Polyamory General - Polyamory drama from Facebook, Reddit, and more

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Wife lets Hubby fuck other women cause had surgery for Stage 3 Bladder Cancer, End result is this
upload_2017-10-30_21-4-39.png

http://archive.is/dyWII

A thread about their "minor" STIs and wouldn't you be surprised, they all have Herpes.
http://archive.is/sBpKp
 
This is why you don't open/get polyamorous with a relationship until you fucking know it's completely okay with both of you, and you BOTH love the other person and yourself completely. If you get another person in your life, it should be just as strong as the love you have for each other.

This is really shitty, and it makes me sad that there isn't a lot of education with this type of thing, especially after reading the above.
 
Wife lets Hubby fuck other women cause had surgery for Stage 3 Bladder Cancer, End result is this
View attachment 305663
http://archive.is/dyWII

A thread about their "minor" STIs and wouldn't you be surprised, they all have Herpes.
http://archive.is/sBpKp

Most of the people I've known who were in or wanted a poly relationship (including the ex parner who suggested that we make our relationship poly as they were/are poly) had some form of STI, mostly herpes.

Not gonna lie when I brought it up to the ex who suggested a poly relationship with me, they never flat out denied it. It's likely they have something. Thank god I didn't fuck them.
 
Most of the people I've known who were in or wanted a poly relationship (including the guy who suggested that we make our relationship poly) had some form of STI, mostly herpes.
Maybe it's because I've only ever been with one guy but can someone enlighten me as to why they think fucking other people can save relationships? It makes less sense than thinking that a baby would.
 
Maybe it's because I've only ever been with one guy but can someone enlighten me as to why they think fucking other people can save relationships? It makes less sense than thinking that a baby would.

Like I said, they don't know how to really love. In order to save a relationship, you have to understand yourself and your own problems with the entire thing before you can even fathom the problems of another. You have to see what YOU did wrong before anything else, and they just don't get that.
 
Maybe it's because I've only ever been with one guy but can someone enlighten me as to why they think fucking other people can save relationships? It makes less sense than thinking that a baby would.

I think it's basically a case of "well they'll end up cheating anyway, so might as well let them know I'm cool with being cucked them fucking other people so they can be with other people but still be with me"

They think that letting their partner do what they want will patch things up because then there's "no secrets" and no lying about whatever is going on. Complete bullshit really.
 
I read this book where the author argues, among other things, that HIV (in the United States) is still almost an exclusively gay male problem because gay men have significantly more indiscriminate sex than straight people. I wonder how poly straights fit into that, and if their subgroup could wind up having their own deadly STI, or at least a deadlier version of an already existing one?

Jacking off and making more friends would fix like 95% of their problems.
 
Maybe it's because I've only ever been with one guy but can someone enlighten me as to why they think fucking other people can save relationships? It makes less sense than thinking that a baby would.
I'm assuming it might be because they want to try anything to 'save' the relationship. Of course bringing in another person into the mix sounds good for short term, but it seems no one ever thinks about how they'll deal with the new guy long term after they supposedly 'fix' the relationship.
 
I read this book where the author argues, among other things, that HIV (in the United States) is still almost an exclusively gay male problem because gay men have significantly more indiscriminate sex than straight people. I wonder how poly straights fit into that, and if their subgroup could wind up having their own deadly STI, or at least a deadlier version of an already existing one?

Jacking off and making more friends would fix like 95% of their problems.

I don't know how HIV affects people so I don't know how it's a problem, never went to sex ed. I have no idea what HIV and AIDS does to people. Clearly it's a problem enough to affect poly relationships? I'm only wondering because one of the posts mentioning STDs, I think that HIV or something similar was mentioned pretty frequently.
 
Good post. I apologize for nitpicking, but if you make grand and general statements you gotta be prepared for spergs like me, lol. I think I was pondering more of the organizational aspect of it all, while you were thinking more in terms of the philosophical. I think we do agree alot about this, though.
Honey, you're fine. That post I made was honestly annoying me myself, and I'm glad you said something against it so I can I give a more detail reply of all of this.

I actually care about this topic, both as a psychologist and as a human: I think it's alright to love multiple people, but if you don't even know what it means to "love", then you get bullshit like this subreddit we are witnessing right now.
 
I read this book where the author argues, among other things, that HIV (in the United States) is still almost an exclusively gay male problem because gay men have significantly more indiscriminate sex than straight people. I wonder how poly straights fit into that, and if their subgroup could wind up having their own deadly STI, or at least a deadlier version of an already existing one?

Jacking off and making more friends would fix like 95% of their problems.

