Culture Oregon again says students don’t need to prove mastery of reading, writing or math to graduate, citing harm to students of color - Progressives: BIPOCs are too stupid

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
1697805261045.png

Oregon high school students won’t have to prove basic mastery of reading, writing or math to graduate from high school until at least 2029, the state Board of Education decided unanimously on Thursday, extending the pause on the controversial graduation requirement that began in 2020.

The vote went against the desires of dozens of Oregonians who submitted public comments insisting the standards should be reinstated, including former Republican gubernatorial candidate Christine Drazan. Backlash against the lowered standard had already delayed the vote, originally slated to take place in September.

Opponents argued that pausing the requirement devalues an Oregon diploma. Giving students with low academic skills extra instruction in writing and math, which most high schools did in response to the graduation rules, helped them, they have argued.

But leaders at the Oregon Department of Education and members of the state school board said requiring all students to pass one of several standardized tests or create an in-depth assignment their teacher judged as meeting state standards was a harmful hurdle for historically marginalized students, a misuse of state tests and did not translate to meaningful improvements in students’ post high school success.

Higher rates of students of color, students learning English as a second language and students with disabilities ended up having to take intensive senior-year writing and math classes to prove they deserved a diploma. That denied those students the opportunity to take an elective, despite the lack of evidence the extra academic work helped them in the workplace or at college, they said.

Board members underscored that state-mandated standardized tests will still be administered to most Oregon high school students – they just won’t be used to determine whether a student has the skills necessary to graduate.

“We haven’t suspended any sort of assessments,” state board member Vicky López Sánchez, a dean at Portland Community College, said during Thursday’s meeting. “The only thing we are suspending is the inappropriate use of how those assessments were being used. I think that really is in the best interest of Oregon students.”

Oregon lawmakers, however, have mandated that families be told each year that they can opt their student out of taking state tests – and one third of high school juniors didn’t take the tests last spring, meaning they and their families don’t necessarily know how they measure up against statewide academic standards.

Proving mastery of reading, writing and math on one of many standardized tests or a teacher-judged in-depth assignment was one of several Oregon graduation requirements. Students also have to earn a prescribed number of credits and complete an education plan that maps out how they can achieve post high-school goals.

During the pandemic, Gov. Kate Brown signed a bill freezing the proficiency requirement, as standardized tests weren’t happening amid school closures. Lawmakers decided to order a more comprehensive review of graduation requirements.

After broad outreach to families, educators, students and employers, with a particular focus on people of color, the Oregon Department of Education recommended new graduation recommendations about a year ago. One of those was to scrap the requirement to show mastery of reading, writing and math. State lawmakers have not acted on that recommendation, and the department in the meantime asked the state board to continue its pause through at least the 2027-28 school year.

Speaking of the academic mastery requirements, Dan Farley, assistant superintendent of research and data for the department, told the state board Thursday, “They did not work. What they were designed to do is protect student interests. We have no evidence that they did that.”

Farley pointed to a 2021 analysis by Oregon’s Higher Education Coordinating Commission that found no clear evidence that implementing the proficiency standards improved the performance of Oregon high school graduates during their first year of community college or university classes. The report did not study all possible postsecondary outcomes, Farley told the commission, and the state could do further research on that point.

The report also notes that it’s possible that the level of skill required to meet Oregon’s since-paused academic mastery standards was “too low to improve college and university outcomes.” It’s also possible, the report said, that student success in college relies more heavily on other factors than writing or math skill levels.

Suspending the requirement at least until the class of 2029 gives the state more time to do community outreach about how best to overhaul the grad standards, Farley said, and gives future high school students plenty of time to prepare if this standard does resume.

Hundreds of people submitted written comments to board members about the requirement for students to demonstrate academic mastery, the vast majority in favor of keeping it. Many of those critical emails used the same stock language.

Drazan, a former member of the Legislature, wrote that she had opposed the 2021 bill that suspended the requirement in the first place. Oregon doesn’t need to decrease standards, she wrote, but create and act on a concrete plan to increase students’ academic achievement.

