📚 Megathread Phil's SSDI Review

[UselessRubberKeyboard]

Much as I'd love Phil to lose his tardbux (especially given how he wastes them on shit instead of things that will actually help him), it ain't gonna happen. He's legitimately a sped. I know he's not claiming SSDI for being a sped (autism), but it's obvious on interacting with Phil that he's not capable of supporting himself in the same way normal people do. Yes, he could work, but it'd take a handler to bully and cajole him into it, and the government doesn't have that kind of money or time to waste on adults already set in their autist ways.

It's just that he doesn't claim SSDI for his actual disability. The shit he claims disables him (depression, personality disorder) is the classic bullshit that gets you disability benefits you don't deserve, provided you have zero self-respect and can playact enough to professionals. As Phil's entire life revolves around roleplaying, he's got that down pat by now. He knows full well that claiming SSDI as an autist would mean actual psych assessments, real diagnoses and actual treatment plans he'll be expected to stick to. And that's going to get in the way of his daily derpings, which is why he doesn't do it.

Problem is, the system is geared towards 'personal agency', so they'll chuck money at anyone who qualifies and let them do what they want with it, until proven without a shadow of a doubt that said person is an idiot. And Phil is, sadly, far from the stage where he qualifies for a payee yet (we're talking someone with 100% delusional beliefs, unable to function independently at all). It sucks to see Phil leeching taxpayer's money to gallavant around the west coast and get shit tattoos, but he's the minority. Most disabled people aren't twats, most want to manage their conditions the best they can, and that's why the system is designed to allow claimants as much freedom as possible by giving them money to spend how they see fit. Watching claimants more closely, assigning payees (especially for people without close family) and things like prepay cards instead of cash actually cost the government more, and make the lives of the majority of disabled people shittier just to catch out a few bad apples. For all the SJW bullshit he spouts about disabled people, he's the kind of 'disabled person' that makes life for others more difficult.

Tl;dr - Phil's a twat, he's keeping his tardbux as they are, and he'll be a gleeful roach about it for ages afterwards. Expect much smug fuckery and Australatismland victory day marches incoming around November time.

 

[Giraff3]

Other than trooning it up there's no difference between the lardass Phil now and the lardass Phil who worked at Wawa for months with no problem. He didn't quit because he was disabled, but because he threw a tard rage at them not changing his name instantly.

He was a tad less antagonistic and paranoid than he is now, I think. You're right though.

 

[Jaimas]

I'd like to discuss Phil's upcoming SSDI review later this year.

For those of you who aren't in the loop: Phil will be having an interview later this year where someone from the government will interview him to determine if he will continue to receive tardbucks or not. Due to his own actions, Phil's condition has not improved because he refuses to see doctors or take prescribed medication. I believe some people have also said that the government expects him to eventually improve and get out of the system, although I have no source on that.

Given that Phil has actually gotten worse, many here on KF have speculated that his disability interview will result in him either being disqualified from SSDI, or being given a representative payee. A representative payee is someone who would recieve all of Phil's SSDI, and would be responsible for spending it on his behalf. Only after all of Phil's needs are met, including future needs such as building up a savings account, insurance, and perhaps putting money away for retirement if the payee does not believe that Phil will be recieveing government assistance indefinitely. He is allowed to have the rest.

The Social Security Administration normally prefers that family or friends act as a representative payee, but of course his family won't talk to him and it seems that they do actually check up on you before letting you be a payee, so his "friends" probably won't qualify. This is important.

This would mean that Phil's income would massively decline. First off, private organizations are allowed to charge a fee for acting as a representative payee (but only after seeing to all of his needs.) That means that he might have very little money left over once they're done. In fact, he may have no money at all, since he insists on living in very, very expensive places like Portland and San Francisco.
He also won't like how representative payees will spend his money. For example, for a payee, housing is more important than tattoos, so Phil's dumb shit money will have to go into things like that, and he won't be happy about that at all.

The real question is: how likely is he to get a payee? I feel like it's sort of become a meme now that he will get one, but according to the Social Security Administration, the volunteer program is quite overloaded, and he's not exactly the most sympathetic case.

