ProudSkibidiTolietAryan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2025
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's a decade old stereotype that incels or redpillers or however you want to call them refer to women as "females" unusually often, and leftists take this as the incels like, dehumanizing women by referring to them in a way like they're talking about animals. They would take this stereotype so seriously that I remember ResetEra at times would straight up suspend or ban people for using the word "female" in almost any context, like it got to the point that the word itself is suspect.Could I get an explanation as to why "I call women females" is considered "alt-right terminology"?
Wrong, buckaroo.It is safe, if you don't explicitly use the one feature that makes it unsafe, lol. How is that surprising or controversial.
Basically… the MIT do-whatever-you-want license, but with the commercial rights for SaaS reserved for the copyright holder.
if I had a nickel for every time a tranny lost their shit over completely innocent computer code making them dysphoric I'd have 2 nickels. Which isn't much but its weird that it happened twiceThe troon behind the Rust 'bincode' crate rewrote the git history only to change his name. When Reddit found out, he got 'doxxed'.
If you're just going to blame the programmer then why not blame the programmer for all bugs written in C? I thought the point of Rust was to make the path of least resistance be to write memory safe code. If that's putting unsafe {} or .unwrap() everywhere then surely, by Rust's standards, we blame the language.It is safe, if you don't explicitly use the one feature that makes it unsafe, lol. How is that surprising or controversial.
Programming languages do precisely what you tell them to, and only in the way which they were written to implement it.C irrefutably, unassailably proven to be literally orders of magnitude more buggy, and that's even when you insist on shooting yourself in the foot by using unsafe.
It seems to be a double standard of Rust proponents. When they advocate for Rust, they blame the language (C bad!). When other people start blaming the language, it's fine unless that language is Rust, at which point they switch right back to blaming the programmer. Rust advocates are always right as long as they don't hold consistent principles.Programming languages do precisely what you tell them to, and only in the way which they were written to implement it.
If you're stating here that your code is buggier when written on C, it's extremely likely it's because of the programmer (you). Skill issue.
This actually sounds like the penultimate kind of software you should depend on at work so when the big boss man asks why you're charging him up the ass for thousands of hours of overtime just say "some tranny is malding and abandoned the repo and we're left hopeless without our integrated API mechanisms and synergy right now bro"Tranny rage-quits and abandons his project and everyone that depends on it.
Example 19235542345 of : never depend on troon-ware. Any support/bugfixes/new features suddenly ceasing is always just a random rage-quit away.
And since troons never get along with other people, there will never be anyone to take over when the troon rage-quits.
Every passing year on this earth I feel more and more like Terry Davis.It seems to be a double standard of Rust proponents. When they advocate for Rust, they blame the language (C bad!). When other people start blaming the language, it's fine unless that language is Rust, at which point they switch right back to blaming the programmer. Rust advocates are always right as long as they don't hold consistent principles.
You can't do anything if you don't use unsafe.It is safe, if you don't explicitly use the one feature that makes it unsafe, lol. How is that surprising or controversial.
Angry programmers didn't stop. There's still people that get arrested for that.In the past, programmers on payroll would lay the foundation to crash servers and software if they were fired or laid off. When we finally laid down punishments for that behavior, which made fentanyl dealers look like jaywalkers, the angry programmers stopped. With open source trannies can crash anything they want $1 to $1,000,000,000,000,000. I argued against this exact idea 13 years ago. I actually believed that in an open-source environment, people would program to help people. The angriest, most ban-happy people I have ever met were open-source fairies. How are you even able to navigate that space?
These people could never make a real paycheck with their skillset because they would be fired/never hired because they are liabilities.The angriest, most ban-happy people I have ever met were open-source fairies. How are you even able to navigate that space?
There's some kind of irony in it all that they're clearly about degenerate BDSM shit and power games but also take extreme issue with the words master and slave.Trannies have lack of control in their own lives, so they subjugated to controlling Rust programmers’ lives instead. It’s a power fantasy, make a program people rely on, make threats of abandonment, see how many people’ll suck your dick at the slightest inconvenience. They get off to this.
Every passing year on earth I feel more and more like Ted KaczynskiEvery passing year on this earth I feel more and more like Terry Davis.
SameEvery passing year on earth I feel more and more like Ted Kaczynski
think many people would hate Rust much much less if it didn't have the cult like behaviour surrounding it, to require all projecrs to be re-written and dismiss it's limitations.