OddEyes
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2018
Kinda funny how a "spin-off" like Let's Go! ended up having far fewer issues than the supposed "big love letter to the fans and first main-line entry on a home console" game
At least you know better now, never trust a company when they go full damage control
I was in the same boat. I rationalized LGPE as Game Freak's opportunity to get past some of the growing pains of moving from handheld to console and learn how to make something for the Switch. Yes, yet another bout of Kanto pandering was obnoxious but surely not having to create an entire new region, new characters, new plot, and new Pokemon would free them up to focus on programming and learning the ropes. It was the sacrifice necessary to make Sword and Shield the best they could possibly be. And if it got GO players into the core games, then I'd have more people at work to sperg out with.
I miss having hope like that.
I remember arguing (tooth and nail) with those kind of people talking about how I didn't want Pokemon to start going the way CoD did, slow slope into mediocrity, and now we're here. I guess the fanbase will have to learn a harsh lesson from this in the future. (They won't but I can dream.)
Pokemon fans have been buying the same copypasted games for over a decade and it took THIS for them to finally grow some common sense and stop buying it?
First off, I'd like to point out that there were interviews by the head honchos of GF that gave conflicting accounts on the mainline status of the let's go games. Honestly, I don't think it's right to get on the case of anyone who thought on either side with that.
Secondly, I love this mentality now.
Cause it's the same one - People bitching about past games when they come out, but then later act like they're the greatest games - It happened with Gen 5, and I'm seeing again with Let's go P/E, so I'd like to point out a lot of issues that People are forgetting about the let's go games:
-Removed held items and abilities yet somehow allows Megas
-Removed Wild Pokemon battles
-The ability to trade over your now PAID ONLINE SERVICE IN ADDITION TO ONLINE BATTLES!
-Increased the price $20 more than normal Pokémon games despite having half the content
-Only using the first 151 Pokemon plus a sneak preview of a game I don't believe actually exists
-Put a mythical Pokemon behind a $50 paywall and a glorified Pokewalker as opposed to a digital distribution
-Made the graphics WORSE than USUM (Subjectively of course, but if people are gonna tote their big fat onions around here as fact, I might as well too)
-Not improving on or fixing any problems from the plumper and more well-made remakes FRLG.
-Handholding worse than any other Pokémon game despite the fact that all Pokémon games are made for the same f***ing audience. Seriously, kids don't actually like being talked down to.
Thirdly, I have issues with a lot of the discussion about the rom going around, frankly, like I've shown, I am optimistic - Not due to me being a fan, but because I actually like to think like a developer and like to at least believe in some good in people - Even those who are in corporations - Because behind those huge concrete walls are still people with beating hearts (unless gamefreak isn't telling us something - Which, who knows? Maybe they found a way to hook up their developers up to life support and iv drips that keep them working well into the night).
Honestly, if someone was able to patch in codes into the game, and the game isn't even fully been dropped within... 2-3 days (?), then that should be a red flag right there. How do we know that the games haven't been hit with that?
Honestly, I may be optimistic, but I'm also a skeptical person as well. I'm skeptical about GameFreak's reaction, but I'm also skeptical of the claims being made. Especially by clout chasers.
Again, maybe I'm wrong, but at the same time, people are willing to go above and beyond in order to piss people off, or to start a fire under people's asses. We've seen this before.
And finally, to talk about Nintendo holding back review copies - I actually can't blame them.
Yes, if what we've seen is 100% true, then yeah, it's bad. But by that same logic, I'd like to point out that most other gaming franchises aren't under the same obligation to reveal everything that's in the games beforehand. It'd be pretty devastating if a product of a large franchise was leaked out, or had everything ripped out of a game that's not officially released, it is a jarring experience.
Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised that this causes the Series to go completely digital only in order to get past this problem.
Like I said, gaming companies aren't really required to show everything off in a game, not only did people get pissed off when the Pokemon Company did that for Sun and Moon's dex in the months up to it's release, but what other franchise has fans that require to see EVERYTHING about a game before it's release?
I get it. I really do.
People want to make an informed business decision - Perfectly fine, but normally, that's what reviews are for - So let the schmuks buy the games so you don't have to.
Because like I said, I'm skeptical of all parties in this.
Go on, mark me with disagreement, call me dumb, I'm actually surprised in all the times I've commented saying that, not a single person has done so... but hey, I'd love to break that.