Oklahoma sets execution dates for 25 death row inmates through end of 2024. - Infamous Something Awful child murderer Kevin Ray Underwood gets something to think about.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Oklahoma will resume executions on Aug. 25 and carry out lethal injections in stages through the end of 2024 under a schedule made public Friday morning.

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals set 25 execution dates for convicted murderers who have exhausted appeals of their convictions and sentences.

First up in August is James Coddington who beat a friend to death with a claw hammer in 1997. His attorney said in a statement Friday he "embodies the principle of redemption."

"Prison staff have given him accolades for his problem-free record and commitment to serving the prison community and engaging in academic study over his 15 years on death row. James is the most deeply and sincerely remorseful client I have ever represented,” attorney Emma Rolls said.

Second up in September is Richard Glossip, who was within an hour of being executed in 2015 when a doctor realized the wrong drug had been delivered.

His innocence claim has drawn widespread support, notably from actress Susan Sarandon who won an Academy Award in 1996 for her portrayal of death penalty opponent Sister Helen Prejean in "Dead Man Walking."

He also has found support at the state Legislature. State Rep. Kevin McDugle, R-Broken Arrow, said June 15 that a new "independent investigation confirmed, in my mind, that we do have an innocent man on death row.”

Oklahoma Attorney General John O'Connor asked for the dates after 28 inmates lost their federal lawsuit challenging the lethal injection protocol. Two of those inmates have not exhausted their appeals and a third may be too mentally impaired to be executed.

Another 15 also still have appeals pending.

Executions are carried out at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester on Thursdays. Two inmates were put to death there last year and two more this year.

After the first execution phase was set Friday, the attorney general said the family members of murder victims have waited decades for justice.

"They are courageous and inspiring in their continued expressions of love for the ones they lost," O'Connor said. "My office stands beside them as they take this next step in the journey that the murderers forced upon them.

"Oklahomans overwhelmingly voted in 2016 to preserve the death penalty as a consequence for the most heinous murders. I’m certain that justice and safety for all of us drove that vote."

Inmates still can seek clemency before the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board. The governor gets the final say, but only if the board recommends a sentence reduction. Gov. Kevin Stitt in November commuted the death sentence of Julius Jones about four hours before his execution was to begin.

Inmates also still could get execution stays while they appeal their lawsuit loss. An Oklahoma City federal judge dismissed the lawsuit June 6 after ruling the state's lethal injection protocol does not violate the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

Glossip Friday morning raised a new challenge to his conviction based on the investigative report's findings. Others could be spared if they are found to be no longer mentally competent.

Corrections officials had asked that the executions be at least four weeks apart. The attorney general had asked the appeals court to set as many as possible that way.

The parole board asked for a schedule that allowed it to have only one clemency hearing a month, during its regular meeting.

The judges on the Court of Criminal Appeals explained in an order they were dividing the execution dates into phases so they can respond to unforeseen contingencies in the future.

"These execution dates are (obviously) subject to change due to unforeseen delays or other circumstances that may arise," they wrote. "This Court will adjust the execution schedule as needed to ensure that executions progress in a timely and orderly manner.

"An open month will separate each phase ... to accommodate rescheduling if needed."

Most of the 25 inmates "are ... vulnerable individuals who suffer from severe mental illness and experienced horrific trauma and deprivation throughout their childhoods," their attorneys said.

"Many also are brain-damaged, several are floridly psychotic, and at least one is a person with intellectual disability. Their cases reveal other deep flaws in Oklahoma’s capital punishment system, including racial bias, prosecutorial misconduct, and arbitrariness."

