Bepis
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2019
Yeah, that's the one. Is he trying to look young to bring in those hip right-wing zoomers or something? It's very jarring. Kind of reminds me of the emo dad.Two words: Mullato Perm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, that's the one. Is he trying to look young to bring in those hip right-wing zoomers or something? It's very jarring. Kind of reminds me of the emo dad.Two words: Mullato Perm
I disagree personally. I think thereās a significant chance that Dave Smith didnāt really know who Ethan Ralph even is, or very little of the autism spectacle that surrounds him, and agreed on the host out of the desire to debat Nicky the Knife (lmao I dunno why they call Fuentes āthe knifeā heās so little/skinny and goofy) on a platform as Nick has been banned everywhere. He, like the majority of normies, doesnāt know about the underbelly of odyssey/d-live or whatever other slurry put the funneled these people into. He probably knows the basics but w Ethan off YouTube and having minimal engagement on his Twitter he probably just sees him asanother sperg.Disingenuous, name the 19 other people who literally distributed revenge porn?
I am not saying that because I dislike Ralph, I dislike Ralph because he actually fucking sent revenge porn live. That is why people have totally disavowed him.
Itās extremely disturbing to see predators propped up and if Dave and other libertarians are propping up other predators this is why no one will know of them or take them seriously.
Misses Caucus ppl go from from scaring School board members with a threat to be doxed (because they are protecting pedos) to protecting predators themselves.
The hypocrisy. Ofc the stans wonāt care but all the people you have to convince to have a shot at being taken seriously wonāt be so kind, let alone consider a third party which has never been taken seriously before, especially on a national level.
They totally lose people like me who could have been helpful, but instead I end up warning others about them. Warning them they prop up predators, are absolute hypocrites and are fine with helping malicious people continue to harm others.
he pulled a knife out on halsey during warskis and jfs ibs show(lmao I dunno why they call Fuentes āthe knifeā heās so little/skinny and goofy)
nigger he did it liveis that until itās proven in court itās all allegations anyways.
this argument is such bullshit to me since the right has always said not to follow or watch or support people for things they feel are immoral or gross or fucked. libertarians should be for platforms deciding what they can host if anything, what if i ban you for discussing shovels on my rake forum for being off topic am i violating your holy freedom of speech? if you advocate for fucking little kids am i not "allowed" to say "hey fuck this guy dont associate with him"?The idea that Dave, or the Mises, or anyone else in the lolbertarian party is actively propping up abusers is a little absurd to me. Also being against deplatforming people it kind of makes sense- let the market/the viewers/the people decide who they want to watch,
I agree that Smith probably didn't have a clue who Ralph was. That's just as bad as knowing though.I disagree personally. I think thereās a significant chance that Dave Smith didnāt really know who Ethan Ralph even is, or very little of the autism spectacle that surrounds him, and agreed on the host out of the desire to debat Nicky the Knife (lmao I dunno why they call Fuentes āthe knifeā heās so little/skinny and goofy) on a platform as Nick has been banned everywhere. He, like the majority of normies, doesnāt know about the underbelly of odyssey/d-live or whatever other slurry put the funneled these people into. He probably knows the basics but w Ethan off YouTube and having minimal engagement on his Twitter he probably just sees him asanother sperg.
The idea that Dave, or the Mises, or anyone else in the lolbertarian party is actively propping up abusers is a little absurd to me. Also being against deplatforming people it kind of makes sense- let the market/the viewers/the people decide who they want to watch, where they want to spend their money, and how they spend their time. As much as I dislike Ethan the fact of the matter is that until itās proven in court itās all allegations anyways. We have all the info here, sure, but itās really a niche part of the internet that people donāt really know about. Unless you find the farms or dig yourself it looks like a bad breakup by w a fat eceleb and a bpd bitch (which it is) surrounded by rumor and conjecture (which, again, it is). We know what Ethan is, and where to find the goods, but most people donāt.
yeah he did it live. I know that . You know that. What Iām saying is that most people really donāt know who Ethan is or what allegations people have against him or why. Shit we both know he did it, but most people donāt.he pulled a knife out on halsey during warskis and jfs ibs show
nigger he did it live
this argument is such bullshit to me since the right has always said not to follow or watch or support people for things they feel are immoral or gross or fucked. libertarians should be for platforms deciding what they can host if anything, what if i ban you for discussing shovels on my rake forum for being off topic am i violating your holy freedom of speech? if you advocate for fucking little kids am i not "allowed" to say "hey fuck this guy dont associate with him"?
if you cant check for archives of an oft spammed revenge porn tape then your campaign is utter shit or youre entirely too invested in ethan ralph not being the type to do that, most people even dame who said he didnt see the tape leaked live found it fairly easily.yeah he did it live. I know that . You know that. What Iām saying is that most people really donāt know who Ethan is or what allegations people have against him or why. Shit we both know he did it, but most people donāt.
on a personal level it makes even less sense since we cancel people for shit all the time we just dont call it that when we agree with it, i remember holly conrad saying she was cancelled because people insulted her for cheating on her husband. we have calls to boycott from the get woke go broke crowd all the time and sometimes i agree with them, sometimes the left are right to cancel people like ralph for calling 16 year olds who are trafficked "voluntarily" whores who were asking for it. there was probably a time where that was actually a minority opinion seen as basically demanding men geld themselves and neuter their natural sexuality.Iām talking about the individual. I think itās bullshit when a strong, loud, and politically motivated vocal minority wage a campaign against someoneās career. Iām against compelling services but Iām also against huge banks forcing people out of business while simultaneously choking out any competition to them. I really donāt have a solution so I typically speak about it on the personal level, as opposed to the business level (if that makes sense).
