Pedophiles of Sluthate AND Lookism (MRZ, Brian Peppers and many more!)

[Surtur]

So make the production of child pornography illegal? It's really not a hard concept for fucks sake. Holocaust happened for holocaust images to be created. Make holocaust illegal, but don't make images of the holocaust illegal. It's not a hard concept, honest to fucking god, it is not hard to understand this, I seriously think something is wrong with you if you cannot understand this, and it makes me really sad, because I hate all these broken people who don't know how to think.

What is your favorite hard candy?

 

[Lurker]

So make the production of child pornography illegal? It's really not a hard concept for fucks sake. Holocaust happened for holocaust images to be created. Make holocaust illegal, but don't make images of the holocaust illegal. It's not a hard concept, honest to fucking god, it is not hard to understand this, I seriously think something is wrong with you if you cannot understand this, and it makes me really sad, because I hate all these broken people who don't know how to think.

It's already illegal and people still make it, you stupid fuck.

 

[SolidusChris]

So make the production of child pornography illegal? It's really not a hard concept for fucks sake. Holocaust happened for holocaust images to be created. Make holocaust illegal, but don't make images of the holocaust illegal. It's not a hard concept, honest to fucking god, it is not hard to understand this, I seriously think something is wrong with you if you cannot understand this, and it makes me really sad, because I hate all these broken people who don't know how to think.

This is dumb even for you. You'd have to make a holocaust happen for you to be able to take pictures of it.
Like, what are you suggesting? For people to just discover someone raping a kid and then video it?

 

[HickoryDickory]

All studies that have been done on the effect of legalizing child pornography possession show that it has led to decreased child molestation rates. Some studies on individuals who consume child pornography show that it can in some individuals trigger molestation, but in nation wide studies on the effects of legalizing child pornography viewing, it has in every case resulted in a decrease in child abuse rates. We can assume from this that although viewing child pornography may lead some people to molest children, it reduces the probability that others will, and the net effect is a decrease in child molestation rates.

Feel free to make counter arguments to any of the points I've made, but I don't see why I need to argue against myself for you.

I'm not going to argue with you because you are beneath me. I just thought it was strange that you'd reply to everyone elses posts and not @Kirby's.

 

[Saney]

I'm not going to argue with you because you are beneath me. I just thought it was strange that you'd reply to everyone elses posts and not @Kirby's.

You'd think he'd like Kirby. He's small and likes to suck things.

 

[zrm]

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say these victims of child abuse that you're fapping to are going to have a much harder time coping if pornography featuring their rape is being openly and legally shared. We ban it because it is snuff footage of rape. I'm curious do you think that rape footage in general should be openly distributed or just the stuff involving children?

Real rape porn is already completely legal to distribute and possess in the US as long as it is of 18+ only. You may risk an obscenity charge at the worst for distribution of it, but it's completely legal to fap to and possess real rape videos of adults.

The people depicted in CP have no awareness that anyone is looking at CP featuring them. If looking at CP could cause any measurable effect in the people depicted in it, you could actually use this to send messages through them, by looking at images of their CP in a modulated pattern at one geolocation to cause the measurable effect to happen, and then measuring the effect at the other geolocation where the child is. In addition to being patently ridiculous to even consider possible, this is actually impossible by the laws of physics, as there isn't a classical channel between the person viewing the CP and the child, and due to the quantum no-communication theorem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-communication_theorem

In physics, the no-communication theorem is a no-go theorem from quantum information theory which states that, during measurement of an entangled quantum state, it is not possible for one observer, by making a measurement of a subsystem of the total state, to communicate information to another observer.

 

[Squealer]

@zrm Are you in NAMBLA?

 

[zrm]

I'm not going to argue with you because you are beneath me. I just thought it was strange that you'd reply to everyone elses posts and not @Kirby's.

Lol, do you feel like you are above me? That is sad . I'm sorry you feel so bad about yourself that you need to try to raise your self esteem by being better than others. I feel perfectly fine about myself, I'm intelligent and enlightened, it just makes me sad that I live in the matrix .

