Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate & Woman-Hate Thread-Hate Thread

Probably. But that's if it's even worth doing that. Some will, some won't. The whole point of this is to nuke the economy from orbit and force it to recover very quickly. Long term, everything you just said will happen.

Meh, can't post Ws all the time. I ain't dying on the hill of a bad take.
Total destruction rather than adjustment - good plan.

Men comprise 26% of teachers and 14% of nurses. 37% of commercial bankers are women; 36-63% of people employed by top banks are women. 51% of credit union CEOs are women. Nearly 40% of lawyers are women. 66% of customer service people are women. Women dominate registered nurses, dental hygenists, dental assistants, medical record/health info people, and medical assistants. Women hold 51.8% of managerial, professional and related occupation positions overall. Women hold nearly 62% of accountant and auditor positions.

You going to repurpose ship deckhands and heavy equipment operators (the two most male-dominated professions) as accountants and lawyers?

Good fucking luck.

Nursing would be the only sector negatively affected.
>clerks
Calling them useless would be a compliment as they're a fucking drain on resources.
See above.
 
Total destruction rather than adjustment - good plan.

Men comprise 26% of teachers and 14% of nurses. 37% of commercial bankers are women; 36-63% of people employed by top banks are women. 51% of credit union CEOs are women. Nearly 40% of lawyers are women. 66% of customer service people are women. Women dominate registered nurses, dental hygenists, dental assistants, medical record/health info people, and medical assistants. Women hold 51.8% of managerial, professional and related occupation positions overall. Women hold nearly 62% of accountant and auditor positions.

You going to repurpose ship deckhands and heavy equipment operators (the two most male-dominated professions) as accountants and lawyers?

Good fucking luck.


See above.
Without those jobs we've be more productive..Like I said, only nursing would be hurt. Maybe teaching but the smart kids can teach themselves through youtube these days
 
Total destruction rather than adjustment - good plan.

Men comprise 26% of teachers and 14% of nurses. 37% of commercial bankers are women; 36-63% of people employed by top banks are women. 51% of credit union CEOs are women. Nearly 40% of lawyers are women. 66% of customer service people are women. Women dominate registered nurses, dental hygenists, dental assistants, medical record/health info people, and medical assistants. Women hold 51.8% of managerial, professional and related occupation positions overall. Women hold nearly 62% of accountant and auditor positions.
You've honestly convinced me that we really would be better off with less women in the workforce.

I'm not very sympathetic to bankers or middle managers.
 
better yet make divorce financially ruinous for women.
It is.
Women’s household income falls by an average of 41% following a divorce, while men’s household income falls by only 23%.


if the default of divorce didn't include forced financial exchange and custody of children was joint-custody by default or even if it was just as common for men to get custody as it is for women then men would be less hesitant to take the risk.
Most courts seek shared parenting time, whether or not it's enshrined in law as a rebuttable presumption. And:
On average, a typical divorced dad living in a red state will see his child 400 fewer hours each year than a blue-state dad and 700 fewer hours than a purple-state dad. Divorced dads in purple states receive an average of 40.2% of custody time as standard ― or about 3,500 hours. Blue-state dads receive about 3,200 hours (36.6%), while red-state dads only get about 2,800 hours in a typical parenting arrangement (32.1%).

In 20 states the usual division of parenting time is 50-50 (percentages in the table are average dad-time):

RankStatePct
# 1Alaska50%
# 1Arizona50%
# 1Colorado50%
# 1Connecticut50%
# 1Delaware50%
# 1Florida50%
# 1Kentucky50%
# 1Maine50%
# 1Massachusetts50%
# 1Minnesota50%
# 1Missouri50%
# 1Nevada50%
# 1New Hampshire50%
# 1New Jersey50%
# 1New Mexico50%
# 1North Dakota50%
# 1Vermont50%
# 1Virginia50%
# 1West Virginia50%
# 1Wisconsin50%
# 21Alabama33.7%
# 22Texas33%
# 23Nebraska32.9%
# 24California32.8%
# 25Hawaii31%
# 26New York30.4%
# 27Indiana28.8%
# 28Oregon28.7%
# 29Wyoming28.6%
# 30Iowa28.3%
# 31Pennsylvania28.8%
# 32Arkansas28.1%
# 33North Carolina27.9%
# 34South Carolina27.8%
# 35Michigan27.1%
# 36Kansas26.4%
# 37Utah26.2%
# 38Maryland26.1%
# 39Montana26%
# 40Louisiana25.4%
# 41Idaho24.1%
# 42Rhode Island24%
# 43Washington23.8%
# 44Ohio23.7%
# 45South Dakota23.6%
# 46Georgia23.5%
# 47Illinois23.1%
# 48Mississippi23%
# 49Oklahoma22.4%
# 50Tennessee21.8%

https://www.custodyxchange.com/topics/research/dads-custody-time-2018.php (note the table above is based on that company's info, so the sample is not all divorces with children).

