Pedophile acceptance on tumblr

[Coldgrip]

If saying 'don't rape children' makes me a Nazi, I guess I'm just a Nazi.

Heil Hitler 1488

 

[Star Stuff]

4chan is a lot more openly hostile, while Tumblr is more subtle and passive-aggressive. As it so happens, 4chan is mostly male-dominated with the exception of a few boards while Tumblr is very much female-dominated. I'm sure that's no coincidence.

I liked a saying someone told me about the two. Went something along the lines of "Tumblr is full of people pretending to be depressed and 4chan is a bunch of people pretending not to be."

Or maybe it was Autism.

Both would be equally true.

 

[UnclePhil]

We should all know by now that online anonymity is a complete myth. Even if someone filters their tracks through a VPN, any computer forensic detective halfway decent and determined enough will find them.

So what we have here are people who have a vested interest in announcing their child fuck fetish to millions of potential Internet users. Except not really, entire world, boss, wife, neighbors down the street with small children, because these are "good" pedophiles, like "good" vampires. They're doing this on an open blog that requires an e-mail address to register, an e-mail address tied at some node to their IRL IP address, name, exact location.

Who the fuck thinks telling an entire surface connected network about being a vegetarian 'MAP' is a good idea? Who would be so exceptional as to risk their livelihoods, relationships, and societal reputations by confessing this on a public forum...not only that they're pedophiles, but that they are proud of it?

 

[Fiddleford]

Pretty ballsy of him to attach his name to this.

I'm way too scared to try and join that Discord. I'd have the fbi tracking me down within weeks.

 

[Star Stuff]

I'm way too scared to try and join that Discord. I'd have the fbi tracking me down within weeks.

But the temptation and curiosity. This is some Sinful Fruit deal. Like I can't help but wonder what these kinds of people even talk about.

 

[Johnny Bravo]

...because these are "good" pedophiles, like "good" vampires.

"Good" vampires kill other vampires.

 

[FierceBrosnan]

"Good" vampires kill other vampires.

And "good" pedos are dead ones... which means the best pedos are ones that rise from their graves to kill and eat living pedophiles.

 

[AbaddonTheDepoiler]

And "good" pedos are dead ones... which means the best pedos are ones that rise from their graves to kill and eat living pedophiles.

Don't forget to shoot 'em back in the head once they're done, and set the remains on fire.
Do the same with the other pedos.

 

[FierceBrosnan]

Don't forget to shoot 'em back in the head once they're done, and set the remains on fire.
Do the same with the other pedos.

But make sure to wear a breathing mask and eye protection when burning and handling the bodies. We have to prevent the spread of the pedo-virus and one can never be too cautious.

 

[sideofthematress]

Whoah if you guys think that's bad here is a self proclaimed MAP/Pedo that goes by Mells the MAP and she has a tumblr and youtube account
Warning this video is fucking crazy.

Here's a video on her child rape and why she thinks it's okay for her to fantasize about children sexually.
http://mells-the-map.tumblr.com/
And here is her Tumblr that is just writhe with intellectual fallacies. Really shows how warped she is.

 

[sideofthematress]

Whoah if you guys think that's bad here is a self proclaimed MAP/Pedo that goes by Mells the MAP and she has a tumblr and youtube account
Warning this video is fucking crazy.

Here's a video on her child rape and why she thinks it's okay for her to fantasize about children sexually.
http://mells-the-map.tumblr.com/
And here is her Tumblr that is just writhe with intellectual fallacies. Really shows how warped she is.

Here is a example of her intellectual fallacies. You see she says pedophilia is wrong and her attraction is wrong yet she says she has the right to defend using metaphors like "it's like defending good corn."

(you see here she is implying that her attraction is like defending good corn. Even though she says her attraction is wrong.)

Then when she is called out on it She back pedals and act like she has no idea of what the anon is talking about.

She is shaping up to be quite the pedo lolcow material I tell yah what.

