Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

"The Xlibre devs would send me to a death camp if they could"

First of all. Based.

Second. These people are just fucking insane. We need people that are willing to tell them to shut the fuck up and code. This is what happens when no one is willing to tell them they're retarded, and insane. Now if anyone does they will just be called another Nazi.
So does that mean that Debian and the distros that are based on it are Pedo Bars by ther logic since they let pedophiles into their official dev team :smug:
 
So does that mean that Debian and the distros that are based on it are Pedo Bars by ther logic since they let pedophiles into their official dev team :smug:
Please stop saying such mean things. Look, you've made him sad!
1759520336839.png

Fun fact: this photo was deleted from the 2025 GUADEC album. (404, archive) Probably not because of him, as the other 4 where he is present are still up, but still.
 

"The Xlibre devs would send me to a death camp if they could"

First of all. Based.

Second. These people are just fucking insane. We need people that are willing to tell them to shut the fuck up and code. This is what happens when no one is willing to tell them they're retarded, and insane. Now if anyone does they will just be called another Nazi.
Open source in 2025 has more Nazis than WW2 Germany, apparently.
 

"The Xlibre devs would send me to a death camp if they could"

First of all. Based.

Second. These people are just fucking insane. We need people that are willing to tell them to shut the fuck up and code. This is what happens when no one is willing to tell them they're retarded, and insane. Now if anyone does they will just be called another Nazi.
Does this person have the authority to speak for the Debian organization? Indications are that as long as XLibre properly submits a package inclusion request (and doesn't do something insane like ask them to replace Xorg outright on new installs) it will likely be accepted, once Xlibre has a stable version
 
Lol. I had a realization while finishing that video.

Trannies saying "I don't feel safe"

Is the equivalent of a Florida man yelling "I feel threatened!" Directly before getting into a fight or shooting someone. To get away on stand your ground laws.

Literally doesn't matter what it is. They just need to claim "safety" and the rest of the retards go along with it.
Reminds me of "It's coming right for us!"

 
Literally doesn't matter what it is. They just need to claim "safety" and the rest of the retards go along with it.
If you want to see the illusion of safe space being obliterated by law, fax and logic, check this vid:
Poetically being spearheaded by a jewish person, fupa haver H3H3.

They even outright admited that reddit admins, as in official paid reddit higher ups, gave Hasan, Denims and co. free software services to obfuscate personally identifiable information from the internet "in fear or retaliation (in refference to swatting)" while being part of a community notorious for weaponizing personally identifiable info and taking part in swatting.

Fucking reddit, man.
 
Every time I finish a project and think of GPL'ing it, I can always come back to this thread and remind myself that FOSS was a mistake and is not worth getting into.


"The Xlibre devs would send me to a death camp if they could"

First of all. Based.

Second. These people are just fucking insane. We need people that are willing to tell them to shut the fuck up and code. This is what happens when no one is willing to tell them they're retarded, and insane. Now if anyone does they will just be called another Nazi.
Debian is such abysmal dog shit. There is a reason that daily driving it is a meme. Its primary contribution to the Linux ecosystem is being a base that people can build better OSes off of.
 
Does this person have the authority to speak for the Debian organization? Indications are that as long as XLibre properly submits a package inclusion request (and doesn't do something insane like ask them to replace Xorg outright on new installs) it will likely be accepted, once Xlibre has a stable version
yeah this is probably some random tranny sperging that lunduke is turning into s-tier clickbait and after 9 months of debian bureaucracy it will get packaged
Every time I finish a project and think of GPL'ing it, I can always come back to this thread and remind myself that FOSS was a mistake and is not worth getting into.
if you think free software is bad because of a few tranny fails and prefer the indian hellscape that is outside the walls of the gpl, you are even less right in the head than the average troon imo
"open source" absolutely is stupid though. just look at android
Debian is such abysmal dog shit. There is a reason that daily driving it is a meme. Its primary contribution to the Linux ecosystem is being a base that people can build better OSes off of.
debian is an incredibly stable base that is a great distro to run a server off of
it's not so great for desktop use but that's why there are a bunch of derivatives of it for desktop use
 
f you think free software is bad because of a few tranny fails and prefer the indian hellscape that is outside the walls of the gpl, you are even less right in the head than the average troon imo
Literally every big open source project is tranny fails now.

debian is an incredibly stable base that is a great distro to run a server off of
it's not so great for desktop use but that's why there are a bunch of derivatives of it for desktop use
yea that's why I qualified it with "daily driving." I run it on my VPS and it works great.
 