Also note that "time with kids" and "custody" are different terms. You can have "joint custody" without having equal parenting time, and vice-versa. Both physical and legal custody being joint have been the preferred direction by many courts for decades, and those numbers continue to increase.


You've honestly convinced me that we really would be better off with less women in the workforce.

I'm not very sympathetic to bankers or middle managers.
Lawyers, accountants, customer service, nurses, teachers? (I left out childcare workers, bc with women at home, daycare and after-school programs can go hang, right?). Don't need to defend or assert your rights, do your taxes, keep books for your business, have a commercial complaint or question, get in to see a doc, have an operation, or send your kids to school outside your home, because you wouldn't be able to do so. And tell me about the ability to get a medical appointment without medical assistants, administrators, or coding pros. And never need eldercare, because no one will be there for you.

But tell me about this deckhand-to-PA or accountant pipeline.

(And don't confuse commercial bankers with ibankers or supposed banking fat-cats. Commercial bankers are the people getting you your home, auto, and equipment loans, not the ones doing deals that individually impact industries or wreck companies. Yes, predatory lending and lack of transparency/disadvantage to consumers happens from commercial bankers, too, but when you gut compliance, legal, and risk (heavily women-populated), you - individually and as a class/consumer will be harmed. You think it's bad now? Without those functions, not only would consumers be raped, but solid banks would go out of business. Because sales and ops people have neither the knowledge nor the taste for prudence or fairness or transparency. It's a different set of wires altogether.)
 
You've honestly convinced me that we really would be better off with less women in the workforce.

I'm not very sympathetic to bankers or middle managers.

Back before women entered the workforce en masse, we simply could not do stuff like conquer globe-spanning maritime empires, build the intercontinental railroad system, invent modern medicine, break the sound barrier, and put a man on the moon and do the real work a modern economy needs, such as constructing powerful human resources departments to schedule corporate Pride Month observances.

Look at this chart of administrators per doctor. Could we possibly meet the modern need to have over twenty administrators per doctor without women in the workforce? As FoDP rightly points out, it would be impossible to see a doctor without these layers and layers of women doing the hard work of...uh...administration...stuff. Before 1964, you couldn't even see a doctor! There were no doctors at all, actually. Why? Because there wasn't enough administration yet. Three cheers for women!

1716353372951.png
 
Back before women entered the workforce en masse, we simply could not do stuff like conquer globe-spanning maritime empires, build the intercontinental railroad system, invent modern medicine, break the sound barrier, and put a man on the moon and do the real work a modern economy needs, such as constructing powerful human resources departments to schedule corporate Pride Month observances.

Look at this chart of administrators per doctor. Could we possibly meet the modern need to have over twenty administrators per doctor without women in the workforce? As FoDP rightly points out, it would be impossible to see a doctor without these layers and layers of women doing the hard work of...uh...administration...stuff. Before 1964, you couldn't even see a doctor! There were no doctors at all, actually. Why? Because there wasn't enough administration yet. Three cheers for women!

View attachment 6009444

37% (and growing) of doctors are women.
 
Lawyers, accountants, customer service, nurses, teachers? (I left out childcare workers, bc with women at home, daycare and after-school programs can go hang, right?). Don't need to defend or assert your rights, do your taxes, keep books for your business, have a commercial complaint or question, get in to see a doc, have an operation, or send your kids to school outside your home, because you wouldn't be able to do so. And tell me about the ability to get a medical appointment without medical assistants, administrators, or coding pros. And never need eldercare, because no one will be there for you.
Most of those jobs aren't needed. When I worked for the public sector I realized most admin roles are there simply to hire women and minorities whose job could be done by one white guy. There's a lot of paperwork just there to create a job for someone to stamp. We've significantly increased the number of administrative roles in medical and something some of my family who've worked in medicine have talked to be about.

When the pandemic hit it wad woman most affected by job loss because it's men that keep our infrastructure running. Physical is overwhelming men (sewage, electrical, structural) and the digital (which I was a part of during the pandemic is mostly men even though women don't have the excuse of being physically weaker for that job. When we switched back to part time in office, part time teleworking most of the women at my job didn't need to come back because they were in administrative roles that didn't need to be in office 90% of the time.

If we'd get an actual libertarian president who'd cut the bloat in federal government it would be women most affected since administrative roles are just there.
 
You going to repurpose ship deckhands and heavy equipment operators (the two most male-dominated professions) as accountants and lawyers?

Good fucking luck.
Stop it. You're making my terrible idea seem like a good idea. I don't know why you people insist on defending my not exactly well thought out idea. Statements like these defend my idea better than I ever could.

