Piracy General

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Linux based devices do something that a regular desktop PC can't?
The "Linux based device" I was describing that I bought for $3 is basically a desktop PC in terms of functionality, maybe better. I guess these days most desktops handle 1080p60 H264 just fine but you don't have to go that far back to find ones that struggle. Plus it's the size of a McDonald's cheeseburger and uses maybe 10W of power.

I use it like a Chromecast, where it's primarily just a UPNP renderer. It also handles emulation up to N64/DC like a boss.
 
What the fuck kind of faggots even think piracy is morally wrong? What a bunch of gaywads.
Cooperate America doesn't ever seem to quibble over morality when it fucks the consumer. Why would I ever quibble over morality when I fuck them back, in my own small way?

I'm perfectly okay with moral relativity, so long as it is being applied to moral relativists.
As we sow, we shall reap and all that.
 
Everybody who thinks piracy is morally wrong should present proof that they paid license fees to the legitimate heirs of the first people who made noises, because otherwise they have no permission to speak and should shut up forever
 
Everybody who thinks piracy is morally wrong should present proof that they paid license fees to the legitimate heirs of the first people who made noises, because otherwise they have no permission to speak and should shut up forever
I'm going to be honest, I can see the argument of "If you enjoy x you should purchase to encourage the creator to make more content." I'm not saying I don't pirate new content I enjoy, I'm just saying I see the logic behind the argument that you should support someone actively creating something you enjoy.

The thing I find mind boggling is when people try to argue it's morally wrong to pirate media 10, 20, 30 years old. Like, people will try to argue you're under some kind of moral obligation to pay Netflix $10 a month to watch some sitcom from the 90s that was beamed into everyone's house for free over network TV thousands of times over the last 30 years where the creators are already all filthy rich and or dead.
 
I'm going to be honest, I can see the argument of "If you enjoy x you should purchase to encourage the creator to make more content." I'm not saying I don't pirate new content I enjoy, I'm just saying I see the logic behind the argument that you should support someone actively creating something you enjoy.
I generally actually pay for shit now, instead of pirating, despite a lifetime of piracy which I do not regret in the least. I get most of my vidya from Steam, I do not buy AAA bullshit (usually), and considering I generally spend less than $100 a year on any of it, just the "on any PC in the world I can have all my games just by clicking a button" thing makes it worthwhile.

That was the insight Gabe Newell had that made Steam successful. If you make the buying some shit experience more pleasant and useful than the pirating shit experience, people will actually pay for that. Not sure why it took the rest of the vidya world so long to understand it, or why music and film boomers still don't understand it.
 
I'm going to be honest, I can see the argument of "If you enjoy x you should purchase to encourage the creator to make more content." I'm not saying I don't pirate new content I enjoy, I'm just saying I see the logic behind the argument that you should support someone actively creating something you enjoy.
While I get that, they'd have to be using a platform like Bandcamp where the artist gets paid fairly.

As a Tax, anyone know a decent pirate site for ESPN+ stuff? Streameast is nice, but it doesn't have all the college games.
 
In the olden days... ok, just a few years ago, I would buy series on Amazon that I was enjoying and watching.

Now, let's pretend I liked "The Witcher" well, it's on Netflix, so I have to have a subscription there. Maybe "The Wheel Of Time" that's Amazon, surely I can buy a season. Oh, no, it's free with ads with Prime or a subscription without ads.

You know what, login to torrent site, download torrent file, copy to seedbox, wait 10 minutes, watch.

Also, it works on Linux MPV, and my Android VLC, and my iPad VLC.
 
I generally actually pay for shit now, instead of pirating, despite a lifetime of piracy which I do not regret in the least. I get most of my vidya from Steam, I do not buy AAA bullshit (usually), and considering I generally spend less than $100 a year on any of it, just the "on any PC in the world I can have all my games just by clicking a button" thing makes it worthwhile.

