Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
using github is a full admission that you don't give a single fuck about free software and like slaving for jewgle
Why? It's a non paid service( for most) where you can store infinite files, docker images and more. You can then easily distribute these to people thanks to their countless servers

I see this similar to "no nazi/tranny/etc contributing to my code". If your enemy does shit for you for free, why not let him? If you want your code to be open then Google and MS will scan it on w/e git site you use. Backup, as always, but that's true for anything.

--
Sorry for theoposting again, but this is really good

Status chasing" is an indicator of people who have "nothing of actual value to provide"
- Claims man who recently put a $20k donation bounty for removing someone's twitter access for offending his sensibilities
1762734613544.png

What does Theo actually do in terms of code? What about open source? Do we have any evidence he can program at all? I see he has an sdk and some projects that are basically starting templates, but nothing else. It's like he went through a few courses and put the resulting files in the templates
 
Why? It's a non paid service( for most) where you can store infinite files, docker images and more. You can then easily distribute these to people thanks to their countless servers

I see this similar to "no nazi/tranny/etc contributing to my code". If your enemy does shit for you for free, why not let him? If you want your code to be open then Google and MS will scan it on w/e git site you use. Backup, as always, but that's true for anything.

--
Sorry for theoposting again, but this is really good

Status chasing" is an indicator of people who have "nothing of actual value to provide"
- Claims man who recently put a $20k donation bounty for removing someone's twitter access for offending his sensibilities
View attachment 8148728

What does Theo actually do in terms of code? What about open source? Do we have any evidence he can program at all? I see he has an sdk and some projects that are basically starting templates, but nothing else. It's like he went through a few courses and put the resulting files in the templates
He is JS code monkey so it is safe to assume that he cant
 
My Github account is ancient and while I respect that some folks have ideological difficulties with Github, my reality is that the first programming language I learned was Microsoft QBASIC, and I learned that through its builtin documentation. So I'm really fine with Microsoft being my portal to the world of Git. I know there's a bunch of compromise, but at the end of the day I can still just git clone https://github.com/user/project from my command line like everything else. For properly chudly projects, I'll use GitGud.
 
the big providers, most notably Google of course, have all but guaranteed that your email might get through if you're sending from someplace that they consider Safe and Trustworthy. You don't even have to be running your own mail server to enjoy spam folders and black holes, stalker.
Meanwhile, 90% of the spam I get comes from Outlook or Gmail addresses. What, you thought the strictness goes both ways?
 
Meanwhile, 90% of the spam I get comes from Outlook or Gmail addresses. What, you thought the strictness goes both ways?
Spamming inboxes is a science researched by chinks and jeets for decades: they know by this point what triggers either antispam to the point they're able to shit out hundreds of thousands of emails unimpeded.

As a consequence the criteria and triggers for spam got very strict where you can get filtered by them on the merit of "your account is not 5-or-more years old".

It's a non paid service( for most) where you can store infinite files, docker images and more.
If your enemy does shit for you for free, why not let him?
The idea of using anything even tangentially owned by microsoft is understandably revolting to people ideologically convinced bigtech is the worst thing in modern history since the establishment of the state of israel. It's not "free" either considering you are in fact signing away your projects to microsoft to train copilot after all.

If you want your code to be open then Google and MS will scan it on w/e git site you use.
It's the intent why the code is made open that's different, almost entirely defined by licensing. A work can be open-source but complete pain the ass to adopt depending on where and how you use it, like GPL and MPLv2 (ex. B included). Zingers like MIT are an open declaration of bending over forwards to benefit anyone using your software but you, where most what you get is credit and a cute little award in the licenses page nobody really reads or recognises. BSD is the same but also begging for it, as it produced the all-beloved Intel Management Engine working on MINIX.

Does the common tranny and/or zoomie care about open-sores in the long term? Hell no, I am spectating a group of 4 trannies signing their entire life away in MIT licensed works as a plea for recognition of merit when applying for jobs all over the country and not getting any offers back.
 