Scheduled for execution are:
  • James Coddington on Aug. 25 for murdering a friend, Albert Troy Hale, 73, in Choctaw during a cocaine binge and robbery spree in 1997. He is 50.
  • Richard Glossip on Sept. 22 for the 1997 beating death of his boss, Oklahoma City motel owner Barry Van Treese. He is 59. A motel maintenance man confessed, saying Glossip offered to pay him $10,000 to do it to keep from being fired.
  • Benjamin Cole on Oct. 20 for killing his infant daughter in 2002 in Claremore because she wouldn't stop crying. He is 57.
  • Richard Fairchild on Nov. 17 for fatally beating his girlfriend's 3-year-old son in Del City in 1993. He is 62.
  • John Hanson on Dec. 15 for fatally shooting a woman in 1999 after kidnapping her from a Tulsa mall during a carjacking. He is 58.
  • Scott Eizember on Jan. 12, 2023, for bludgeoning an elderly man to death in 2003 after breaking into the victim's home in Depew to spy on an ex-girlfriend. He is 61.
  • Jemaine Cannon on March 9, 2023, for fatally stabbing his girlfriend at her Tulsa apartment in 1995 after escaping from a state Corrections Department work center. He is 50.
  • Anthony Castillo Sanchez on April 6, 2023, for murdering University of Oklahoma ballerina Juli Busken in Norman in 1996 after raping her. He is 43.
  • Phillip Hancock on May 4, 2023 for fatally shooting two men in Oklahoma City in 2001. He is 58.
  • James Ryder on June 1, 2023, for bludgeoning a 70-year-old woman to death in 1999 at her Pittsburg County home over a property dispute. He is 60.
  • Michael Dewayne Smith on July 6, 2023, for two fatal shootings in Oklahoma City in 2002. He is 40.
  • Wade Lay on Aug. 3, 2023, for fatally shooting a Tulsa bank guard during an attempted robbery in 2004. He is 61. His execution will be called off if a jury in May finds him mentally incompetent.
  • Richard Rojem on Oct. 5, 2023, for murdering a 7-year-old girl in 1984 after kidnapping her from an Elk City apartment and raping her. He is 64.
  • Emmanuel Littlejohn on Nov. 2, 2023, for fatally shooting an Oklahoma City convenience store owner during a robbery in 1992. He is 50.
  • Kevin Underwood on Dec. 7, 2023, for killing a 10-year-old Purcell girl in 2006 because of his cannibalistic fantasies. He is 42.
  • Wendell Grissom on Jan. 11, 2024, for a 2005 fatal shooting at a rural Blaine County home during a burglary. He is 53.
  • Tremane Wood on Feb. 8, 2024, for fatally stabbing a migrant farm worker from Montana during a robbery at an Oklahoma City motel on Jan. 1, 2002. He is 42.
  • Kendrick Simpson on March 7, 2024, for killing two men in a drive-by shooting in 2006 in Oklahoma City after a confrontation at a nightclub. He is 41.
  • Raymond Johnson on May 2, 2024, for killing his girlfriend and their infant daughter in 2007 in Tulsa. He is 48.
  • Carlos Cuesta-Rodriguez on June 6, 2024, for fatally shooting his wife in 2003 in Oklahoma City. He is 66.
  • James Pavatt on July 11, 2024, for the 2001 fatal shooting of his lover's estranged husband in Oklahoma City. He is 68. The girlfriend, Brenda Andrew, also was sentenced to death for her role in the murder.
  • Clarance Goode Jr. on Aug. 8, 2024, for a triple murder in Owasso in 2005. One victim was a 10-year-old girl. He is 46.
  • Ronson Kyle Bush on Sept. 5, 2024, for fatally shooting a friend in 2008 in Grady County. He is 45.
  • Alfred Brian Mitchell on Oct. 3, 2024, for bludgeoning to death a counselor at an Oklahoma City recreation center in 1991. He is 49.
  • Marlon Harmon on Dec. 5, 2024, for killing an Oklahoma City convenience store owner in 2004 during a robbery. He is 41.
 
cheese omelet with ground beef
Gross. Execute him for that alone.
Why reduce the punishment then because of vague "mental health issues"? That would just meant that many crimes, that are in itself already grounds enough for a diagnosis, would practically become unprosecutable.

What's the logic supposed to be here? Where do you find a mentally healthy pedophile cannibal?
The logic is making normies sitting ducks for psychotic or low IQ criminals because they can't help themselves. Meanwhile, that they can't help themselves is precisely why they should be taken behind the woodshed.