And tell me about the ability to get a medical appointment without medical assistants, administrators, or coding pros. And never need eldercare, because no one will be there for you.
All of these are jobs men could do. For higher wages. Or are useless jobs altogether. Women also make up the majority of HR, which every company would be better off without. Besides, if all women can do is stay home and have children, the need for elder care plummets. Children can take care of their elderly parents. Those jobs don't go away, their need gets reduced though. Also, men are better at that job anyway. That job requires strength, and that strength is something women just don't have.

Honestly I wasn't willing to die on the hill of my stupid idea. Now you're convincing me I was right and it was a good idea and we need to kick women out of the work force. Thank you.

37% (and growing) of doctors are women.
I also can't help but notice as I get older majority of doctors and nurses are completely fucking retarded and have only gotten worse over time. Hmm....I wonder if these two things are correlated. 🤔
 
Heyyyyyyyyyyyyy wtf.
No more happy pills prescriptions for you!
On a side note, now that you mention it- what is with the fucking happy pills? You don't need them. You know what makes me happy? I go for a walk on a warm summer morning and enjoy the sun rise. I have my morning coffee. I enjoy barbecue for dinner. It's not difficult to be fucking happy when you learn to just enjoy the world around you and love the simple things. If you need happy pills and don't have serious problems, you're legit retarded.

And let's face it, the people with real problems usually aren't the ones on happy pills...
 
On a side note, now that you mention it- what is with the fucking happy pills? You don't need them. You know what makes me happy? I go for a walk on a warm summer morning and enjoy the sun rise. I have my morning coffee. I enjoy barbecue for dinner. It's not difficult to be fucking happy when you learn to just enjoy the world around you and love the simple things. If you need happy pills and don't have serious problems, you're legit retarded.
"You don't need pills to be happy, just eat some really nice oranges and watch a sunrise or something" are the words of a man who's never had a taste of really fire pills.
 
"You don't need pills to be happy, just eat some really nice oranges and watch a sunrise or something" are the words of a man who's never had a taste of really fire pills.
That's exactly why they don't want to sell alcohol to you abos anymore.
Your dopamine's receptors are cooked.
 
On a side note, now that you mention it- what is with the fucking happy pills? You don't need them. You know what makes me happy? I go for a walk on a warm summer morning and enjoy the sun rise. I have my morning coffee. I enjoy barbecue for dinner. It's not difficult to be fucking happy when you learn to just enjoy the world around you and love the simple things. If you need happy pills and don't have serious problems, you're legit retarded.

And let's face it, the people with real problems usually aren't the ones on happy pills...
Never date a girl on any type of brain mess



The amount of dates I've been on where after eating the girl takes her SSRIs is honestly disheartening. Oh the type to talk to a therapist.
 
On a side note, now that you mention it- what is with the fucking happy pills?
They're actually quite hard to get where I live. Benzos for anxiety are somewhat common, but still require a special prescription. Stimulants like various amphetamines and derivatives are nearly impossible to score legitimately. And pain medication ranges from somewhat accessible for the weak ones, to near impossible for the actual good stuff, like oxy, morphine, hydromorphone, pethidine and fentanyl, you will have to be actually ill for that. Even in the hospital, even for rather severe trauma, like broken legs/arms, you ain't getting the good stuff, until you're in the pre-anesthetic phase of the surgery where they wanna calm you down significantly, so you'll get an IV of fent or something, which is supposed to last you after the surgery too.
So, TL;DR, very hard to get happy pills.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Mr Bones Wild Ride
Men comprise 26% of teachers and 14% of nurses. 37% of commercial bankers are women; 36-63% of people employed by top banks are women. 51% of credit union CEOs are women. Nearly 40% of lawyers are women. 66% of customer service people are women. Women dominate registered nurses, dental hygenists, dental assistants, medical record/health info people, and medical assistants. Women hold 51.8% of managerial, professional and related occupation positions overall. Women hold nearly 62% of accountant and auditor positions.
so women are mostly babysitters and useless middle managers?

these stats really make it seem like all women could go back to the kitchen and society would be completely fine, and many areas would improve greatly. I guess losing nurses might cause some issues but other than that it'll be smooth sailing.
 

o/

I like your profile picture. It’s from one of those Chinese cartoons the kids like right?

Yeah, it's called Cowman Bongchang. It follows an ex - Red Guard soldier who travels China with three other misfits and a dog spreading the word of Mao Zedong. Fun cartoon, even better soundtrack.
 
Never date a girl on any type of brain mess
View attachment 6010342
View attachment 6010343

The amount of dates I've been on where after eating the girl takes her SSRIs is honestly disheartening. Oh the type to talk to a therapist.
Taking SSRI’s on a date is so fucking tacky sounds like you dodged a bullet. How retarded do you have to be to flaunt your mental illness in public? It’s not cute or quirky it’s legitimately infantile and weird.
 
Back