 

[TheAmazingAxolotl]

Lol, do you feel like you are above me? That is sad . I'm sorry you feel so bad about yourself that you need to try to raise your self esteem by being better than others. I feel perfectly fine about myself, I'm intelligent and enlightened, it just makes me sad that I live in the matrix .

"Intelligent and enlightened" now apparently means "a sick, subhuman piece of shit". Thanks for that realisation.

 

[Lurker]

Lol, do you feel like you are above me? That is sad . I'm sorry you feel so bad about yourself that you need to try to raise your self esteem by being better than others. I feel perfectly fine about myself, I'm intelligent and enlightened, it just makes me sad that I live in the matrix .

If you felt good about yourself, you wouldn't need to try justifying your pedophilia in order to feel validated for your disgusting beliefs.

 

[Ariel]

If you couldn't pull a 16 yr old girl when you were 19-20. There is no way you can get involved with one later on without a felony.

 

[zrm]

@zrm Are you in NAMBLA?

Nah I'm not in any organized group that supports changing sex laws, sluthate is closest to that that I'm involved with. I'm not even on any of the actual pedo forums for that matter.

If you couldn't pull a 16 yr old girl when you were 19-20. There is no way you can get involved with one later on without a felony.

Are you aware that the age of consent is 16 in the vast majority of the United States, as well as the UK, Canada, and most of Australia?

 

[Ariel]

Are you aware that the age of consent is 16 in the vast majority of the United States, as well as the UK, Canada, and most of Australia?

*15 then

You have no chance.

 

[Lucricities]

Real rape porn is already completely legal to distribute and possess in the US as long as it is of 18+ only. You may risk an obscenity charge at the worst for distribution of it, but it's completely legal to fap to and possess real rape videos of adults.

The people depicted in CP have no awareness that anyone is looking at CP featuring them. If looking at CP could cause any measurable effect in the people depicted in it, you could actually use this to send messages through them, by looking at images of their CP in a modulated pattern at one geolocation to cause the measurable effect to happen, and then measuring the effect at the other geolocation where the child is. In addition to being patently ridiculous to even consider possible, this is actually impossible by the laws of physics, as there isn't a classical channel between the person viewing the CP and the child, and due to the quantum no-communication theorem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-communication_theorem

Children shown in CP would definitely notice if it was legal, just saying. The reason they don't know now is because of the rigorous anti-cp culture of the internet in general.

There's a bunch of laws regarding non consensually filmed or distributed porn that make it illegal too varying by state which real snuff rape porn definitely fall under. You probably just think it's readily available because you believe in poorly acted amateur/JAV porn.

"completely legal to distribute" + "You may risk an obscenity charge at the worst for distribution" do not work together. Stop conflating legality with chance of getting in trouble. You are contradicting yourself from sentence to sentence.

 

[zrm]

*15 then

You have no chance.

Well, I fully plan to renounce my current citizenship and relocate to Uruguay, age of consent is 15 there, plus there are no penalties for fucking as young as 12 as long as you can prove consent.

Also, I love how you so obviously just blindly support whatever the law is in your country. You think age of consent where you live is 18 so omg sick fucks want to have sex with 16 year olds. O wait age of consent is 16 here? Sick fucks want to fuck 15 year olds! You are truthfully a zombie.

 

[Ariel]

Well, I fully plan to renounce my current citizenship and relocate to Uruguay, age of consent is 15 there, plus there are no penalties for fucking as young as 12 as long as you can prove consent.

Also, I love how you so obviously just blindly support whatever the law is in your country. You think age of consent where you live is 18 so omg sick fucks want to have sex with 16 year olds. O wait age of consent is 16 here? Sick fucks want to fuck 15 year olds! You are truthfully a zombie.

The age of consent means nothing when they won't want to have anything to do with you.

