Patrick W. Gilmore (he/him) is a fan of censorship of the internet - Also allegedly a massive sucker of tranny cock

[Smaug's Smokey Hole 2]

How does publicly posting someone's address benefit the discussion? What purpose does it serve? This isn't Guru Gossip forums where people want to gossip about how nice the yard looks or the new paint color.

It's relevant if someone pretends to be an uwu smol and poor gay boi but they live in an expensive house and works for Lockheed Martin. Just sayin'

 

[Tamara Knight]

It follows that, if you're posting under your own legal name and your posts aren't to fulfill a professional responsibility, you're an idiot

I don't disagree. The question remains, what is the practical purpose of posting someone's address publicly? What is the intended outcome?

 

[thhrang]

>literal who posted something on twitter
Wow great thread, OP.

It's directly ripped from the KF Telegram.

 

[Tamara Knight]

Show me your post history advocating for banning for twitter, facebook, etc. you won’t. Because you are a lying tranny who just wants to get the farms banned because they call you out. What’s your thread faggot? Link it to me.

I want to ban Twitter and Facebook because their users personally annoy me. FWIW doxing is not allowed on Facebook and Twitter. You can't just go around posting people's addresses if they haven't listed them. Even some antifa accounts have been banned for doxing minor alt right personalities.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

This is pretty disingenuous. The reason why you post someone's address publicly is because you are hoping that they will get harassed or be intimidated into silence. Not saying some people don't deserve it but have the balls to admit why you do what you do.

No, we don't want lolcows to be harassed. It's not funny. We post doxes because we're autistic. We're driven to learn all we can about lolcows, both for the sake of completeness and because it gives us some insight into why they act the way they do. It also helps us check their lies- you can claim you're living in a hovel outside of town, but if we can prove, through doxing, that you're actually living with your wealthy parents, what else are you lying about? Perhaps that you're really a woman?

Unethical? Perhaps.

Autistic? Absolutely.

Illegal? No. If you want that to change, there are avenues to change the law.

 

[Lady Rackets Ass]

The intended outcome is that they can’t hide behind anonymity later like you are trying to do like a tranny faggot. People post their addresses online or have them posted because they commit criminal offenses and the government posts them for them. Archiving publicly available info isn’t illegal you fucking retard tranny

 

[named]

I don't disagree. The question remains, what is the practical purpose of posting someone's address publicly? What is the intended outcome?

The intended outcome is laughing at their life in reality in addition to their life online; same as any other tabloid. You can argue that they're not figures of public interest; but if they're not of public interest, then why are they interesting to the public?

 

[Dyn]

This is pretty disingenuous. The reason why you post someone's address publicly is because you are hoping that they will get harassed or be intimidated into silence. Not saying some people don't deserve it but have the balls to admit why you do what you do.

The reason we post people's addresses is because we're flexing that we found their address. This is a long running bbs tradition that dates all the way back to usenet flamewars, and nobody harassed or threatened anybody over it before viral posts on social media became a thing, and we're not particularly keen on abandoning a part of our site culture just because rabid tweens on TikTok are so vicious and mindless they keep trying to get people fired for saying things they don't like or or a 12 second Karen video makes them look racist. That shit has no place here.

I don't know of anyone who's ever complained about people contacting their workplace or showing up to their house because we doxed them, and if you do you're welcome to correct me, because if that was going on it would be a pretty alarming precedent and make a lot of us rethink our stance on how much dox is acceptable to drop.

 

[Tamara Knight]

The intended outcome is that they can’t hide behind anonymity later like you are trying to do like a tranny faggot. People post their addresses online or have them posted because they commit criminal offenses and the government posts them for them. Archiving publicly available info isn’t illegal you fucking retard tranny

Step 1. You know someone's real name and address and other people do to.
Step 2.
Step 3. Unethical behavior of subject is ceased

What's step 2?

 

[SIGSEGV]

It's directly ripped from the KF Telegram.
View attachment 5242644

That just makes OP even more of a faggot tbh.

 

[Lady Rackets Ass]

Step 1. You know someone's real name and address and other people do to.
Step 2.
Step 3. Unethical behavior of subject is ceased

What's step 2?

