Official Kiwifarms Libtard-Hate Thread - The World's Most Insufferable Ideology

Norbert the Tiger said:
Edit--I just finished a book called Boomers: The Men and Women Who Promised Freedom and Delivered Disaster by Helen Andrews. The book misses the mark to a lot of degree, and is dumbed down a bit to be a best seller. It really is not about the boomers but focuses on six influential figures of that generation. Despite that, the volume does demonstrate how utterly pernicious the Boomer generation has been. In reference to this thread, it does demonsrtate how progressive orthodoxy is a legacy of boomer influence. None of the succeeding generations have been able to actually revolt against their boomer parents and now grandparents they way a few radical dissidents such as myself are able to. Alas.
Click to expand...
I have that book, too. To be honest, I find Boomer hate to be less and less impressive despite my good share of jokes at their expense. Yes, Boomers tend to be frustrating and obnoxious, but they are as unfairly maligned as Millennials are, and I dread the day when Boomers finally die and the system is in the hands of X-ers, Millennials and eventually Zoomers.

Jim Goad once posited that smearing entire generations is at best a gross oversimplification because outside circumstances change far faster than either human nature or psychology. Anyone of any generation can be as maliciously selfish or destructively consumptive as they can be suicidally altruistic. The howling majority of people effectively do not effect any sort of change whatsoever. They're, at best, consumers of goods or belief systems that suit their circumstances sooner than they are enforcers of a particular set of values beyond their immediate families. They can just as easily change ideas as they can socks for their personal convenience or benefit. What matters most is the power held by the elites. Those are the people who directly rule us, and their decisions cascade down. If the elites can be made to change or be dispensed of entirely, then society will change.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Guyspleasedontfight and Peepeepoopoo Witch
RichardMongler said:
I have that book, too. To be honest, I find Boomer hate to be less and less impressive despite my good share of jokes at their expense.
Click to expand...
I do not fault the book for its animus to boomers. Helen Andrews is actually pretty tame on that, much more than I would be. I fault the book for being a low effort polemic that is really not about boomers but six essays on influential figures that happen to be boomers.
I found the chapter on Sonia Sotomayor interesting not because of what it said about boomers but because what it revealed about how radical the Warren Court was (they were going to obliterate distinction between public and private if the Civil Rights Act was not passed) and how it reveals the current civil rights regime to be tyrannical. That's a different topic though then Boomers, especially as the lawyers and judges responsible judicial activism were not boomers.
RichardMongler said:
Jim Goad once posited that smearing entire generations is at best a gross oversimplification because outside circumstances change far faster than either human nature or psychology. Anyone of any generation can be as maliciously selfish or destructively consumptive as they can be suicidally altruistic. The howling majority of people effectively do not effect any sort of change whatsoever. They're, at best, consumers of goods or belief systems that suit their circumstances sooner than they are enforcers of a particular set of values beyond their immediate families. They can just as easily change ideas as they can socks for their personal convenience or benefit.
Click to expand...
Yeah I am not sure about that. The idea of free choice is largely a chimera and most people's views and even preferences in things like music or toys they liked as a child are predetermined by the time and place they were born into. There are always exceptional individauls in any group, eg Brigitte Nielsen is 6'1 but that does not mean she typfies your average woman. Same with for example boomers.
RichardMongler said:
What matters most is the power held by the elites.
Click to expand...
On that we are in absolute agreement.
 
As an Anarcho-Communist, I too hate liberals!
 
Omori Boy said:
As an Anarcho-Communist, I too hate liberals!
Click to expand...
Why?

I'm not against leftists expressing their respective grievances with liberals, but it's been my experience that leftists hate liberals for failing to live up to their ideals for humanism, inclusivity, pluralism and especially democracy. I hate liberals for ruling via lies and making promises they knew they couldn't fulfill but still tyrannize those who reject them anyway.

But don't let me tell you how to feel. What's your problem with liberals?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: 𒀭Δημιουργός χάος and Harbinger of Kali Yuga
RichardMongler said:
Why?

I'm not against leftists expressing their respective grievances with liberals, but it's been my experience that leftists hate liberals for failing to live up to their ideals for humanism, inclusivity, pluralism and especially democracy. I hate liberals for ruling via lies and making promises they knew they couldn't fulfill but still tyrannize those who reject them anyway.

But don't let me tell you how to feel. What's your problem with liberals?
Click to expand...
You took the words right out of my fucking mouth.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: RichardMongler
Another insufferable thing about The Cult of Progress is how those wannabe commies known as SJWs think "the ends justify the means", when it comes to "striving for social justice" for "the good" of "the community". Which can then end up in SJWs acting fascist against "wrongthinkers" -- because they want power disguised as "virtue". Such as Twitter freaks "cancelling" people for streaming that "transphobic" Hogwarts Legacy game. Or physical violence against so-called "fascists" in "woke"-run hellhole cities.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Peepeepoopoo Witch
How I deal with libtards. It is the only way I can deal with them now in Silicon Valley or any high tech region.


revenge2.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 𒀭Δημιουργός χάος and ToroidalBoat
sweater_supremacy said:
i dont like how they claim they love diversity even though all they do is take over every culture like a disease and force them to pick up certain ideals or be smeared. every culture that accepts them ends up like a bland grey blob. it's as if they don't understand that the differences are what make other cultures special and unique and interesting, if nothing else i hope they never win so wonderful cultures that have their own unique things to offer canc ontinue to exist.
Click to expand...
For a good swath of libtards, their love for diversity is entirely contingent on the demographic being a loyal client group for their causes. Should the libtard be forced to choose between advancing his own side's political interests and the diverse demographic's interest, his only compromise will only be to see if he can transform the latter's people into witting functionaries for the libtard's greater interests. The dissonance from middle class White libtards when colored people didn't immediately come out to support gay marriage in the late 2000s was telling.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: 𒀭Δημιουργός χάος, Peepeepoopoo Witch and sweater_supremacy
>muh COINTELPRO

As if the Feds didn't also target George Lincoln Rockwell/ American Nazi Party and the Ku Klux Klan.
 
You know, this is an interesting topic. What I see upon them is that the "go with the flow", meaning - they see that "correct manner of being" is to be respectful and tolerant (with a small amount of dissident) towards opinions, but never being "radical" or "extremist". You have the typical "safe edgy" types, and perhaps the "well behaved" ones. I don't believe for a moment that the typical "libtard" is that "offended at everything", but rather a person who just shrugs and thinks right wingers are "dumb" (a misconception). A good example: Hbomberguy.

The sheer smugness and the gloating that they have in their attitude in general just makes them insufferable, however. If they were able to keep that in check, things would be much better. The dialogue should be allowed, a controlled one too. I think it would facilitate things as well. Yet no such thing happens. It just so happens that it's easy to label enemies of "the other side" as the worst of the worst.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: 𒀭Δημιουργός χάος, Peepeepoopoo Witch and RichardMongler
What I hate most about liberals is that they aren't liberal but extremely authoritarian. If they would go be psychotic and morally retarded in their deep blue hellholes I wouldn't care but they want to remake the entire world into a soulless concrete hive. They're a virus.
Catler said:
Conservatards are ineffective. Hate lefties all one likes, they get stuff done and cons just whine in response.
Click to expand...
And far righters just whine about both.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: RichardMongler
Peepeepoopoo Witch said:
What I hate most about liberals is that they aren't liberal but extremely authoritarian. If they would go be psychotic and morally retarded in their deep blue hellholes I wouldn't care but they want to remake the entire world into a soulless concrete hive. They're a virus.
Click to expand...
It's okay when we're being totalitarian.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back