Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate & Woman-Hate Thread-Hate Thread

Oh also, unironically the best thing to come from this is I was made aware of Lidl Drip's existence. She's quickly risen with AnOnimous of people who post here, who I can disagree with on things heavily, but appreciate them immensely.
Like what exactly? AnOminous has consistently smart takes. What posts from LidlDyke do you consider to be worthy of note?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AIKA
Like what exactly? AnOminous has consistently smart takes. What posts from LidlDyke do you consider to be worthy of note?
I can't say I have a specific one for either of them that stands out, I just appreciate how much both of them drive people absolutely insane.

Also I would point out that when one encounters AnOminous in the wild, he's usually talking about a specific thread. When one encounters Lidl Drip, its usually because she's sperging out against retards who are sperging out, which is pretty entertaining.

Granted, I might be weird, I place Woman haters as equally retarded as Man Haters so I really don't have a pony in the who's worse race. Both sides are pretty retarded.
 
I swear to god one of these days I’m going to enact violence
LMAO even. You gonna kill some kids in the womb? Or gonna poison some old ass dude while he lays unresponsive in his hospital bed? Cuz that's about the closest you're gonna get to a able-bodied man who doesn't break your wrist when you raise a hand to him, so you can scream to Big Daddy Gubment about how you're a victim.

Take some fuckin' responsibility, if you know the word.

thot.jpeg
 
You yourself said that you only want women around so you can fuck us, an act which men think is so degrading that we women become useless, grotesque , and hateful to you in your post-nut “”clarity””.
This is not the take I thought would happen but in hindsight, I guess my wording does make it sound that by "be with them" meant "have sex with them". That actually wasn't my intention. Rather I meant I wanted to be around them, to be in a social circle with them. I doubt you will find this explanation to be convincing, but I thought I should at least mention it.

The other jibber-jabber is typical feminist talking points that have been disproven a long time ago.
 
Women had no input in developing craftsmanship, language, or culture, silly! We just sat by in a state of suspended animation, incubating the children, while men did all that, and then patiently waited for them to magnanimously let us in on it. :story:
Name me a poet from circa 3000 B.C. to 800 B.C. that was not a man.
 
and it fits that the barbarians - who have way more badass women like Fredegonde and Brunehilda - took over.
So how would you explain the fact that the Eastern Roman Empire/Byzantium got taken over by Muslims who treated their women worse (had less freedom) when compared to Christian women of any Christian denomination?
 
Absolutely. Men created language, spoken and written.
So no woman made a vocal sound before men allowed them to? No women dared to scratch some tallies into a rock? You realize how idiotic that sounds, right?

You're gonna be threadbanned before long but I figure we should have fun with you for now, since you're the most brain dead moid currently in this thread. Keep saying wrong things with confidence, it's genuinely funny.
 
and routinely raped and murdered by child soldiers is not the kind of society I think we should aspire to.
I have no idea what you mean other than the late stages of the Agoge when trainees had to kill a helot without being scene. If found out, the trainee is killed for dishonour. There's nothing about rape of female helots.
 
So no woman made a vocal sound before men allowed them to? No women dared to scratch some tallies into a rock? You realize how idiotic that sounds, right?
Name me a poet from circa 3000 B.C. to circa 600 B.C. who is not a man.

Language has to do with the ability to discern things and categorise them accordingly. The first to do this were the men of our species, this isn't disputed.
 
If I had a time machine the first thing I'd do is go beat off in the middle of teutoburgerwald while pieces of dead Romans are still nailed to all the trees,
Clearly the act of a more civilised person, that uses the Roman script and his line of thinking is undoubtedly formed from Christian thought, that was made possible through the patronage of the Roman state, that his own nation desperately wanted to emulate not even 50 years ago.
 
Language has to do with the ability to discern things and categorise them accordingly. The first to do this were the men of our species, this isn't disputed.
girls learn to speak sooner than boys and outperform them in literacy studies too, i think you're a great example of men's poor reading skill, see the box on the top of the page? Try to read that slowly, I'm sure you can figure out what it says.
 
Name me a poet from circa 3000 B.C. to circa 600 B.C. who is not a man.

Language has to do with the ability to discern things and categorise them accordingly. The first to do this were the men of our species, this isn't disputed.
If you're going on written records that have survived that long aka purposefully preserved by other humans, you would be right that only writing by males has survived or had been bothered to be saved. That however is a product of societal subjugation of women that was happening even back then. There was no doubt countless writings from women at the time (and all of history tbh) that were unceremoniously tossed out by male archivists and to think otherwise is to be utterly wrong.

Also, who do you think was feeding those poets? Who do you think was taking care of their basic needs while they wrote these masterpieces that supposedly invented language? I'll wait.
 
Back