Does anyone here actually have experience with this sort of thing? Some insight or predictions would be appreciated.

I remember reading that a big reason that Phil's being reviewed is his combination of living like a derelict and actively refusing medical treatment for his problems. There's a serious argument that can be made that Phil isn't mentally competent enough to collect his autismbux without a proper chaperone at this point, and I'm pretty sure that the reviewers know this going in. This is on top of trying to schedule SRS for himself that we know is bullshit, claiming he has fibromyalgia, and dozens of other bits of similar Phil retardation.

Point of fact, there's a big possibility that someone could make the argument that Phil is non compos mentis and really not have much of a case to prove given that Phil's a fucking idiot whose life is a magnificent shambles. I'd personally ask @AnOminous about the legalese involved, but I've got this hunch that Phil might be in some unforeseen trouble. I hope he winds up with the Payee.

 

[AnOminous]

Point of fact, there's a big possibility that someone could make the argument that Phil is non compos mentis and really not have much of a case to prove given that Phil's a fucking idiot whose life is a magnificent shambles. I'd personally ask @AnOminous about the legalese involved, but I've got this hunch that Phil might be in some unforeseen trouble. I hope he winds up with the Payee.

I do too, but I wouldn't be shocked if he didn't. If that did happen it would probably be some professional tard wrangling organization that might put a halt to his bumming around.

 

[Ravenor]

I have stickied this thread until after the review.

It's from the ALJ opinion he posted part of.

I'll just post all the text that was legible.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

After careful consideration of the entire record, I make the following findings:

1. The claimant’s date last insured is December 31, 2014.

2. There is no evidence of substantial gainful activity since August 31, 2010, the alleged onset date (20 CFR 404.1520(b), 404.1571 et seq., 416.920(b) and 416.971 et seq.).

There is no evidence that the claimant has engaged in substantial gainful activity at any time relevant to her applications for benefits (see, Exhibits 3D-8D, 10D-12D, 2E & 3E and hearing testimony). Therefore, a finding of disability is not precluded on the basis of work activity.

3. The claimant has the following severe impairments: a depressive disorder, an anxiety disorder, and a personality disorder (20 CFR 404.1520(c) and 416.920(c)).

The claimant has alleged disability on the basis of autism/Asperger’s syndrome, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a generalized anxiety disorder, a dissociative disorder, a personality disorder and fibromyalgia. She reported that her symptoms include suicidal ideation, difficulty interacting with others, difficulty sleeping, memory problems and impaired concentration. As a result of her symptoms, the claimant has become homeless and has difficulty performing tasks, including personal care. The claimant also testified that she is transgender woman who is transitioning from a man (see, Exhibits ?E, 6E, 10E, 11E & 15E and hearing testimony).

As will be discussed below, the findings reported in the claimant’s medical records indicate that the above impairments have more than a minimal effect on her ability to work. I therefore find that the claimant’s impairments are “severe.”

4. The severity of the claimant’s impairments meets the criteria of Section 12.06 of the Listing of Impairments found at 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (20 CFR 404.1520(d), 404.1525, 416.920(d) and 416.925).

According to the claimant’s medical records, she legally changed her name after determining that she wanted to transition from male to female and was placed on a hormone regimen by her physician in May 2020 (Exhibit 1F/36). Thereafter, during a subsequent visit to the Mazzoni Center in June 2011, the claimant requested a referral for psychiatric treatment as she was

[. . .]

August 2013, she presented to the emergency room shortly thereafter, with suicidal ideation. Her emergency room physician suggested that the claimant’s current symptoms may have been precipitated by the new medication and her medication was stopped (Exhibit 13F/4).

At the hearing, the medical expert testified that he had reviewed the record, including the evidence of persistent depression, uncontrolled with psychotropic medication, and of a personality disorder, with difficulty functioning on a day-to-day basis. Dr. Tanenhaus specifically noted that the record describes a sleep disturbance, psychomotor agitation, feelings of worthlessness and difficulty concentrating, as contemplated under the “paragraph A” criteria of Section 12.04. He further testified that the record describes evidence of persistent disturbances of mood or affect and intense and unstable interpersonal relationships, as contemplated under the “paragraph B” criteria of both Section 12.04 and Section 12.08. In addition, in Dr. Tanenhaus’ opinion, the “paragraph B” criteria of both Section 12.04 and Section 12.08 are satisfied because the record indicates that the claimant’s impairments cause a mild restriction in activities of daily living, marked difficulties in maintaining social functioning, marked difficulties in maintaining concentration, persistence or pace, and no episodes of decompensation of extended duration.

I accept his testimony and accord it great weight, as it was based upon a review of the record in its entirety and is supported by the underlying medical evidence of record. Taking into consideration the opinion of the medical expert and the record as a whole, I find that the claimant suffers from a Listing level affective disorder that meets the criteria of Section 12.04 and from a Listing level personality disorder that meets the criteria of Section 12.08.

In making these findings, I have also considered other opinion evidence in accordance with the requirements of 20 CFR 404.1527 and 416.927 and SSRs 96-2p, 96-6p and 06-3p. I give some

[. . .]

I have also considered all symptoms and the [. . .] consistent with the objective medical evidence and other evidence, based on the [. . .] 20 CFR 404.1529 and 416.929 and SSRs 96-4p and 96-7p. After considering the evidence of record, I find that the claimant’s medically determinable impairments could reasonably be expected to produce the alleged symptoms, and that the claimant’s statements concerning the intensity, persistence and limiting effects of these symptoms are generally credible.

5. The claimant has been under a disability as defined in the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010, the alleged onset date of disability (20 CFR 404.1520(d) and 416.920(d)).

DECISION

Based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on June 27, 2011, the claimant has been disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010.

Based on the application for supplemental security income protectively filed on February 16, 2013, the claimant has been disabled under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010.

The component of the Social Security Administration responsible for authorizing supplemental security income will advise the claimant regarding the nondisability requirements for these payments and, if the claimant is eligible, the amount and the months for which payment will be made.

Medical improvement is expected with appropriate treatment. Consequently, a continuing disability review is recommended in 24 months.

/sneed/
Richard P. Laverdure
Administrative Law Judge

November 10, 2014
Date

Specifically, it's the last page, which is why he's having a CDR after just two years instead of a longer period. Where he could run into issues is if he's willfully not getting appropriate treatment.

Chris is different in that he's never been expected to improve.

You know what's always bugged me about that - "She" even in California they would have to use the gender specified on the form, at the time he had nothing legitimate saying he's a woman hell it was a bit gloating point for him last time he officially changed his name is that he got the gender marker flag changed from M to F.

My view of the situation regarding his paper work for his tugboat is this - It's a edited version of the real document, so he can claim he's getting it for one thing and not what he's really getting it for, i.e. being a sped.

Now onto the review it's self, currently he's bricking it he knows that certain things are expected of him and he's not complied with any of them he's frittered away his money and not made a single iota of improvement, that's why when we shot down his housing lie he went nuclear.

As I have said before Phil is a very black and white thinker and has a thing for official looking paper work he can't understand why we don't belive him when he put's forth a picture of himself next to yet another letter (if you believed him he'd have approximately 20 letters so far), what real paper work he does have he's modified in some way and what he hasn't got he's more than happy to fake.

The thing is myself and others know exactly what he's got and how he's pissed off a number of medical professionals who not only told him "NO!" but how he's burned the bridge associated with it.

 

[HickoryDickory]

The thing is myself and others know exactly what he's got and how he's pissed off a number of medical professionals who not only told him "NO!" but how he's burned the bridge associated with it.

To be a fly on the wall... I'd really like to know more about that.

 

[Ravenor]

To be a fly on the wall... I'd really like to know more about that.

Yea I have posted this before and I think @Smutley will have the link handy but we found a website that coverd exactly what was said to Phil in a public space, by a VERY respected SRS surgeon that told him in public no less that "Your not trans and you make a mockery of real transgender people", Phil was still claiming he had a letter from that person too.

 

[Positron]

Two questions:

1. We know Phil is not receiving psychiatric care (and the review board can and probably will verify that). How is he going to explain that? What story is he likely to tell and will people believe that?

