Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Attempted many times before, by the chud "niggers", "ynbaw" as as the libtard "oh noes dats raycist" side. These projects never go anywhere because the amount of people who can and want to contribute is not that big. And remember, you also compete with the original project and their maintainers.
To gain adoption there need to be actual functionality that sets it apart, and developers to work on the project. It's pretty rare to have successful forks for this reason. I think the way to solve this is to flip the tables. People need to start making good projects first. Once there is an established piece of software, you can put a ywnbaw copy paste in a comment and by then it will be too difficult for people to leave.
 
I have no experience with it but supposedly the language itself is fine to use, it's just the "community" that exists around it that makes it absolute niggerfaggot ass cancer.
Yeah. It doesn't work well for a game engine when the scripting language you use is Rust. I don't think the performance gains are worth the effort.
 
Rust=chop your cock off language it is pure troon shit.
Regarding Rust, I'm not exactly sure what all the fuss is about with the language. I've glanced at it a few times, but never enticed me to take a closer look. Normally when a crowd of people are obsessing over something (especially programming related) I stay far, far away from it. Usually when a bunch of people are cock-sucking something, it's consistently, A, a product that does something a little unique and innovative but everything else about it is poorly designed and of low quality and therefore negates any benefit it proposes. Or, B, a over promoted product that does the same thing as anything within its category but in a fancier skin.
 
Regarding Rust, I'm not exactly sure what all the fuss is about with the language. I've glanced at it a few times, but never enticed me to take a closer look. Normally when a crowd of people are obsessing over something (especially programming related) I stay far, far away from it. Usually when a bunch of people are cock-sucking something, it's consistently, A, a product that does something a little unique and innovative but everything else about it is poorly designed and of low quality and therefore negates any benefit it proposes. Or, B, a over promoted product that does the same thing as anything within its category but in a fancier skin.
The Rust sales pitch is directed at two groups of people:
  1. Functional programmers who want speed and compatibility. Rust managed to foster a nice ecosystem and if you like functional style programming and speed it's the best option. Want to make a Python library? Want to make a terminal UI? There are libs/ frameworks for all of that.
  2. C++ programmers who are fed up. Rust syntax stays pretty close to C++ with regards to references, the double colons for inheritance etc, while also offering a nicer experience with regards to no header files, not having to bother with CMake.
If you're not in either camp I think it's a harder sell. There are too many people who are "Rust fanboys" who gush over memory safety and a bunch of other bs, who never went beyond the hello world example.
 
Rust is Ada for effeminate men.
I think the way to solve this is to flip the tables. People need to start making good projects first. Once there is an established piece of software, you can put a ywnbaw copy paste in a comment and by then it will be too difficult for people to leave.
Unfortunately, people have been trained to use MicroSoft GitHub for everything, so they'll believe anything to be irrelevant unless it's there, and if it were there then MicroSoft would be a good custodian of the state religion and ban it immediately.
 
something i've been thinking about in relation to open source is this push the modern scene has towards constantly maintaining projects, pull requests and sometimes even communities. it flings a lot of responsibility even at those who usually just write some small thing and from time to time might find it great having an ez way for someone to contribute, only to start getting pressured into doing a lot more work than it's worth should it pick up some popularity.
last time i checked i don't even think you can disable pull requests on repositories at github, so the push comes from the top as well to treat even the little things you write as some sort of big deal, what with creating a repository bugging you about adding licenses and readmes and cocs.
i wonder if this is related to all the nonsense that's been going on with pushing languages like rust everywhere *sigh*
 
something i've been thinking about in relation to open source is this push the modern scene has towards constantly maintaining projects, pull requests and sometimes even communities. it flings a lot of responsibility even at those who usually just write some small thing and from time to time might find it great having an ez way for someone to contribute, only to start getting pressured into doing a lot more work than it's worth should it pick up some popularity.
last time i checked i don't even think you can disable pull requests on repositories at github, so the push comes from the top as well to treat even the little things you write as some sort of big deal, what with creating a repository bugging you about adding licenses and readmes and cocs.
i wonder if this is related to all the nonsense that's been going on with pushing languages like rust everywhere *sigh*
Fossil chads keep winning. My house, my cathedral, my rules.
 
something i've been thinking about in relation to open source is this push the modern scene has towards constantly maintaining projects, pull requests and sometimes even communities. it flings a lot of responsibility even at those who usually just write some small thing and from time to time might find it great having an ez way for someone to contribute, only to start getting pressured into doing a lot more work than it's worth should it pick up some popularity.
last time i checked i don't even think you can disable pull requests on repositories at github, so the push comes from the top as well to treat even the little things you write as some sort of big deal, what with creating a repository bugging you about adding licenses and readmes and cocs.
i wonder if this is related to all the nonsense that's been going on with pushing languages like rust everywhere *sigh*
You can upload it to github and set the repo to read-only. I think that disables all "features". Or you can just do it the cathedral way, put it on sourceforge or as a .zip on some webhost. Or on some FTP server. If you want to come to my temple and read my scrolls, you have to walk up the mountain it's on.
 
last time i checked i don't even think you can disable pull requests on repositories at github, so the push comes from the top as well to treat even the little things you write as some sort of big deal, what with creating a repository bugging you about adding licenses and readmes and cocs.
100% agreed on push coming from the top. The best you can do with GitHub is a bot that auto closes pull requests for you https://github.com/marketplace/actions/repo-lockdown
 
The Open Source game engine Godot reminds users about the code of conduct, celebrating pride month.

View attachment 6052772
At what point does the tranny menace become institutionalized enough to where troon signaling is just a given to boost your project?
I hate people whoring out in the field that I love, but I also can't blame them. If I were a man of less integrity, God knows I'd do it myself, but this cognitive dissonance has gotten me second-guessing whenever I see stuff like this lately.
How much do you reckon of the gay nigger shit is propped up? Is it just complacency because insane trannies are willing to truckdump hundreds of hours into insignificant projects? Can you even distinguish between the two? Do you die a chud or live to see yourself become the tranny?
 
It's well known that the Romanian people loved their leader, Nicolae Ceaușescu, and how they did not line him up against a wall alongside his wife and shoot them the moment they realized they could.
They loved these people. They were the most beloved people of all time.

And then, one day, for no reason at all, they did this.

You know exactly the execution I'm thinking of, and I won't post it. Someone else can, if they want.
 
They loved these people. They were the most beloved people of all time.

And then, one day, for no reason at all, they did this.

You know exactly the execution I'm thinking of, and I won't post it. Someone else can, if they want.
My grandparents hated the guts of the Communists.
It was similar to modern day North Korea cult leader behavior.

You have to understand many people fake their love for their leaders because they are in danger if they are caught criticizing the government. The same thing is similar here. Many people have in their subconsciousness an issue with modern day propaganda, but they are pussies to fight the cult behavior.
 
I like Mental Outlaw but I know he doesn't know what the fuck he is doing, which is why I don't even bother watching him for his tutorials or guides on anything. He is simply my basic OSS and security news. That is all he really should be.
mental outlaw tried to insist that openbsd wasnt meant for anyone except hackers and enterprise servers because he didnt see pictures on the home page for openbsd, and thenhe lied and claimed he couldnt find any on google images either. this is keeping in mind that openbsd is one of those operating systems that comes prepackaged with games if you select option for it during setup, which im pretty sure hackers wouldnt care about. he is literally the linux equivilent of a windows fanboy.
 
Back