🐱 Pedophiles rebranding themselves as 'Minor-Attracted Persons’, seek same protection as LGBT community

CatParty


An investigation for The Mail on Sunday has found that several notorious child-sex offenders of Britain are using online platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter to rebrand themselves as ‘Minor-Attracted Persons’. Through these social media sites, they are also trying to re-categorize pedophilia as a harmless sexual preference.

As per the findings of the investigation, every day hundreds of social accounts are being set referring to both potential and prolific abusers as “MAPs” - Minor-Attracted Persons. The rebranding is reportedly an attempt by them to detach themselves from the “stigma” attached to the word pedophile. The report has claimed that anonymous users have also come up with their own rainbow “MAP Pride” flag, with some even arguing that they should be celebrated as a niche group alongside the LGBT community.

Not just that, the anonymous users have also created their slogan just like the LGBT community. Some of those slogans are, “#MAPPride” and “#Mappositivity”, reportedly seen as an aim to present pedophilia as part of society’s wider move towards sexual freedom. The unidentified users have posted memes online proclaiming “Gay MAPs are amazing” and cartoon characters saying, “Repost if you think maps should be able to date minors.” One such account was @SandMapMinorva, which has now been suspended. The message posted on that account read: “Minor-attraction is natural.”

Besides, the investigation by The Mail on Sunday has discovered that for the profile image of these anonymous accounts, the users are using cartoon avatars rather than photographs. Most of them have mentioned the ages of children they are attracted to and it goes to as low as “two to seven”. “They are a fiendish group of sub-humans and they will find no haven in the LGBTQ community. We utterly rebuke their delusional and evil claims,” Otep Shamaya, a gay rights campaigner, said.

However, this is not the first time such type of campaign has started online. According to reports, in the 1970s and 80s, the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) campaign was there that took advantage of the gay liberation movement at the time to push for pro-child abuse policies, such as lowering the age of consent to just four. It has also been said that the current propaganda has chilling echoes of the PIE that happened decades ago.






Though the PIE campaign was dissolved in 1984, the investigation by the newspaper has found out that its former chairman, Tom O’Carroll, is still active and is using social sites to argue for the legalization of pedophilia. In one “interview”, which is still on YouTube, Britain’s most notorious pedophile campaigner - O’Carroll - has claimed that a sexual relationship between an adult and a child is similar to a relationship between a child and the mother. Along with YouTube, O’Carroll also uses his Wordpress blog to work towards the legalization of sex with children. However, the report said that Wordpress had suspended his blogs.

The report stated that some academics are also supporting these kinds of campaigns as they believe pedophiles’ voices should be heard. One such academic is Dr Craig Harper, senior lecturer in psychology at Nottingham Trent University, who signed a 2018 letter written to Twitter demanding retrieval of pedophile accounts that were taken down. Harper stated that “pedophilia and child abuse are not the same things” and “pedophilia is a sexual attraction pattern that shares common features with other sexual orientations”.

Meanwhile, child sex abuse survivor Jacqui Dillon, who runs the Beck Road Alliance online support network, said: “This is absurd and dangerous. Twitter and other corporations are now providing pedophiles with access to children online.”






While Twitter responded that it had “zero tolerance for any material that features or promotes child sexual exploitation”.
 
To any faggots trying to distance themselves from child-fuckers here:


Your whole "movement" was based on pedos larping as faggots.
Yeah, understand why it's such a fucking uphill battle getting the namblamap retards to fuck off? The reason that video keeps getting taken down is because the gay community likes to think its history is squeaky clean. It fucking ain't.
 
[
I'm archiving this video because of this comment:

View attachment 1434824

View attachment 1434822
To any faggots trying to distance themselves from child-fuckers here:


Your whole "movement" was based on pedos larping as faggots.
Derrick Jensen is a neo-Rousseauvian fuckhead, but I gotta give him props for having the balls to reveal how closely the roots of "Queer Theory" are intertwined with pedo apologia.

BTW, here's the story behind this video.
 
Personally, I'm not too concerned with the push to normalize pedos. They're bad, I hate it, etc. I'm not even concerned about the idea that bestiality and necrophilia are the logical next steps in that chain of degeneracy. What REALLY worries me is what still-coalescing depravity might come after. Brainwashing & willing 'lolita sex doll' body mods? VR & AI mind torture where you get abused in alternate lives within lives within lives? Cloning lower functioning versions of yourself to parade around in public on leashes? Reverse-engineering Disassociative Identity Disorder and actually inflicting it on yourself or others to keep everybody company?

The political degeneracy train is on a collision course with another train carrying Transhumanism ideas and some scary new tech, and nobody's switching the tracks.
 
Personally, I'm not too concerned with the push to normalize pedos. They're bad, I hate it, etc. I'm not even concerned about the idea that bestiality and necrophilia are the logical next steps in that chain of degeneracy. What REALLY worries me is what still-coalescing depravity might come after. Brainwashing & willing 'lolita sex doll' body mods? VR & AI mind torture where you get abused in alternate lives within lives within lives? Cloning lower functioning versions of yourself to parade around in public on leashes? Reverse-engineering Disassociative Identity Disorder and actually inflicting it on yourself or others to keep everybody company?

The political degeneracy train is on a collision course with another train carrying Transhumanism ideas and some scary new tech, and nobody's switching the tracks.
That sounds more like a Phil K. Dick novel than reality, but then, I would have said that about a lot of things ten years ago.
 
What do you think the age of consent should be?
Should that be applied globally?
Should this affect other things teenagers can do, eg places where you can drink at 18, join the army at 16? Should age of consent for all adult activities be the same?
If the concern is sex leading to children, does that mean a different age of consent for gay sex, or for safe sex?
What should happen if two people below the age of consent have sex?

Goddamn, this is hard. But I'll try my hand to it.

The age of consent? In an ideal world, it should be linked to the age of majority. For the sake of coherence and clarity.
No exception should be made, tolerated, accepted or even suggested to be. Children are humanity's collective treasure and future, whose mind should be kept as free of the perversion of degenerates as it can possibly be.

Globally? No, that would take a totalitarian world government.
More specifically, it is my belief the psychological coming into adulthood can slightly differ ( A year or two around 18 ) depending on the amount of autonomy and responsabilities that are given to teenagers at any given time in each country. I insist on the psychological aspect of things, because that is what the pedos try to affect in order to exert their fantasies. In short, countries have different laws and should punish pedos for violating them.

Other aspects? Absolutely. I want coherent laws, so I want the same age for all activities. If you have enough discernment to drink and not end up in a coma, you have enough discernment to get laid and not end up traumatized, pregnant in the case of women, or raped.

No difference for orientation or getting raw, with the caveat that you know the safe practices, the protections, and the medical help that you can reach out to in case of an emergency. The reason being, again, that everybody should be equal and stay equal. No Animal Farm bullshit in the field of sex.

Two teenagers fucking? Not much, I guess, except medical/psychological help if either want it, as discreet as possible. I'd advocate frequent visual and oral reminders of how a condom/other means of protection are meant to be used, during middle school.
If there happens to be a girl in the mix and she ends up pregnant, I'm sorry, but the parents will have to be informed and have a say in the matter.

Edit: A few typos
 
Personally, I'm not too concerned with the push to normalize pedos. They're bad, I hate it, etc. I'm not even concerned about the idea that bestiality and necrophilia are the logical next steps in that chain of degeneracy. What REALLY worries me is what still-coalescing depravity might come after. Brainwashing & willing 'lolita sex doll' body mods? VR & AI mind torture where you get abused in alternate lives within lives within lives? Cloning lower functioning versions of yourself to parade around in public on leashes? Reverse-engineering Disassociative Identity Disorder and actually inflicting it on yourself or others to keep everybody company?

The political degeneracy train is on a collision course with another train carrying Transhumanism ideas and some scary new tech, and nobody's switching the tracks.

Ah, here: http://eidolon.net/?story=The Extra&pagetitle=The+Extra&section=fiction
 
These are genuine questions for the people in this thread, not looking for excuses to fuck teenagers:

What do you think the age of consent should be?
Idc what the particular year you choose is, to some degree age-of-consent is an arbitrary concept. 16? 18? 20? 21? Who's to say when an individual person is ready to engage in sexual activity with someone clearly older than them? The problem isn't young people seeking out older men/women though. Its those older individuals who predate after Juveniles. As far as I'm concerned if you're 30 or over you have ZERO business fucking around with anyone under 20.

Should that be applied globally?
Lol! By who?

Should this affect other things teenagers can do, eg places where you can drink at 18, join the army at 16? Should age of consent for all adult activities be the same?
Sure why not.

If the concern is sex leading to children, does that mean a different age of consent for gay sex, or for safe sex?
The concern is young, weak, inexperienced juveniles being taken advantage of by older, stronger, wiser adults in a way that can irreparably damage them. All this bullshit about child-rearing is just icing.

What should happen if two people below the age of consent have sex?
What do you mean? Why are we so concerned about teenagers fucking each other?
 
These are genuine questions for the people in this thread, not looking for excuses to fuck teenagers:

What do you think the age of consent should be?
Should that be applied globally?
Should this affect other things teenagers can do, eg places where you can drink at 18, join the army at 16? Should age of consent for all adult activities be the same?
If the concern is sex leading to children, does that mean a different age of consent for gay sex, or for safe sex?
What should happen if two people below the age of consent have sex?

