Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

View attachment 7831647
Rowling taught a generation of misandrists how to ingratiate with rightists by spewing the correct buzzwords about loony troons. This tweet is causing a meltdown amongst mongoloids who do not realize their surfin' TERF idol is a subversive Frieren demon, because their stupid asses fail to fathom how dangerous this female siege mentality interpretation is. Men who are brainwashed into hating themselves, mutilating their bodies and then committing suicide are bigger victims than wenches who loved destroying male spaces until gender ideology encroached on their own victim complex.
"Female judge sentences Boddingtonhamshire man to life in prison for assaulting transgender woman who merely was using the women's loo."
 
I've said it countless of times before, but it should always be repeated without fail. Literally 100% of the people I know IRL that are supporting this bullshit are women. Ok, maybe you could throw in the faggots, so it's not literally 100% women, but they don't really count cause they're part of the rainbow coalition.

So, to increase the exactitude of the statement: Outside of color coded sodomites, literally 100% of the people I know IRL who support this crap are women.
 
Last edited:
wenches who loved destroying male spaces until gender ideology encroached on their own victim complex
And some of them took it a step further to destroy little boys too with the whole gender affirming care bullshit. I would love to see the data between the sexes who approve of this delusion. I don't think it would be a surprise to anyone (who isn't a raging feminist) that women would overwhelmingly be in favor of it.

Not once have I ever reaffirmed the delusions of a tranny and not once did I ever approve of them ever invading anyone's spaces. As much as I hate most women, they had their own spaces and it should have been kept that way. They did this to themselves, just like they make the conscious decision to troon out their kids.
 
Rowling taught a generation of misandrists how to ingratiate with rightists by spewing the correct buzzwords about loony troons. This tweet is causing a meltdown amongst mongoloids who do not realize their surfin' TERF idol is a subversive Frieren demon, because their stupid asses fail to fathom how dangerous this female siege mentality interpretation is. Men who are brainwashed into hating themselves, mutilating their bodies and then committing suicide are bigger victims than wenches who loved destroying male spaces until gender ideology encroached on their own victim complex.
Relevant thought from a My Little Pony thread:

TERFs are just the newest-minted cuckservatives: conservatism is a narrow-brained reaction to personal grievances, while more authentic reaction is a paradigmatic re-assesment that I'm convinced only really happens when the powers-that-be threaten the integrity of the creative process—it's a response to dishonesty that usually involves an artform of some kind. The GamerGate guys who only cared about bikinis in AAA or whatever are still dying on that hill; the ones who had a problem with being expected to lie and to accept a compromised medium on top of that are the ones that majorly re-aligned religiously and politically in the subsequent decade. TERFs are ironically just like the AAA bikini guys they were up against a decade ago; I'm sure in the near future we'll see a ton of anti-pedo trannies that everyone calls "based and redpilled", who (just like the TERFs and GG grifters before them) will never reflect and engage with anything beyond the tip of the spear.
 
Relevant thought from a My Little Pony thread:
Culture and Politics are predicated on dialogue, dialogue naturally implies reaction; TERFs aren't just roiling at petty grievances, they're attempting to reassert/maintain the hierarchy feminism established during the 20th century.

Troons, and to a lesser extent poons, threaten the very foundations of their movement. At the very edifice of Feminism is the implicitly expressed notion that Men are naturally depraved, and by contrast Women are naturally virtuous. The idea that one could essentially subvert their nature and gain some purchase in virtue upends their entire world view and angers them to no end. The idea that a disgusting moid could transform into a virtuous foid quite literally offends their deepest convictions about the world and how it operates.
 
So, to increase the exactitude of the statement: Outside of color coded sodomites, literally 100% of the people I know IRL who support this crap are women.
100% of people who shill for LGBT crap in media are also women. Kathleen Kennedy is why every disney movie after a certain year has a mandatory faggotry scene

The cult of woke is exclusively upholded by wimminz and the pussywhipped simps that do the work for them.
 
Culture and Politics are predicated on dialogue, dialogue naturally implies reaction; TERFs aren't just roiling at petty grievances, they're attempting to reassert/maintain the hierarchy feminism established during the 20th century.
It’s interesting that when asking TERFs what we should go towards, it’s always back to 2015 or so when campus rape hysterias were back on the menu and we were seeing shit like farting near a girl is rape, that “manspreading” should be illegal, etc. Basically they just want to go back to their zenith of power. Which is why I’ve never thought there was any value allying with TERFs. The peak of Pumpkin Spice feminism was fucking terrible and we are not going back to that shit.
 
Update of my YouTube feed:
In addition to the Basketball American male channels sneed about their woman, and now there is a Japanese voice generator channel about posting unhinged Japanese Feminist tweet on X(formerly twitter) start to appear in my YouTube feed too.
I still blame you guys for this, of course.
Mine was recently spammed with septum piercing theory. I didn't bother to watch those, since I knew it for a long time ago
Gist is facial and other piercings are ugly. That includes nipple piercings, bellybutton piercing and other parts of body besides ears, which also can be made ugly with fookin tunnels. And if you are make yourself uglier, than you have a self image and self-esteem problem. Mutilation of your body parts will not help with it.
 
Culture and Politics are predicated on dialogue, dialogue naturally implies reaction; TERFs aren't just roiling at petty grievances, they're attempting to reassert/maintain the hierarchy feminism established during the 20th century.

Troons, and to a lesser extent poons, threaten the very foundations of their movement. At the very edifice of Feminism is the implicitly expressed notion that Men are naturally depraved, and by contrast Women are naturally virtuous. The idea that one could essentially subvert their nature and gain some purchase in virtue upends their entire world view and angers them to no end. The idea that a disgusting moid could transform into a virtuous foid quite literally offends their deepest convictions about the world and how it operates.
I probably used the word wrong; by "reaction" I don't mean "going back to when we had power"; any dude who wants to go back to the 90s when there was booba in his video games does that, or any 2010's Sargon of Akkad viewer. I'm talking about people who try to pinpoint the actual beginning of the revolution for truth's rather than comfort's sake.

I would definitely call what you're describing, which I agree with, a petty grievance—but, again, I could be using the word wrong.

This isn't to say that there aren't honest women who have a TERF phase any less than some men have a Carl Benjamin phase, but (as I'm sure you'd agree) that's not the core of those demographics.

Waah waah waaah women won't come near me the thread
Regale us with tales of your multitudinous sexscapades, big manly kiwifarms feminism-man. Tell us your skinwalking secrets.
 
have a Carl Benjamin phase
A bit off-topic here, but what is the ordeal surrounding Sargon of Akkad. As in, why do any people care about him at all? Granted, my exposure to him is limited, from what I’ve seen, there’s nothing particularly remarkable about his content. His takes aren’t unique or impressive, his debating skills seem pretty average (at least in the examples I’ve watched), and overall he just comes across like another Paul Joseph Watson type who makes a living of saying bad thing is bad.
 
A bit off-topic here, but what is the ordeal surrounding Sargon of Akkad. As in, why do any people care about him at all? Granted, my exposure to him is limited, from what I’ve seen, there’s nothing particularly remarkable about his content. His takes aren’t unique or impressive, his debating skills seem pretty average (at least in the examples I’ve watched), and overall he just comes across like another Paul Joseph Watson type who makes a living of saying bad thing is bad.
He seems fine to me. And he occupies a bit of a niche by focusing on British issues.
 
A bit off-topic here, but what is the ordeal surrounding Sargon of Akkad. As in, why do any people care about him at all? Granted, my exposure to him is limited, from what I’ve seen, there’s nothing particularly remarkable about his content. His takes aren’t unique or impressive, his debating skills seem pretty average (at least in the examples I’ve watched), and overall he just comes across like another Paul Joseph Watson type who makes a living of saying bad thing is bad.
He was a standard-bearer for the center-left "classical liberals" who made up the bulk of Gamergate back in 2014, who (himself) before that came from the "skeptic" community. I haven't followed him at all since 2015, but apparently he was able to monopolize that bottleneck to some degree for the better part of the rest of the decade (judging by his part in the Kraut/skeptics vs. alt-right beef in around 2018). He was a big fish in the pond of people who weren't willing to move farther to the right than Jordan Peterson (and probably not even that far). It might seem like it's all chuds all the time now, but that was a decent chunk of people back in the day.