I actually donāt fault Dave Smith for not knowing who Ethan Ralph is or what malicious things ect. But the whole idea of why Ralph is paid by Odysee to stream and why this debate is even happening is because this is a commercial. A commercial for Odysee & these libertarians.He, like the majority of normies, doesnāt know about the underbelly of odyssey/d-live or whatever other slurry put the funneled these people into. He probably knows the basics but w Ethan off YouTube and having minimal engagement on his Twitter he probably just sees him asanother sperg.
The idea that Dave, or the Mises, or anyone else in the lolbertarian party is actively propping up abusers is a little absurd to me. Also being against deplatforming people it kind of makes sense- let the market/the viewers/the people decide who they want to watch, where they want to spend their money, and how they spend their time. As much as I dislike Ethan the fact of the matter is that until itās proven in court itās all allegations anyways. We have all the info here, sure, but itās really a niche part of the internet that people donāt really know about. Unless you find the farms or dig yourself it looks like a bad breakup by w a fat eceleb and a bpd bitch (which it is) surrounded by rumor and conjecture (which, again, it is). We know what Ethan is, and where to find the goods, but most people donāt.
Whatās the school board/pedo shit tho? I usually keep my ear to the ground with niche drama (hence me being on the farms lol) but Iāve not heard anything like that. Iād like to hear the gossip lmao.
Eh Iād say that thereās all kinds of people that should be shunned and Iām not arguing to not shun them or anything. What Iām talking about are harassment campaigns against people (in general, not just Ethan) that make them lose their livelihood and community and support systems. Let people know what kind of person someone is and if they still support them and buy their shit thatās on them. Shunning isnāt bad and itās an excellent social tool to discourage bad behavior but weāre in a spot where itās gone past shunning and into harassment (of some people) with a lot of them having no way out. Usually shunning is done until the person learns what their doing is annoying, but weāre seeing more that people arenāt doing that. Itās total removal of any social activities and I donāt really get behind that.if you cant check for archives of an oft spammed revenge porn tape then your campaign is utter shit or youre entirely too invested in ethan ralph not being the type to do that, most people even dame who said he didnt see the tape leaked live found it fairly easily.
on a personal level it makes even less sense since we cancel people for shit all the time we just dont call it that when we agree with it, i remember holly conrad saying she was cancelled because people insulted her for cheating on her husband. we have calls to boycott from the get woke go broke crowd all the time and sometimes i agree with them, sometimes the left are right to cancel people like ralph for calling 16 year olds who are trafficked "voluntarily" whores who were asking for it. there was probably a time where that was actually a minority opinion seen as basically demanding men geld themselves and neuter their natural sexuality.
i think youre using too broad a brush if you think not wanting people to support that or ralphs revenge porn is "cancelling someones freedom of speech" think you need to focus more on whether the person needs to be shunned or not rather than just not liking shunning in general
ralph has been legally recognized as harassing people to the point he literally had to have his 1st amendment rights revoked. also "its on them" it really isnt if you dont say "hey wtf do you support barely legal scat revenge porn?" consequences only exist in so far as people enforce it. theres proportional response but there really isnt much that ralph doenst deserve,Eh Iād say that thereās all kinds of people that should be shunned and Iām not arguing to not shun them or anything. What Iām talking about are harassment campaigns against people (in general, not just Ethan) that make them lose their livelihood and community and support systems. Let people know what kind of person someone is and if they still support them and buy their shit thatās on them. Shunning isnāt bad and itās an excellent social tool to discourage bad behavior but weāre in a spot where itās gone past shunning and into harassment (of some people) with a lot of them having no way out. Usually shunning is done until the person learns what their doing is annoying, but weāre seeing more that people arenāt doing that. Itās total removal of any social activities and I donāt really get behind that.
i dont think conviction only is a good standard when you can easily find ralph sharing the revenge porn live, if he cant find that he shouldnt be running for so much as county head of sanitation. i think its this network of cop outs people build so they can just grift off propping up revenge pornographers and probable sex offenders like ethan ralph. hell even the license info picture i posted is suspicious on ethans part and hes refused to easily and with no cost prove he isnt a registered chomoI donāt think anyone has cancelled his free speech (I donāt think I said anything like that? I could be wrong but I just mention Dave Smith was against deplatforming and he ma not care if he knew about him as he hadnāt been convicted of anything.. itās late here tho) but I donāt want them to. When heās online he canāt get away w too awful much Bc the fucking retard canāt keep quiet about ANYTHING lmao.