 

[Probably Not]

I'd point out that fictional child pornography is in fact legal in many countries (such as the US and Japan) with the rationalization that any laws regarding it would be unreasonably vague and no actual children are being harmed. The way I see it, if pedophiles aren't doing anything that harms actual children they should be fine to do as they please. Fictional porn such as art and writing should be fine and seems like a healthy outlet for them since no children are being harmed. I'll also note the internet seems more or less okay with loli and shota (which is drawn) porn when it's confined to its proper areas and there's even some joking about it (pedobear for example).

That said it seems like not such a smart move to announce your pedophilia on the internet since people have a kneejerk demonizing reaction of the pedohunt. However I do think we should offer some sympathies and psychological treatment options to pedophiles who do not want to act on their desire and genuinely don't want to hurt children. The issue is that pedophiles seeking treatment tend to fear being outed which can potentially result in physical harm, vandalism, or death. It's a bit like drug addicts not seeking treatment because they fear legal and employment ramifications. This is a serious problem. Pedophilia is bad because it can cause harm to minors, but we should be freely offering psychological treatment to pedophiles who do not act on their urges and I'd argue there shouldn't be stigma associated with pedophiles seeking an outlet with fictional pornography since it doesn't actually harm minors.

They have their own theme song.

Can't forget one of the greatest hits from Oingo Boingo:

Bit of trivia, according to Danny Elfman the song is actually about rich middle aged and old men in California in the eighties who would date and marry girls in their twenties and late teens.

 

[soryu]

UWU

 

[sideofthematress]

I'd point out that fictional child pornography is in fact legal in many countries (such as the US and Japan) with the rationalization that any laws regarding it would be unreasonably vague and no actual children are being harmed. The way I see it, if pedophiles aren't doing anything that harms actual children they should be fine to do as they please. Fictional porn such as art and writing should be fine and seems like a healthy outlet for them since no children are being harmed. I'll also note the internet seems more or less okay with loli and shota (which is drawn) porn when it's confined to its proper areas and there's even some joking about it (pedobear for example).

That said it seems like not such a smart move to announce your pedophilia on the internet since people have a kneejerk demonizing reaction of the pedohunt. However I do think we should offer some sympathies and psychological treatment options to pedophiles who do not want to act on their desire and genuinely don't want to hurt children. The issue is that pedophiles seeking treatment tend to fear being outed which can potentially result in physical harm, vandalism, or death. It's a bit like drug addicts not seeking treatment because they fear legal and employment ramifications. This is a serious problem. Pedophilia is bad because it can cause harm to minors, but we should be freely offering psychological treatment to pedophiles who do not act on their urges and I'd argue there shouldn't be stigma associated with pedophiles seeking an outlet with fictional pornography since it doesn't actually harm minors.


Can't forget one of the greatest hits from Oingo Boingo:

Bit of trivia, according to Danny Elfman the song is actually about rich middle aged and old men in California in the eighties who would date and marry girls in their twenties and late teens.

I'm sorry dude but psychologist has proven time and time again that simulated CP actually if seen in a normal mindset actually makes a pedo more likely to offend. Cause it is drawing sex with children as "okay". Actually there have been recent studies that show that pedos when view said drawn child porn actually encourages there need to sexually molest children. Plus with all those cases in Japan where lolicon is used by pedos to groom children with and what not. (The grieger complex incident is a example of loli porn being used by a pedo to encourage his actions of offending.) Also lolicon and shotacon falls under US law as a obscenity crime.

The best thing they can do is seek help and try not to offend.

 

[Probably Not]

I'm sorry dude but psychologist has proven time and time again that simulated CP actually if seen in a normal mindset actually makes a pedo more likely to offend. Cause it is drawing sex with children as "okay". Actually there have been recent studies that show that pedos when view said drawn child porn actually encourages there need to sexually molest children. Plus with all those cases in Japan where lolicon is used by pedos to groom children with and what not. (The grieger complex incident is a example of loli porn being used by a pedo to encourage his actions of offending.) Also lolicon and shotacon falls under US law as a obscenity crime.

The best thing they can do is seek help and try not to offend.

Most people understand the difference between fantasy and reality when it comes to sexual interests. According to some statistics as much as a third of men have fantasized about raping a woman and about half of men have had the fantasy of being raped by a woman. Another study indicated more than half of women had fantasies or engaged in roleplay involving coercion or rape during sex. This doesn't mean we have a slew of rapists running around or an epidemic of rape. People are fully capable of separating fantasy from reality and not engaging in the real thing because to do so would cause harm.

Some pedophiles are capable of controlling themselves and not acting on their urges and those who do should be given treatment options and allowed healthy outlets that do not actually harm minors.

Also fictional child pornography and obscenity laws has issues with the biggest being that there is no national standard for obscenity laws. It actually varies by jurisdiction and some jurisdictions explicitly only consider it obscene if it's a recording of something that actually happened when it comes to child pornography. Federally, outside inconsistent obscenity laws fictional child pornography is technically legal.

Also to add, according to Stanley v. Georgia (1969) mere possession of obscene material for private use can not be prosecuted by State laws. Basically people have a right to pornography if it doesn't break federal law and they have no intention of distributing it publicly.

 

[Meowthkip]

I'm sorry dude but psychologist has proven time and time again that simulated CP actually if seen in a normal mindset actually makes a pedo more likely to offend. Cause it is drawing sex with children as "okay". Actually there have been recent studies that show that pedos when view said drawn child porn actually encourages there need to sexually molest children. Plus with all those cases in Japan where lolicon is used by pedos to groom children with and what not. (The grieger complex incident is a example of loli porn being used by a pedo to encourage his actions of offending.) Also lolicon and shotacon falls under US law as a obscenity crime.

The best thing they can do is seek help and try not to offend.

Lolicon and shotacon are in a weird legal grey area in the United States. There's also the issue if arresting people for possessing cartoon depictions of child porn is essentially arresting them for a thought crime, which could potentially be a violation of the First Amendment.

If you've ever gone through Shadman's thread, it's been noted that his loli and shotacon are mostly legal. What is illegal are his depictions of actual, real life children in pornography, which he has gotten in serious hot water over, as he well should.

I don't know or claim to know about the psychology of pedophiles, but I do take an interest in protecting the Freedom of Speech and knowing its boundaries. I would like to say that I, too, would not be opposed to pedos jerking it to lolicon, as no actual child is being harmed or exploited, but I also understand that it ends up not being enough for many of these people. And hell, even regular pornography can be used to convince children into performing sex acts on child molesters, so I'm not sure how greatly offenses would be reduced if it were to be made illegal across the board.

I guess what I'm saying is that I don't think somebody should go to jail for possession of loli or shotacon alone, though possession of such materials could reasonably be used as evidence in a conviction of child molestation. I just don't think it's rational to want to send somebody to prison for being a creepy pervert who hasn't actually hurt anyone, even if they are incredibly, super creepy, and you can't send people to jail for crimes they have yet to commit.

It's an icky subject.

 

[Corrugated Daffodils]

Lolicon and shotacon are in a weird legal grey area in the United States. There's also the issue if arresting people for possessing cartoon depictions of child porn is essentially arresting them for a thought crime, which could potentially be a violation of the First Amendment.

If you've ever gone through Shadman's thread, it's been noted that his loli and shotacon are mostly legal. What is illegal are his depictions of actual, real life children in pornography, which he has gotten in serious hot water over, as he well should.

I don't know or claim to know about the psychology of pedophiles, but I do take an interest in protecting the Freedom of Speech and knowing its boundaries. I would like to say that I, too, would not be opposed to pedos jerking it to lolicon, as no actual child is being harmed or exploited, but I also understand that it ends up not being enough for many of these people. And hell, even regular pornography can be used to convince children into performing sex acts on child molesters, so I'm not sure how greatly offenses would be reduced if it were to be made illegal across the board.

I guess what I'm saying is that I don't think somebody should go to jail for possession of loli or shotacon alone, though possession of such materials could reasonably be used as evidence in a conviction of child molestation. I just don't think it's rational to want to send somebody to prison for being a creepy pervert who hasn't actually hurt anyone, even if they are incredibly, super creepy, and you can't send people to jail for crimes they have yet to commit.

It's an icky subject.