Simps for criminals, the indigent, and the mentally ill started out by opposing institutionalization. They're now on the next phase where such people shouldn't be held accountable or removed from the public whatsoever.
 
Gross. Execute him for that alone.

The logic is making normies sitting ducks for psychotic or low IQ criminals because they can't help themselves. Meanwhile, that they can't help themselves is precisely why they should be taken behind the woodshed.

Simps for criminals, the indigent, and the mentally ill started out by opposing institutionalization. They're now on the next phase where such people shouldn't be held accountable or removed from the public whatsoever.
Well,no. I am a HUGE proponent of asylums (=institutionalization). The reason they were, more or less, gotten rid of were stupid social justice warriors and their weird, anti-psychiatry propaganda (see One flew over the cuckoo's nest. Remember the infamous electrocution scene? Electric stocks are in use-under general anesthesia). See the dumb asshole in NYC, the guy allegedly "murdered" my Mr. Penny. Underwood was sick and did not get help (=being put in a closed asylum). I am for 100% accountability. Because of this, I am also a proponent of life sentences, prisons becoming a place where you have to face the fallout of your crimes and of criminals staying on parole (if released from prison) until the day they drop dead.

Did you know that there are some SJWs who really believe that giving s.o more than 10 years in prison is "cruel"? I have seen a "scientific" paper really claiming that. It's as dumb as simping for capital punishment.

I agree about cheese omelets with ground beef,though. It is gross and no one should ever eat this.
 
Last edited:
If you're innocent and always contesting you're innocent until you get to the point of having to order a last meal, THEN I'd see your point. But ordering an excessive amount of food and barely eating it, I can say fuck off and blame that jag for ruining it for everyone else, because an excessive amount of food for a last meal seems malicious.
Disagree. You do not punish someone for something they didn't do. No matter HOW bad that thing that was done is. And I seriously don't give a fuck if some food was thrown away a decade ago, that's not grounds enough to do away with this (again, in my opinion very important) symbolic act.
We need these ceremonies around the death penalty, because otherwise we're back to "the government can just kill you if they feel like it lmao".
 
I think the most cancerous aspects of the death penalty debate is when it slippery slopes into police and prison abolition. Some people don't really want to accept the fact that certain people are just evil, and add negative value to society. There's just no reason to mourn their removal, and no reason to save them. There are just certain people, when they cross a line, have to be left up to god. Society can only tolerate, and deal with so much. You just can't be lax on anti-social behavior - it's an abuse of empathy. There's just some people who just gotta go.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2024-12-19_at_you_are_a_prison_abolitionist_X_Cancelled.png
    Screenshot_2024-12-19_at_you_are_a_prison_abolitionist_X_Cancelled.png
    195.6 KB · Views: 14
Disagree. You do not punish someone for something they didn't do. No matter HOW bad that thing that was done is. And I seriously don't give a fuck if some food was thrown away a decade ago, that's not grounds enough to do away with this (again, in my opinion very important) symbolic act.
We need these ceremonies around the death penalty, because otherwise we're back to "the government can just kill you if they feel like it lmao".
Your first sentence made me stop giving a shit. I said there are some messed up situations where the person is executed but is unfortunately innocent. I can see why you wouldn't eat when you are requested your last meal. Meanwhile a faggot than orders an ecessiceve amount of food for the last meal and doesn't eat a bite sounds like a malicious nigger that did the horrible shit they did, but still want to claim innocence. Blame that faggot you bitch.
 
I don't advocate for torture.

Trying to work out some debt that can be paid in pain and torture is a fast way to blacken your soul with sadism, and the height of arrogance to think yourself so knowing. Ultimate and perfect judgement is awaiting them on the other side, after all. Also, nothing you can do to their body in this fallen world will ever measure to the Justice waiting for them, and torture just stains you with sin.

If someone needs to be permanently removed from society, you have a Christian duty to do it as cleanly and quickly as you are able. Subjecting a person to hellish torture and rape is barbaric and beneath the dignity of any civil man or healthy society. A length of rope or a bullet will accomplish all that needs doing, with honor and civility.