That was the insight Gabe Newell had that made Steam successful. If you make the buying some shit experience more pleasant and useful than the pirating shit experience, people will actually pay for that. Not sure why it took the rest of the vidya world so long to understand it, or why music and film boomers still don't understand it.
I generally pay for a lot of games too. I also pirate a lot. I have some kind of autistic doomsday vault built up now that's a combination of digital, physical and pirated games that would take me ten lifetimes to play at the rate I play games.

I tend to do the thing a lot where I spend like a week to set up a device with the perfect library optimised for the device, end up playing one or two games and then putting it away. Kind of like the kind if shit you see on Retro Game Corps.

I go to the movies and live shows a lot, but if I'm watching it at home, I pirated it.
 
Maybe I would though. Suppose I could "steal" a car by just making a copy of it and the original owner would still have his "stolen" car. So why not do that?
There are certain protection levels to it the same way one uses VPNs & Proxies while torrenting too.

For example, I recommend using this method as a protection level before the "stealing":
1000076946.jpg
Even if caught, you might be ok as a "product of socio-economical condition" at best.
 
There are certain protection levels to it the same way one uses VPNs & Proxies while torrenting too.

For example, I recommend using this method as a protection level before the "stealing":
View attachment 8175016
Even if caught, you might be ok as a "product of socio-economical condition" at best.
I wonder how viable it would be to rob a place while wearing a black man latex mask under your balaklava. That you were wearing a latex mask wouldn't be super obvious under the ski mask.
 
Maybe I would though. Suppose I could "steal" a car by just making a copy of it and the original owner would still have his "stolen" car. So why not do that?
I threaten to steal my bosses truck all the time, already. In the same way we used to swap CD-Rs back in the day, and currently swap movies, so too would my friends and I copy each other's rides.

Why is this even up for debate?
 
I buy certain media in most cases (games, manga, artbooks) but there are a lot of forms of entertainment media where the IP rights holder won't see a cent from me. Piracy doesn't need to be justified, especially when looking at the clusterfuck that is streaming. Steam figured it out for the most part, why can't anybody else ? Well, they probably just don't want to, might be pro consumer, and we can't have that.

For example, I recommend using this method as a protection level before the "stealing":
1000076946.jpg
Even if caught, you might be ok as a "product of socio-economical condition" at best.
I love Gantz.
 
I wonder how viable it would be to rob a place while wearing a black man latex mask under your balaklava. That you were wearing a latex mask wouldn't be super obvious under the ski mask.
I was thinking about something similar the other day. If you're going to do something illegal while wearing a balaclava, why not confuse witnesses even further by adding a few centimeters of fake hair sticking out of it in the back?
 
I'm going to be honest, I can see the argument of "If you enjoy x you should purchase to encourage the creator to make more content." I'm not saying I don't pirate new content I enjoy, I'm just saying I see the logic behind the argument that you should support someone actively creating something you enjoy.
One problem with that sentiment in modern times is: how do you actually reward the creator without supporting the mammoth system of endless middlemen skimming their percentage off the gross?

That was the one point musicians made during the height of the anti-Napster fervor (not that it helped against piracy; in fact it probably encouraged people to pirate more) that actually had merit. Some musician (Courtney Love, maybe?) actually walked through the math of how much money the average musician makes for a given album, and it amounted to some ridiculously low percentage of total revenue, like 1% or similar pittance. So many other people get a slice of the vig the only way musicians make any money these days is going on tour, and even then it's a crap shoot.

Some others involved in making films, TV shows, music, whatever certainly deserve recognition and pay for their work. Stage hands, set builders, electricians, directors, screenwriters, etc., people who actually help make the damned thing. But so many more people glom onto the average production just to squeeze some juice without contributing much (if anything) that the actual creatives and competent makers don't see much cash from it. Actors, directors and producers certainly get a big chunk, but studios go out of their way to make sure they get the lion's share. Yes, they take the financial risk on each production, but they either profit or get paid by (((investors))) who don't particularly care about profit but rather (((the message))).