All people are doing by hosting on github, is giving them content to train their various AI projects. And I wouldn't be surprised if they are getting paid in other ways that I don't know about.
Sounds good to me. Let them train on my code. Copilot, how do I do X, and it spits out Perl. Or better yet some 100% memory-unsafe C that was designed for a tightly bounded microcontroller project. Good times.
 
I was installing Arch+Hyprland, wanted to install neofetch, it’s unmaintained (Thanks for letting me know Andrea), so wanted to look up an alternative.

I hate finding shit like this in the wild.
IMG_3663.jpeg
 
I was installing Arch+Hyprland, wanted to install neofetch, it’s unmaintained (Thanks for letting me know Andrea), so wanted to look up an alternative.

I hate finding shit like this in the wild.
View attachment 8151328
How does weird software like this get added to official repos but my software hasn't, it has been in aur for like 5 years. There has been work to add my software to even alpine linux, but not arch official repos.
 
How does weird software like this get added to official repos but my software hasn't, it has been in aur for like 5 years. There has been work to add my software to even alpine linux, but not arch official repos.
How many tranny flags does it have?

Remember, the rule is add as many tranny flags as you feel are necessary, then add one more.
 
How many tranny flags does it have?

Remember, the rule is add as many tranny flags as you feel are necessary, then add one more.
I need to add a spinning pride flag windmill as the loading icon. Although that's illegal in my country and would land me 2 years in prison.
 

Attachments

  • Swastika_ultra_pride_flag.webp.png
    Swastika_ultra_pride_flag.webp.png
    253 KB · Views: 24
Last edited:
How does weird software like this get added to official repos but my software hasn't, it has been in aur for like 5 years. There has been work to add my software to even alpine linux, but not arch official repos.
might be that archniggers are fucking lazy and don't package anything because they have a shitty ports system full of nasty malware and proprietary software (but i repeat myself)
 
>memory safe implementation
>look inside
>Rust made by a bunch of faggots
"memory safe" is a powerful quality to have but rustlets use it as a buzzword for "written in rust"
little do rustniggers know, c can be memory safe too
the legends say that if you shout "hans boehm" 3 times in a row, you can kill any rustoid
you can also shout "just don't fuck up lmao" 3 times but it will only stun them momentarily
 
c can be memory safe too
true.gif
Trvth Nvke.

C is memory safe, but you have to write your code to be memory safe. This means that you have to have a deep understanding of the C code, the C compiler and the architecture you're writing to code for to know when and how to make your code memory safe. This means skill and knowledge, both of which the Rust troons lack, so much like Linux users, they resort to lying by omission. Hammering the idea that Rust is memory safe and C isn't just because Rust compiles everything as memory safe by default. The more they hammer this idea the more they make it seem like C cannot be memory safe and that Rust is the only way to go forward, which is the lie by omission they want to achieve.

In short: C is memory safe and Rust is redundant. If you want to write memory safe C code, git gud fagit.
 
View attachment 8151939
Trvth Nvke.

C is memory safe, but you have to write your code to be memory safe. This means that you have to have a deep understanding of the C code, the C compiler and the architecture you're writing to code for to know when and how to make your code memory safe. This means skill and knowledge, both of which the Rust troons lack, so much like Linux users, they resort to lying by omission. Hammering the idea that Rust is memory safe and C isn't just because Rust compiles everything as memory safe by default. The more they hammer this idea the more they make it seem like C cannot be memory safe and that Rust is the only way to go forward, which is the lie by omission they want to achieve.

In short: C is memory safe and Rust is redundant. If you want to write memory safe C code, git gud fagit.
You can compile your C project with this: https://fil-c.org/ to make it memory safe automatically :^)
 
You can compile your C project with this: https://fil-c.org/ to make it memory safe automatically :^)
Bring it up whenever a Rustroon tries to force Rust down someone's throat and ask them what other benefit Rust has when you can just compile C/C++ to be memory safe and watch as they twist into a pretzel just to not say that "the only benefit of using Rust is that you'll be using Rust". Delightfully devilish.
 
Back
Top Bottom