You haven't seen enough anecdotes to entice yourself to say these people are fucking monsters. People like this don't care, and it doesn't matter the race, but majority are spics and niggers. Enjoy open borders. Working great for the UK and EU right? Not like there isnt tons of examples of beheading, rapings, and child sex trafficking rings that spawn from allowing these useless cunts into a first world civilisation.

Edit: done now sorry for triple posting, people are literally this retarded, I get it now.
 
I think the most cancerous aspects of the death penalty debate is when it slippery slopes into police and prison abolition. Some people don't really want to accept the fact that certain people are just evil, and add negative value to society. There's just no reason to mourn their removal, and no reason to save them. There are just certain people, when they cross a line, have to be left up to god. Society can only tolerate, and deal with so much. You just can't be lax on anti-social behavior - it's an abuse of empathy. There's just some people who just gotta go.
I really wonder why some people think prison/police abolition should/could be a real thing.

The only "abolition" I can fathom is this:

have a well equipped, content,effective and motivated police force=criminals get caught asap, a high clearance rate.
Have the same in court= fast draw like trials (no capital punishment, so no eternal,retarded appeals).
In prison: well trained, content COs= lower recidivism rates, people are actually rehabilitated. Potential offenders understand that the will get caught eventually.
This all ultimatelely leading to: a lower number of crimes, thus a lower number of prisons required, thus "abolishing" the ones no longer needed.

Sperging full stop.

How is this even connected to the issue of capital punishment? Did a quick research and countries in Africa/Europe are, apparently, not discussing it.....
 
have a well equipped, content,effective and motivated police force=criminals get caught asap, a high clearance rate.
The thing is, that solution, and the current solution is actually much more progressive than what we used to do with criminals. Before prisons, and even centralized police, humanity used the death penalty a lot more and a lot quicker. They don't really understand they're going backwards. Society used to just not have the resources to pay to keep people locked up. Prison in itself is already rehabilitative.
 
The thing is, that solution, and the current solution is actually much more progressive than what we used to do with criminals. Before prisons, and even centralized police, humanity used the death penalty a lot more and a lot quicker. They don't really understand they're going backwards. Society used to just not have the resources to pay to keep people locked up. Prison in itself is already rehabilitative.
Maybe if compared to lynchings but we can and should do better.Also,
I don't think it is, as our prisons are battlegrounds for a whole circus of prison gangs...
 
Also fuck everyone of these fucks that skated by with "The Grace Of God" stop housing these niggers spics and white trash. They will never be reintegration into society like prison is supposed to, they are on death row and it should have been death by a firing squad after being found guilty.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: TexasRanger
You haven't seen enough anecdotes to entice yourself to say these people are fucking monsters. People like this don't care, and it doesn't matter the race, but majority are spics and niggers. Enjoy open borders.

I'm not sure what you're trying to communicate. You need to slow down, stop triple posting, and actually articulate your thoughts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TexasRanger
Your first sentence made me stop giving a shit. I said there are some messed up situations where the person is executed but is unfortunately innocent. I can see why you wouldn't eat when you are requested your last meal. Meanwhile a faggot than orders an ecessiceve amount of food for the last meal and doesn't eat a bite sounds like a malicious nigger that did the horrible shit they did, but still want to claim innocence. Blame that faggot you bitch.
Are you fucking retarded? In your example, even the first guy would be punished for the behavior of the latter. It's a basic principle of any nation that is inhabited by people with an average IQ over 80 that you punish the ones responsible for misbehavior and not others.

Who gives a shit if some low IQ faggot once thought it was funny to waste a meal or two? Do you see how much food is thrown out at restaurants every day? Nigga just put it in Tupperware and have the guards eat it.
Do you not see how you give that one idiot even more power if you do away with an important tradition of our society, just because someone "abused" it once?

Let alone the armchair psychology where for some reason your own execution can only make you nervous if you're innocent. Are you literally mentally deficient?

Maybe the problem is just your reading comprehension. "Innocent" in the context of my post refers to ANY death row prisoner, even the rightfully convicted ones, now not getting their last meal; "innocent" in terms of "innocent of maliciously ordering food".

tldr you're a retard
 
Back