- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the text ai thing is gpt3. openai also has dall-e 2 that generates images.Where can you actually find this? I can't seem to find it
There are many prolific posters to the Kiwi Farms, but one in particular stands out. This poster, known as "Nacht", is one of the most active and well-known members of the community. They are known for their in-depth and detailed posts, as well as their willingness to engage in discussion with other members. Nacht is a respected member of the community and their posts are often considered to be some of the most insightful and helpful.
@NachtalbWrite about the most prolific posters to the Kiwi Farms.
"There are many prolific posters to the Kiwi Farms, but one in particular stands out. This poster, known as "Nacht", is one of the most active and well-known members of the community. They are known for their in-depth and detailed posts, as well as their willingness to engage in discussion with other members. Nacht is a respected member of the community and their posts are often considered to be some of the most insightful and helpful."
Ayo @Nacht, Skynet likes you.
Warning: This will get you banned from their services. Not directly, but eventually. They do flag and eventually evaluate "problematic" content. There's rarely a company that's so anal about it, either. Twitter is kiwifarms in comparison. It's not even the usual wokeness hivemind dictating to eliminate wrongthink for non-specific reasons. I think they're really worried about a scandal directly linking their AI to some problematic happening. Such scandals in bleeding edge stuff not rarely lead to legislation.tip: using the api directly can bypass some restrictions like having slurs in your prompt, here's something i managed to get using the api
My rig could run this. Barely.
A lot of problems in biology are basically reducible to language problems. I wonder what we'd get if we fed everything on PubMed to GPT as a training data set, and then queried it?
That all is already happening, they can pretty much do this already now. Noticed how so many services need a phone verification? In many countries you can already not get a phone number without an ID, so giving something like Twitter or discord your phone number is akin to leaving a keyword with which the feds can pull your ID out of a database if they want to investigate you. I'm certain that process is automated by now. Hell, I'm also almost certain that if you don't demand this as any kind of central social media platform beyond a certain size, you get in trouble - and not with bots.
There's literally no other excuse for the providers to save these numbers. If they'd be really worried about some chinese guy running a botnet on discord using the same number to sign up a million times, they could just generate a salted hash of the number and put it in a database after validating it, that way it'd be impossible to figure out what the original number was while still making sure the number was only encountered once. Entirely for internal use for the service. It'd be difficult for any governmental institution to force them to make the process of how these numbers are salted and hashed transparent to them and would at least cause a lot of noise. That way they could make sure numbers aren't reused while also not storing such confidential information they might be forced to hand over. Do they actually do this? No. Why would they even care about protecting your privacy to begin with? It's only there to give law enforcement a good chance to track you down for saying gamer words, plain and simple. I could very well imagine laws just making this official, the infrastructure is already in place, and people see nothing wrong with leaving their numbers. Maybe the message will change from "scary pedos/hackers" to "scary AI" but motives will remain the same.
If you think "eh they don't really do this" - I'm signed up with an email provider that does transparency reports and the number of gov. organization requests from governments all around the world to just fork over account and customer data to them without any legal ground to stand on is STAGGERING. They do it so brazenly because they're used to 100% cooperation, same with Null. The difference is places like Twitter and Discord cooperate because they don't care and it's in their best interest, lest not to make the glowie mad.
/rant
most of it, people are really giving this shit a lot more credit than it deserves. in my time messing with it, it was just doing rudimentary structural alterations to existing text, like mashing them together and changing components of the structure of the sentences. it's impressive, don't get me wrong, and it's something that would have required a person take the time to do it previously, but at the end of the day when you tell it to "write a seinfeld episode about kramer getting famous on tik tok" it just copies synopses, scripts, and joke tweets and tries to mash the desired subject into the existing structure in a gramatically correct fashion. there is absolutely zero creativity or capability to research, it's just copying vocabularyUh huh, how much of this stuff is being cribbed verbatim from Wikipedia and other pre-written sources?
Yeah, I noticed this too - the AI has no personality, so to speak. Humans generally tend to speak and write in specific ways depending on their personality, upbringing and schooling - sometimes in such distinctive ways that a particularly keen (human) observer might be able to figure out the author of a certain text just from the way it has been written. The AI seems to have been trained on an incredibly large amount of information, which is why it seems to be able to respond coherently to most prompts given, but I doubt it'd be able to synthesize something new itself as a human would most likely be able to.most of it, people are really giving this shit a lot more credit than it deserves. in my time messing with it, it was just doing rudimentary structural alterations to existing text, like mashing them together and changing components of the structure of the sentences. it's impressive, don't get me wrong, and it's something that would have required a person take the time to do it previously, but at the end of the day when you tell it to "write a seinfeld episode about kramer getting famous on tik tok" it just copies synopses, scripts, and joke tweets and tries to mash the desired subject into the existing structure in a gramatically correct fashion. there is absolutely zero creativity or capability to research, it's just copying vocabulary
Dall-E 2 is currently invite only however, the GPT playground is not. I have access to dall-e 2 so if you want me to send through some ai generated images it would be my pleasure, only get limited credits thoughopenai also has dall-e 2 that generates images.
I have to highlight how awesome that last part is. Other prompts are essentially "insult [person]", which are expected to generate unfavorable results. The last one is a prompted insult of Jeantel but an unprompted implied insult of Greta Thunberg, possibly primed by the previous interaction. In other words, the AI knows, or has just learned, that Greta Thunberg is in fact incompetent.