Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate & Woman-Hate Thread-Hate Thread

No pussy communism?
So it's pussy capitalism? It's a free market and you're allowed to make a choices.

So why would you make the worst possible choice?

Lol abortpilled
Yeah I was brainwashed by "equality " rhetoric into thinking men were equally responsible for reproduction and didn't understand that it was 100% up to me, also retardedly dating an older man. I did mention I was young didn't I, dumb af tbh would go back in time and beat me for this mistake lmao
Women are 100% responsible for reproduction and men should play no role in it beyond the cum.
 
1721848542539.png
/thread
 
This type of post is healing the community.

Thank you for your service.

No pussy communism?
So it's pussy capitalism? It's a free market and you're allowed to make a choices.

So why would you make the worst possible choice?

Lol abortpilled
Wait.... wtf lmao these two posts one after the other is gold.
 
Men are just mad that it's not pussy communism anymore aka every man gets a woman of his own.
There was never such a thing in human history.
Yes it is, don't argue.
I can't believe you're still fixated on unrelated shit from 2022 dude.
Anyway, have it your way, grats on winning the argument without one.
 
Last edited:
Both threads have attracted all kinds of retardation to the site and lead to this stupid autistic civil war that gives the jannies extra work.

At the same time, it's lead to some absolutely hilarious pink triangles and halals on both ends, so, I'd say it evens out or is even a net gain for the site's mission.
 
Texas law does not forbid D&E of dead fetuses; it forbids abortion of a fetus with a detectable heartbeat. I a
I see you didn't watch the vids. That's okay, I'll lay it out then:

It forbids abortions. This includes medically required abortions (which are termed thus) required to remove a miscarriage. This is what the vids are highlighting.


But hey if you want it more clean cut...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abo...llegal,not explicitly constitute an exception.

"December 2023, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that a pregnant woman whose fetus was diagnosed with a fatal condition and whose pregnancy posed a threat to her health could not be permitted to receive an abortion.[3] In June 2024, the Texas Supreme Court further upheld the state's criminalization of abortion.[9]"

Sorry I left it to the vids to get the message across. I am a busy girl.
I asked for an example of an actual law, not someone who is "nervous."
but why is he nervous? It isn't magical pixies he's afraid of. No, the abortion law is to muddled, too strict, and leads to it being interpreted as leaving a dead or dying feotus in a woman until the health risk is that severe.

Isn't the law supposed to be clean cut? Understandable? Why do medical professionals have to deal with all this nonsense? And if you want to stand by the strict law still, why not fight for it to be a bit more concise on allowing a miscarriage to be removed?

Learn to read. You've tried and failed twice now to find an example of a state where extracting dead fetuses is illegal and failed, because, guess what, no state has such a law. You're a hysterical retard who thinks her fantasies are real life.
I see from your attitude you're not in this for religious reasons
I've seen what they have to say and it's all retarded. Spiteful women
So you admit that abortion bans do not result in a bunch of 6 year olds, ever so thankful of being "spared" but instead more angry liberals?

Perfect. There are some things conservative parties are right in. But the extreme restrictions on abortion will just push people towards your left

forced to reconcile with the reality that they can't have frivolous sex without consequence any longer. Cry me a fucking river.
If you're so salty about promiscuous sex, why not ban pre marital sex then? Why not leave the abortion rights to the doctors, who know more than laymen do? Stick to the social issues, leave anything requiring medicine out of it.



But muh rape, but muh incest,
So why not relax the stance on at least those two issues?

Absolutely miniscule consideration.

But muh medical needs!
So why not relax the the stance regarding medical issues?



Not a single state that makes it illegal for a pregnancy for a dead fetus to be terminated. The one instance I think it would be okay to have a child terminated is if the mother will die if she has it.
See above

Because of retarded liberal politics that are systematically destroying said countries. What kind of argument is this?
all of them? 😂 No, some of them have conservative government. But I guess it isn't the extreme takes you have so for you they'd be liberal? 🤔

Maybe that's why they get voted in.