Yeah, sex is a thing that people, especially in the gay community, take for granite. It's the most intimate you can become physically with someone, and gay men have a hard time understanding the concept that even though they may not get all the issues that straights do with pregnancy, it's still a very physical intimate thing that can cause physical and emotional health problems if not done correctly.
 
Wife needs r/polyamory's help to convince her husband who works 90 hours a week to let in her married BF (40 years old) who got fired from a job cause is in a Poly relationship with a 17 year old boy and the boy's parents had the police go to his work.
http://archive.is/zH15r
 
Yeah, sex is a thing that people, especially in the gay community, take for granite. It's the most intimate you can become physically with someone, and gay men have a hard time understanding the concept that even though they may not get all the issues that straights do with pregnancy, it's still a very physical intimate thing that can cause physical and emotional health problems if not done correctly.

Exactly- it's fun and some people feel like the intimacy brings them closer as a couple, but a lot of people do tend to get a bit more careless if there's no worry about pregnancy. It's worrying yet somewhat hilarious to hear from people about how they didn't use protection while on the pill or other contraceptive that they got told, by a fucking doctor, doesn't stop STDs, and got an STD.
 
I truly get where people are coming with this, and why it's abhorred by a lot of people: I don't think it's a problem to love multiple people romantically, but the fact is that none of these people whom I have read on this subreddit really knows what the fuck that even means. It's just some little game of cuckolding to them, and that disgusts me.
 
Honey, you're fine. That post I made was honestly annoying me myself, and I'm glad you said something against it so I can I give a more detail reply of all of this.

I actually care about this topic, both as a psychologist and as a human: I think it's alright to love multiple people, but if you don't even know what it means to "love", then you get bullshit like this subreddit we are witnessing right now.

Can you really teach someone how to love though? I'm viewing this topic through a biologist lens and not a psychologist lens. Love is a complicated, chemical process and I do think there are people where this process does not work correctly at all. In animals the closest thing to "love" would be the bonding that monogamous species take part in, I suppose. But equating that to human love is anthropomorphism. Sex for monogamous species is supposed to accelerate the bonding process and allow for them to become better parents to raise offspring.

So, how do you teach someone how to love if there's never any bonding chemicals that happen for them? Most people go through a "honeymoon phase" in their relationships but if the bonding and love processes work properly, their relationships are maintained past that phase. I also think the people shown in this thread also don't understand the importance of the communication aspect in relationships either--or maybe they are all just socially stunted in several aspects to begin with. The complete disregard for their partner's emotions in these stories is also something that amazes me.
 
Can you really teach someone how to love though? I'm viewing this topic through a biologist lens and not a psychologist lens. Love is a complicated, chemical process and I do think there are people where this process does not work correctly at all. In animals the closest thing to "love" would be the bonding that monogamous species take part in, I suppose. But equating that to human love is anthropomorphism. Sex for monogamous species is supposed to accelerate the bonding process and allow for them to become better parents to raise offspring.

So, how do you teach someone how to love if there's never any bonding chemicals that happen for them? Most people go through a "honeymoon phase" in their relationships but if the bonding and love processes work properly, their relationships are maintained past that phase. I also think the people shown in this thread also don't understand the importance of the communication aspect in relationships either--or maybe they are all just socially stunted in several aspects to begin with. The complete disregard for their partner's emotions in these stories is also something that amazes me.

The brain is biological, and thus follows the same rules of biology and genetics, if that helps you get my psychological viewpoint.

I believe people can learn to love, even later in life just due to neuroplasticity and flexbility of the wiring of the brain, but it does depend if they just even have that simple wiring in the first place-- sociopaths, for one, may not have this wiring. Of course, when I say "wiring", that is a complex thing, and has many underlying implications, which I will try to define below somehow.

Love at this level is very hard to define, as there is familiar love, romantic love, friendship love, and absolute love: in greek, these concepts have their own words: philo, eros, and agape (friendship, romance, and absolute love). It depends on how you look at how these three systems develop physically within the brain, as they both hit the concept of "love", but in much different ways. However, they are all representative of "bonding" in some level.

I guess the best thing we can look at are sociopaths, those with the complete inability of "empathy", or the emotional stance of understanding/bonding with people. All of these systems I have referred to simply derive from the brain's intrinsic process of bonding and understanding others, and that is what simply love is in a biological standpoint: the ability of the brain to send physical signals in order to give a sense of "bonding" and "caring" with others.

So loving yourself is simply rewiring your brain, or developing habits and behaviors, which are beneficial to how you view yourself in all of these categories: it's simply making sure you survive and thrive, and bond with yourself and what you are in essence.
 
Back
Top Bottom