I will note however that in places like the UK and possibley the rest of Europe people can be arrested for Loli and Shota. One guy got arrested for Simpsons porn lol.

https://www.dailydot.com/parsec/uk-manga-fan-convicted-for-loli-possession/

 

[Probably Not]

I will note however that in places like the UK and possibley the rest of Europe people can be arrested for Loli and Shota. One guy got arrested for Simpsons porn lol.

https://www.dailydot.com/parsec/uk-manga-fan-convicted-for-loli-possession/

While nearly all of of the members of the European Union made all forms of child pornography illegal in compliance with EU laws, there are a few exceptions such as Finland, Sweden, and Denmark that still allow fictional child pornography. Again, the rationale in those countries is that the pornography has to involve actual, real children to cause harm and thus be illegal.

Sweden actually set a precedent for drawn artwork being legal after a guy successfully had his lawyer argue that loli porn did not depict real children and could not be mistaken as such after being charged with possession.

 

[Star Stuff]

I'm sorry dude but psychologist has proven time and time again that simulated CP actually if seen in a normal mindset actually makes a pedo more likely to offend. Cause it is drawing sex with children as "okay". Actually there have been recent studies that show that pedos when view said drawn child porn actually encourages there need to sexually molest children. Plus with all those cases in Japan where lolicon is used by pedos to groom children with and what not. (The grieger complex incident is a example of loli porn being used by a pedo to encourage his actions of offending.) Also lolicon and shotacon falls under US law as a obscenity crime.

The best thing they can do is seek help and try not to offend.

This is the same argument as "vidya gayms makes killers WE GOTTA BAN CAWL O' DOODY". It's a Slippery Slope Fallacy, so this whole thing falls flat on it's face. Also, it's an obscenity crime if you show it off to everyone on the street, which pretty much stretches from any form of pornography to streaking. If you can claim that "[INSERT PROFESSIONAL HERE] have proven [INSERT ANYTHING HERE] time and time again", then you can cite respectable sources.

EDIT: I find these relevant. I really recommend reading the fallacy list so you can have more vetting in your forming of conclusions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_fallacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope

Lolicon and shotacon are in a weird legal grey area in the United States. There's also the issue if arresting people for possessing cartoon depictions of child porn is essentially arresting them for a thought crime, which could potentially be a violation of the First Amendment.

If you've ever gone through Shadman's thread, it's been noted that his loli and shotacon are mostly legal. What is illegal are his depictions of actual, real life children in pornography, which he has gotten in serious hot water over, as he well should.

I don't know or claim to know about the psychology of pedophiles, but I do take an interest in protecting the Freedom of Speech and knowing its boundaries. I would like to say that I, too, would not be opposed to pedos jerking it to lolicon, as no actual child is being harmed or exploited, but I also understand that it ends up not being enough for many of these people. And hell, even regular pornography can be used to convince children into performing sex acts on child molesters, so I'm not sure how greatly offenses would be reduced if it were to be made illegal across the board.

I guess what I'm saying is that I don't think somebody should go to jail for possession of loli or shotacon alone, though possession of such materials could reasonably be used as evidence in a conviction of child molestation. I just don't think it's rational to want to send somebody to prison for being a creepy pervert who hasn't actually hurt anyone, even if they are incredibly, super creepy, and you can't send people to jail for crimes they have yet to commit.

It's an icky subject.

This also represents what I believe to a T. I am a STAUNCH defender of the First Amendment, as I'd like to think many others are here considering the very nature of the internet, so the mere possession of a non-crime being prosecuted as such is ridiculous. That said, to some extent I consider loli/shotacon much like I would a gun: You having the gun is okay, so you shouldn't be arrested for it. You killing someone with that gun, however, should entail that you're charged for both the murder and the murder with that gun. It's situational evidence, basically, since on its own it means literally nothing.

Not the best analogy, but I hope it gets my point across. We should only trump up the charges with possession should a crime be evident, because there will always be a large difference between a civilian and a criminal and how they use different materials.

I just woke up. Thinking is hard.

 

[Hui]

If you fap to loli's or shotas chances are you are a pedophile. Or Japanese.