Any way, you go down the street and see an asshole, you see an asshole. See everyone is an asshole, maybe you're the asshole.
Not necessarily gets them off but that they relish the chance to escape the consequences of frivolous sex and whore culture. Women and accountability etc;
Oh come on, you honestly think the whole world is like that? Don't you think you're a little obsessed with "whore culture" a bit much? Don't you think you're going down the rabbit hole here?
Women frame it as a point of independence but what they actually want is a lack of consequence. Women are also largely immoral so if the choice is between something heinous but 'liberating' or something moral but responsible the majority will choose the former every time because they're retarded.
See everyone is an asshole, maybe you're the asshole.....
do. The crap conditions of my country are a direct result of retarded foids using their voting powers with utter irresponsibility.
So, out of curiosity, how are you going to vote to fix the insane medical bills/lack of access able medical help in the usa?

How about the insane working conditions there?

Or do those things not concern you? Why do you think your country is a laughing stock?
 
that gives the jannies extra work.
Does it really though? If that's the case why don't they simply ban the users shit flinging, or maybe create a thread where they can actually shit fling. Right now they're segmented in little echo chambers seething and malding at each other without any real catharsis. Why not make a thread or hell even a board specifically for this shit?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: crazedaze
So you admit that abortion bans do not result in a bunch of 6 year olds, ever so thankful of being "spared" but instead more angry liberals?
No? It quite literally would lead to more six year olds. This is why there's no point in arguing with women you just misread and make retarded shit up then argue against stuff that wasn't even said.

No, some of them have conservative government.
Name a single European country with a government more conservative than America.
Oh come on, you honestly think the whole world is like that?
The parts of the world I care about are like that. And no, I'm not too concerned with whore culture, I'm simply stating the obvious to anyone that isn't a brain-addled retard.
See everyone is an asshole, maybe you're the asshole....
Sure, I'm an asshole, but only insofar that I actually say what needs to be said. I don't kill babies so by default that makes me better and less of an asshole than most foids.
So, out of curiosity, how are you going to vote to fix the insane medical bills/lack of access able medical help in the usa?
Goalposts? What are those?

Try to use all that strong girlbrain power to stay on topic. I know the average woman has the attention span of an especially stupid dalmation but you could at least try to avoid spearing off into completely unrelated issues.
 
Both threads have attracted all kinds of retardation to the site and lead to this stupid autistic civil war that gives the jannies extra work.

At the same time, it's lead to some absolutely hilarious pink triangles and halals on both ends, so, I'd say it evens out or is even a net gain for the site's mission.
all of my favorite users involved have ended up getting banned leaving only the dogshit users(as well as myself) so I don't see it as any sort of gain.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: AgendaPoster
No? It quite literally would lead to more six year olds. This is why there's no point in arguing with women you just misread and make retarded shit up then argue against stuff that wasn't even said.
Au contraire...




So, good going.
Name a single European country with a government more conservative than America.
What? Now why the bloody hell would I do that? 😂 Did you not read my post? See below...

all of them? 😂 No, some of them have conservative government. But I guess it isn't the extreme takes you have so for you they'd be liberal? 🤔
I admitted myself they would not "be as conservative as usa" do I don't know what your point is. And why being more extreme is even something yo be proud of.

Heck, why you worry about the European countries specifically is bizarre.

Are you over worked too? 🤔 Who am I kidding, you live in the usa. You're probably stuck with the shittiest hours.
The parts of the world I care about are like that.
Must be a very small part of the world. What is it, your basement?

A small world for a small mind.


And no, I'm not too concerned with whore culture, I'm simply stating the obvious to anyone that isn't a brain-addled retard.
You're the one who brought it up. For someone who accuses pro-choicers as being angry and bitter you seem to be very angry and bitter yourself.

Why not just admit this is all some petty vendetta again women?


Sure, I'm an asshole, but only insofar that I actually say what needs to be said. I don't kill babies so by default that makes me better and less of an asshole than most foids.
As an individual no. But as an individual I have never had sex, never had an abortion nor put anyone at risk via sex. So by your logic as an individual I'm better than you.

Then again if you want to be judged along with the other activists, looking at those infant mortality rates, maybe you're a baby killer than I could ever be.... 🤔
Goalposts? What are those?

