PBS straight-up doxes someone from the CVille protest, tries to get them fired

https://web.archive.org/web/2018070...defense-contractor-with-a-security-clearance/

This story is part of an ongoing collaboration between ProPublica and FRONTLINE that includes documentaries scheduled to begin on PBS in August 2018.

If you’ve witnessed or experienced hate crimes, harassment or incidents of bias, you can use this form to send information to FRONTLINE, ProPublica and other partners in the Documenting Hate project.

There likely isn’t such a thing as a “typical” violent white extremist in America in 2018. Still, Michael Miselis — a University of California, Los Angeles doctoral student with a U.S. government security clearance to work on sensitive research for a prominent defense contractor — makes for a pretty unusual case.

For months, ProPublica and FRONTLINE have been working to identify the white supremacists at the center of violent demonstrations across the country, including the infamous Unite the Right rally last August in Charlottesville, Virginia. The Rise Above Movement, a Southern California group that expresses contempt for Muslims, Jews, and immigrants, became a focus of that effort. ProPublica and FRONTLINE were able to quickly identify a number of the group’s leaders, and find evidence that put them in the middle of violence in Charlottesville and Berkeley, California, among other places.

But one seeming member of RAM was harder to nail down. In video shot in Charlottesville, a bearded, husky man is seen in a red Make America Great Again hat with his hands wrapped in tape that came in handy for the brawling that occurred that day. During one encounter, the unidentified man in the red hat pushed an African-American protester to the ground and began pounding on him, video of the episode shows; moments later, a known RAM member choked and bloodied a pair of female counter-protesters. The possible RAM member also had turned up in video shot during hours of combat at a Trump rally in Berkeley, as well. Wearing protective goggles to ward off pepper spray, the man fought alongside RAM members, wrestling one protester to the ground and punching others.

Ultimately, ProPublica and FRONTLINE determined the man in the violent footage was Miselis, a 29-year-old pursuing a Ph.D. in UCLA’s aerospace engineering program. Miselis was identified using video footage and social media posts, and reporters confirmed his identity in an encounter with him outside his home. In interviews, a number of California law enforcement officials said Miselis was a member of RAM.

In addition to his scholarly pursuits, Miselis works as a systems engineer for Northrop Grumman, the giant defense contractor with a plant in Redondo Beach, California.

When approached by ProPublica and FRONTLINE in front of his home in Lawndale, a small city south of Los Angeles, Miselis said he “didn’t know anything” about what happened in Charlottesville.

“I think you got the wrong guy,” he said before driving off in his car.

Miselis did not respond to questions about his involvement with RAM. He did not answer additional questions sent by email.

Several current and former employees at Northrop Grumman told ProPublica and FRONTLINE that Miselis has received a security clearance to work in a computer modeling and simulation group within Northrop’s aerospace division. Such security clearances are typically issued in a two-step process. The federal Office of Personnel Management conducts an investigation into the individual. The agency’s findings are then forwarded to a special unit within the Department of Defense, which makes the final determination on whether the person should receive a clearance, a status that often allows the person access to classified or otherwise sensitive information concerning national security.

Public affairs officers at the Defense Department declined to comment about Miselis and his security clearance. The federal personnel management office referred questions regarding Miselis to Northrop Grumman.

Northrop Grumman did not respond to several requests for comment. However, interviews with current and former Northrop employees, as well as an internal email, make clear the company knows of Miselis’ actions in Charlottesville and involvement with RAM. Miselis informed his superiors about his contact with reporters from ProPublica and FRONTLINE, as is required by any individual who holds a higher-level security clearance, the people said.

So far, it seems, the company has taken no action against Miselis, who remains employed.

Keegan Hankes, an analyst with the Southern Poverty Law Center who follows RAM closely, said he was surprised that nothing has been done about Miselis’ employment and security clearance.

“It’s ridiculous,” Hankes said.

“They’re openly motivated by racism,” he added of RAM.

As ProPublica has previously reported, RAM first surfaced publicly last spring and has quickly established itself as one of the violent groups in the resurgent white supremacist scene; members, who regularly train in boxing and martial arts, have been documented engaging in a string of melees. Founded in early 2017 by Robert Rundo, a Queens, New York, native who served an 18-month prison sentence for stabbing a rival gang member six times during a 2009 street fight, the group’s core membership is small —15 to 20 young men — but capable of real menace, ProPublica’s reporting has shown.

Rundo has recruited followers from the Orange County and San Diego chapters of the Hammerskin Nation, the country’s largest Nazi skinhead gang, and one the authorities say has been behind at least nine murders. One of the Hammerskins who joined up with RAM, Matthew Branstetter, went to prison in California in 2011 on hate crime charges for robbing and assaulting a Jewish man in an Orange County park. The attack left the victim with “a concussion, broken jaw, eye socket fracture, broken nose, cracked ribs, severe facial bruising, and cuts and bruises to his body and face,” according to a news release issued by county prosecutors at the time. Other RAM members have spent time in prison and Los Angeles County jail on charges for robbery, firearms possession and other offenses.

