- Joined
- Jul 22, 2017
Of course it isn't "justified", I mean not because it's a "meltdown", it's because he parroting cathedral orthodoxy to a T. He's totally compromised and that's normal. If he wasn't totally compromised he'd be like RMS. A blacksheep without the corporate comforts, constantly harassed under the guise of miscellaneous nothingburgers, but the real reason is he doesn't compromise himself. You either follow the party line totally or you're out. Linus follows the party line. Greg would absolutely disavow Linus and be propelled at high velocity by corpos and foundations to swift hostile takeover of the project if Linus were to leave the reservation. The same is true vice-versa, it's true for all the corpo bootlickers. You can lose your legacy in a moment merely because you didn't prostrate yourself well enough.as much as a hate poasties i think linus meltdown at the guy was not justfied
No one genuinely agrees with cathedral orthodoxy 100%, but that is what is required of them, anyone who believes otherwise is unironically 1984-double-think-land. You're either autistically value driven, or you kowtow like a weak normie nigger cattle.
He was agreeing for the wrong reason. I don't even know what Linus reason was, something to do with ads? Maybe the NYT posted an article about how the war in Ukraine might be ambiguous, or some cautious act of questioning a narrative. That tends to rile up globohomos with petty twitter complaints whenever that happens. Even if Linus is angry about NYT posting "fake news", it's not your type of "fake news", chud (and he absolutely has to make that clear).the thing was he was agreeing with linus on the new york times yet he has this meltdown about it