Philippines PM Duterte to Obama: "Go to Hell"

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-duterte-arms-idUSKCN12414A


Philippine leader tells Obama 'go to hell', says can buy arms from Russia, China

Philippine leader Rodrigo Duterte on Tuesday told U.S. President Barack Obama to "go to hell" and said the United States had refused to sell some weapons to his country but he did not care because Russia and China were willing suppliers.

In his latest salvo, Duterte said he was realigning his foreign policy because the United States had failed the Philippines and added that at some point, "I will break up with America". It was not clear what he meant by "break up".

During three tangential and fiercely worded speeches in Manila, Duterte said the United States did not want to sell missiles and other weapons, but Russia and China had told him they could provide them easily.

"Although it may sound shit to you, it is my sacred duty to keep the integrity of this republic and the people healthy," Duterte said.

"If you don't want to sell arms, I'll go to Russia. I sent the generals to Russia and Russia said 'do not worry, we have everything you need, we'll give it to you'.

"And as for China, they said 'just come over and sign and everything will be delivered'."

His comments were the latest in a near-daily barrage of hostility toward the United States, during which Duterte has started to contrast the former colonial power with its geopolitical rivals Russia and China.

When asked about Duterte's comments, U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby said on Tuesday, "Frankly, it seems at odds with the warm relationship that exists between the Filipino and American people and the record of important cooperation between our two governments, cooperation that has continued under the Duterte government."
 
Russia are belligerent assholes, they keep stationing their troops on their own borders, mere kilometers away from peaceful and defensive American missile bases. Aggression like this shouldn't be tolerated.

We sometimes do that, too, but their more obnoxious habit is encroaching on the airspace of other countries with warplanes and teasing air defenses by sometimes just crossing over the border to see what they can get away with. This is why Turkey shot down one of their planes and had every right to.
 
> Russia
>Not sticking it nose in the internal affairs of other states
Lol

Of they do shit as well. But everybody thinks that US is somehow better when both do the exact same shit. Its SJW tier double standards.
 
Defense chief says Duterte 'misinformed' on importance of PHL-US war games

http://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/natio...-on-importance-of-phl-us-war-games/ar-BBx19d3

Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana on Wednesday said President Rodrigo Duterte may have been misinformed when he said that the country does not benefit from its joint military exercises with the United States.

"Ayon sa kanya, ang mga Kano lang ang nagbebenepisyo sa mga exercises na 'yan. Pero ayon naman sa mga nakalap ko sa mga opisyales sa General Headquarters at Army, meron naman [benepisyo sa Pilipinas]," said Lorenzana.

Duterte has openly expressed his dislike with the PHL-US military exercises, even going as far as saying that the war games being held from October 4 to 12 in different areas in the Philippines will be the last under his term.

He also threatened to scrap the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA).

Lorenzana, however, said he believes Duterte just did not receive the complete information from the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the Department of National Defense regarding the joint military exercises.

"Kaya nasabi kong misinformed ang ating mahal na Presidente ay dahil mukhang hindi kumpleto ang mga impormasyong dumadating sa kanya," he said. "Siguro nagkulang ang DND at ang AFP ng pagbibigay ng wastong information."

"Ito ang siya naming tutugunan sa mga darating na araw," Lorenzana added.

Benefits

He said the benefits of the war games include the Filipino soldiers' use of brand new firearms and protective clothing, and their exposure to new war systems, tactics, and concepts such as joint landings, marksmanship, fire and maneuvers.

Lorenzana said under the joint exercises, Filipino soldiers are trained on humanitarian assistance and disaster readiness, which he said is necessary for a calamity-prone country like the Philippines. He cited the assistance provided by US troops after Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) hit the country in 2013.

"Dahil sa close military-to-military relations, madaling naka-coordinate ang US at AFP para ipadala sa Tacloban ang kanilang barko at helicopter nang agaran pagkatapos salantain ng Haiyan ang Tacloban noong November 2013. Sa katunayan sila ang mga unang dumating at sumaklolo," he said.

Lorenzana said Filipino and US troops also conduct civil actions whenever they have joint exercises in a certain area. He also said that top officials also learn how to conceptualize and execute strategies during TableTop Exercises.
 
Defense chief says Duterte 'misinformed' on importance of PHL-US war games

http://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/natio...-on-importance-of-phl-us-war-games/ar-BBx19d3

Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana on Wednesday said President Rodrigo Duterte may have been misinformed when he said that the country does not benefit from its joint military exercises with the United States.

"Ayon sa kanya, ang mga Kano lang ang nagbebenepisyo sa mga exercises na 'yan. Pero ayon naman sa mga nakalap ko sa mga opisyales sa General Headquarters at Army, meron naman [benepisyo sa Pilipinas]," said Lorenzana.

Duterte has openly expressed his dislike with the PHL-US military exercises, even going as far as saying that the war games being held from October 4 to 12 in different areas in the Philippines will be the last under his term.

He also threatened to scrap the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA).

Lorenzana, however, said he believes Duterte just did not receive the complete information from the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the Department of National Defense regarding the joint military exercises.

"Kaya nasabi kong misinformed ang ating mahal na Presidente ay dahil mukhang hindi kumpleto ang mga impormasyong dumadating sa kanya," he said. "Siguro nagkulang ang DND at ang AFP ng pagbibigay ng wastong information."

"Ito ang siya naming tutugunan sa mga darating na araw," Lorenzana added.

Benefits

He said the benefits of the war games include the Filipino soldiers' use of brand new firearms and protective clothing, and their exposure to new war systems, tactics, and concepts such as joint landings, marksmanship, fire and maneuvers.

Lorenzana said under the joint exercises, Filipino soldiers are trained on humanitarian assistance and disaster readiness, which he said is necessary for a calamity-prone country like the Philippines. He cited the assistance provided by US troops after Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) hit the country in 2013.

"Dahil sa close military-to-military relations, madaling naka-coordinate ang US at AFP para ipadala sa Tacloban ang kanilang barko at helicopter nang agaran pagkatapos salantain ng Haiyan ang Tacloban noong November 2013. Sa katunayan sila ang mga unang dumating at sumaklolo," he said.

Lorenzana said Filipino and US troops also conduct civil actions whenever they have joint exercises in a certain area. He also said that top officials also learn how to conceptualize and execute strategies during TableTop Exercises.

So Duterte is just buttmad that the US generals always field a mix of Riptides and Wraithknights, while he is stuck with Tyranids.
 
So Duterte is just buttmad that the US generals always field a mix of Riptides and Wraithknights, while he is stuck with Tyranids.
Maybe his new friends will loan him their Necrons.
 
Looks like he is living up to his word:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/first-cracks-appear-u-alliance-193751887.html

The Philippines’ president has heaped abuse on the United States for weeks, but now Rodrigo Duterte is backing up his words with action. His defense minister said Friday the Philippines has suspended joint naval patrols with the United States in the disputed waters of the South China Sea.

Manila’s announcement deals a blow to the Obama administration’s diplomatic and military strategy in the South China Sea, and raises questions about the future course of an alliance that had been seen as a reliable bedrock.

The joint naval patrols, launched this year, were designed to send an important symbolic message to counter China’s aggressive territorial claims and island-building in the strategic waterway. American and Philippine naval ships have conducted three patrols since March, the most recent in July, Pentagon spokesman Cmdr. Gary Ross said.

Philippine Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana said he had conveyed the decision to the head of U.S. Pacific Command during a visit to Hawaii last week.

The joint patrols “have been suspended for the time being. They (Washington) know it already,” Lorenzana told reporters.