People do illegal things on websites that aren’t the kiwi farms

This is somehow the kiwi farms fault

This is your brain on current democracy TM

 

[Rent Tin]

I'm not a tranny. I can't really state my position without fed posting. But I'm not going to lie and say "oh tee hee here's someone's address I don't like, that I'm posting for no reason whatsoever." That's catty woman bullshit.

I know you're probably just a tranny trolling but if you want me to give you an actual explanation for why addresses is often posted it is because:

1. If we remove addresses, they will go onto the next thing "You need to take down IRL names, this is harmful to them" -> "Why do you even need to use names at all, just post vaguely so it doesn't hurt anyone." etc. etc.

2. A lolcow's location can often be used to find funnier information about them to post. It is also useful for further investigation into the person.
Chris Chan without knowing where he lives and seeing how his crack house isn't as funny.
Patrick Tomlinson isn't as funny without knowing his address, considering he sources his niggeroni from the surrounding streets.
The retarded things these people do are a mirror of their IRL actions.

3. It is trivial to find this information elsewhere thanks to the fact that most of these people publicly post their addresses or whereabouts online.

4. Nobody from Kiwi wants to go fuck with these people because:

a. People are lazy
b. Nobody actually cares
c. The things they do are a lot funnier when it is organic and caused by their own faults.

 

[named]

People do illegal things on websites that aren’t the kiwi farms

This is somehow the kiwi farms fault

This is your brain on current democracy TM

No, he actually has a point if that's your motive. If you're trying to post someone's real name to change their behavior, what (legal) Step 2 is there? You're not going to get any of these people to change their behavior anyway; just look at Greer or Yaniv. They have no shame over their behavior anyway because they're mentally ill.

Agendaposting and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Step 1. You know someone's real name and address and other people do to.
Step 2.
Step 3. Unethical behavior of subject is ceased

What's step 2?

Let me make this as simple as possible for you.

We are recording people's publicly available addresses. We need no reason beyond the fact it's legal. We certainly won't stop because you tell us to. The fact that you're passive-aggressively trying to pry us into submission makes us resist all the more.

If this chaps your ass so much, contact your representative and have them introduce a law that plainly says "It is illegal for private entities or individuals to publish the address of another private individual without that individual's express consent." If it becomes law, we will spend a day or two combing the website and altering posts accordingly.

 

[Lady Rackets Ass]

It is illegal for private entities or individuals to publish the address of another private individual without that individual's express consent." If it becomes law, we will spend a day or two combing the website and altering posts accordingly.

If they did this then then basically the entire entire internet would become illegal overnight not to mention the white/yellow pages.

 

[Barry McKockner]

If they did this then then basically the entire entire internet would become illegal overnight not to mention the white/yellow pages.

I'm laughing at Taylor Lorenz having to remove her doxx of LoTT if that passes.

 

[Rent Tin]

I'm laughing at Taylor Lorenz having to remove her doxx of LoTT if that passes.

I'm sure if that ends up happening they will have a very nice carveout for journalists, (only those with a certified media company).
After all, some of us animals are more equal than others.

 

[named]

If they did this then then basically the entire entire internet would become illegal overnight not to mention the white/yellow pages.

There is some precedent for laws like this that control collecting a "consumer's sensitive personal information," like the Californian Consumer Privacy Act of 2018. I think that this site would generally not be covered by such acts because there's no business relationship with the thread subject, though.

They're extremely annoying to comply with, and are almost as good for generating programmer employment as SOX was. The European equivalent (GDPR) is subject to endless lawsuits that make doing business in Europe very difficult.

 

[Lady Rackets Ass]

There is some precedent for laws like this that control collecting a "consumer's sensitive personal information," like the Californian Consumer Privacy Act of 2018. I think that this site would generally not be covered by such acts because there's no business relationship with the thread subject, though.

They're extremely annoying to comply with, and are almost as good for generating programmer employment as SOX was. The European equivalent (GDPR) is subject to endless lawsuits that make doing business in Europe very difficult.

So basically you agree that the kiwi farms isn’t doing anything illegal. Good for you tranny.

 

[named]

So basically you agree that the kiwi farms isn’t doing anything illegal. Good for you tranny.

I'm not the person who was asserting that we were doing something illegal. I'm just saying that trying to use their physical address to stop them from "[hiding] behind anonymity" doesn't make any sense. If you're not harassing them, then what would they be hiding from? It's not like this site has an e-police force or more than a few thousand people read this site.