Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

[Next Task]

Is your friend Brianna Wu? Please tell me it's Brianna Wu.

Ha! Like Wu has friends. Wu has orbiters, simps, and people whose clout he's desperately chasing, but like Pat nobody actually likes spending time with him IRL. Twitter friends aren't friends and narcissists don't have friends, which is why both Pat and Wu are terminally online and bullshitting about their life. Closest thing they have to friends are Twitter followers who are too cowardly to get as angry as either of them, so live vicariously through their calls to violence and expressions of hatred.

 

[SixPennyWalnut]

Unemployed man with no academic credentials at all needs to brush up on his quantum mechanics research. What a fat dickhead. Actual teams of geniuses with funding are still battling to make breakthroughs on this. He thinks he can get up to date on it by reading Wikipedia.

 

[Meriasek]

Unemployed man with no academic credentials at all needs to brush up on his quantum mechanics research. What a fat dickhead. Actual teams of geniuses with funding are still battling to make breakthroughs on this. He thinks he can get up to date on it by reading Wikipedia.

View attachment 3329025
View attachment 3329027

The best thing about idiots like this is that all those popsci articles heavily misrepresent quantum computing and what it can and will do. Even if he's trying to keep up it's going to be wrong, and his completely uneducated ass has absolutely no hope of even knowing that he's wrong. Even if he actually got into the real science behind quantum computers and general quantum mechanics, he'd be hopelessly in over his head, because his flunked-highschool-math ass would have to actually learn so much actual higher math to actually understand any of that shit he'll actually really go cross-eyed.
Popular misconceptions of quantum mechanics and quantum computing in particular are a bit of a pet peeve of mine. And functionally retarded dumbasses like Fatrick thinking they even know the most basic thing about quantum computing or -mechanics are my favourite.

 

[get-tar manajerk]

The new scientist is not how anyone but young adults keeps up with science it's just popsci bullshit.

 

[SixPennyWalnut]

The best thing about idiots like this is that all those popsci articles heavily misrepresent quantum computing and what it can and will do. Even if he's trying to keep up it's going to be wrong, and his completely uneducated ass has absolutely no hope of even knowing that he's wrong. Even if he actually got into the real science behind quantum computers and general quantum mechanics, he'd be hopelessly in over his head, because his flunked-highschool-math ass would have to actually learn so much actual higher math to actually understand any of that shit he'll actually really go cross-eyed.
Popular misconceptions of quantum mechanics and quantum computing in particular are a bit of a pet peeve of mine. And functionally retarded dumbasses like Fatrick thinking they even know the most basic thing about quantum computing or -mechanics are my favourite.

When talking specifically about scalable quantum computers, i.e. conquering the error threshold, it’s probably safe to say that they're physically impossible to build in any practical sense. It’s like how nuclear fusion is always 30 years away. It’s theoretically possible but every answer provides 100 more questions. Maybe they’ll be another 50 major breakthroughs but who knows? I doubt it, Patrick certainly has no idea what he’s talking about.

You will probably know better than me, as I know enough to admit I know nothing - but as far as I know, the only examples of quantum computing are incredibly expensive, incredibly unstable and practically unusable - and are just research / theoretical builds?

 

[Meriasek]

When talking specifically about scalable quantum computers, i.e. conquering the error threshold, it’s probably safe to say that they're physically impossible to build in any practical sense. It’s like how nuclear fusion is always 30 years away. It’s theoretically possible but every answer provides 100 more questions. Maybe they’ll be another 50 major breakthroughs but who knows? I doubt it, Patrick certainly has no idea what he’s talking about.

You will probably know better than me, as I know enough to admit I know nothing - but as far as I know, the only examples of quantum computing are incredibly expensive, incredibly unstable and practically unusable - and are just research / theoretical builds?

Yeah, not to mention that most "quantum computers" currently built still don't really have proper entanglement, which is kind of a key feature for quantum algorithms.
Also, quantum information teleportation isn't working the way fat pigs like Fat Pat think it is.

 

[Torque Wheeler]

The best thing about idiots like this is that all those popsci articles heavily misrepresent quantum computing and what it can and will do. Even if he's trying to keep up it's going to be wrong, and his completely uneducated ass has absolutely no hope of even knowing that he's wrong. Even if he actually got into the real science behind quantum computers and general quantum mechanics, he'd be hopelessly in over his head, because his flunked-highschool-math ass would have to actually learn so much actual higher math to actually understand any of that shit he'll actually really go cross-eyed.
Popular misconceptions of quantum mechanics and quantum computing in particular are a bit of a pet peeve of mine. And functionally retarded dumbasses like Fatrick thinking they even know the most basic thing about quantum computing or -mechanics are my favourite.