 

[LordAzazel]

All studies that have been done on the effect of legalizing child pornography possession show that it has led to decreased child molestation rates. Some studies on individuals who consume child pornography show that it can in some individuals trigger molestation, but in nation wide studies on the effects of legalizing child pornography viewing, it has in every case resulted in a decrease in child abuse rates. We can assume from this that although viewing child pornography may lead some people to molest children, it reduces the probability that others will, and the net effect is a decrease in child molestation rates.

Feel free to make counter arguments to any of the points I've made, but I don't see why I need to argue against myself for you.

@zrm, what's your opinion on virtual child porn?

Could you live with legalized 3D child porn and the age of consent just staying the same?

I've got to admit, I've read the same case studies as you have, because the pedofile problem fascinates me. On one hand it's absolutely revolting to me, on the other hand I can recognize pedofiles didn't chose to be that way either. Delving into these issues is like a decaying corpse on the side of the road to me, you know it's going to trigger a vomit reflex but. you. just. have. to. take. a. closer. look.

So yes, I've seen the reports that countries that (accidentally) legalize child porn (Hello post-Soviet Tsech Republic) suffer from less abuse (correlation and causation is still an issue, obviously).

But newsflash: children are being abused for the production of child porn.

The only system that would be truly victimless and therefore in my opinion the only ethical solution:

Government mandated virtual child porn producers. We live in the age of CGI, we should be able to make realistic child porn. The government makes sure they don't sneak real CP in there, the producers supply the pedofiles with movie files and supply the government with a list of hash values of their files.

When the police raid a home, they can check all the files against the list of hash values automatically, so they don't have to watch that shit to make sure it's legal. Changing the files changes the hash value, and makes it a crime to posses it to make sure they don't hide real CP in those images.

No victims of the production process, less child abuse victims, pedofiles can jerk all they want and the cost of government involvement you can earn back by taxing those producers extra. Everybody happy.

Age of consent stays where it is, and dividing by two plus seven as a minimum becomes law, because seriously. 30 year olds have no business going after girls half their age.

 

[zrm]

Children shown in CP would definitely notice if it was legal, just saying. The reason they don't know now is because of the rigorous anti-cp culture of the internet in general.

There's a bunch of laws regarding non consensually filmed or distributed porn that make it illegal too varying by state which real snuff rape porn definitely fall under. You probably just think it's all around because you believe in poorly acted amateur/JAV porn.

"completely legal to distribute" + "You may risk an obscenity charge at the worst for distribution" do not work together. Stop conflating legality with chance of getting in trouble. You are contradicting yourself from sentence to sentence.

It's probabilistically legal or illegal is the issue, real rape porn isn't explicitly illegal to distribute but it could be illegal if charged under obscenity laws, if it is determined to be obscene, which it likely would be, but it still isn't explicitly illegal to distribute it, unlike child pornography which is explicitly illegal to distribute even if it isn't considered obscene. I'm not conflating myself, things are just complicated sometimes.

 

[TheAmazingAxolotl]

Well, I fully plan to renounce my current citizenship and relocate to Uruguay, age of consent is 15 there, plus there are no penalties for fucking as young as 12 as long as you can prove consent.

Also, I love how you so obviously just blindly support whatever the law is in your country. You think age of consent where you live is 18 so omg sick fucks want to have sex with 16 year olds. O wait age of consent is 16 here? Sick fucks want to fuck 15 year olds! You are truthfully a zombie.

Now, if I'm not mistaken, Uruguay is a country that believes that any sexual relations had with a person between the age of 12 and 15 is a violent one. Not to mention the fact that even if a child is a above the age of consent, the parents are still able to press charges against their sexual partners if they believe their child was manipulated in some way.

Given how you've presented yourself, one [impossible] boning in Uruguay would be your downfall.

 

[Lurker]

...unlike child pornography which is explicitly illegal to distribute even if it isn't considered obscene.

When is child porn not considered obscene?

Do you even read what you type, or do you just hit the Post Reply button immediately after you typed a bunch of autistic bullshit?