So if you like some small-scale director's work, how do you become his direct patron? Or some small-time special effects house? Or your favorite D-list scream queen? Or hell, how does a Taylor Swift fan pay her directly (without middlemen) for her efforts to show their support?

The whole fucking thing's built so you can't. Cash goes into the system and (barely) trickles down to the actual workers. Piracy has never bothered me in the slightest because of this. It's not like spending $50 for two people at the local theater actually puts any of my money in the filmmakers' pockets.
 
What's the point of using all those gizmos when you can just connect the TV to your computer? Can any of those Android or Linux based devices do something that a regular desktop PC can't?
Reliably use FTP; if you're talking about a Windows computer. It's astonishing how bad FTP is on Windows; Hey Windows, when I double click on an FTP media file, I want it to play in a media player NOT IN FUCKING INTERNET EXPLORER, and you can't even change the behavior of this, even with CMD, not that you SHOULD FUCKING HAVE TO. Did absolute fucking retards come up with this? I do NOT want to use FileZilla for anything, I want it to be as easy as Nautilus/Dolphin on Linux; Double click media file, opens in media player. WHY MAKE IT SO FUCKING HARD.

i think multiple people called my mom to talk to her about it out of great concern
Why do all you guys' parental figures have such a massive stick up their ass? My dad basically only exclusively showed me, my lil' brother and mom pirated content. It's how me and my lil' brother got into it and eventually even my mom as well, we're a pirate household. It's gotten turned back a bit since I bought Netflix (I pay for it, my parents use it (I was getting tired of them having to watch SD content bootlegs recorded in a cinema by a Motorola flip phone in Venezuela)).

The "Linux based device" I was describing that I bought for $3 is basically a desktop PC in terms of functionality, maybe better.
I used my old PC parts to make a home server, worked pretty good; installed SSH/FTP, opened a port, and now I can stream my gay little shows at lunch break at school without having to rely on some third party's ass servers which go down every fucking millisecond. I also use it to host other things such as IRC, web pages or other hosted content. If I want a friend of mine to watch shows with me, I could give him an account on it and he'd be free to stream. So yeah, home made servers >>> Shitty HDMI sticks. (Although, Intels Compute stick would satisfy both worlds)

I generally actually pay for shit now, instead of pirating, despite a lifetime of piracy which I do not regret in the least.
Being a child with absolutely zero money at all makes piracy the only option to even play things. I didn't even have a bank account until high school, all fiat. I should really look into piracy again with vidya; I'm running dry with paying for everything and then also my regular expenses. -- I do still pirate video content, because fuck having to look for some HQ BD's that won't reliably even fucking play on any fucking computer no matter the OS -- or even content that hasn't even been released anywhere but specific countries, specific streaming services or not at all.

or why music and film boomers still don't understand it.
YOU WILL BUY SONY'S SHITTY BLU-RAY PLAYER OR ELSE YOUR BD DICS WILL BE ABSOLUTE DOGSHIT PAPERWEIGHTS.
 
Why do all you guys' parental figures have such a massive stick up their ass?
lol yeah that's a bit baffling to me, too. My folks would have told busybodies like that to stop wasting their time and go fuck themselves, especially over something so trivial. They certainly never would have bothered other parents if their kids were copying CDs or whatever. Who the fuck hadn't heard of a "mix tape" back in those days anyway? It's not like copying CDs was much different than that.
 
My parents never gave a shit they grew up behind the iron curtain. If your social status is dictated by your buying potential, though, then the things you own are representative of your social status. Some 12 year old burning game discs is a gross violation of that paradigm

That CHILD has whatever he wants at his disposal? I have to spend MONEY to do that!
 
Reliably use FTP; if you're talking about a Windows computer. It's astonishing how bad FTP is on Windows; Hey Windows, when I double click on an FTP media file, I want it to play in a media player NOT IN FUCKING INTERNET EXPLORER, and you can't even change the behavior of this, even with CMD, not that you SHOULD FUCKING HAVE TO.
Use something like WSL where ftp acts pretty much like in any command line Linux.
 
Back
Top Bottom