Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

[AprilRains]

This is so far the only case I've seen him work on and it's his first firm after getting out of school. His father is a Judge though. He only started with them in October 2023. A few months later he was given Patrick's case and two of their major lawyers helping him out, probably to give him some credibility. Though that can't be cheap.

Not sure what he was doing between 2019 when he finished and 2023, maybe helping out his father.

Then why are you so sure it's him? I'm really confused.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Then why are you so sure it's him? I'm really confused.

Probably because according to William "Bill" Grau Linkedin account claims that he's an Associate Attorney at STRANG BRADLEY, LLC, the same William Grau who's father is Gregory Grau, a retired Judge. (Bills white according to the photo on wausaupilotandreview, the one on Linkedin is dark as fuck due to the terrible lighting)
William "Bill" Grau in 2020.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Probably

The question seemed to be about your unshakeable certainty that a lawyer wrote all that decidedly un-lawyerly prose.

 

[Thé au lait]

IDK about rape threats but I guess Fatrick approves killing police horses?

View attachment 6333982

Who wouldn't love a pony??

I don’t but here’s a tweet thread where you can find it:

View attachment 6333917

Cheers, I think the account got banned but this might be enough to go off of to track it down

Probably because according to William "Bill" Grau Linkedin account claims that he's an Associate Attorney at STRANG BRADLEY, LLC, the same William Grau who's father is Gregory Grau, a retired Judge. (Bills white according to the photo on wausaupilotandreview, the one on Linkedin is dark as fuck.

That just means he signed off on the papers. My reasoning is that we have two possible authors of a text that expresses personal offense and poor legal knowledge, which is right next to a text that's legally competent. One of the potential authors has reason to take it personally, is known to say "meek", and is legally incompetent. The other doesn't have such a reason, passed the bar and grew up with a parent in the legal profession, and 99.8% chance has never used the word in his life outside of maybe quoting Matthew 5:5.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

That just means he signed off on the papers. My reasoning is that we have two possible authors of a text that expresses personal offense and poor legal knowledge, which is right next to a text that's legally competent. One of the potential authors has reason to take it personally, is known to say "meek", and is legally incompetent. The other doesn't have such a reason, passed the bar and grew up with a parent in the legal profession, and 99.8% chance has never used the word in his life outside of maybe quoting Matthew 5:5.

Ah yes, because no one has ever used that word besides Patrick.

The question seemed to be about your unshakeable certainty that a lawyer wrote all that decidedly un-lawyerly prose.

To quote @Useful_Mistake

He has a lawyer, and was filed and writen by said lawyer (unless he committed fraud upon the court)

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Ah yes, because no one has ever used that word besides Patrick.

Why are you making it about one word? There are a dozen instances of language and formatting in that filing that deviate sharply from standard legal nomenclature. FFS he even cites an article to back up his assertion about a bomb threat that is not even mentioned in the article.

To quote @Useful_Mistake

Yes, that’s correct: It’s fraud. It’s also something that’s done on a frequent basis by plenty of lawyers who know there will be no real consequences for them. What’s your point?

 

[Thé au lait]

Ah yes, because no one has ever used that word besides Patrick.

You honestly believe more than maybe 10 English speakers, especially native ones, use the word unironically outside of quotes? In a legal context?
Also way to ignore the entire rest of the post lol

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Just for starters, I’d be willing to bet that “Consider a thought experiment” has never appeared in any (non-pro se) legal filing. This shit was written by someone who thinks a university dean’s list is called the honor roll.

 

[lindsayfan]

that legal filing qualifies as some of the year's best african sci-fi

 

[Judge Holden]

Oh what a delightful start to the morning. Imma pour myself some of my workplace cognac and flick throo for funni bits.


I vote that any further reference to the pigman's pegger be made with the (not a teenager) followup




Sheeeit yo damn right she showed herself and came in front of me...

YO NIKKKI (not a teenager)TELL YOUR PET PIG TO SHUT THE FUCK UP AND COME SHOW LAWNGDICK LYNDON SOME LOVE OR IMMA KICK THE DOOR DOWN AND FUMIGATE YOU RIGHT THERE IN THE LIVING ROOM


"The cops are not allowed to investigate 911 calls about me, especially if they involve reports of me hunting little negro children in a windowless van while singing the pepperoni song"


Don't they know that's Nikkki (not a teenager)'s job?

Oh my fucking god fatrick officially cares more about his half-porch than his daughter, his literary career, and his health all combined. There were old timey plantation owners who watched the picking of a dynastic fortune's worth of cotton and the breaking of a thousand screaming bucks while sipping mint julips from their antebellum estate's porch who were less territorial and emotionally invested in this specific piece of architecture than fatrick.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I would not have personally conceded any of these points if I wanted my lawsuit to succeed. They effectively agree with defendants about the only part that matters.

