Disaster Pedophiles are about to become a protected class in Minnesota - A transgender representative in Minnesota has introduced a bill that will remove the exclusion of pedophiles from the protected class of “sexual orientation.”

1682535830388.png1682535841306.png

What if I told you that a bill in the Minnesota Legislature is changing the definition of “sexual orientation” to include pedophilia?

That’s crazy, right? Who thinks pedophiles should be a protected class?

The authors of this bill which is progressing through the Minnesota State Legislature, that’s who.

The bill amends the provisions in Minnesota law that created sexual orientation as a protected class, meaning that discrimination of any kind based upon sexual orientation is illegal in the state. It’s been around for a long time, unsurprisingly, and like all such provisions, it encourages mischief such as lawsuits, quotas, DEI initiatives, etc. They also undermine the right to free association.

There is a carve-out for some non-profits, but otherwise, it applies to everything and everybody. Nothing shocking, of course. This sort of thing is common now. Nobody has the right to free association in America anymore.

Well here in the great state of Minnesota we are about to expand the definition of “sexual orientation,” and in the process, the great minds of the Democrat majority in the House of Representatives have decided to remove a provision that excluded pedophilia as a legitimate sexual orientation.

No, I am not kidding. Pedophilia is about to be legitimized. Not legalized–yet. But discrimination against pedophiles will now be prohibited if this bill becomes a law.

Most of the controversy surrounding the bill has been the provisions related to gender identity, putting our “human rights” law into something more in line with the contemporary mores of the Left. All the gender gobbledygook will be legally affirmed, and of course, anybody who wants to opt out of affirming crazy people will be turned into targets of lawsuits and harassment.

But the pedophilia provision should be getting more attention than that.

Striking the current law a provision that carved out pedophilia from the definition of sexual orientation is a radical move, and not getting the attention that it deserves.

Pedophiles will become a protected class. A PROTECTED CLASS! They will get the same legal protections against discrimination as gays and lesbians and be lumped into the same legal category.

You will be subject to lawsuits if you discriminate against pedophiles. You have to hire them, house them, and serve them in your restaurant regardless of your objection to their evil desires. They will have more rights than you. Because they are pedophiles.

Gays Against Groomers, call your office!

Lots of normal people are blissfully unaware of the Leftist agenda to groom children. It sounds like a conspiracy theory because, to be clear, it is too evil to contemplate. How can our neighbors, our elected officials, and our educators be monsters? It is inconceivable! Conservatives must be crazy liars.

But there it is, in black and white. Again. The agenda moves forward.

Minnesota and other Blue states are rushing headlong to pass bills like these both because Leftists believe in this, and their current grasp on power is allowing them to pass every insane idea that pops into their minds.

It is happening here. It is happening now. And the next stop is going to be explicitly legalizing pedophilia.

Once the Rubicon of declaring children mature enough to make lifetime medical decisions at ages as young as 8 it makes no sense to assert that they aren’t mature enough to engage in “consensual” relationships. If you can get permission from a child to sterilize and mutilate them, why stop there? They have been essentially declared adults in sexual matters.

Go read the bill. Look at the list of authors. It is still a growing list, too. It has had its “second reading,” which means it can appear on the floor for a vote at any time.

1682535914414.png

Authors (17)​

17 Authors and the list is still growing. This isn’t accidental–removing the exception of pedophilia that would allow for discrimination against pedophiles is in the bill’s description:
Gender identity separate definition created, and human rights act sections removed that allow for discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The Democrat Party is becoming the party of sexual groomers. It really is that simple.

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2023...become-a-protected-class-in-minnesota-n546242 (Archive)

Bill: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/te...ssion=ls93&session_year=2023&session_number=0 (Archive)
 
Last edited:
>Bottom of the slope
Lol

>Be some time in the near future
>Go to work
>Get stuck behind the local NAMBLA pride parade
>Show up late
>Get called into HR
>See a pride flag with a paw print on the door
>Open it
>The stench of diapers and death hits you like a sack of bricks
>See someone in a fur suit fucking a deer's carcass
>This genderless furry tells you to sit down
>Try not to gag because that's a sign of bigotry
>The furry points to a computer screen containing posts of you condemning MAPs
>You correct the thing by pointing out it's child rape
>The furry thing tells you you're fired
>Get escorted out of the office
>Go to your car
>It won't start
>Your Schwab-Gates Social Credit Score is too low
>Walk home
>You're being evicted from your apartment
>For being a mapphobic bigot
>Find yourself in a nearby park
>You're homeless
>Watch as white girls with their own pride flags fuck their dogs in public
>People walking by are forced to praise them
>Nearby furries take turns fucking the dog
>White girls have to share the dogs or else they'll end up like you
>All the while the newly redesigned American flag gets unveiled
>It's unveiled by the local mayor
>The mayor's a necrophiliac
>The new flag is a mishmash of every pride flag known to exist
>It looks like five people took ipecac and food coloring and threw up all over a 3x5 foot piece of cloth
>Everyone sings the new national anthem
>It's all about sucking dicks
>You pray to God you're at the bottom of the slippery slope
Had to screenshot this. I laughed until it hurt.
 