2. Ditto for housing. How is Phil going to explain his inability to rent a place?

 

[DragoonSierra]

In addition to the regularly scheduled CDRs, the SSA may conduct a continuing disability review in any of the following situations:
A third-party informs the SSA that you are not following your treatment protocol

 

[Bogliacci]

Two questions:

1. We know Phil is not receiving psychiatric care (and the review board can and probably will verify that). How is he going to explain that? What story is he likely to tell and will people believe that?

2. Ditto for housing. How is Phil going to explain his inability to rent a place?

He'll tell them how his life is like a warzone, constantly being raped and attacked by white dudes who don't want to chop their dicks off.

 

[OtterParty]

I just hope it'll be approved. The poor woman's suffered enough and with her various disabilities it'd be a hard slog to find a sustaining job to match her aspirations. On top of that, there are so many employers willing to turn her away based on her appearance alone. It's an unalterable condition for Rihanna's sake.

 

[UselessRubberKeyboard]

The welfare system should stop his SSDI until he complies with treatment (but they won't, cos sjw reeeeeeeeeeeee human rights etc).

 

[Slowboat to China]

The best thing for Ahuviya would definitely be to get a payee. He'd be furious in the short term, but since he does seem to enjoy things like hot meals, he could perhaps be converted.

That being said, I doubt it will happen. The system is way too backed up with paperwork and millions of claimants to pay attention to him.

 

[DragoonSierra]

I hadn't thought of that.

The SSA probably keeps a close eye on payees. Though Phil could cry embezzlement, I bet the SSA hears this a lot. Any payee that keeps good records would be believed before him anyway.

Much as I'd love Phil to lose his tardbux (especially given how he wastes them on shit instead of things that will actually help him), it ain't gonna happen. He's legitimately a sped. I know he's not claiming SSDI for being a sped (autism), but it's obvious on interacting with Phil that he's not capable of supporting himself in the same way normal people do. Yes, he could work, but it'd take a handler to bully and cajole him into it, and the government doesn't have that kind of money or time to waste on adults already set in their autist ways.

It's just that he doesn't claim SSDI for his actual disability. The shit he claims disables him (depression, personality disorder) is the classic bullshit that gets you disability benefits you don't deserve, provided you have zero self-respect and can playact enough to professionals. As Phil's entire life revolves around roleplaying, he's got that down pat by now. He knows full well that claiming SSDI as an autist would mean actual psych assessments, real diagnoses and actual treatment plans he'll be expected to stick to. And that's going to get in the way of his daily derpings, which is why he doesn't do it.

Problem is, the system is geared towards 'personal agency', so they'll chuck money at anyone who qualifies and let them do what they want with it, until proven without a shadow of a doubt that said person is an idiot. And Phil is, sadly, far from the stage where he qualifies for a payee yet (we're talking someone with 100% delusional beliefs, unable to function independently at all). It sucks to see Phil leeching taxpayer's money to gallavant around the west coast and get shit tattoos, but he's the minority. Most disabled people aren't twats, most want to manage their conditions the best they can, and that's why the system is designed to allow claimants as much freedom as possible by giving them money to spend how they see fit. Watching claimants more closely, assigning payees (especially for people without close family) and things like prepay cards instead of cash actually cost the government more, and make the lives of the majority of disabled people shittier just to catch out a few bad apples. For all the SJW bullshit he spouts about disabled people, he's the kind of 'disabled person' that makes life for others more difficult.

Tl;dr - Phil's a twat, he's keeping his tardbux as they are, and he'll be a gleeful roach about it for ages afterwards. Expect much smug fuckery and Australatismland victory day marches incoming around November time.

Issuing him an EBT card is more expensive than printing checks every month?

I have stickied this thread until after the review.



You know what's always bugged me about that - "She" even in California they would have to use the gender specified on the form, at the time he had nothing legitimate saying he's a woman hell it was a bit gloating point for him last time he officially changed his name is that he got the gender marker flag changed from M to F.

My view of the situation regarding his paper work for his tugboat is this - It's a edited version of the real document, so he can claim he's getting it for one thing and not what he's really getting it for, i.e. being a sped.