Yeah, I used to read popular science when I was a kid too. "We're only 2 years away from graphene batteries that will solve our energy density issues!!!". Stuff like that is tailor made for optimistic but uneducated kids or fat wisconsinites to impress their fake Twitter followers

 

[TreeFortRichardsTCell]

Huh we must know each other irl, because we know the same people, I told Bell just today about Fat Rick's many many many Pepperoni related crimes, and Bell the staunch advocate for both racial and gender justice thinks that Fat should be "raped by a pack of niggers"

he didn't say he SHOULD. he just said if he did, it would be his fault.

 

[Teknorat]

Researchers at the University of Wisconsin announced they have made a new breakthrough in quantum scales that will one day allow them to weigh Patrick Tomlinson.

 

[TreeFortRichardsTCell]

Someone needs to send one of the Fat Rick stories to NBC as a potential script for SVU.
Think of all the potential lines for Ice T.

Sick bastard likes to chain the black kids to the floor and jump back and forth on them before he grinds them up. calls it Rick Tac Toe

 

[stupid moron]

Researchers at the University of Wisconsin announced they have made a new breakthrough in quantum scales that will one day allow them to weigh Patrick Tomlinson.

I heard MIT actually had a working quantum computer in their possession. When they tried to solve one of mankind’s greatest questions, the probability of a dimension existing where Patrick isn’t fat, the computer exploded.

 

[AprilRains]

Science popularizations summarized:

Some sperging about science, mathematical models, and accounts derived from the models:

Spoiler

I think of scientific explanations of the universe as consisting of a mathematical model of the universe, and then various pictures derived from that model, adapted to a variety of levels of understanding and to different needs.

Scientists themselves are focused on the model alone in their work. It is the main thing they work on and its needs come first. The desirable qualities of a model are simplicity, generality, and accuracy. Nowhere in there do they consider comprehensibility to the general public. The model would never be as powerful as it is if they did.

However, from that model, one can derive pictures that provide various audiences with a handle on the model for their purposes. Even scientists try to have some sort of picture of the model. Engineers get a picture that can be pretty close to the model in order to do their work. Different popularizations provide pictures with varying degrees of detail and accuracy with respect to the model.

A professor in my undergrad years insisted that only the model mattered. That was true for his work, but not for all of the social value of science. One of the reasons he got generous public funding is that people want to hear and see the story of the universe in some way that they can understand, Popularizations derived from the model perform much of that function. They were not his focus, but they were a form of postdiction that society values. He cared much more about prediction, and he did great work in that area.

However, popularizations will never give you a real understanding of the model. They're a sort of low-resolution rendition of the model. You can't just go "enhance, enhance" like some cheesy CSI spinoff and get back to the model. You need seriously advanced mathematics to understand even the basics of quantum theory. Calculus is just the beginning. Advanced matrix mechanics will get you more of the way there. Vector calculus will get you further still. But without those, there is a point beyond which one cannot proceed.

Do I need to explain that Ol' 1.7 is incredibly short of where he'd need to be to get any of that? Even geometry and mildly advanced algebra are beyond his ken. He thinks you can't divide zero by a non-zero number. How can he ever understand a Hamiltonian operator? He couldn't even achieve operational familiarity with the mathematical operations required to perform basic calculations with them.

Of course, he is too stupid to grasp that limitation. He does not even know what he does not know. That's how he can have the nerve to be confused by his inability to grasp concepts that actual smart people struggle with. And since he would not understand the difference between the simplest popularization and the bare metal of the model itself, he never will.

TL;DR: Pat is too fat and stupid to get real science.

 

[SixPennyWalnut]

Science popularizations summarized:

View attachment 3329149

Some sperging about science, mathematical models, and accounts derived from the models:

Spoiler

I think of scientific explanations of the universe as consisting of a mathematical model of the universe, and then various pictures derived from that model, adapted to a variety of levels of understanding and to different needs.

Scientists themselves are focused on the model alone in their work. It is the main thing they work on and its needs come first. The desirable qualities of a model are simplicity, generality, and accuracy. Nowhere in there do they consider comprehensibility to the general public. The model would never be as powerful as it is if they did.

However, from that model, one can derive pictures that provide various audiences with a handle on the model for their purposes. Even scientists try to have some sort of picture of the model. Engineers get a picture that can be pretty close to the model in order to do their work. Different popularizations provide pictures with varying degrees of detail and accuracy with respect to the model.

A professor in my undergrad years insisted that only the model mattered. That was true for his work, but not for all of the social value of science. One of the reasons he got generous public funding is that people want to hear and see the story of the universe in some way that they can understand, Popularizations derived from the model perform much of that function. They were not his focus, but they were a form of postdiction that society values. He cared much more about prediction, and he did great work in that area.

However, popularizations will never give you a real understanding of the model. They're a sort of low-resolution rendition of the model. You can't just go "enhance, enhance" like some cheesy CSI spinoff and get back to the model. You need seriously advanced mathematics to understand even the basics of quantum theory. Calculus is just the beginning. Advanced matrix mechanics will get you more of the way there. Vector calculus will get you further still. But without those, there is a point beyond which one cannot proceed.

Do I need to explain that Ol' 1.7 is incredibly short of where he'd need to be to get any of that? Even geometry and mildly advanced algebra are beyond his ken. He thinks you can't divide zero by a non-zero number. How can he ever understand a Hamiltonian operator? He couldn't even achieve operational familiarity with the mathematical operations required to perform basic calculations with them.

Of course, he is too stupid to grasp that limitation. He does not even know what he does not know. That's how he can have the nerve to be confused by his inability to grasp concepts that actual smart people struggle with. And since he would not understand the difference between the simplest popularization and the bare metal of the model itself, he never will.

TL;DR: Pat is too fat and stupid to get real science.

I’m pretty sure at one point Patrick mistook sha256 encryption as 256 bits when discussing how “hackers” could “hack” your private keys, which is mistaking the number 256 as the number 110,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Mistaking something possible with something completely impossible, which completely undermines his point and exposes his retardation.

 

[Nate Higgers]

Patrick is tweeting about having pressure washed his car port.
View attachment 3311910

He is showing off his weird looking hand
View attachment 3311911

I'll point out the obvious: he's extremely bad at pressure washing and left all his concrete completely stained.

Holy shit please please could it be true that Fat Rick “built” that wall himself. I know enough about concrete work and that stuff that I’m looking at it and I’m absolutely sure that he either didn’t pour a footer or a thick/deep enough footer, and he probably didn’t put rebar inside the wall itself (that giant vertical crack on the left side gives me that assumption), because why would fatrick know how to cut rebar or dig a fucking trench

 

[AnOminous]

I've heard Pat is branching out into beef jerk.

He should try jerk chicken instead, fitting in with the general chickenhawk motif.

 

[Picnic_Boy]

Seriously. I usually hate when people say this. Like just accuse people they don't like of being closeted homosexuals. The first thing he calls Josiah after being called a fat faggot with bitch tits, is "sweetie". I don't know a lot of real life tough guys, I'll admit but I don't think I've ever heard a man call another man sweetie before.

Yeah, I don't really think it would make him happier. I just wanted to call him a fag, because he obviously is.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Yeah, I don't really think it would make him happier. I just wanted to call him a fag, because he obviously is.

Happiness isn’t possible for someone like Pat. The most he can hope for are isolated moments of delight when he’s getting whatever narcissistic supply he can scrape together between Twitter and IRL. But those moments are fleeting, and he’s still stuck with the worst possible life sentence: being Pat S. Thomas. Misery is his birthright.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Unemployed man with no academic credentials at all needs to brush up on his quantum mechanics research. What a fat dickhead. Actual teams of geniuses with funding are still battling to make breakthroughs on this. He thinks he can get up to date on it by reading Wikipedia.

You seriously think Pat thinks he has to read Wikipedia to keep up to date on quantum mechanics? He read the headline in that tweet, he's all set.

 

[instythot]

So, the weekly squeal posted a skit where Boomia gets a visit from the mounties over patposting. Is that based on actual events or not? All I could find on the other forum was a bunch of people flexing their insult muscles on Dan

 

[artilleryfroth]

Holy shit please please could it be true that Fat Rick “built” that wall himself. I know enough about concrete work and that stuff that I’m looking at it and I’m absolutely sure that he either didn’t pour a footer or a thick/deep enough footer, and he probably didn’t put rebar inside the wall itself (that giant vertical crack on the left side gives me that assumption), because why would fatrick know how to cut rebar or dig a fucking trench

To be fair, I don’t know how to do those things. But I wouldn’t even try, because only an idiot thinks that kind of task is easy. People should know their limits, and hire professionals if in doubt.
Which is why Fatrick not only does it himself, but also posts his Ls proudly online. He’s an idiot. He seems to truly think his “retaining wall” basically falling down in less than a year is still a very good boy manly achievement.