Literally every big open source project is tranny fails now.
idk still works much better than infernal jeetware
i can tolerate a few troons as long as they actually write good software and don't get too rowdy
the gnu people are actually really good at tardwrangling troons; how many times have you seen drama here from guix (the better nix)
i think you are just being a bit of a confirmationbiaslet tbh
 
idk still works much better than infernal jeetware
i can tolerate a few troons as long as they actually write good software and don't get too rowdy
the gnu people are actually really good at tardwrangling troons; how many times have you seen drama here from guix (the better nix)
i think you are just being a bit of a confirmationbiaslet tbh
Twenty more years will pass, Windows and other proprietary software will continue to evolve, and Linux users will still be squabbling about how a computer should start up. That's just how it is with FOSS.
 
I have seen rules about this on a few forums and social stigma on almost all. Why is that? To me, nothing about the concept of continuing a thread even after long inactivity (in light of some new information or for whatever other reason) seems bad. It feels far more preferable than having two or more threads discussing the same topic with nothing really linking them. Is the stigma something that evolved way in the past due to some practical reasons and has been carried to the modern times through tradition, it has no reason at all (apart from the personal opinion of some moderators, and proliferation through tradition), or is there some practical purpose even today that I am simply missing? Or maybe even something completely different?
Don't let jannies gaslight you. The concept of "necroing" is almost always retarded. Linux forum jannies are for some reason obsessed with it, also stack overflow. Despite often times these threads being #1 results when searching specific error messages. It's an obvious example of jannies who just get off on closing threads and shit. There's obvious examples of when necroing might be annoying, but that doesn't justify it as a rule. I'd also argue that discussions regarding errors can transcend specific version releases.
 
Windows and other proprietary software will continue to evolve
if you call putting embedded chromium in the start menu "evolving", then yeah
squabbling about how a computer should start up
a natural part of freedom, which i freely ignore and just use whatever comes default (but i know if it pisses me off i can easily switch)
 
richard stallman has said that free hardware will eventually happen at some point
i feel like with these liberated firmwares, we're just beginning to see little glimmers of it on the horizon
He's also said that he didn't think "free hardware" should be a thing because you can't copy hardware in the way that you can software. He's said a lot of dumb shit over the years which, given how much he posts, most people just forget....... but pepperidge farms remembers.
 
He's also said that he didn't think "free hardware" should be a thing because you can't copy hardware in the way that you can software. He's said a lot of dumb shit over the years which, given how much he posts, most people just forget....... but pepperidge farms remembers.
of course you couldn't copy hardware in the same way as software all the way back in the 90s!
now it's starting to gradually seem like it could eventually become feasible, along with troubling recent trends in hardware that are making it so we will eventually only be able to run fully free systems on free hardware

rms isn't psychic by any means (he didn't perfectly foresee things like "saas" or tivoization) but i still think he is right far more often than he is wrong
 
of course you couldn't copy hardware in the same way as software all the way back in the 90s!
FPGAs were a thing even back then, good sir. You couldn't exactly clone an 80386 with all the trimmings, but free hardware could have been a thing even then. Stallman was simply ignorant of the state of the art and ran off at the mouth. He does that with alarming frequency.
rms isn't psychic by any means (he didn't perfectly foresee things like "saas" or tivoization) but i still think he is right far more often than he is wrong
Selective memory is a helluva drug. People like to repeat that mantra ("I still think he is right far more often than he is wrong") to excuse his colossal fuckups and pretend that the times he was right were due to some keen insight on his part, rather than literally being him parroting what everyone around him was already saying. I refuse to participate. He's a smelly, toejam-eating infosocialist who spends more time being mad on the internet than doing anything productive.
 
FPGAs were a thing even back then, good sir. You couldn't exactly clone an 80386 with all the trimmings, but free hardware could have been a thing even then.
ah yes fpgas that you can program using no computers and no software (fpga software is definitely not proprietary software, especially not to this very day)
ran off at the mouth. He does that with alarming frequency.
photograph of you.webp
Selective memory is a helluva drug. People like to repeat that mantra ("I still think he is right far more often than he is wrong") to excuse his colossal fuckups and pretend that the times he was right were due to some keen insight on his part, rather than literally being him parroting what everyone around him was already saying.
everybody fucks up massively at least sometimes, especially if you've done as much shit as rms has
He's a smelly, toejam-eating infosocialist who spends more time being mad on the internet than doing anything productive.
im going to be extra mean and photograph of you.webp this one too
 
Back
Top Bottom