It's less about your responsibility and understanding how it works for future events. Never give them an inch, because those who do are always out for a mile.
I liked gay people for maybe three years, and I've swung further back into being really homophobic. For some reason, that's disturbing to my homophobic partner.
 
I liked gay people for maybe three years, and I've swung further back into being really homophobic. For some reason, that's disturbing to my homophobic partner.
As you should. The more you learn about the gay community the more you'll see that it was always leading here. There's a persistent issue of child molestation in that community and they refuse to do anything about it. It's practically foundational.
 
Women have cuddled up to whoever has power to try to use them as a weapon and to try to give themselves protection since prehistory. They all talk shit about him on places like lolcow and onion though. I think he only tolerates them cause they paypig though.
So that means if Nazism becomes popular again, women will gravitate towards the weirdos who scream about how "DA JOOZE are ruining the world" or whatever.
I can't imagine being gay, homophobic, and dating another man who's also homophobic. That sounds like a fun idea for a sitcom though.
The thought of two closeted gay guys who don't like gay people having a relationship sounds hilarious.
 
So that means if Nazism becomes popular again, women will gravitate towards the weirdos who scream about how "DA JOOZE are ruining the world" or whatever.

The thought of two closeted gay guys who don't like gay people having a relationship sounds hilarious.
Hitler did have a bunch of women simps. I wish I remembered her name, but there was this one Nazi lady who named all six of her children names starting with H for Hitler. She ended up killing them all. So yeah, I feel like that describes some of the users on here pretty well.
Wait, didn't that scenario sort of happen in It's Always Sunny?
 
Hitler did have a bunch of women simps. I wish I remembered her name, but there was this one Nazi lady who named all six of her children names starting with H for Hitler. She ended up killing them all. So yeah, I feel like that describes some of the users on here pretty well.
Wait, didn't that scenario sort of happen in It's Always Sunny?
No idea on It's Always Sunny, but it does sound like the Hitler shit just confirms the incel theories of "women go for bad boys" or whatever the fuck they call it. I dunno about users here but people say a lot of edgy shit online for attention so I'm kinda used to that.
Ironically Scarlett Johansson who is a Jew has a Nazi fetish. It's why she wanted to be in that movie.

View attachment 5094498
Imagine being a Jewish incel and seeing this shit.
 
>Whines about infanticide being illegal.
>Edgy racist
>"B-but religion is bad too guise!!"
>Dislikes trannies
What makes you think she isn't?
She doesn't come off as someone that believes in anything. Either that, or she's actually just playing a bit as part of some master OPSEC plan that prevents even her personality from being connected between social media accounts.

No idea on It's Always Sunny, but it does sound like the Hitler shit just confirms the incel theories of "women go for bad boys" or whatever the fuck they call it.
No, see, they're only predisposed to go after "bad boys" when they're ovulating, and only as short term partners-- not long term "husband material".

...yes, a woman tried to dispute the idea by arguing the above.

You do the math.
 
She doesn't come off as someone that believes in anything.


No, see, they're only predisposed to go after "bad boys" when they're ovulating, and only as short term partners-- not long term "husband material".

...yes, a woman tried to dispute the idea by saying the above.

I'll have you do the math on her explanation.
wait wait wait, who made that ovulator comment, spill the tea buddy.
 
I'm believe this is the politician that specifically introduced the ammendment to protect child molesters whining about the outrage. Seems apt to get an archive in place.


He's thrashing around whining about how mean and unfair the world is, but he doesn't even attempt to debunk the central concept- that his bill protects child rapists. And he's limited replies. Count down to him privating all his accounts. (Which pols should not be allowed to do.)
 
wait wait wait, who made that ovulator comment, spill the tea buddy.
It's a very long comment in a convoluted conversation.

Here's the relevant bit:
MGTOWs and men such as yourself really need to move past this idea that women enjoy men who beat them to a bloody pulp. What you're promoting here is a cycle of abuse, and manipulation. Women only have a 'thing' for 'bad boys' during ovulation and for short-term partners. Never actual marriage material.

Elsewhere, she cites a study about this:
You are referring to Dark Triad, the trait in which women allegedly fawn over. In regards to that particular bit, women might find aggressive mates attractive in the short term, but they are absolutely poor for long term mates, which directly influences child rearing.
 
Last edited:
Back