“The board failed to discuss their responsibility for lagging academic achievement in our state. Instead they cast the blame on a tool used to measure a student’s ability to read, write and do math,” Drazan said in a news release sent after the vote. “It’s disappointing that these unelected bureaucrats decided to ignore public comment and continue down a path that neglects their responsibility to help students meet high standards.”

Whitney Grubbs, executive director for Foundations for a Better Oregon, a coalition of Oregon-based nonprofits that advocates for educational equity among other school reforms, wrote in public testimony that pausing or ending graduation requirements without proposing more effective and equitable alternatives “risks leading Oregonians to believe that our state is lowering expectations to artificially mask disparities” and reinforces false and prejudiced ideas that students’ demographics dictate their academic success.

“As Oregonians, we hold high expectations for students because we believe in the boundless potential of children,” Grubbs’ testimony said. “...We urge state leaders to articulate a plan for holding Oregon’s education system accountable for demonstrating whether and how it is supporting all students to meet graduation requirements.”

https://www.oregonlive.com/educatio...raduate-citing-harm-to-students-of-color.html (Archive)
 
Last edited:
If the school admins really thought education was a right, or that education could improve lives, they wouldn't act this way. They would find a way to get individual tutoring for every struggling student.
we just do things or allow them to exist because we're "supposed" to at this point
 
Once again, a quote from Thomas Sowell springs to mind:
"A recently reprinted memoir by Frederick Douglass (1818-1895) has footnotes explaining what words like 'arraigned,' 'curried' and 'exculpate' meant, and explaining who Job was. In other words, this man who was born a slave and never went to school educated himself to the point where his words now have to be explained to today's expensively under-educated generation."
Douglass must be spinning in his grave.
 
Higher rates of students of color, students learning English as a second language and students with disabilities ended up having to take intensive senior-year writing and math classes to prove they deserved a diploma.
I like how blacks, fresh-off-the-boat foreigners from God knows where, and retards all have a similar command of mathematics and the English language.
according to these dipshits, being black is as disabling as having a sub-70 IQ, and admitting they think that is somehow not legitimately racist.
I mean, many blacks have a similar IQ, so similar results were inevitable. They are simply held to a lower standard.
At some point is no longer possible to keep holding a ball under water. It seems rational that this could only lead to this, or the epiphany that the ideology of Martin Luther King and skin is only race deep is false.
The system will collapse entirely, as it did in South Africa, before this will be allowed. When I was growing up, they were teaching "universal equality" (which I'm actually ok with from a moral perspective -- everyone should get a chance). 30 years on and they've realized universal equality is not borne out in the results, but this idea that evolution stopped at the brainstem is so sacred they have spent trillions inculcating the new paradigm: that every race is equally capable, but whitey is still keeping the black man down (and if it's not plausible that whitey is still keeping the black man down in a given situation, the blame shifts as far back as it needs to and gets explained away as inter generational trauma. Jim Crow, Slavery, the initial European colonization of the Gold Coast... at some point, it's like an English guy blaming the Italians for his failures because of the Roman occupation of Britain).
 
The article in a nutshell "We don't want ours future serfs to understand what we are doing"
This is my stance on why cursive stopped being taught. Most historical documents, diaries, journals, etc. of politicians at the time were drafted in it. American values then are starkly different than the post WW2 hellworld shit they're pushing now. If you control the past, you control the future.
 
Agree. At most, the vast majority of today's bachelor's degrees are about equal to high school diplomas of 30-50 years ago.
Do t know if it still holds, but I was told that an average American undergraduate degree was the equivalent of A level plus first year studies.
Don't you guys think it's pretty weird how just up front progressives are about acknowledging blacks can't compete with whites? Like obviously they frame it in a way where they blame bullshit like poverty for it but the left is far more truthful about the achievment gap between blacks and whites then the right-wing is.
It also shows how rubbish our education system is for everyone. We ONLY exalt academics, but very few people can be truly excellent in academic fields. Nowadays degrees for all, but back in the day the top 10 or at max 15% went to uni and did genuinely academic stuff. Now over half of kids go to uni which means people who are not even top tier, but below average, are doing academic subjects. In order for that to work ALL the degrees got devalued and made much easier.
And anyone who isn’t academic gets ignored. But there are probably the majority who are not academic but capable.
We fail them all - we fail the academic kids who go in degrees that are not rigorous. We fail the kids who aren’t highly academic but are practical and smart and we fail the less able as well.
We should have an academic stream, we should have a stream that teaches the basics of maths and literacy so that people can function, we should have practical and vocational streams that are highly valued.
As yes, some kids won’t engage at all, but we are churning out graduates who are useless. Honestly, we get people who have masters degrees in biology and they’re summer than a five watt bulb. At the same time, you cannot get a decent plumber for love nor money. How can solid trades that are skilled and bring in good mkney be looked down on by society and gender studies looked upon as ‘good.’
 
