I didn't even know Librewolf was made by fags. Every Firefox derivative seems to be made by them.
Open Source and Unix and really all of Silicon Valley and computers have always been fags, even going as far back as Turing.
It didn't use to be this way back in the 90s/2000s. There were a surprisingly number of libertarians or conservative leaning people in tech, silicon valley and open source. But that's pretty much been squeezed out.
I had a friend who got a job with Google Docs. Mostly normal guy, kinda ADHD, but had a massive beard and somehow got these cut skinny girls despite him being kinda fat. After working for Google he totally trooned out. I think this was like 2016 or 2017. Photos of him looked disgusting and sad. He was Anthony/Tranthony/Tech Shrek (formerly of Linus Tech Tips) levels of disgusting, but it was still just .... so very sad. Google is a conversion hub for the cult.
I went back 3 years in commits, it only takes a few minutes. I didn't see one commit that was actual code. Everything was reversions, version bumps or package updates. It's crazy.
A lot of people do this just so people see recent commits/releases and don't think the project is dead. Stuff can't "just work" or be feature complete anymore. It has to be continually updated in our weird always online network connected world.
I used to think he was somewhat informative when he wrote text based articles, but he mostly has moved on to click-baity videos - and after trying to watch his videos, I can't stand his delivery. All the stupid cutesy faces, annoying voices he attempts to mock, I can't last 30 seconds of him.
There have been some things he's covered I hadn't heard anywhere else. I'm glad he exposes some of the insanity in the infected open source world. Still, he is click-baity, he's a Jew who loves Israel (I'm not pro-Palestine, I just hate Israel). If he just wanted to keep politics out of open source, he wouldn't even bring up his retarded political views.
He also gets things wrong and doesn't offer corrections, sometimes even doubling down. As much as I hate Drew DeFuckwit, he kept saying Drew was into child porn. Loli is disgusting, but it's also
not child porn in a lot of countries. Even where it's illegal (United Kingdom and others), it's usually not prosecuted under child porn statues, but specific laws about drawn representation of children. I don't want to sound like it's splitting hairs, but I think it's an important distinction (one thing is criminal, one isn't) and he intentionally uses that term because of the impact/clicks.
Also, he will skip over/censor profanity when reading articles, but he quoted "Nigger Balls" several times. He really just wanted to say the nigger-word.
I also can't stand his face constantly in his videos. He'd be better off with a cartoon version of himself. I find the stuff from mailing lists and commits interesting because no one else really covers that stuff, but half the time he's just reading you news articles like the Tim Pool of tech news. Someone mail that Jew a beanie!
