Philosophy of Rape

[HickoryDickory]

I'm partial to 'trollop.'

I think that is giving these 'philosophers' a bit more credit than they deserve. I think it's more ignorance + autism+ being a pedophile that results in these exceptional strategies.

I do have to say, these kinds of subreddits don't even bother me at this point, they're just cringeworthy. None of these people are actually going out and following their strategies. I think you yourself @HickoryDickory pointed out how dumb one guide they, or a similar subreddit had on how to get a girl from a bar to one's home to rape in a thread here earlier, and there were multiple obvious flaws in it from the beginning. These are all written by edgy misogynists losers who only wish they could be like anything they write, and this becomes painfully obvious in some of the strategies they have, which had massive flaws that anyone who actually went to a bar or had experience dealing with real people would've seen.

I think the likes of Sluthate irritates me much more because their stuff, while toxic and vile, isn't outright highly illegal like this, so I can imagine some of them actually try their negging or other bullshit. This is just a bunch of cowardly losers all around.

I know I said that, but the difference is is that they're posting it out on an open forum. There will be people who are far more mentally ill and might take these guys "philosophies" to heart and attempt to try it. (They don't even need to post or an account)

 

[KingQueen]

I figure they're taking "the kid being punished for smoking" approach. If he wants to do it so much, make him smoke until he gets sick of it.

Well, we all know that corrective rape totally works - I mean, it sure straightens out lesbians, amirite?

The only cock they're allowed to be hungry for is yours. A slut isn't someone who has sex, it's someone who has sex with everyone except for you. Once they're having sex with you exclusively, there's no problem.

Yeah, I know that's what they think they're doing...but I totally fail to see how "train little girls to be sluts" will accomplish this goal.

These freaks don't talk in normal language. "Slut" means "any female who won't have sex with me." That's from newborns up.

In my experience, men are way more thirsty than women. I never understood where the woman=autoslut concept comes from.

I know I said that, but the difference is is that they're posting it out on an open forum. There will be people who are far more mentally ill and might take these guys "philosophies" to heart and attempt to try it. (They don't even need to post or an account)

Agreed. For every 1 troll who knows he's posting offensive shit as a joke, there are 10 psuedo-trolls who think they're joking but actually believe it...so what are the statistics for people who think it's serious? We know they're there, even if they're not posting their shooting sprees on YouTube.

 

[Pope Gregory IX]

I'm a 'hoochie' man myself.

This just gave me a massive case of déjà vu:

Spoiler: Wasted childhood

You ever get the sneaking suspicion that your taste in music isn't as good as you think it is?

 

[DrChristianTroy]

No, but here's a philosophy question that I'm serious about:.... If you believe the following statements are true:

1. all women naturally act like sluts because they're wired that way
   
2. sluts (women) need to be "corrected" to stop them from being sluts

...then why does "correction" always take the form of sex training? I thought you wanted them to STOP being cock-hungry? Why do you think it will help the situation to train prepubescent girls to love "daddy"? Please explain this to me.

Because all their knowledge of sex comes from really bad porn. Sex/sex training solves everything.

 

[The Mass Debater]

I know it's cliche to say that an online community has declined but, Reddit is fucked these days.

And autism like the 'faces of atheism' drama a few years ago wasn't setting a high bar to start with.

 

[Bassomatic]

This is a case of it's real but I will pull the blanket over my head and say it's not.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

No, but here's a philosophy question that I'm serious about:.... If you believe the following statements are true:

1. all women naturally act like sluts because they're wired that way
   
2. sluts (women) need to be "corrected" to stop them from being sluts

...then why does "correction" always take the form of sex training? I thought you wanted them to STOP being cock-hungry? Why do you think it will help the situation to train prepubescent girls to love "daddy"? Please explain this to me.

My theory is that it's not thought through because it's a sexual fantasy masquerading as "correction." Like many who are whiny little men IRL, they harbour fantasies of being sexually dominant. They're not asking for advice, they're fleshing out their fapbanks.

 

[Bassomatic]

My theory is that it's not thought through because it's a sexual fantasy masquerading as "correction." Like many who are whiny little men IRL, they harbour fantasies of being sexually dominant. They're not asking for advice, they're fleshing out their fapbanks.

I think this has some weight behind it as there's the cliche of the CEO being choked in the bedroom.
An escape from normal life in sexuality, or in this case (god willing) lack of.

 

[Sanae Kochiya]

... Reddit, what in the living fuck?

... Actually, I had a really... depraved idea. Since these scholars are dedicated to exploring the philosophical, moral, and ethical applications of rape and how it can be used to correct individuals, I feel that someone should go there and offer a question. If, say, it is perfectly fine for men to rape women as obviously the female gender is composed of frilly little sluts that secretly want to be violated all the time and made into obedient, domesticated sex slaves, then I would love for them to explain the philosophy behind men on men rape, or perhaps the ultimate heresy, female on men rape.

I would love for them to give an intelligent and reasoned discourse on what the implications are if a man is abused and sexually taken control of by a female. Did the slut want to be violated so bad that she took a poor man and forcibly made him penetrate her? Or perhaps this man is not accepting his role as the superior gender that must satisfy his libido and this woman is rightfully showing him his proper place in the sexual food chain.

Or would this just expose this entire subreddit as being composed of a bunch of whiny, impotent beta males who view all women as walking sex toys and that they only serve to be tied down to beds and used as stimulators for their 1 inch dicks.

... Nah. There's no way that anyone would lie on the Internet. Surely these cultured gentlemen must have an explanation for the philosophies behind these other types of rape. I'm sure of it.

Typing out this post made me sick btw.

 

[GL99]

I was about to call this caamib guy a troll (I've seen his incel blog posted around before), but it turns out he's been a regular poster here? Jesus, if he's a troll, that's the most dedication I've seen in a long while.

 

[whitewolf0079]

Why do these people always have the go to of "society is declining" to justify their worldview?...?

Ahh have you look outside your window? In developed countries society is amazing! Not perfect, but still pretty amazing.

 

[CatParty]

I was about to call this caamib guy a troll (I've seen his incel blog posted around before), but it turns out he's been a regular poster here? Jesus, if he's a troll, that's the most dedication I've seen in a long while.

Nah @Marjan Šiklić is serious. Check out his three threads as well as a discussion thread about him. He's insane. He is literally wrong about any subject he talks about

 

[AnOminous]

Why do these people always have the go to of "society is declining" to justify their worldview?...?

They do have a point. The fact these degenerates aren't put up against a wall kind of does show a decline of civilization.

 

[HickoryDickory]

Why do these people always have the go to of "society is declining" to justify their worldview?...?

Ahh have you look outside your window? In developed countries society is amazing! Not perfect, but still pretty amazing.

It really should be a decline of quality men. Their lack of work ethic and social skills is quite apparent to the opposite sex.

 

[melty]

My theory is that it's not thought through because it's a sexual fantasy masquerading as "correction." Like many who are whiny little men IRL, they harbour fantasies of being sexually dominant. They're not asking for advice, they're fleshing out their fapbanks.

You'd be surprised how often its the opposite, too. One of my friends is a dominatrix and she explained she'll often get guys acting misogynistic to her just so she'll get riled up and whip the shit out of them. I wouldn't be surprised if some of these guys had a strongly suppressed submission fetish.

 

[ON 190]

a regular poster here?

That's like saying Hurricane Katrina was "a light drizzle."

Also, while this whole thing disgusts me, one that stands out in particular is their use of the word "train." Sexual training! Gotta make sure the kids grow up to be proper sluts!

Fucking hell.

 

[Lucricities]

I quickly ended up on r/RapingWomen:

Rape as a service to society.​

"It feels to me that rape is part of an "ecosystem" of sorts. There are those who crave rape, and those who crave consent. But rape is a catalyst for both. Without it, how many of those women would have stayed stuck up bitches who use men without giving nothing in return?"

Spoiler: Rape Ecosystem Explained

Edit: Bonafide rape goldmine!

Spoiler: Friends of Rape

 

[wheat pasta]

I quickly ended up on r/RapingWomen:

Rape as a service to society.​

"It feels to me that rape is part of an "ecosystem" of sorts. There are those who crave rape, and those who crave consent. But rape is a catalyst for both. Without it, how many of those women would have stayed stuck up bitches who use men without giving nothing in return?"

Spoiler: Rape Ecosystem Explained

View attachment 37581

I saw the title of this thread, knew what to expect coming in, still utterly disgusted.

 

[melty]

I quickly ended up on r/RapingWomen:

Rape as a service to society.​

"It feels to me that rape is part of an "ecosystem" of sorts. There are those who crave rape, and those who crave consent. But rape is a catalyst for both. Without it, how many of those women would have stayed stuck up bitches who use men without giving nothing in return?"

Spoiler: Rape Ecosystem Explained

View attachment 37581

Well OBVIOUSLY this is wrong because according to redpill philosophy, those women won't go have sex with more different men, they'll just keep banging the 20% of men who are alphas. Thus the overall quantity of sex doesn't increase for those "10 unlucky guys" as those women will continue riding the cock carousel leaving all the beta cucks to wait until they hit the wall and become used goods seeking beta male providers.

Spoiler

Holy shit, what is wrong with me that that's my response? It wasn't even that hard to write. I think I spend too much time here. I'm responding to misogynist lolcows with what a different group of misogynist lolcows would say. Someone please hold me

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

... Reddit, what in the living fuck?

... Actually, I had a really... depraved idea. Since these scholars are dedicated to exploring the philosophical, moral, and ethical applications of rape and how it can be used to correct individuals, I feel that someone should go there and offer a question. If, say, it is perfectly fine for men to rape women as obviously the female gender is composed of frilly little sluts that secretly want to be violated all the time and made into obedient, domesticated sex slaves, then I would love for them to explain the philosophy behind men on men rape, or perhaps the ultimate heresy, female on men rape.

I would love for them to give an intelligent and reasoned discourse on what the implications are if a man is abused and sexually taken control of by a female. Did the slut want to be violated so bad that she took a poor man and forcibly made him penetrate her? Or perhaps this man is not accepting his role as the superior gender that must satisfy his libido and this woman is rightfully showing him his proper place in the sexual food chain.

Or would this just expose this entire subreddit as being composed of a bunch of whiny, impotent beta males who view all women as walking sex toys and that they only serve to be tied down to beds and used as stimulators for their 1 inch dicks.

... Nah. There's no way that anyone would lie on the Internet. Surely these cultured gentlemen must have an explanation for the philosophies behind these other types of rape. I'm sure of it.

Typing out this post made me sick btw.

Yeah, I see them all justify rape as just being a property crime against the husband or father of the victim. But despite these people all being great intellectuals, none of them ever bring up male-on-male rape or female-on-male rape. It's funny because I always see MRA types decrying how feminists act like men are never rape victims (Which I've never even seen, but that's besides the point), but their entire philosophy is predicated on the assumption that men can never be raped and are only the rapers.