Quit yer bitchin old man, this is progressive America, we don't even grade niggers anymore cause racism or something?
When I was there, both as a student and as staff, there were relatively few black students at the Defense Language Institute, and most of the black students were taking relatively easy languages, such as Spanish. There were very few taking the tough languages, such as Korean, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian. This was many years ago, but doubt things have changed much. Entrance standards not likely to have dropped. The using organizations always want better-trained DLI graduates.
 
When I was there, both as a student and as staff, there were relatively few black students at the Defense Language Institute, and most of the black students were taking relatively easy languages, such as Spanish. There were very few taking the tough languages, such as Korean, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian. This was many years ago, but doubt things have changed much. Entrance standards not likely to have dropped. The using organizations always want better-trained DLI graduates.
I would love to go on such a course. Six months and come out functionally fluent. Sounds very tough, but I bet a great experience.
 
Douglass must be spinning in his grave.
I think your point about Douglass highlights the core of the issue: No one wants to learn. It's not cool to be educated, knowledgeable about the world, or have a large vocabulary.

You can very much lead a horse to water, but cannot make him drink, and I think that's the issue.
(And as for IQ, even retards CAN learn, just more slowly. They shouldn't be holding everyone else back, though.)
 
When I was there, both as a student and as staff, there were relatively few black students at the Defense Language Institute, and most of the black students were taking relatively easy languages, such as Spanish. There were very few taking the tough languages, such as Korean, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian. This was many years ago, but doubt things have changed much. Entrance standards not likely to have dropped. The using organizations always want better-trained DLI graduates.
When I visited there a couple years ago I found it hilarious that there were BLM signs everywhere bur they didn't seem to care much for black folks when they interacted with them from what I saw.
 
When I visited there a couple years ago I found it hilarious that there were BLM signs everywhere bur they didn't seem to care much for black folks when they interacted with them from what I saw.
BLM signs on a military base? That's a new one. Was at DLI a couple of months ago, saw nothing of the kind.
 
I would love to go on such a course. Six months and come out functionally fluent. Sounds very tough, but I bet a great experience.
Toughest school I ever attended. The Spanish and Latin languages courses run about six months, all the rest run longer, 34, 48, or 64 weeks depending on degree of difficulty. Six hours a day, five days a week. Great college credit - got 40.5 quarter hours at the university for the 47-week Korean course.
 
There are maybe 50k black people in all of Oregon and 90% of those are in one county. This is for Hispanics. There's whole communities of spics who don't speak a lick of English, and the government wants to get them into the workforce regardless, so free diplomas I guess.
 
Toughest school I ever attended. The Spanish and Latin languages courses run about six months, all the rest run longer, 34, 48, or 64 weeks depending on degree of difficulty. Six hours a day, five days a week. Great college credit - got 40.5 quarter hours at the university for the 47-week Korean course.
Gotta' have respect for the linguists. No sense in having all the infrastructure for espionage if nobody knows what the fuck the other guy is saying. I can't do it, I got the machinery autism gene so they put me in reactor. Closest things to another language I know are FBD and LAD.
 
There are maybe 50k black people in all of Oregon and 90% of those are in one county. This is for Hispanics. There's whole communities of spics who don't speak a lick of English, and the government wants to get them into the workforce regardless, so free diplomas I guess.
You're completely right. Oregon is extremely unblack if anything. They make up just 2% of the population and all live in the Portland metropolitan area and basically just don't exist outside Multnomah county. Hispanics on the other hand make up 14.4% as of 2020.
2020 black.PNG
 
Back