The FBI has taken notice. Several law enforcement officials familiar with the bureau’s work said agents have opened a formal investigation into RAM. In a statement, the FBI said: “While the FBI neither confirms nor denies the existence of an investigation, our agents investigate activity which may constitute a federal crime or pose a threat to national security. Our focus is not on membership in particular groups but on criminal activity. The FBI cannot initiate an investigation based solely on an individual’s race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, or the exercise of their First Amendment rights, and we remain committed to protecting those rights for all Americans.”

Since last August, local prosecutors have brought charges against a handful of participants in the Charlottesville rally, successfully convicting several men so far, including activists on both sides of the clashes. Now federal authorities are targeting neo-Nazi James Alex Fields, the man accused of killing counter-protester Heather Heyer and injuring more than two dozen others. Federal prosecutors recently filed 30 charges against Fields, including 28 hate crime charges.

A native of Stockton, California, Miselis earned a bachelor’s of science degree in mechanical engineering from UCLA in 2011. UCLA’s website today lists Miselis as a Ph.D. candidate in the engineering department’s hypersonics and computational aero-dynamics group. After FRONTLINE and ProPublica began making inquiries about Miselis, the school issued a brief statement saying only that he is technically on leave from the doctoral program.

Miselis was clearly prepared for the unrest in Berkeley in the spring of 2017. At the Trump rally he wore protective goggles to ward off pepper spray or tear gas, taped his hands up like a boxer, and wore a gray active-wear uniform, as did several other RAM members that day. In video footage reviewed by ProPublica and FRONTLINE, Miselis can be seen fighting alongside other RAM members.

The event turned into a multi-hour street battle pitting Trump supporters, including fascists and extreme-right activists, against counter-protesters, some of them militant anti-fascists. Police made 20 arrests, confiscating knives, pepper spray, a stun gun, an axe-handle and many wooden dowel rods, which were used as clubs by participants. At least seven people were transported to the hospital for their injuries. Rundo, RAM’s founder, was arrested and detained for assault on a police officer, but Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley declined to file charges. “We determined we didn’t have enough evidence to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt,” said Teresa Drenick, an Alameda County deputy district attorney.

After the Berkeley rally, Miselis traveled across the country to take part in the massive white supremacist convergence in Charlottesville, where his activities were photographed and recorded on video, both by professional journalists and other people equipped with smart phones. At the rally on Aug. 12, pictures taken by photojournalist Jason Andrew show Miselis walking alongside two other RAM members previously identified by ProPublica, Tom Gillen and Ben Daley.

At roughly 10 a.m., Miselis and the other RAM members confronted counter-protesters a few steps away from Emancipation Park, where white supremacists had gathered beneath a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee.

Daley attacked two female counter-protesters, kicking and punching them, a scene captured in video obtained by ProPublica and FRONTLINE. He wrapped both hands around the throat of one woman, throttling her until she fell to the ground, blood seeping from a gash on her temple. The other woman emerged from the incident with a laceration across her forehead. On video, she screams as blood drips across her face.

Miselis jumped into the fracas. In addition to FRONTLINE and ProPublica, National Geographic produced video documenting the brawl.

A sequence of pictures shot by photojournalist Edu Bayer, who was on assignment for The New York Times, show Miselis hurling what appears to be a can of soda at a counter-protesters. In one photo he flexes his biceps muscles in celebration.

It’s this sort of street combat that worries the SPLC’s Hankes. In his view, such brazen criminal activity should be a red flag for both Northrop Grumman and the Pentagon.

“I can’t believe that participation in an organized white supremacist group focused on street-level violence wouldn’t jeopardize your security clearance,” Hankes said.
 
Good on you P.B.S., you're really doing a public service with stories like this. I'm sure it'll help keep anyone else from sharing the same opinions as those damn dirty conservatives nazis.

You don't have the right to privacy in public. Once you're engaging in street violence you're a topic of interest whether you're antifa or a Nazi or just a sports rioter.

Honest question: is contacting someone's employer in the same way they did, and then pretty much openly admitting it was to get them fired, still considered investigative journalism?
 
Good on you P.B.S., you're really doing a public service with stories like this. I'm sure it'll help keep anyone else from sharing the same opinions as those damn dirty conservatives nazis.
This faggot was expressing his opinions with his fist. He's as bad as antifa and I don't think he should be seeing classified military secrets. Expressing one's opinions is one thing but that right stops when it connects to someone's head.
 
This faggot was expressing his opinions with his fist. He's as bad as antifa and I don't think he should be seeing classified military secrets. Expressing one's opinions is one thing but that right stops when it connects to someone's head.

Considering how that whole shitshow went down, I'm not going to automatically assume that whomever he was punching wasn't the aggressor in that situation in one way or the other. Even if that were the case that he was the aggressor, it doesn't change the fact that this story is yet another that is painting a rally that was for conservatives of different stripes and libertarians as a "white supremacist neo-nazi" rally.
 
Considering how that whole shitshow went down, I'm not going to automatically assume that whomever he was punching wasn't the aggressor in that situation in one way or the other. Even if that were the case that he was the aggressor, it doesn't change the fact that this story is yet another that is painting a rally that was for conservatives of different stripes and libertarians as a "white supremacist neo-nazi" rally.

You are tilting at windmills.
 
IMO, Frontline is one of PBS's most blatantly partisan programs. Everything else is pretty impartial, but Frontline doesn't really make much of a secret of which way it leans. I didn't realize they were that bad until I watched the 2016 election candidates episode and the Russian hacking election episode.
 
Considering how that whole shitshow went down, I'm not going to automatically assume that whomever he was punching wasn't the aggressor in that situation in one way or the other. Even if that were the case that he was the aggressor, it doesn't change the fact that this story is yet another that is painting a rally that was for conservatives of different stripes and libertarians as a "white supremacist neo-nazi" rally.
The "aggressor" is the one who elevates the altercation from words to fists. In this instance, this black dude wasn't throwing shit, he wasn't popping off; he was using his words, like an adult, and this thug thought that throwing his fists around would make the facts he didn't like go away, like a child.

But nah, this is totally doxxing because we can't give those dirty SJWS (here meaning "everyone even slightly to the left of me") a single inch. Best to just double and triple down on our losing position.
 
IMO, Frontline is one of PBS's most blatantly partisan programs. Everything else is pretty impartial, but Frontline doesn't really make much of a secret of which way it leans. I didn't realize they were that bad until I watched the 2016 election candidates episode and the Russian hacking election episode.

Respectfully disagree. Frontline is usually fairly solid programming. I will concede that they dip into partisan waters sometimes but overall it is a good show.
 
The "aggressor" is the one who elevates the altercation from words to fists. In this instance, this black dude wasn't throwing shit, he wasn't popping off; he was using his words, like an adult, and this thug thought that throwing his fists around would make the facts he didn't like go away, like a child.

But nah, this is totally doxxing because we can't give those dirty SJWS (here meaning "everyone even slightly to the left of me") a single inch. Best to just double and triple down on our losing position.

Akshually hitting people with your fists in a meth-fueled white trash rage is free speech kek MAGA
 
Honest question: is contacting someone's employer in the same way they did, and then pretty much openly admitting it was to get them fired, still considered investigative journalism?

Yes.

Especially when the person may have access to sensitive information or perform a job which requires impartiality (lawyer/doctor/judge/police officer/military).
It also applies when the person has a job which requires a person who is mentally sound (like a pilot or a person who has access to the launch nukes button).

There's no magical land where you can run around in public at protests beating people while alongside a group called "Rise Above Movement".

If those are your personal views, then fine, shitpost on the internet and don't use your name online. But as soon as you publicly affiliate with a group which is known for this:
upload_2018-7-6_7-19-13.png

https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounders/rise-above-movement-ram

That's when any sensitive job you have is going to be put at risk.
 
Yes.

Especially when the person may have access to sensitive information or perform a job which requires impartiality (lawyer/doctor/judge/police officer/military).
It also applies when the person has a job which requires a person who is mentally sound (like a pilot or a person who has access to the launch nukes button).

There's no magical land where you can run around in public at protests beating people while alongside a group called "Rise Above Movement".

If those are your personal views, then fine, shitpost on the internet and don't use your name online. But as soon as you publicly affiliate with a group which is known for this:

That's when any sensitive job you have is going to be put at risk.

Quoting the ADL to prove a defense contractor is a security risk racism or whatever? You've got three big faults in your logic here.

1. "I sure do hate chinks and niggers, and love me some white America" doesn't exactly lend itself towards selling secrets to China. Whether or not he's racist is pretty irrelevant from a security standpoint.
2. The ADL is the wonderful organization that brought us such amusement as "Pepe is a hate symbol", and is about as useful as a wet rag for actually categorizing groups.
3. Journalists could learn something from our own rules – don't pozload my negholep.
 
Quoting the ADL to prove a defense contractor is a security risk racism or whatever? You've got three big faults in your logic here.

1. "I sure do hate chinks and niggers, and love me some white America" doesn't exactly lend itself towards selling secrets to China. Whether or not he's racist is pretty irrelevant from a security standpoint.
2. The ADL is the wonderful organization that brought us such amusement as "Pepe is a hate symbol", and is about as useful as a wet rag for actually categorizing groups.
3. Journalists could learn something from our own rules – don't pozload my neghole.

If someone is going out in public and can't control their emotions enough to not engage in physical fights with people over politics then they're a security risk.
Everything you're saying relates to speech and opinions, as soon as someone starts getting into altercations you go beyond speech and opinions.

Even so, if it were just the speech and opinions part many employers would find it to be problematic. Unless your job gives you the freedom to speak then you are at all times a representative of your employer, even if you're off the clock.

Many employment contracts specifically include wording about your level of public engagement and how much of a dumbass you can be before you get fired. If you don't want to give up that freedom then don't sign a contract with that employer.
 
Many employment contracts specifically include wording about your level of public engagement and how much of a dumbass you can be before you get fired. If you don't want to give up that freedom then don't sign a contract with that employer.

Literally every HR department in the country makes this painfully clear and yet people still cite free speech when they get fired from their jobs for beating up black people or stealing hats from teenagers. But leave it to unemployed Kiwis to not understand this basic principle.
 
Back