Him saying recently that he's turning around to Christianity is kind of a canary in the coalmine moment.

 
Sarg’n is much less of a cow now than a decade ago. Started off making Gamergate videos. He then wanted to be the king of the skeptics so he invented a term “liberalist” to be the pied piper of classic liberalism except nobody followed him. Then he decided to get into politics with the UK Independence Party and UKIP went all in on him…and it blew up in their faces. Carl basically just kept to himself thereafter. Peaked back in 2016 when he told a MP he wouldn’t even rape her. That’s the 30,000 foot view on Sargon.
 
Nothing is ever a woman's fault. *ever*. Even partial culpability is out.

I know an AGP MTF who trooned out a few years ago. His wife is absolutely the source of it. She's been suckling online tranny madness for almost a decade now. Pick a creepy or annoying youtube troon with a Farms thread, she probably watched him. Suddenly her husband goes from awkward introvert nerd to talking like a Reddit tranny while she picks out hideous dresses for him? It was her.

Every. Single. Time I tell this story. "That poor trans widow. She's probably just playing along. She didn't know. How long until this wicked man's gross fetish becomes too much and she's driven out into the cold cruel world, blamed because her foul tranny husband did this to her".

She did this. Women Are Wonderful is so powerful that she gets *sympathy* for this.
 
I would like to subscribe to your newsletter please.

Also one suggestion: sterilization should be a common punishment. There are all sorts of behaviors that I can show you the peer-reviewed science to indicate that they’re genetic.

Actually, one more suggestion: a prison colony. For certain crimes, at least give people the option of being dropped off somewhere and allowed to live outside of civilization. Some people legitimately prefer that
I believe all rapists should be sterilized.
It’s interesting that when asking TERFs what we should go towards, it’s always back to 2015 or so when campus rape hysterias were back on the menu and we were seeing shit like farting near a girl is rape, that “manspreading” should be illegal, etc. Basically they just want to go back to their zenith of power. Which is why I’ve never thought there was any value allying with TERFs. The peak of Pumpkin Spice feminism was fucking terrible and we are not going back to that shit.
It's like all the James Lindsays who want to go back to 'moderate common sense 90's liberalism'. Like no shit you just want to go back to when you were top dog.
A bit off-topic here, but what is the ordeal surrounding Sargon of Akkad. As in, why do any people care about him at all? Granted, my exposure to him is limited, from what I’ve seen, there’s nothing particularly remarkable about his content. His takes aren’t unique or impressive, his debating skills seem pretty average (at least in the examples I’ve watched), and overall he just comes across like another Paul Joseph Watson type who makes a living of saying bad thing is bad.
Sargon was the big guy in 2010's milquetoast cuckservative types. He made good points and could debate well, but he was also a giant goof who decried the 'alt right' as nazis and posted gay interracial porn on twitter to 'own the chuds'. But he was also many people's gateway from being apolitical to being a dissident.

I use past tense because Sargon changed at some point, and either he stopped saying the stupid parts of his belief out loud or he realized what a joke he was. The optimist in me says he genuinely realized he was wrong.
 
I believe all rapists should be sterilized.
Rape used to be a hanging offense. It was an early feminist "victory" to reduce the punishment to just jail time.

Their stated reasoning was that because both rape and murder carry the same punishment, rapists are more likely to just go ahead and murder their victims. I'm not sure that connection was ever actually proven statistically.

The actual result, over many decades, has been to justify the dilution of the concept of rape from a concrete objective action (using physical force to overcome physical resistance) into a vague subjective feeling ("I never actually said 'no' but the next day I kinda regretted it").

I don't think rapists should be sterilized; I think they should be put to death ...in a society where rape is defined objectively.

No, the crimes that I think should offer sterilization as an alternative to incarceration are things like assault and robbery:

heritability of crime.webp

Because the reason people commit many crimes is just simply a lack of self control ...and that's hugely heritable:

heritability of self control.webp

Also, now that I put some more thought into it, I do not think sterilization should be a punishment. I think it should be an alternative - like a plea agreement that includes "anger management counseling" in exchange for less or no jail time.
 
Back
Top Bottom