Try to use all that strong girlbrain power to stay on topic. I know the average woman has the attention span of an especially stupid dalmation but you could at least try to avoid spearing off into completely unrelated issues.
The fuck you on about? 😂

Look, I do not live in the usa. All I see are snippets that show it's a madhouse. For example:



So when people here say society is falling and how terrible it is I figure this is what they mean. Why else would you admit the country is crap?

Anyway.. I have already said conservative governments are sometimes right on the odd issue. For all I know Republicans have some method of fixing the medical /work issues. I don't know 🤷‍♀️.

So genuinely, I'd like to know if this is what you mean by the usa being crap, you voting to fix it, and wonder if we're even on the same page. Or if you're ignoring these issues and maulding over some nothing thing instead.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6229732

BPGoon requires your answer...
Better yet hello white christian male pro lifer i have put a biologically yours child in bdp whore you pumped and dump the family courts demand 50/50 custody due to parental rights with addition to pay child support for her . You have 48 hours to marry this woman and take responsibility for where your dick went or push for abortion of your child.
 
Could you elaborate? Is the anonymous sperm donation model of reproduction close to this ideal you've stated?
Men definitely don't need a voice regarding abortion, because men's nature is to seek the fuck and they need women to spread their genes; so inescapable fucking and abortion bans are absolutely concordant with men's nature. Births are supposed to be moderated by women's desire for the fathers (and desire for sex at all). Womens libido? Naturally lower than men's.
There needs to be a strong community of women, so that women get their love from other women and don't need to desperately seek it from a man, something men are ill-equipped to give them given their natural drive for sex. Women need resources for their children, so resource hoarding by men such as in both communism and capitalism are unnatural. Frankly since the advent of agriculture we're a domesticated animal, nothing is natural.
The "drive to dominate and control" is not a universal human characteristic. For millennia and across many cultures, domination and "power over" have been seen as inherently masculine, and celebrated as evidence of manhood. The drive for "power over" plays a central role in patriarchal societies – which ours still is – and it is unabashedly sex-linked. Man's "drive to dominate and control" has always been dangerous to women, children, other men, and other living things. But women have been ignored, ridiculed, and silenced, often brutally, for daring to point that out.
Agriculture itself is an attempt to dominate nature, to make our own food instead of eat what's available so that our population is under some control, and it gives men power over women. Of course this is good for the comfort of the few men who don't end up as slaves, who get an ease of living from exploiting the labor of others, enabled by agriculture, but it's universally bad for women and it's disastrous for our genepool, which is a proxy for our long-term success as a species.
Men's nature is to spread their genes, period. Infinite growth mindset. End result: India.
The community of women should raise the kids together, and we should be much more discerning than we are about who we breed with to keep the gene pool strong.
Women are more invested in their kids, it's biology. Men are more horny and should have to use that as motivation to make the effort to prove that they're worthy by really making himself irresistible.
Genetic Evidence for Unequal Effective Population Sizes of Human Females and Males
As an explanation for the observed differences in the genealogies of the human NRY and mtDNA, we favor a model in which the human effective population size is skewed toward an excess of females by sex-biased demographic processes.
Here's a link to an article where a man is skeptical of this finding, his evidence seems to be
I suspect a misrepresentation of the study.
Then one of his commenters goes
Wilder et al conclude that women outnumber men in human ancestry, but they do not conclude that the ratio is two to one. They make a different conclusion about a two to one ratio, which Baumeister incorrectly restates.
I believe he's referring to this:
In conclusion, our results indicate that the human NRY tends to have an approximately twofold smaller Ne and TMRCA than mtDNA within human populations.
I'm no geneticist so I'm not what conclusion I can pull from that but, I think the data at least does support the idea that reproduction is naturally harder for men than for women and that monogamy is a modern invention, one that gives men the power over the womb. The desire and prevalence of cheating is evidence to me that humans aren't naturally monogamous. Animals can do monogamy, and those animals generally have low sexual dimorphism.
Sexual dimorphism is often caused through evolution in response to male male competition and female choice. Source
One man to one woman in an isolated home together obviously gives too much power to men, due to our biological differences. A lot of men don't want and can't handle the pressures of family life. Because it's not in their nature.
 
Back