catch them -By Barbara Bradley Hagerty"

"Clark tries to teach investigators to take a woman’s allegation of rape as seriously as they would a report of assault or robbery. But in private conversations afterward, he says, it becomes clear the message didn’t sink in: Officers continue to tell him they think that many women lie about being raped, and that their claims aren’t worth investigating. “This is that sort of intractable belief that we could not seem to shake.”"

"Mansfield [rape victim who worked as a prostitute] assumed they would run a background check on her, as well as on Washington. She was half correct. The officers looked at her record but not his, and sent the report to Lieutenant Michael Sauro, who headed Minneapolis’s sex-crimes unit. I recently met with Sauro, who is now retired, to discuss Mansfield’s case. He recalled seeing that she had a prostitution charge on her record. “I’m thinking, Whoa, wait a second here. How much resources am I going to spend if you’re that—how should I say—careless with your own self?” Sauro told me. “So after reading three or four paragraphs, I said, ‘To hell with this. We’re not going to spend any time on this.’ So that’s probably why I did not even waste my time running his criminal history.” - the article goes on to reveal that the man who raped her had been categorized as a level 3 sex offender and that was on his public record. But the officer didn't even bother to look into his background, because he had already decided that a rape victim was lying.

Next time you hear men complaining that Women falsely report rape all the time ask yourself: Are these women actually lying, or are the cops who were supposed to investigate this the one's deciding that she's lying and then writing down that she's lying without investigating? Even in the case of where, on paper, it says, it's a false accusation of rape there's a pretty good chance it just means that the cop didn't feel like listening to the Woman or doing his job.

"Katharine Tellis, a criminologist at California State University at Los Angeles, Spohn published an exhaustive report in 2012 that analyzed sexual-assault investigations and prosecutions in Los Angeles County. “We heard over and over detectives use the term righteous victim,” she told me. A woman who didn’t know her assailant, who fought back, who has a clean record and hadn’t been drinking or offering sex for money or drugs—that woman will be taken seriously. Spohn recalled a typical comment: “ ‘If I had a righteous victim, I would do all that I could to make sure that the suspect was arrested. But most of my victims don’t look like that.’ ”"

Except we also know that this righteous or perfect victim stuff isn't true either, go ask Gisèle Pelicot, who had to fight to have evidence of her crimes be shown in a way that the rapists could not turn away from, the judge wanted to deny her that right.

Do not ever forget that men built the system that hates you.
 
Last edited:
I'm just gonna complain here. States don't care about DV. Or the safety of most women. I've had to hear my friend talk about how she is terrified of her Stepdad (On drugs.) because he hits her Mom. The fact the state she is in has the person to live back with the abused is fucked.

On another topic. He also spoken about her private parts when she was still a kid. How can men get away with abusing women and the state doesn't do jack all to punish them for it.
 
Some interesting comments pointing out that he probably never had this fetish until he found out she did not like this or want to do this, and forcing her to do something she hates turned him on.
I am reminded of a video I watched on Deviantart about weird fetish shit. There was something I noticed that these fetishes all had in common: degrading women.

99% of vore involves women and children being eaten alive. Most transformation related fetishes involve women having their bodies changed against their will. Most of the subjects are never consenting.

It all boils down to the sadistic desire to degrade and humiliate women. Most fetishists are autistic Moids that are repellant to women around them.
 
That disgusting coom-brained porn-sick literal-pissbaby rapemoid makes me MATI. This is why the whole moid rights cry that "she probably consented but then changed her mind!" excuse is one I will never ever accept, because these fucking apes push and nag and beg and cajole, and won't take even a clear and obvious no for an answer, and then when she's finally like "fine, I'll do it once to show you that your magic piss is not any better" he's like "you're only upset because you are making a big deal about it." Literally rapist logic. I will believe all women every time, because even the vanishingly few times maybe a woman really is using a rape accusation to be manipulative, statistically, he's still probably done FAR worse (or wanted to).
 
few times maybe a woman really is using a rape accusation to be manipulative

The thing is, if you look into any famous cases where this has happened, it is usually because some moid bent the rules to try to make a buck. A good example is the Duke Lacrosse case. Under normal circumstances, since it was super obvious that the rape accusations were bullshit, it would have been dismissed quickly. It should have been dismissed quickly. But a moid prosecutor and a moid lawyer thought that it was worth hyping up to further their careers and maybe make some money.