The defense minister also said his government wanted to expel “in the near future” the roughly 100 U.S. special operations forces stationed in the southern Philippines. The American troops help local forces track Islamist militants from the Abu Sayyaf group, and the Pentagon has held up the mission as a low-cost, light footprint success. But Lorenzana indicated the U.S. forces would be asked to leave as soon as Philippine army troops could be trained to use surveillance drones.

Lorenzana unveiled the decision as U.S. and Philippine forces hold a major amphibious military exercise.

Until Duterte came to power on June 30, the Philippines had appealed to the United States to take on a larger military presence in the region and to provide more hardware and radar to prevent China from imposing its will in the South China Sea.


The Philippines, along with several other states in Southeast Asia, are locked in increasingly bitter territorial disputes with Beijing, which claims virtually the entire South China Sea. Tensions between Manila and Beijing are running particularly high over Scarborough Shoal, a resource-rich coral atoll that lies less than 150 miles off the Philippine coast.
But Duterte has taken a different tack. In less than two months, he has called U.S. President Barack Obama a “son of whore,” threatened to kick out about 600 U.S. troops based in the country, cancel all military exercises with the United States, and warned that his government could abandon its decades-old alliance with the Americans.

This week, he said Obama could “go to hell.”

The Philippine president’s open hostility to Washington followed criticism from the United States and other Western governments over his violent war on drugs, which has claimed the lives of more than 3,300 people and prompted allegations of widespread vigilante killings.

Duterte has vowed to continue the anti-drug crime campaign, even though the violence and his statements have spooked financial markets, sending the country’s peso to a seven-year low. He even likened himself to Hitler last month, saying that the Nazi dictator had killed millions of Jews and that he would like to kill millions of drug dealers: “I’d be happy to slaughter them.”

While Duterte has made no apologies for his coarse remarks, officials in Manila and Washington have sought to play down his inflammatory comments. Some experts predict that despite the strain caused by Duterte’s invective, the U.S.-Philippine relationship will endure without any dramatic change.

But the move to call off joint naval patrols suggested Duterte may follow through on other threats to cancel all military exercises with the Americans and to possibly revoke a new defense cooperation agreement that grants the United States wide access to air and naval bases across the country.

Foreign Affairs Secretary Perfecto Yasay on Thursday said Duterte wanted to free the country from the “shackles of dependency” on the United States and that he was “compelled to realign” Philippine foreign policy.
 
Well do they got any industry beside the drug one? No wonder the investors are scared, they are afraid they won't get the dope they paid for!
 
Pussified American foreign policy is pissing me off.

We should just nuke them.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Joan Nyan
An aging Philippine actress calls out on Duterte's antics.

http://qz.com/805114/you-are-a-psyc...rte-has-gone-viral/?utm_source=YPL&yptr=yahoo

Since coming to power in late June, Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte has shocked the world with a brutal anti-drug campaign that involves extrajudicial killings, and with crude insults directed at anyone questioning that campaign. He’s directed his tirades not just at domestic opponents, but also at world leaders like UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon and institutions like the European Union. He’s also ranted against the United States, suggesting he’ll weaken ties with the longtime ally and aid provider, while forging stronger ones with China and Russia—countries less inclined to criticize his methods.

Now another voice is questioning Duterte—this time from the world of entertainment in the Philippines. On Oct. 7 award-winning actress Agot Isidro wrote a Facebook post about Duterte in which she called the volatile leader “a psychopath.” Her post came in response to Duterte saying he’d be fine with the US and EU withdrawing their aid to the impoverished nation.

“If you think it is high time for you guys to withdraw your assistance, go ahead,” he said. “We will not beg for it. We have a problem here trying to preserve our society and you mess up by human rights.”

The 50-year-old actress wrote:

First of all, no one is trying to fight you. As a matter of fact, you’re the one who’s picking a fight. Secondly, the country where you are elected as president by 16 million out of 100-plus million is Third World. You talk as if the Philippines is a superpower. Excuse me, we don’t want to go hungry. If you want, you do it yourself. Leave us out of it. So many people have nothing to eat, and yet you’ll starve us even further… Third, I know a psychiatrist. Get yourself checked. You’re not bipolar. You are a psychopath.

Yesterday (Oct. 9) Isidro’s post trended on Twitter, and the original post on Facebookhas received more than 10,600 shares and over 36,000 reactions.

The president’s office responded to Isidro’s comments on Sunday:

“While she (Isidro) is entitled to her own opinion, it also reveals the kind of attitude that the President is addressing – dependency on foreign aid. He wants the Filipino people to gain true independence, economically, mentally and socially.”
 
Ok he is now using rumors of a sex tape to smear one his most vocal critics. He truly is the Trump of Asia, this'll pmurt

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/10/07/...sex-tape-slut-shame-senator-508254.html?rx=us

Former Justice Secretary and now Senator Leila de Lima prepares to read a statement on August 18 at the Philippine Senate in suburban Pasay city south of Manila, Philippines. President Rodrigo Duterte, in a news conference, linked her to the illegal drug trade and called her an "immoral woman." de Lima responded, "President Duterte, who also criticized the United Nations for condemning the spate of killings of suspected drug criminals in the country, is "abusing and misusing his executive power."BULLIT MARQUEZ/AP
Leila de Lima is sitting at a square table sharing a meal with some of her political allies in a meeting room in a Manila hotel. Two young male aides stand guard outside the room; they ask that her hotel not be named. “This is my life now,” says de Lima, a human rights advocate and member of the Philippine Senate. “It’s become a nightmare, but I’m getting used to it.”

Since September 20, when her address and cellphone number were read out at a congressional hearing, de Lima, 57, has moved between the homes of friends and relatives. She has received death threats and is now too afraid to spend the night at her own house, where she lives alone. “I sneak home occasionally to see my dogs,” she says. A former head of the national Commission on Human Rights and justice secretary in the previous administration, de Lima took a new role in August that has made her a target: She has become possibly the country’s most outspoken — and high-ranking — critic of President Rodrigo Duterte’s ruthless campaign against drug dealers and users.

“Duterte wants to make an example of me so that nobody will speak out and oppose him,” says de Lima, her tone switching between anger and exasperation. “This is a man who abhors dissent and muzzles all around him.”

Since Duterte assumed office on June 30, he has followed through on his pledge to pursue a war on drugs. In his first 100 days, roughly 3,400 Filipinos were shot dead in police operations or vigilante-style executions. The crackdown has sparked outrage overseas: Politicians and officials in the U.S., the U.N. and Europe have all slammed the Philippine leader. Duterte has reacted furiously, telling U.S. President Barack Obama that he could “go to hell” and threatening to end long-standing military ties to Washington, while proposing new trade alliances, long-term land leases and even weapons deals with Beijing and Moscow.

In the Philippines, most critics are too intimidated to speak up—in part because Duterte’s crackdown has sent his popularity ratings soaring to 76 percent, according to a recent poll. De Lima first publicly stood up to Duterte in August, when, as the chair of the Senate justice committee, she launched hearings into the surge of killings. The inquiry prompted Duterte to describe her as “immoral” and an “adulterer.” He also suggested she should hang herself.

In September, the conflict between Duterte and de Lima intensified when a self-professed hitman named Edgar Matobato testified at the hearings, claiming that death squads had killed drug users on Duterte’s orders during the president’s stint as mayor of Davao City. Matobato also said Duterte had shot dead a federal investigator with a machine gun. The president and police chiefs denied the claims, and apparent inconsistencies in Matobato’s account were uncovered in his cross-examination.

After Matobato’s testimony, de Lima faced an increase in attacks from Duterte’s supporters. Political allies, led by Manny Pacquiao, the boxing superstar who became a senator in May, ousted her as committee chair. Around the same time, she started receiving death threats. And in late September, Duterte loyalists in the country’s lower legislative house, the House of Representatives, threatened to screen a sex tape purportedly featuring de Lima (who has been divorced since 2007) with her married chauffeur. The pro-Duterte lawmakers alleged that the driver was also her “bagman” who collected payoffs for her from jailed drug lords in return for permitting them to continue their illegal trade while she was justice secretary. The video would purportedly help establish how close she was to the driver, they argued.

