People Who Did Nothing Wrong

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Marco Fucko

Marco Fucko

I fantasized about this back in Chicago
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 10, 2018
>inb4 Hitler

Controversial historical figures whose actions you don't disagree with. I'll Start:
800px-William-Tecumseh-Sherman.jpg
 
Harvey McClout

I un-categorically deny all allegations against me. I did not touch that cat, I did not look at that cat, and most especially I did not cum on that cat. Anyone who repeats these rumors against me is committing slander and I will be suing you to the full extent of the law
 
55316148eab8ea59068b456a

The Federal government was out of control (Waco was only one of a handful of massacres/government-sanctioned murders under the Clinton Administration) and it was about time somebody bloodied their nose.

McVeigh put an admirable amount of thought into his attack, selecting a target that would have all three of the guilty government agencies present while attempting to minimize civilian casualties. He considered the presence of the daycare to be tit-for-tat for the deaths of the Waco children.

McVeigh's manifesto was written logically and from what I can tell, he had a sense of humility around him that most terrorists don't. He was much better than the Alt-Right dipshits we have now (screw your optics, I'm going in).

Quality terrorist, definitely my all-time favorite (although Osama and Tarrant are strong competition).
 
Gilles de Rais

There has been growing evidence he was innocent of the crimes levied at him, and only confessed to avoid excommunication.
 
Pinochet.jpg

Augusto Ride-Or-Die Pinochet.
Okay, maybe not nothing wrong, it was a complex situation and he might not have been as good at running a country as he was at saving it...
But, if a group of people are threatening to violently overthrow the government, modeling themselves after maoist cultural revolutionaries, promising to take peoples stuff after they win, and demonstrating willingness to kill anyone who tries to stop them, then it is morally good to make them disappear.


Autumnal Equinox said:
There has been growing evidence he was innocent of the crimes levied at him, and only confessed to avoid excommunication.
Click to expand...
Growing evidence like what? no sarcasm intended but on a case that old how much new evidence is there to pop up?
 
Last edited:
Adolf Hitler. He took Weimar Germany and turned it around, making it an industrial powerhouse and a formidable military presence were it once was an impoverished, badly weakened nation. How many people could do that in a country where a loaf of bread cost literally millions of German Marks? If he had just robbed and expelled the Jews as opposed to murdering them, he might've been looked upon as a misunderstood genius.
 
Giordano_Bruno.jpg

Giordano Bruno
Free thinker, philosopher, scientist, renaissance man.
Burned at the stake by the Catholic church in 1600 for heresy.
The Catholic church still maintains it was justified and refuses to apologize despite popular opinion to the contrary.
 
"I'm rotting away, demented, brain damaged and malnourished in a cell, and none of you care that I tried to save you."
iu
 
800.jpeg

me
Patricia Campbell Hearst

She was brainwashed. She was raped and tortured. She was fearful for her life so of fucking course she's going to rob a bank.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom