Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Could I get an explanation as to why "I call women females" is considered "alt-right terminology"?
nigga I have no fucking clue.
1766015586322.jpeg
 
Could I get an explanation as to why "I call women females" is considered "alt-right terminology"?
There's a decade old stereotype that incels or redpillers or however you want to call them refer to women as "females" unusually often, and leftists take this as the incels like, dehumanizing women by referring to them in a way like they're talking about animals. They would take this stereotype so seriously that I remember ResetEra at times would straight up suspend or ban people for using the word "female" in almost any context, like it got to the point that the word itself is suspect.
 
It is safe, if you don't explicitly use the one feature that makes it unsafe, lol. How is that surprising or controversial.
If you're just going to blame the programmer then why not blame the programmer for all bugs written in C? I thought the point of Rust was to make the path of least resistance be to write memory safe code. If that's putting unsafe {} or .unwrap() everywhere then surely, by Rust's standards, we blame the language.
 
C irrefutably, unassailably proven to be literally orders of magnitude more buggy, and that's even when you insist on shooting yourself in the foot by using unsafe.
Programming languages do precisely what you tell them to, and only in the way which they were written to implement it.

If you're stating here that your code is buggier when written on C, it's extremely likely it's because of the programmer (you). Skill issue.
 
Programming languages do precisely what you tell them to, and only in the way which they were written to implement it.

If you're stating here that your code is buggier when written on C, it's extremely likely it's because of the programmer (you). Skill issue.
It seems to be a double standard of Rust proponents. When they advocate for Rust, they blame the language (C bad!). When other people start blaming the language, it's fine unless that language is Rust, at which point they switch right back to blaming the programmer. Rust advocates are always right as long as they don't hold consistent principles.
 
Tranny rage-quits and abandons his project and everyone that depends on it.

Example 19235542345 of : never depend on troon-ware. Any support/bugfixes/new features suddenly ceasing is always just a random rage-quit away.
And since troons never get along with other people, there will never be anyone to take over when the troon rage-quits.
This actually sounds like the penultimate kind of software you should depend on at work so when the big boss man asks why you're charging him up the ass for thousands of hours of overtime just say "some tranny is malding and abandoned the repo and we're left hopeless without our integrated API mechanisms and synergy right now bro"

Real alpha male IT employee strategy is to optimize on dependencies upon the most unstable repos (mentally unstable repos that is) - think about it, if you want the entire system to break and want a few days off, you don't have to call in a bomb threat like some kind of fag, just write a few mean comments on the github and whoever maintains it is sure to make a 40,000 word blogpost about the abuse that gets on the front page of HN before they ragequit
 
Last edited:
It seems to be a double standard of Rust proponents. When they advocate for Rust, they blame the language (C bad!). When other people start blaming the language, it's fine unless that language is Rust, at which point they switch right back to blaming the programmer. Rust advocates are always right as long as they don't hold consistent principles.
Every passing year on this earth I feel more and more like Terry Davis.
 
It is safe, if you don't explicitly use the one feature that makes it unsafe, lol. How is that surprising or controversial.
You can't do anything if you don't use unsafe.
You can't make syscalls.
You can't interact with the system.
Pure functional languages are safe and useless, just like (safe) Rust.
 
In the past, programmers on payroll would lay the foundation to crash servers and software if they were fired or laid off. When we finally laid down punishments for that behavior, which made fentanyl dealers look like jaywalkers, the angry programmers stopped. With open source trannies can crash anything they want $1 to $1,000,000,000,000,000. I argued against this exact idea 13 years ago. I actually believed that in an open-source environment, people would program to help people. The angriest, most ban-happy people I have ever met were open-source fairies. How are you even able to navigate that space?
 
In the past, programmers on payroll would lay the foundation to crash servers and software if they were fired or laid off. When we finally laid down punishments for that behavior, which made fentanyl dealers look like jaywalkers, the angry programmers stopped. With open source trannies can crash anything they want $1 to $1,000,000,000,000,000. I argued against this exact idea 13 years ago. I actually believed that in an open-source environment, people would program to help people. The angriest, most ban-happy people I have ever met were open-source fairies. How are you even able to navigate that space?
Angry programmers didn't stop. There's still people that get arrested for that.
I think it happens way more than anyone knows about because companies don't want to put it out there that they got fucked or cause a lack of confidence.

Plus how many times does it happen and no one even really knows about it (timelocked database corruption etc)? And beside that how many people leave with exfiltrated client data (which is often way more valuable than any software) and poach clients or sell it to someone?
 
Trannies have lack of control in their own lives, so they subjugated to controlling Rust programmers’ lives instead. It’s a power fantasy, make a program people rely on, make threats of abandonment, see how many people’ll suck your dick at the slightest inconvenience. They get off to this.
 
Trannies have lack of control in their own lives, so they subjugated to controlling Rust programmers’ lives instead. It’s a power fantasy, make a program people rely on, make threats of abandonment, see how many people’ll suck your dick at the slightest inconvenience. They get off to this.
There's some kind of irony in it all that they're clearly about degenerate BDSM shit and power games but also take extreme issue with the words master and slave.
 
I think many people would hate Rust much much less if it didn't have the cult like behaviour surrounding it, to require all projecrs to be re-written and dismiss it's limitations.

For example, I don't see Haskell or Go programmers wanting to replace any other language. I wonder what caused Rust to be different. Someone should make a documentary on this phenomenon.
 
Every passing year on earth I feel more and more like Ted Kaczynski
Same

Most people's biggest issue with uncle Ted wasn't killing people nor was it him getting caught. Ted's biggest sin was being born 30 years too early.

think many people would hate Rust much much less if it didn't have the cult like behaviour surrounding it, to require all projecrs to be re-written and dismiss it's limitations.

Rust is just running the Ruby on rails playbook. There were some wonderfully hilarious posts about RoR in the wild, that read a lot like Rust's spiel.
 
Back
Top Bottom