If the system had worked as it should do, it would have been a nothing burger, no evidence, dismissed. Because we absolutely do not live in a system that favors women or tries to make a case for them when there is none. No way, no how, ever.

But in this case, moids kept the case alive for their own personal reasons. Male lawyers with clout and money sensed a 'case' that could be exploited for their own selfish gains.

And now because a bunch of moids didn't do their jobs properly it's a famous example of WOMEN lying. Riddle me that. Oh, wait, it's not a riddle, it's because the world hates women.
 
faggots.jpg

Huh.
That's funny.
I don't see chinless faggots running for the kitchen and child rearing? Men yearn for the office so much they run off on their wife and kids with an unburdened secretary. It's not gaslighting if it's actually true.

Do it, faggot. I dare you. Show me how much better it is to take care of a gaggle of kids with no income and a overbearing husband. That quarter wit dick sucker would snap so fast it would end in a family annihilation.
 
View attachment 7185975

Huh.
That's funny.
I don't see chinless faggots running for the kitchen and child rearing? Men yearn for the office so much they run off on their wife and kids with an unburdened secretary. It's not gaslighting if it's actually true.

Do it, faggot. I dare you. Show me how much better it is to take care of a gaggle of kids with no income and a overbearing husband. That quarter wit dick sucker would snap so fast it would end in a family annihilation.
It drives me insane that men hate women doing anything except rearing children, then they turn around and complain that women never contributed to society. What do they actually want?
 
View attachment 7185975

Huh.
That's funny.
I don't see chinless faggots running for the kitchen and child rearing? Men yearn for the office so much they run off on their wife and kids with an unburdened secretary. It's not gaslighting if it's actually true.

Do it, faggot. I dare you. Show me how much better it is to take care of a gaggle of kids with no income and a overbearing husband. That quarter wit dick sucker would snap so fast it would end in a family annihilation.
This has got to be one of the most retarded things they keep repeating. YOU have a boring unfulfilled job you hate, quit projecting scrote :story:
"Still kinda blows my mind that women fought for the right to have their own income instead of being an obligatory housemaid sex slave to an ugly abusive scrote who has a wageslave income" shut the fuck up retard lol
 
fag flags.jpgfag hag.jpg

I'll admit to being on ovarit from when it started - and this happened there a lot too.

SO, I get being against fag days and flags and the whole virtue signaling charade... But there's a weird vitriol that radfems and gc women have against asexuality.

I just love how JK needs to get a little gay cock in her mouth while denouncing asexuality. You'll disagree with SOME fag days but the pedo turd burglers still should get to parade in public. At this point in my life I'd rather asexual people tell me 'they don't fancy a shag' rather than having pup play pedos and bug chasers in public.

But good for you, JK. Good to know that you still think that the aids class is anywhere near allies with women. They'll love to have your support for surrogacy, degeneracy, and using women as men typically do. If you need their support, forget their number.

Jesus JK, gay men are men. ICK
 
View attachment 7185975

Huh.
That's funny.
I don't see chinless faggots running for the kitchen and child rearing? Men yearn for the office so much they run off on their wife and kids with an unburdened secretary. It's not gaslighting if it's actually true.

Do it, faggot. I dare you. Show me how much better it is to take care of a gaggle of kids with no income and a overbearing husband. That quarter wit dick sucker would snap so fast it would end in a family annihilation.
Men don't understand that domestic labor is actual labor. It takes work, to maintain both a family and a household. It is daily work with no pay, no time off, and little to no appreciation. They look down their noses at SAHM because they don't value their labor, but then when they have to watch the children and clean the house for a few days they can't handle it.

Screenshot 2025-04-06 2.43.16 PM.png
 
Back