I'm very curious, because there is one thing that's true - age of consent is rather arbitrarily decided and varies from state to state, country to country. It's the big question about these kinds of lines, like with drinking or driving or surgery - why this number? Are you going for as many people being mature enough to handle it so you're putting it higher? Are you thinking of your sex drive as a teenager (or your desire to have sex with teenagers) and putting it lower? The convenience of round numbers are they're simple and obvious, but if you think even just in full years, if 18, why not 19? Or 17?

I think it's actually a really interesting question that I hope isn't shut down just because ... whatever @BoxerShorts47 is is part of it.

- 18. There is a big maturity difference between 16 and 18 both physically and psychologically. Yes, it is fundamentally a random number, but societies need an age at which an individual can be assigned adult legal responsibilities, and 21 seems too late to be practical.
- Yes, if enforcement issues can be dealt with. It’s arguable that it would have a suitably chilling effect even if enforcement was difficult.
- Yes, although I think there is merit in moving the age of military recruitment to 21 as deciding to get killed is a pretty big choice.
- No. Sex is sex and the major harms of child sexual abuse aren‘t pregnancy dependent
- If both are 16 or 17, there has been no material inducement, both parties are fully consenting and no issues of undue influence or coercion arise, that activity should not be criminalised. That is peer to peer activity. No one really cares if 16 year olds swap handies. But they are fully off limits to adults. Sexual activity prior to the age of 16 should be grounds for compulsory social work referral.
 
Pedros can argue the semantics all day.
noose.jpg

Just form an orderly line at the gallows.
 
Господи, ну что за пиздец творится. Господи, помоги нам.
 
These are genuine questions for the people in this thread, not looking for excuses to fuck teenagers:

What do you think the age of consent should be?
Should that be applied globally?
Should this affect other things teenagers can do, eg places where you can drink at 18, join the army at 16? Should age of consent for all adult activities be the same?
If the concern is sex leading to children, does that mean a different age of consent for gay sex, or for safe sex?
What should happen if two people below the age of consent have sex?
1) 20 with a Romeo and Juliet law of 1.5 years age difference down to 16.
2) I don't know enough about mudhut culture in East Africa to make a judgement here. It would probably work in the developed world though.
3) I'm for the slow ramp-up to adult responsibility. Seems like in recent years we have clamped down on everything but kids screwing. Driving, working, having a beer. Need to get the training wheels back on those things and stop wrapping the kids in bubble wrap then dumping them off in the world at 18. I like Idaho's Daytime Drivers license at 15. Washington's alcohol with guardian supervision law. The Federal sub-minimum training wage for minors. Loans, contracts, buying booze, smokes, and military service should come later 18-21.
4) Nope. There will be no Clintonian definition of "is" wrangling. Baby-making is just one thing they aren't ready for. There are other deeper emotional development things that must also be considered.
5) If there is no age disparity, counseling. If there is a couple year disparity, juvie and counseling. Some home life investigating wouldn't be a bad idea either. Lots of creeps out there letting their feral children fuck each other in a cycle of abuse.
 
This opinion stems from "mysogyny (or whatever the word is)" more than anything: what's the difference in emotional and cognitive maturity between a 16 year old and an 18 year old in this day of age? Hell, I've been with women in their late 20s that don't (or can't) understand the repercussions of their choices that they make. Regardless of age or maturity, they tend to claim that they had no agency in their choices when there's a negative outcome.
 
This opinion stems from "mysogyny (or whatever the word is)" more than anything: what's the difference in emotional and cognitive maturity between a 16 year old and an 18 year old in this day of age? Hell, I've been with women in their late 20s that don't (or can't) understand the repercussions of their choices that they make. Regardless of age or maturity, they tend to claim that they had no agency in their choices when there's a negative outcome.
There are always going to be outliers in any data set but if you're going to legislate something like age of consent, it seems reasonable to do so at an age where the majority of people would be considered "adult", factoring in societal factors. Cognitive failures/lack of comprehension are things that tend be assessed on a case by case basis when consent is considered to be morally grey, if not strictly legally. Mentally disabled people over the age of consent should probably not just be lumped in with everyone else, based solely on their age, for example. To suggest that all women protest a lack of agency whenever the outcomes are negative seems disingenuous.
 
To suggest that all women protest a lack of agency whenever the outcomes are negative seems disingenuous.

Yes it is though. Women in college can fuck a guy, regret it an (x) amount of years later, and call it rape.
Jennifer Lawrence had no choice but to willingly fuck Harvey Weinstein for a role in Hunger Games.
 
Back