Polyamory General - Polyamory drama from Facebook, Reddit, and more

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Rules of Polyamory

1. Get cucked.
2. Get cucked.
3. Get TOTALLY cucked.
4. Get cucked again.
5. ???????
6. LOSS!!
 
fellow kiwis i give to you a drama bomb i call the sapiosexual saga

1.png
2.png
3.png
4.png
5.png
6.png
7.png
8.png
9.png
10.png
 
CatParty said:
fellow kiwis i give to you a drama bomb i call the sapiosexual saga

View attachment 91725 View attachment 91726 View attachment 91732 View attachment 91731 View attachment 91727 View attachment 91729 View attachment 91733 View attachment 91734 View attachment 91730 View attachment 91728
Click to expand...
These people take victim complex to a whole new retarded level. They're so complacent that they don't want to challenge those stereotypes but instead whine and treat them like they can't be changed. They for some reason want to live in a bigoted world. Sorry if this is a bit hard to explain.
 
Scratch This Nut said:
These people take victim complex to a whole new retarded level. They're so complacent that they don't want to challenge those stereotypes but instead whine and treat them like they can't be changed. They for some reason want to live in a bigoted world. Sorry if this is a bit hard to explain.
Click to expand...
I think they are less concerned with combating actual bigotry or social issues and more concerned with signaling to other members of their own in-group that they are virtuous. They are trying to differentiate themselves from "outsiders" or "other" by parroting certain terms or talking points, which becomes obvious in a hilarious way whenever an "outsider" stumbles upon the group
 
There's just so much that is scientifically wrong there that I can't even wrap my head around it. You could write a fucking book about it.
 
on a serious note said:
I think they are less concerned with combating actual bigotry or social issues and more concerned with signaling to other members of their own in-group that they are virtuous. They are trying to differentiate themselves from "outsiders" or "other" by parroting certain terms or talking points, which becomes obvious in a hilarious way whenever an "outsider" stumbles upon the group
Click to expand...
I'm convinced if you programmed a bot to randomly string together words like patriarchy, cisnormative, oppression, privilege, ableist, and consent, most SJWs would be unable to distinguish it from a real person talking. I really get the impression they don't actually try to have coherent and consistent viewpoints, but simply side with whoever uses the right buzzwords.
 
ChurchOfGodBear said:
I'm convinced if you programmed a bot to randomly string together words like patriarchy, cisnormative, oppression, privilege, ableist, and consent, most SJWs would be unable to distinguish it from a real person talking. I really get the impression they don't actually try to have coherent and consistent viewpoints, but simply side with whoever uses the right buzzwords.
Click to expand...
We have a few coders on the farms, maybe we should get one of them to try it.
 
sjw_ebooks?

I can't believe I just read through that entire fucking comment thread. Yes, "sapiosexual" is pretentious bullshit code for "I want another nerdy autist to talk to and ignore I'm ugly" but all the rest of it is a bunch of whining about societal level things that you can't generalize to individual people without talking to them first.

There's being wary because internet dating is full of creepy losers, and then manufacturing outrage because you spent a minute reading a profile that you don't like.
 
Maybe people judge you, Kyle, because you're a crippled tard in a wheelchair with 0 redeeming qualities?
 
It's Princess and the Pea feminism.

Remember that story where the princess is found out to be of royal heritage because she's delicate and sensitive enough to detect a pea beneath a huge number of mattresses? In these groups, the more delicate you get, the more it means you're one of the chosen few. The strength of your performative outrage is directly proportional to the pain you were caused by whatever triggered you, under this paradigm, so you can show yourself to be better than others by detecting smaller and smaller "peas" under more and more "mattresses" piled on top of one another. The more layers you need to peel back to reveal the -ism beneath, the keener your sense of justice and sensitivity to wrongdoing.
 
While completely not giving a shit about sapiosexual blahblah, if adding that into my profile requirements was all I needed to filter out those fucking morons, I would've done it a year ago.

Well, that and avoiding the poly scene en masse. Christ, if there's a group that constantly outs itself as rotten to the core and self-delusional beyond any capacity for reason, it's poly.

Thanks for the tip, Kylie. Despite being a fuck up and broken in every sense of the word, you're a real bro.
 
Smutley said:
There's a whole lot more to this post that I cut out because it's boring. The important part to note is that Dennis Rodman is an unfortunately hideous old woman. wow. WOW.
View attachment 52142
View attachment 52143
View attachment 52144
Click to expand...

Holy shit, I've seen this person before, using a different name

I'm in a fb group for queers that is mostly ok--not a lot of jumping on people's throats, people post a lot of cute cat pictures. This woman was a member who wound up being banned after a lot of drama between her and other members (she said she was super oppressed for being old and it was offensive that young people didn't want to fuck her)

"Fuck you, tumblr image! LOOKISM IS OPPRESSION"

sperging.png
 
Psycho said:
I'm so glad Kylie is back in Polyamoury.

Also, everyone has to start sleeping with tards.
Click to expand...

I'm curious, despite Kylie talking about sex nonstop, has that little retard ever had sex? Also, it's pretty funny in that chain that Kylie is like "WHITE PEOPLE ARE ALL RACIST/ABELIST" then two black dudes trash his ass in the comments for it but get removed because they are not a Good Fit For The Group (AKA Black people think we are total faggots while shitting on our virtue signaling and we can't have that.) by the white overlords who control the group.

You couldn't make this shit up if you tried.
 
CharlesBarkley said:
I'm curious, despite Kylie talking about sex nonstop, has that little exceptional individual ever had sex?
Click to expand...

Good question. With his disability, he's probably unable to have sex in anything but the most passive of positions. So unless he got someone willing to find him attractive AND do all the work, I'd say no.
 
Tiny Fake Tree said:
Holy shit, I've seen this person before, using a different name

I'm in a fb group for queers that is mostly ok--not a lot of jumping on people's throats, people post a lot of cute cat pictures. This woman was a member who wound up being banned after a lot of drama between her and other members (she said she was super oppressed for being old and it was offensive that young people didn't want to fuck her)

"Fuck you, tumblr image! LOOKISM IS OPPRESSION"

sperging.png
Click to expand...
I don't want to derail the thread, but you've got me curious.
 
Scratch This Nut said:
I don't want to derail the thread, but you've got me curious.
Click to expand...

I think this person's modus operendi is to moan about how no one wants to fuck them because they're too old/black/fat/ugly and those people are oppressive. People called her on her shit when she said it was ok to be raped if you were thin, white and pretty (regardless of gender/orientation). In other words she's a perfect fit for the polyamory group

sperg2.png

I'm a moron, so this image is small. Went on for another 4 paragraphs about how her "tall AMAB partner" is more acceptable

1a6bd66.png

Ok, I'm done. I'd love to know if this person posts actively in the poly group
 
Abortions4All said:
It's Princess and the Pea feminism.

Remember that story where the princess is found out to be of royal heritage because she's delicate and sensitive enough to detect a pea beneath a huge number of mattresses? In these groups, the more delicate you get, the more it means you're one of the chosen few. The strength of your performative outrage is directly proportional to the pain you were caused by whatever triggered you, under this paradigm, so you can show yourself to be better than others by detecting smaller and smaller "peas" under more and more "mattresses" piled on top of one another. The more layers you need to peel back to reveal the -ism beneath, the keener your sense of justice and sensitivity to wrongdoing.
Click to expand...
Until eventually, there's no fucking pea to begin with. It's all made up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom