People Who Did Nothing Wrong

Can people say who their photos are of? I’m don’t know all of them.
I like the premise of this thread!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Picnic_Boy
Jesus-Christ.jpg


He literally did nothing wrong. Not a single sin.
 
This thread has an appalling lack of Ian Smith. All of his old enemies who weren't part of Mugabe's club eventually acknowledged that he was the better leader for the country and respected him, and his predictions about the future that would result from Britain's rushed transfer to black majority rule were prophetic.
Ian Smith.jpg


Nguyen Ngoc Loan, as I already said on the historical images thread.
Nguyen Ngoc Loan.jpg


The only thing Jozef Pilsudski did wrong was die too soon. Then again, he's fairly popular in Poland, so I'm not sure how controversial he really is. He is the kind of guy I could see American lefties shrieking fascist over if any of them actually knew who he was. I can't say he would have kept Poland out of the grip of the Soviets and Nazis, but if anyone could have, it would have been Pilsudski. If he was there after the war he might have managed to prevent the hammer and sickle fucking the allies gave the Poles at the treaty table too.
Pilsudski.jpg


Antonio de Oliveira Salazar. The end of the Estado Novo was also instrumental in the fall of Rhodesia, so this ties back into Ian Smith.
Antonio de Oliveira Salazar.jpg

Chiang Kai-Shek was let down by his subordinates, but he refused to quit and is the only reason Taiwan didn't get cultural revolution'd (which would have killed far more people than the white terror did) and is a booming first world country instead of the CPC's backwater bitch today. Something they should consider when protesters there want to tear down his monuments.
Chiang Kai Shek Portrait.jpg

Lon Nol once said with tears in his eyes that he failed the Cambodian people. Like a true leader, he took all responsibility for the fall of the Khmer Republic on himself. But Lon Nol was failed by a prince who cowered before the North Vietnamese, a US ally that used his country as a disposable pawn in the Vietnam war to their detriment, corrupt generals, and his own health (he suffered a stroke after his first year in charge, leaving him without the faculties to properly lead the country during most of the civil war). His initial reasoning for overthrowing Sihanouk was sound. If it weren't for that stroke and Nixon's yanking of troops in favor of carpet bombing the countryside indiscriminately in a truly retarded combination of voter pandering and an attempt to convince the North Vietnamese that he was a dangerous lunatic, things might have turned out differently. Phnom Penh was a booming, rapidly modernizing place under the government he helped put in place right up until it fell.
Lon Nol.jpeg


Chad Vlad the Impaler. Puts Muslim invaders up on pointy sticks and doesn't afraid of anything. It's amazing how vilified he was (outside of Romania, where he's rightly recognized as a hero) for not bullshitting around with a numerically superior group of invaders who intended to force everyone to convert and assimilate or become second class citizens who would have their firstborn sons taken, enslaved, and brainwashed into being shock troopers for the invaders.
Vlad the Impaler.jpg
 
Last edited:
by-thomas-sully.jpg


All he did was win and get hated for winning. Hoes mad.

The last good president. He was a real warrior king.

Can people say who they’re photos are of? I’m don’t know all of them.
I like the premise of this thread!

Maybe you should have payed attention in history class or keep up on current events.
 
Chad Vlad the Impaler. Puts Muslim invaders up on pointy sticks and doesn't afraid of anything. It's amazing how vilified he was (outside of Romania, where he's rightly recognized as a hero) for not bullshitting around with a numerically superior group of invaders who intended to force everyone to convert and assimilate or become second class citizens who would have their firstborn sons taken, enslaved, and brainwashed into being shock troopers for the invaders.
View attachment 1083727

I came here to post the same thing. Bravo, sir.:drink:

For all the vilification he receives, Vlad fought to protect the people of Wallachia from being raped and killed by invading muslim trash.

Most of the people who demonize Vlad wouldn't have had the balls to do what he did.
 
oda nobunaga.jpg

turned one of the weakest clans in japan into one of the strongest. people thought him a fool and an autist (they were right about the autist part though) but proved them wrong when he BTFO one of the strongest clans in the land. traded with foreigners and became a christian in exchange for fucking guns he used to wreck even more shit. would promote people over merit instead of them coming from noble households (one of his officers who was a simple wood cutter ended up becoming the god damn shogun in the future). would "cheat" in battles by using superior tactics and gorilla warfare while the losers would scream YOU HAVE NO HONOR! pissed off a bunch of Buddhist (hell, all of japan) by burning them all alive inside their temple. a sin so great he got the nick name "demon king" and the Japanese still see him as a villain/monster til this day. was about to conquer the land but some fuckboy got all jelly over his successes and stabs him in the back only for him ending up dying 9 days later.

Oda Nobunaga broke every rule in the book and than some but he brought stability to a land full of war, chaos and alot of people loved this crazy bastard for it. his more a misunderstood hero than a villain in my book.
 
Last edited:
This thread has an appalling lack of Ian Smith. All of his old enemies who weren't part of Mugabe's club eventually acknowledged that he was the better leader for the country and respected him, and his predictions about the future that would result from Britain's rushed transfer to black majority rule were prophetic.
View attachment 1083686

Nguyen Ngoc Loan, as I already said on the historical images thread.
View attachment 1083688

The only thing Jozef Pilsudski did wrong was die too soon. Then again, he's fairly popular in Poland, so I'm not sure how controversial he really is. He is the kind of guy I could see American lefties shrieking fascist over if any of them actually knew who he was. I can't say he would have kept Poland out of the grip of the Soviets and Nazis, but if anyone could have, it would have been Pilsudski. If he was there after the war he might have managed to prevent the hammer and sickle fucking the allies gave the Poles at the treaty table too.
View attachment 1083690

Antonio de Oliveira Salazar. The end of the Estado Novo was also instrumental in the fall of Rhodesia, so this ties back into Ian Smith.
View attachment 1083691

Chiang Kai-Shek was let down by his subordinates, but he refused to quit and is the only reason Taiwan didn't get cultural revolution'd (which would have killed far more people than the white terror did) and is a booming first world country instead of the CPC's backwater bitch today. Something they should consider when protesters there want to tear down his monuments.
View attachment 1083696

Lon Nol once said with tears in his eyes that he failed the Cambodian people. Like a true leader, he took all responsibility for the fall of the Khmer Republic on himself. But Lon Nol was failed by a prince who cowered before the North Vietnamese, a US ally that used his country as a disposable pawn in the Vietnam war to their detriment, corrupt generals, and his own health (he suffered a stroke after his first year in charge, leaving him without the faculties to properly lead the country during most of the civil war). His initial reasoning for overthrowing Sihanouk was sound. If it weren't for that stroke and Nixon's yanking of troops in favor of carpet bombing the countryside indiscriminately in a truly exceptional combination of voter pandering and an attempt to convince the North Vietnamese that he was a dangerous lunatic, things might have turned out differently. Phnom Penh was a booming, rapidly modernizing place under the government he helped put in place right up until it fell.
View attachment 1083716

Chad Vlad the Impaler. Puts Muslim invaders up on pointy sticks and doesn't afraid of anything. It's amazing how vilified he was (outside of Romania, where he's rightly recognized as a hero) for not bullshitting around with a numerically superior group of invaders who intended to force everyone to convert and assimilate or become second class citizens who would have their firstborn sons taken, enslaved, and brainwashed into being shock troopers for the invaders.
View attachment 1083727
I came here to post the same thing. Bravo, sir.:drink:

For all the vilification he receives, Vlad fought to protect the people of Wallachia from being raped and killed by invading muslim trash.

Most of the people who demonize Vlad wouldn't have had the balls to do what he did.

Vlad is who I was going to mention as well.

Dude tried to keep an invasion of hostiles out of Europe and used psychological warfare as a tactic to help that cause, what's the problem?
 
I would have suggested Hitler, but someone else has already posted about him. So I'm going to suggest the first serial killer who goes after paedophiles..

55316148eab8ea59068b456a

The Federal government was out of control (Waco was only one of a handful of massacres/government-sanctioned murders under the Clinton Administration) and it was about time somebody bloodied their nose.

McVeigh put an admirable amount of thought into his attack, selecting a target that would have all three of the guilty government agencies present while attempting to minimize civilian casualties. He considered the presence of the daycare to be tit-for-tat for the deaths of the Waco children.

McVeigh's manifesto was written logically and from what I can tell, he had a sense of humility around him that most terrorists don't. He was much better than the Alt-Right dipshits we have now (screw your optics, I'm going in).

Quality terrorist, definitely my all-time favorite (although Osama and Tarrant are strong competition).

I would have agreed, but anyone who plays "tit-for-tat" with childrens' lives are scum. Children are not responsible for the actions of adults nor are their deaths, attempted or realised, ever justified.
 
Back