I really do think a lot of Ralphs tard immunity has just been how low profile he is, meanwhile having that check mark on twitter is enough to get any dumb fuck running for an office as a legitimate source. If the outrage mob really knew of Ralph they'd end his last few bread crumbs.ralph has been legally recognized as harassing people to the point he literally had to have his 1st amendment rights revoked. also "its on them" it really isnt if you dont say "hey wtf do you support barely legal scat revenge porn?" consequences only exist in so far as people enforce it. theres proportional response but there really isnt much that ralph doenst deserve,
Let's get this settled for any dumb fuck that doesn't know the extent. Ralph isn't just some e-tard like Tonka, Warski, and Mundanematt getting his harvest. He's a lying, vindictive, petty, opportunistic convicted felon that has committed crimes out of spite (the revenge porn), seems to target mentally ill women like a jabba the hut ted bundy (the women he gets are shit so don't feel bad). We are blessed that Ralph has only hurt dumb fucks like Pantsu, Digibro, Faith Vickers, Flamenco, Zoom (no one you'll cry about). But calling Ralph a racist, a felon, a deadbeat dad, a predator, a degenerate gambler isn't some woke "you're a fascist" phrase that has lost all meaning. He get's called those things because he is those things.As for Dave.. heās a normie (I hate that word, but I canāt think of a better one. Itās late here) preaching to normies and none of them know theyāre normies. He thinks heās a fringe element when he isnāt really. He just has the benefit of saying common sense shit (that weāve all been saying and thinking) in public wo too much bullshit. It was dumb to go on Ethanās show and heās probably going to find out that when you roll in the mud with pigs you get more than mud on your shirt. As for Ethan.. he a retard. I donāt care if heās shunned or not. Tbh if heās driven off the internet then I wonāt be able to laugh at him as much so I hope people do keep going in his show and I hope he keeps getting enough to scrape by. Heās much funnier with a little $ in his piggy pockets. I donāt think anyone has cancelled his free speech (I donāt think I said anything like that? I could be wrong but I just mention Dave Smith was against deplatforming and he ma not care if he knew about him as he hadnāt been convicted of anything.. itās late here tho) but I donāt want them to. When heās online he canāt get away w too awful much Bc the fucking retard canāt keep quiet about ANYTHING lmao.
Ralph when talking about Nick's success with the Rittenhouse trial "I don't talk about Rekieta anymore."Ralph seething about Rackets was very based and redpilled, Ralph truly showed us how the trash is suppose to be dealt with !
MEMPHIS TEN BALLS IN YOUR MOUTH, SHIT THUMB UP MY NOSE
lol he tried to dunk on flamenco for lower viewers at the time too, having to simultaneously contradict his own copes in real time. now even flamenco does better viewers. what a cowardly little womanly bitch.Ralph when talking about Nick's success with the Rittenhouse trial "I don't talk about Rekieta anymore."
We already know his cope "ah' MAID' flamengo!!! MAID HIM. Tha' ungrateful' son......OF A MOTHER FUCKER OWES ME EVERYTHING!.....no loyalty....NO. LOYAL. T. Have my gift to you flamenco"lol he tried to dunk on flamenco for lower viewers at the time too, having to simultaneously contradict his own copes in real time. now even flamenco does better viewers. what a cowardly little womanly bitch.
he says the same about rackets lol. its funny that viewers matter over morals except when hes losing the countWe already know his cope "ah' MAID' flamengo!!! MAID HIM. Tha' ungrateful' son......OF A MOTHER FUCKER OWES ME EVERYTHING!.....no loyalty....NO. LOYAL. T. Have my gift to you flamenco"
You have never watched Legion of Skanks, have you? The content on that podcast is way more offensive than anything Ethan fucking Ralph and Nick Fuentes produce.The person pushing this and deciding Ralph is the conduit to use is really stupid or wants to hurt Smithās chances for a future imo.
Dave isn't your usual libertarian, he understands that the masterson-types are just psychopaths looking for an ideology to let them go nuts. He even has quite the lifestory, from being a wigger fucking in public and drinking 40s begging people for money on the street until he had enough for some weed and a 40, to turning his own life around converting to chrisitanity and preaching the evils of thottery and abortion, and he was doing that before Nick hit puberty.
Sure. Big Jay Oakerson, Luis J Gomez, Shane Gillis, Ari Shaffir, Mark Normand, Michael Che, colum tyrell, Paul Virtzi, Yannis Puapas, Zac Amico, aaron berg, rich vos, nate bergetze, joe list, dan soder, dante nero, doug stanhope, joey diaz, kurt metzger,and jason ellisDisingenuous, name the 19 other people who literally distributed revenge porn?
exactlyYou have never watched Legion of Skanks, have you? The content on that podcast is way more offensive than anything Ethan fucking Ralph and Nick Fuentes produce.
He took a shower. Saying he washed it is extremely optimistic, but even rinsing away just some of the grease it's regularly caked in with hot water allows it hang as it should. And, it makes him look like a huge faggot. The retard hair, bifurcated gunt, toothpick legs, etc. Gunt's own DNA ayylawgs him on a daily basis.What the hell did Ralph do to his hair?