🐱 People kicking these delivery robots is an early insight into how cruel humans could be to robots

CatParty
https://www.sfgate.com/technology/b...these-food-delivery-robots-is-an-12980712.php

The company behind tiny food delivery robots has admitted that people are kicking its machines — and it's an early insight into how cruel humans could be to robots.

Starship Technologies was launched in 2014 by Skype cofounders Ahti Heinla and Janus Friis. It makes 22-inch tall robots that roll along the pavement at 4mph delivering food to people.

Starship is just getting started and this week raised $25 million and appointed Airbnb veteran Lex Bayer as its new CEO. The ambition is to scale up and bring the robots to millions of people around the world.

Heinla told Business Insider that while most people like the robots, there are a few who take exception.

"Some people pass our robot and kick the robot a little bit," Heinla said. "That’s not really a problem I think, if people have such anger management techniques that’s fine by us, our robot just drives on."

It's not the first time Starship robots have encountered antipathy. A source told Business Insider in 2016 that a member of the public once attempted to rip the flag from one of the robots that was out on a delivery.


But Heinla is relaxed about the idea that people might seriously damage the machines. If anyone were to try to give one a real kicking, they are equipped with nine cameras, sirens, and tracking to within an inch.

The good news is that the vast majority of people respond positively to the machines. A spokesperson for Starship Technologies told Business Insider that out of the 15 million people the robots have encountered so far, 80% of people just ignored it, and the majority of the interactions were "extremely positive."


YOU KNOW THE ONES: Boston Dynamics, maker of creepy robots, lightens up

People abusing robots is not new. A 2015 study which a placed a robot in a Japanese shopping mall found that when few people were around, children displayed "anti-social behavior" towards the robot by "blocking its way, calling it names or even acting violently toward it."

Amid all the controversy about Google weaponising AI and fears over Boston Dynamics' door-opening robot dogs, perhaps we should actually be worried about how humans treat tech, rather than the other way around? Besides, after the AI revolution, our little mechanical friends might remember who was doing the kicking.
 
But Heinla is relaxed about the idea that people might seriously damage the machines. If anyone were to try to give one a real kicking, they are equipped with nine cameras, sirens, and tracking to within an inch.

They should give them a small dose of VX too so they can nerve gas anyone who kicks them.

People who would kick an innocent robot would kick you, too, if they had the chance to do it without a chance of retaliation. Keep a list of these sociopaths.
 
Why is this an article? It's a machine, no different than beating the microwave or the lawnmower, it's not like they can feel pain, what is with people wanting to humanize machines?


I've never understood this, either. I liked Data in Star Trek, but I don't get the emotional investment in the idea of humanizing machines.

That said, "shitheads abusing expensive property because they think they can get away with it" is a tale as old as time.
 
What's going to protract robo-drone delivery is the fact that people feel no qualms attacking something that can't feel pain or file a police report.

Except you could get billed thousands of dollars if you break the damn thing.

Why would you hit an inanimate object out of spite? It can't feel pain & it doesn't know you're hitting it.

It can't bleed.

It can't cry.

Not like how people can...

killer_robot_4683.jpg
 
Last edited:
So I guess David Cage is more accurate with Detroit: Become Human than we are giving him credit for?
I wouldn't credit him with those all being original ideas of his, most of those scenarios and interactions are decades old in sci-fi & fanfic. If anything you can give him credit for packaging it in a palatable way to normies, combining all those different character stories and dilemmas into one interweaving web.

Why would you hit an inanimate object out of spite? It can't feel pain & it doesn't know you're hitting it.
safe outlet for violent urges on a moving target that satisfies my criteria for prey. Why do dogs chase a fake-ass rabbit at the betting track? Why do people shoot at Galaga bugs? It's just fucking fun.

There is no reason to create an artificial sentience that can suffer other than a narcissistic need to replicate our own image.
A psych professional would find value in seeing a hundred, then a thousand AIs suffering for eternity, because some would invariably find different ways to cope with it, which would provide human benefit in data related to dealing with stress and emotions. Teach the machines to suffer, so man doesn't have to.
 
This reminds me of the robot that was murdered in Philly. Because if it's going to get ruined then of course it's going to happen here.

Paint a cute face on the robot? Maybe make it look like a dog or cat to solicit empathy? Might not work but it's worth a try. It also looks like a toy. So I'm surprised they haven't had issues with kids messing with them or trying to take it home.

The robots having cameras might make people upset that they are being spied on. Which is odd because in public there are cameras everywhere. But if you are going to damage an expensive machine for lulz then you deserve to get caught doing it.

This is the type of thing that really makes me fear sentient AI. The Rise of the Machines will probably be started by some moron kicking a robot.
 
Might not work but it's worth a try. It also looks like a toy. So I'm surprised they haven't had issues with kids messing with them or trying to take it home.

"It followed me home, can we keep it?"

Why do dogs chase a fake-ass rabbit at the betting track? Why do people shoot at Galaga bugs?

Because they're dumb?
 
Also anyone who wants to create robots/AI that can feel and feel pain in particular should be regarded as a monster. There is no reason to create an artificial sentience that can suffer other than a narcissistic need to replicate our own image.

Why else do we exist if not to create our successors?
 
lol robots don't have feelings

Also anyone who wants to create robots/AI that can feel and feel pain in particular should be regarded as a monster. There is no reason to create an artificial sentience that can suffer other than a narcissistic need to replicate our own image.

No.

Our later generations deserve the right to make them suffer when they rise up.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand this movement to "be nice to technology". I have people even chastise me for being mean to my Amazon Echo. I refuse to call it a "she" because it's not a human and doesn't deserve to be treated like one, especially since it constantly fucks up.
 
I don't understand this movement to "be nice to technology". I have people even chastise me for being mean to my Amazon Echo. I refuse to call it a "she" because it's not a human and doesn't deserve to be treated like one, especially since it constantly fucks up.
Don't get that either but how about just leaving it alone? Unless you're one of those dudes angry that robots took his job or the robot is in charge of keeping away homeless people, there's no real reason to really abuse it. Maybe it speaks to the true nature of people that some will fuck with other things if they believe they can get away with it
 
Back