Patrick W. Gilmore (he/him) is a fan of censorship of the internet - Also allegedly a massive sucker of tranny cock

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Lady Rackets Ass

Lady Rackets Ass

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 12, 2022
Patrick W. Gilmore (he/him)
Shoutout to Patrick W. Gilmore (he/him): UCLA Member, former Chief Network Architect of Akamai (extremely large CDN), former Board Member of ARIN (the North American RIR which handles IP assignments), current board member of the Seattle Internet Exchange (massive IX handling cross connects in one of America's largest datacenter clusters), co-founder and board member of PeeringDB (tool that LFJ uses to identify our providers), and ...
Full-time Managing Network Engineer of fucking Meta.

These are the people who want you silenced.


IMG_5703.png
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, Mayhem, 820㎌Cap and 26 others
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, 820㎌Cap, Autistic Joe and 26 others
⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛ said:
You can tell why this guy doesn't like there being a site out there that makes fun of people for cringy things that they willingly post themselves online.

The guy literallywifepostes (Archive) on QUORA.

He responds to trolls in an even cringier way than Patrick S. Tomlinson.
Click to expand...
No child, I will not unblock your cyberstalker website until you say I don't have bitch tits.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, 820㎌Cap, Autistic Joe and 16 others
Sprate Header said:
View attachment 5242547View attachment 5242548
(https://archive.li/dsfCF) (https://archive.li/qpoCY)
Click to expand...
He thinks he has a RIGHT to stalk
Click to expand...
We don't stalk. We just collect publicly accessible information, including social media posts you willingly post. The problem can be solved by simply logging off and touching grass. And yes, as your posts and antics are all public, we do have the right to discuss them.

dox
Click to expand...
"Doxing" isn't illegal. If it was illegal, phone books would be illegal. The Whitepages would be illegal. The government would be breaking its own law by posting publicly filed court cases, which include mailing addresses.

threaten and harass people online
Click to expand...
We might wish death on someone, but threatening is a big no-no. Threats result in bans, mockery, and Josh handing personal information over to the relevant authorities. If simply reposting a public social media post showing you support pedophilia means you have to fear for your life, maybe the problem is with you.

And again, we don't "harass." It's possible someone can do it in our name, but we have no way of identifying or combating the issue. Your privacy is your concern, not ours.

Again, he keeps mistaken defamation as a personal liberty
Click to expand...
If Kiwi Farms, or its users, have defamed you in any way, that is legally actionable and you can take Josh to court. The reason you don't is because you know we've done nothing wrong. Our speech might be offensive, but it's all legal. The reason you resort to illegal tactics is because we have archived and made public information detailing criminal activities by you and your associates.

I almost hope this goes to court. Discovery will be a hell of a ride.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, Helvítis Túristi, Mayhem and 50 others
I don't think private companies should be allowed to compile and publish people's personal information without their consent, and I'm pretty sure that in many countries they aren't. Take Google Street View for instance, they never asked anyone for consent or provided any compensation

If someone chooses to post something on social media that's obviously fair game
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, 820㎌Cap, Autistic Joe and 22 others
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
And again, we don't "harass." It's possible someone can do it in our name, but we have no way of identifying or combating the issue. Your privacy is your concern, not ours.
Click to expand...
This is pretty disingenuous. The reason why you post someone's address publicly is because you are hoping that they will get harassed or be intimidated into silence. Not saying some people don't deserve it but have the balls to admit why you do what you do.
 
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, Hweeks, 820㎌Cap and 58 others
Tamara Knight said:
I don't think private companies should be allowed to compile and publish people's personal information without their consent, and I'm pretty sure that in many countries they aren't. Take Google Street View for instance, they never asked anyone for consent or provided any compensation

If someone chooses to post something on social media that's obviously fair game
Click to expand...
Private companies also build profiles based on your search history, which they then sell to advertisers. Sleazy and unethical, but legal.

Saying that some tranny is disgusting for getting off by giving children black market estrogen is quite tame in comparison.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, Mayhem, 820㎌Cap and 25 others
Tamara Knight said:
Be as passive aggressive as you want, everyone knows what the game is. When someone posts the address of an anti-vax Christian family that homeschools everybody knows it's not so people can discuss the architecture. The same applies to right wing doxing.
Click to expand...
So Twitter and Facebook should be banned too? They have posted thousands more addresses than kiwi farms have. And infinitely more cp because kiwi farms has posted zero. Get the fuck out with your disingenuous arguments fag.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Mayhem, 820㎌Cap, Autistic Joe and 8 others
Lady Rackets Ass said:
So Twitter and Facebook should be banned too? They have posted thousands more addresses than kiwi farms have. And infinitely more cp. Get the fuck out with your disingenuous arguments fag.
Click to expand...
If I were king, I would also ban Twitter and Facebook, yes.

How does publicly posting someone's address benefit the discussion? What purpose does it serve? This isn't Guru Gossip forums where people want to gossip about how nice the yard looks or the new paint color.
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Disagree
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, Hweeks, 820㎌Cap and 22 others
Tamara Knight said:
If I were king, I would also ban Twitter and Facebook, yes.

How does publicly posting someone's address benefit the discussion? What purpose does it serve? This isn't Guru Gossip forums where people want to gossip about how nice the yard looks or the new paint color.
Click to expand...
Sure you would. If the info is publicly available then it is fair game. Cry more tranny.
 
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Like
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, 820㎌Cap, Autistic Joe and 8 others
Tamara Knight said:
This is pretty disingenuous. The reason why you post someone's address publicly is because you are hoping that they will get harassed or be intimidated into silence. Not saying some people don't deserve it but have the balls to admit why you do what you do.
Click to expand...
This site is interested in the real-life identity of thread subjects because the people this site profiles tend to have extensive criminal histories and legal affairs. If they can't stop talking online, they're usually not that much better offline either.

Your real-life identity is generally easily tied to your physical name and address. How do you think debt collectors or bail bondsmen get them?

It follows that, if you're posting under your own legal name and your posts aren't to fulfill a professional responsibility, you're an idiot. Twitter fads come and go, but they can generally outlast your life's savings.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: 820㎌Cap, Autistic Joe, Botchy Galoop and 18 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back