- Joined
- Feb 19, 2024
It's the mediocrity that sells me on Flamigo; the utter state of Game Freak when it comes to designing mons, nowadays. Even if it would've been a Dodrio rehash, we needed "Flamigos" as an evolution.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's the mediocrity that sells me on Flamigo; the utter state of Game Freak when it comes to designing mons, nowadays. Even if it would've been a Dodrio rehash, we needed "Flamigos" as an evolution.
Personally I don't like Chatot because it looks nothing like a real parrot. I get that the head is a quaver because it mimics sound, but otherwise it's a bunch of circles that vaguely look like a bird. Squawkabilly in comparison actually looks like a parrot. It's even got two backwards-facing toes like real parrots do.At least Chatot turned out alright, parrots are cool.
View attachment 7663039
They're really hit and miss with birds.
I wouldn't blame this specific thing on the newer gens. Many bird (and horse) Pokemon are guilty of being just cartoon versions of a real animal. You've got such creative Pokemon as literally just a sparrow (Pidgey), literally just a swallow (Taillow & Swellow), literally just an owl (Noctowl), literally just a pigeon (Pidove), and literally just a swan (Swanna).I don't think it's birds, I just think designs post-Gen V have degraded across the board. Compare other Gen 4 birds like Empoleon, Staraptor and Honchkrow to what came after; Gen 6 only had Talonflame and Hawlucha (laughably), Gen 7 had Decidueye's design infamously breaking with Rowlett/Dartrix, nevermind Toucannon. Can't speak to 8 and 9, though Corviknight seems decently well recieved.
The worst thing about Flamigo is that there was a better flamingo Pokemon planned for Kalos that was scrapped.It's the mediocrity that sells me on Flamigo; the utter state of Game Freak when it comes to designing mons, nowadays. Even if it would've been a Dodrio rehash, we needed "Flamigos" as an evolution.
Very odd, for once.What are people's predictions for the direct tomorrow?
I really am half and half on this. I do think they're trying to rope people back into the brand through an inordinate amount of hype after nearly 2 years of dead silence, but I'm not sure they'll go as far as revealing gen 10. I know they'll reveal something decently "big," they have to at this point if they want Z-A to do anything sales-wise, but it's just a matter of how "big".Anonitolia said:I’m honestly half and half, but since gen 10 being revealed isn’t very popular, let me be devil’s advocate:
This Presents is getting an enormous amount of unusual hype. It was announced extremely early in advance, has an entire pre-show dedicated to it, and comes in the middle of an insanely dry period for news.
Most notably, its date is a reverse of Pokémon Day’s: instead of being on 2/27, it’s on 7/22, which I think has some significance given Gamefreak’s schizophrenic bending of the rules lately. They’re trying really hard to be subversive towards their traditions, so I can absolutely see them mostly focusing on Z-A and then dropping a Scarlet/Violet-tier teaser for gen 10.
Basically, I think things will play out as follows:
>Tomorrow’s Presents is mostly focused on Mobileslop with one big push for Z-A. This push for Z-A will kick off multiple months of smaller marketing reveals up until release.
>The Presents will end with some cryptic or very small reveal of gen 10, probably not going any further than starters + titles.
>This reveal will be followed up on next Pokémon Day, where there will be a whole official reveal trailer and lots of attention given to both gen 10 and the 30th anniversary,
>which will be heavily focused on through constant news updates until gen 10 releases.
I think this clicks most with what Gamefreak is going for. Hyping up this specific Presents so much just for Z-A makes little sense, so I think they’re trying to recapture normie attention spans for a long time yet. They’re going to draw them in with Z-A news and hook them in with gen 10, then keep feeding that goldfish memory with hit after hit regarding the brand so that they have a constant spotlight during the 30th anniversary and boost advertising + revenue during what will probably be a very profitable period.
TL;DR: I think they’ll be secretive about gen 10 until 2/27/26, but reveal it at this Presents to try and keep people interested in the brand.
The battle facilities are my favorite part of the postgame and the Battle Arcade and Castle are my favorites. I'm usually pretty good at getting the events I want in the Arcade, and the Castle adds a layer of strategy, it kinda reminds me of a roguelike challenge.I have to say, I am not as familiar with Battle Frontier in Gen 4 as much as the one in Gen 3, but I am really coming around to it. Battle Arcade keeps things interesting but I can see that getting a gold medal might be a nightmare due to all the RNG. Battle Castle, on the other hand, is all about long term planning and resource management, which is a fantastic spin on the formula and could be a small game in and of itself.