“De Lima is not only screwing her driver; she is also screwing the nation,” Duterte said on September 22 in remarks at the opening ceremony of a power plant, adding that she has a “propensity for sex.” The president has also said he loses his appetite every time he views the purported sex tape; he has not explained why he has watched it more than once.

De Lima says she does not know if she is featured in the sex tape, if it exists. She acknowledges previously having a relationship with the driver but insists that is a private matter, irrelevant to bribery claims that she denies. “Duterte is trying to destroy me at any cost in the hope that it will break my spirit, destroy my credibility and end my crusade to expose the truth about his presidency,” de Lima tells Newsweek. “It’s so ridiculous and surreal to find myself talking about a sex tape and completely false drug allegations.”

The lawmakers have recently backed away from their plan to show the tape, and some started to express doubts about that it featured her. But by using the allegations to attack de Lima, Duterte has risked alienating some potentially important voters: women. On October 4, the Senate passed a resolution filed by female senators from different parties denouncing Duterte’s supporters’ plan to show the alleged sex tape in the House of Representatives, calling it a form of “slut-shaming.” The hashtag #EveryWoman trended on Twitter and Facebook as female posters repeatedly wrote: “I would like to testify in Congress. It was me in the sex video.”

“The way she has been treated by Duterte is typical of how women in the Philippines are so often treated by men,” says Jozy Acosta-Nisperos, founder of anti-Duterte Facebook group the Silent Majority. “But he’s taking on the wrong woman. She won’t back down.”

Duterte has made inappropriate and hostile remarks about women in the past: He joked about the rape of a murdered Australian missionary on the campaign trail—a remark widely condemned outside the Philippines but largely brushed off inside the country as “Duterte being Duterte.”

Even though they acknowledge his overt sexism, some female critics say Duterte has introduced measures that have helped women. Katrina Stuart Santiago, a media columnist who blogs as “Radikal Chick,” notes that he introduced anti-discrimination statutes in Davao and says women there do not experience the same levels of street harassment as they do in other cities.

Some feminist groups have also praised his appointment of women to senior positions in government; few spoke up in de Lima’s defense until talk of the sex tape began. Although two of the six presidents since the overthrow of Ferdinand Marcos in 1986 have been female, women’s issues are typically low on the political agenda. “There is no real large-scale women's movement in this country,” says Santiago. “Mainstream media is not one to talk about feminism or women's issues, and there's no real woman's vote in this country.”

De Lima knows the risks of continuing to criticize Duterte. But even without the widespread support of women in the Philippines, she feels compelled to continue her campaign. “As a human rights advocate, I’m so shocked by the targeting of the poor, defenseless, small-time pushers who sell drugs to feed their addiction,” she says. “He mentions big names but only goes after the weak and vulnerable. What sort of war is that?”

For now, Duterte appears supremely confident; many perceive him as something of a second Marcos, the late dictator. But in a country with such a volatile political history, even strongmen like Marcos—who fled to Hawaii in 1986 after the mass protests of the “People Power revolution”—can find themselves suddenly stripped of power. De Lima is determined not to back down in her confrontation with the president. “The more they attack me, the more they embolden me,” she says. “If Duterte thinks he can break my spirit, he is dead wrong.”
 
I hope he enjoys going the way of Chavez.
You mean enjoying near unlimited power for 2 decades regardless of his own idiocy, surviving multiple coups and assassination attempts and be revered like a folk hero after death despite bringing his country to ruins?

Uh, yeah I think Duterte would enjoy that very much.
 
If merging all the Duterte threads is too messy, just make a new megathread in news and only post there.
 
Back