 

[Rimanah]

Lawyers don’t use the emotional language and emphatic italics that have been deployed in this filing

lol. lmao even. Emphatic italics are used so often they have bluebook rules. And lawyers not using emotional language and arguments? Pathos is as old as Aristotle.

Many of you all are seriously overestimating the skill of the average lawyer. Especially your average small firm plaintiff’s attorney.

 

[Judge Holden]

Porktits has returned to declare our Sneeder of Feeders a stalkerchild who will soon be enjoying prison

 

[AutoClownMaker]

Do you have an example of William using the word "meek" in any other filing?

"Meek" may have been used in the caselaw.

'turning square corners' is used in Masonic rituals. but a long dead supreme court justice used it in a famous decision so you'll see it turn up in motions that touch upon that decision. Same with 'sunlight being the best disinfectant'.

Cultures have words/terms used to show you are part of the group. Meek may just be trying to show you've read the caselaw. On this thread FFWBT is used to show you are part of this thread. Enjoy Prison shows you know of Patrick's style. Calling someone brotherman shows you know of ONAfourms.

There are well developed codebases for running analysis of a text for seeing who may or may not be the author. The Fatprick has produced a whole lot of text, some edited by others to varying degrees. Running that code VS his output would provide better linkage beyond 'meek isn't used often and Patrick uses meek ergo PAT!' Meek -> Patrick is the kind of leap taken by Jackie with DoucheAtard -> Swedish national,

I definitely agree that the lawyer just touched up Rick's part and then decided to add a second half that has actual legal significance. The front half was undoubtedly Rick, the phrasing seems so distinctly full of impotent anger from a personal place. I wonder if it might hurt his chances lol

and

Why are you making it about one word? There are a dozen instances of language and formatting in that filing that deviate sharply from standard legal nomenclature. FFS he even cites an article to back up his assertion about a bomb threat that is not even mentioned in the article.

Yes, that’s correct: It’s fraud. It’s also something that’s done on a frequent basis by plenty of lawyers who know there will be no real consequences for them.

If the pests figure out there are bar grievances then chances could be hurt by filing 'em over precieved violations of the bar rules. Dealing with a bar complaint that gets dismissed "takes 40 hours;' per a bitching about bar complaints. Filing one can be for any reason, valid or not.



Get enought bar complaints and the insurance firms will drop ya. Pests might have figured out that and started sending copies of the complaints to the insurance firms.

View attachment 6334549

Oh my fucking god fatrick officially cares more about his half-porch than his daughter, his literary career, and his health all combined. There were old timey plantation owners who watched the picking of a dynastic fortune's worth of cotton and the breaking of a thousand screaming bucks while sipping mint julips from their antebellum estate's porch who were less territorial and emotionally invested in this specific piece of architecture than fatrick

Curtilage is a legal term of art. The writing style where it was used indicates that was drafted by the lawyers. In the WI statutes it shows up 4 times and only in the crimes VS property section. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/943/ii/13/1e/cr/2

Looking on google scholar in the caselaw section there is pages and pages of Meek. But Meek is a surname so no meek in the filing text. Meek might just be a Patrick term.

I would not have personally conceded any of these points if I wanted my lawsuit to succeed.

The Fatprick can't afford taking the case to an appeal. The non payment of Quasi and whatever is in his Lexus-Nexus credit report shows that he lacks depth to his wallet.

The lawyers filing something to lose the case to be rid of The Fatprick would not be unheard of.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I love this.

The citation he uses does not mention the bomb threat, or Patrick at all. Just the best.

 

[Schizoid Wife]

Porktits has returned to declare our Sneeder of Feeders a stalkerchild who will soon be enjoying prison
View attachment 6334966

Oh this is golden.

A troll in Nikolas Talbott's orbit made an AI generated audio of him with a doxx attached. Pigtits has already seethed over it twice.

Archive

Spoiler: Fatrick's confession

 

[Mourning_Cloak]

IDK about rape threats but I guess Fatrick approves killing police horses?

Patrick Tomlinson: husband, author, comedian, gardener, athlete, carpenter, mechanic, political firebrand, pepperoni connoisseur, lifeguard, actual badass, sex god, killer of black preachers and horses.

Simply too many titles to name. How does he do it? Simply spectacular.

 

[grapeshark77]

Okay, so the state has two weeks to write the last response - then the next thing on the docket is an "interim settlement report" in November followed by "dispotive motions" in December, which is what I assume happens if the trial moves forward.

I assume at some point before then the judge will look at all this to consider the dismissal - do any Kiwis know about what that timeframe would be?

He does not want this to go to trial. The sheer amount of evidence they must have of him yelling and failing to throw punches alone. The tiny bit we've seen is insane.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

do any Kiwis know about what that timeframe would be?

Before October would be my guess, if the Judge wants to be bound by the modification he made to the schedule.

 

[Judge Holden]

The stalker trial fanfic continues...