Now onto the review it's self, currently he's bricking it he knows that certain things are expected of him and he's not complied with any of them he's frittered away his money and not made a single iota of improvement, that's why when we shot down his housing lie he went nuclear.

As I have said before Phil is a very black and white thinker and has a thing for official looking paper work he can't understand why we don't belive him when he put's forth a picture of himself next to yet another letter (if you believed him he'd have approximately 20 letters so far), what real paper work he does have he's modified in some way and what he hasn't got he's more than happy to fake.

The thing is myself and others know exactly what he's got and how he's pissed off a number of medical professionals who not only told him "NO!" but how he's burned the bridge associated with it.

You know exactly what documents he has?

Two questions:

1. We know Phil is not receiving psychiatric care (and the review board can and probably will verify that). How is he going to explain that? What story is he likely to tell and will people believe that?

2. Ditto for housing. How is Phil going to explain his inability to rent a place?

I personally dont think they will look at his facebook unless someone tells them. Besides its all set to private. The only way they could see the incriminating posts is if someone shows them to the SSA.

One thing I do think will do him in is if he mentions hes getting tattoos as a substitution for medical treatment. I dont know if he legit believes its helping him and is an actual substitute for therapy but the reviewer will be very suspicious if he mentions that and Im not sure Phil is smart enough to keep his trap shut about that. Ditto if he mentions he cant get a place because they arent some Latina socialist commune. I dont know how much weight they will give to his housing lie. Surely they would expect a document showing hes on the list right?

I really hope there isnt someone giving him fake medical documents in preparation for this review. I mean really good ones.

 

[DogshitTaco]

I really hope there isnt someone giving him fake medical documents in preparation for this review. I mean really good ones.

He would be playing with fire doing that because unlike us, the government won't be laughing at him like we do if he gets caught. I mean, I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he'd be committing fraud.

He's been lucky thus far, but I have a feeling that luck won't last forever.

 

[pickledance]

I wonder about the laws in the US about ssdi. In Canada that's handled on the province level so if, for example, a person gets the version for their province then moves to another (or resides there for over a month without notifying their coverage) they may be responsible for paying back for the months they resided in another province.

I only bring it up as Phil has claimed Cali sperg pay benifits like his metro card and Oregon ones as well. In Canada that constitutes provintial level fraud.

 

[Splendid]

I wonder about the laws in the US about ssdi. In Canada that's handled on the province level so if, for example, a person gets the version for their province then moves to another (or resides there for over a month without notifying their coverage) they may be responsible for paying back for the months they resided in another province.

I only bring it up as Phil has claimed Cali sperg pay benifits like his metro card and Oregon ones as well. In Canada that constitutes provintial level fraud.

American Social Security is pretty much all federal, so this is very unlikely to become a problem for him.

 

[pickledance]

American Social Security is pretty much all federal, so this is very unlikely to become a problem for him.

Good to know. Here it can often go down to where you live in a given city as to what you might receive.

 

[The Dude]

American Social Security is pretty much all federal, so this is very unlikely to become a problem for him.

Not only that, but Phil tends to hang out mostly in West Coast states, and they tend to be more Left-leaning and therefore much more likely to give away tax payer money on those they deem "less fortunate". Or at least, the major cities are. In other words, Phil has a much easier time milking the system in those states, which is probably a big reason he moved there.

 

[Ravenor]

He would be playing with fire doing that because unlike us, the government won't be laughing at him like we do if he gets caught. I mean, I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he'd be committing fraud.

He's been lucky thus far, but I have a feeling that luck won't last forever.

I'm still on the hunt for whoever provided that bunch of stolen medical data to him - but I wouldn't be so sure he's smart enough to not at least consider handing over false or misleading paperwork to the government Phil thinks he's smarter than every one else even though deep down he knows he's really not.

And his luck is running out, he's not got long left before it all comes crashing down.

Phil has a much easier time milking the system in those states, which is probably a big reason he moved there.

That was one of the primary factors, but he also had some nudgeing from others and he's also following a migration pattern that I have been told is popular with the more mobile crust punks i.e. portland for the summer and san-fran for the winter.