Now that you mention it, if Legends Arceus didn't count as a remake, then neither does ZA. They may still announce a remake tomorrow. Or remaster, given that's what BDSP is.Gen 5 remake or sidegame vaguely hinted at to tie in with Black Bolt/White Flare.
Gates to Infinity remake
Yep.schizophrenic wish-fulfillment
No, Battle Palace in Emerald can go die in a fire. Quite literally no skill required, only RNG and it is usually not in your favor. I once had a perfect competitive party die to one single Dodrio not because they couldn't handle it, but because the dumbasses chose not to attack it and lost in an embarrassing 72 turn battle. That was the last time I took that battle facility seriously, I used save states and an emulator to get my gold since then and even then I had to do a ridiculous number of retries. Never again!The Battle Factory can go die in a fire, though.
Absolutely nothing, Gamefreak is a lost cause and so is Pokemon. That "AAA" RPG title they're working on will be no better than Little Town Hero and most other non-Pokemon games they worked on. I have no clue why people are giving it any benefit of the doubt.What are people's predictions for the direct tomorrow?
I haven't played gen 3 so I never had to deal with that, but having to win 40 consecutive battles where you can't control your Pokemon sounds like hell.No, Battle Palace in Emerald can go die in a fire. Quite literally no skill required, only RNG and it is usually not in your favor. I once had a perfect competitive party die to one single Dodrio not because they couldn't handle it, but because the dumbasses chose not to attack it and lost in an embarrassing 72 turn battle. That was the last time I took that battle facility seriously, I used save states and an emulator to get my gold since then and even then I had to do a ridiculous number of retries. Never again!
Battle Factory in Emerald was awful simply because the movesets are plain ass. Funnily enough, they're much better if you play Emerald with a physical/special split romhack(I used Revelation Emerald), not sure if they improved the movesets in Gen 4 since last time I played Battle Factory there was around 2010/2011.
Yeah, same problem as in Emerald then.I haven't played gen 3 so I never had to deal with that, but having to win 40 consecutive battles where you can't control your Pokemon sounds like hell.
I hate the Battle Factory because it's the most RNG reliant in gen 4. In theory, the more you swap the stronger your Pokemon choices will be next round, in practice the "stronger Pokemon" is a Bibarel or a Kricketune or some other mediocre mon. And no, the sets are not better, because when I get something like a Garchomp it's a shitty special set or the one with Dragon Rush as its only STAB. Also, whenever I get a good streak I always seem to be walled by a Regi, it's suprisingly hard to get something that breaks through a Regi's bulk when you're at the mercy of rentals.
I'd say it's either the Battle Tower or the Castle, they both give the same amount of BP so it's whichever one you prefer. The only facility in gen 4 that gives more BP per battle is the Factory, but well, it's the Factory.Speaking of which, what's the meta here for getting as much BP as possible as quickly as possible? I remember for Emerald it was to either get lucky with The Pike or be boring and speedrun Battle Tower.
Not before an Explorer's remaster.If I wanted to be really bold I'd suggest a Gates to Infinity remake,
There was an interview abou that:I think there's something about 3D models that made them rethink their designs, and it stinks. It's like they wanted the mons to be easier to model, and animate, so they toned down some of the crazier stuff.
I don't recall the precise timing of how past generations were introduced, but this strikes me as too early.Gen 10 reveal with the starters, titles, and maybe region. Release window.
I hope that they don't introduce a new battle gimmick just for the sake of throwing in something new. The battle mechanics are in a pretty good state, where they just need tweaks, not an overhaul. Terastallization is well-balanced and was well-received by the VGC people. Let them just stick with that as the battle gimmick for a while.If the Teraleak hit them hard enough, they might end up revealing a new gimmick (or at least hinting at it).
It would make some sense to go along with the card set, but I wonder if they would really release more remake games before the next Gen 10 mainline games.Gen 5 remake or sidegame vaguely hinted at to tie in with Black Bolt/White Flare.
How about an original PMD game? Remember the last time we got one?Not before an Explorer's remaster.
Blaze Black and Volt WhiteAny predictions for what the remakes will be called, assuming that they stick with the convention of [adjective or thing + original name]?
It wouldn't be good.How about an original PMD game?